Investor Presentation October 2018 Forward Looking Statements This - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor Presentation October 2018 Forward Looking Statements This - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Investor Presentation October 2018 Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward -looking statements within the meaning of the securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Investor Presentation

October 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Forward Looking Statements

This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that Viper Energy Partners LP (“Viper,” the “Partnership,” “VNOM”, “we” or “our”) expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward- looking. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, these statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward- looking information and include statements with respect to, among other things, Viper’s ability to make distributions on the common units and expectations of plans, strategies and

  • bjectives and anticipated financial and operating results of Viper.

These statements are based on certain assumptions made by Viper based on management’s expectations and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of Viper, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking

  • statements. These include the factors discussed or referenced in the “Risk Factors” section of Viper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on

Form 8-K and in Viper’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), risks relating to financial performance and results, current economic conditions and resulting capital restraints, prices and demand for oil and natural gas, availability of drilling equipment and personnel, availability of sufficient capital to execute our business plan, impact of compliance with legislation and regulations, successful results from our operators’ identified drilling locations, our operators’ ability to efficiently develop and exploit the current reserves on

  • ur properties, our ability to acquire additional mineral interests, our pending, completed or future acquisitions of mineral interests and other important factors that could cause actual

results to differ materially from those projected. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and Viper undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Non-GAAP Financial Measures Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that is used by management and external users of our financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. Viper defines generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful because it allows it to more effectively evaluate Viper’s

  • perating performance and compare the results of its operations from period to period without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. Adjusted EBITDA should not be

considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as an indicator of Viper’s operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing a company’s financial performance, such as a company’s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of Adjusted EBITDA. Viper defines cash available for distribution generally as an amount equal to its Adjusted EBITDA for the applicable quarter less cash needed for debt service and other contractual obligations and fixed charges and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of Viper’s general partner may deem appropriate. Viper’s computations of Adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies or to such measure in its credit facility or any of its other contracts. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), please refer to Viper’s filings with the SEC. Oil and Gas Reserves The SEC generally permits oil and gas companies, in filings made with the SEC, to disclose proved reserves, which are reserve estimates that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, and certain probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions for such terms. Viper discloses only estimated proved reserves in its filings with the SEC. Viper’s estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2016 contained in this presentation were prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P., an independent engineering firm, and comply with definitions promulgated by the SEC. Additional information on Viper’s estimated proved reserves is contained in Viper’s filings with the SEC. In this communication, Viper may use the terms “resources,” “resource potential” or “potential resources,” which the SEC guidelines prohibit Viper from including in filings with the SEC. “Resources,” “resource potential” or “potential resources” refer to Viper’s internal estimates of hydrocarbon quantities that may be potentially discovered through exploratory drilling or recovered with additional drilling or recovery techniques. Such terms do not constitute reserves within the meaning of the Society of Petroleum Engineer’s Petroleum Resource Management System or SEC rules and does not include any proved reserves. Actual quantities that may be ultimately recovered by the operators of Viper’s properties will differ substantially. Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of the operators’ ongoing drilling programs, which will be directly affected by the availability of capital, drilling and production costs, availability of drilling services and equipment, drilling results, lease expirations, transportation constraints, regulatory approvals and other factors; and actual drilling results, including geological and mechanical factors affecting recovery rates. Estimates of potential resources may change significantly as development of our properties by our operators provide additional

  • data. In addition, our production forecasts and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production, decline rates from existing wells

and the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Continue to use scale and expertise in the Permian Basin to consolidate the fragmented private minerals market

Deals focus on net asset value, yield, production and acreage accretion; immediately accretive to 2018 cash flow and production per million units

Acquired 2,457 net royalty acres for ~$260 million across 15 transactions during 3Q ‘18

Since inception, have now acquired over $1 billion of net royalty acres across 273 transactions; over $520 million acquired year to date in 2018

Drop down of 1,696 net royalty acres for $175 million from Diamondback to Viper closed in August

Pecos County now Viper's largest core area at 3,328 net royalty acres; Spanish Trail the 2nd largest at 3,253 net royalty acres

3Q ‘18 production of ~890 Boe/d implies 8% annualized yield based on 3Q ‘18 actual corporate level realizations

Differentiated Acquisition Strategy

Viper: Investment Highlights

Source: Partnership data and filings. Data as of 9/30/2018 unless otherwise noted.

Viper’s Continued Volume and Distribution Growth is a Direct Result of Organic Growth on Legacy Assets and Accretive Acquisitions

Diamondback still owns an additional 1,186 net royalty acres in Pecos and Reeves counties; ~85% operated by Diamondback

Diamondback also owns ~575 net royalty acres in the Midland Basin, primarily in Andrews, Martin and Upton counties

Diamondback’s pending acquisition of Energen will contribute a further 266 net royalty acres as well as ~$60-80 million of cash flow related to a company wide NRI that is greater than 75%

Remaining Diamondback assets expected to be dropped down after beginning active development with near-term cash flow visibility

Drop down of Diamondback royalty acres would increase Viper’s acreage operated by Diamondback to ~43%

First Completed Drop Down Transaction Further Sizeable Drop Down Opportunities

3Q ‘18 distribution of $0.58, up 72% year over year

3Q ‘18 production of 18,384 Boe/d (69% oil), up 13% from 2Q ‘18 and 46% year over year

Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 production guidance of 18,500 – 20,000 Boe/d; midpoint up 5% from 3Q ‘18

Increased FY ‘18 production guidance to 16,750 to 17,250 Boe/d; up 1% from prior midpoint

3Q ’18 Annualized Return on Average Capital Employed of 15.5%

Q3 2018 Review

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Royalty MLP with industry leading growth and returns profile:

72% increase in distributions year over year

Targeting 54% annualized production growth for 2018

46% increase in production and 52% increase in mineral assets year over year Royalty ownership provides FCF advantage:

Q3 ‘18 annualized Return on Capital Employed of 15.5%

Sustained EBITDA margin of >90% since 2014

Distributes 100% of available cash flow to unitholders

Multiple years of future growth from undeveloped assets in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford 24 active rigs and 523 active horizontal drilling permits on Viper’s acreage(1)

Viper Energy Partners Overview

Source: Partnership data and filings. Financial data as of 9/30/2018 unless otherwise noted. (1) DrillingInfo as of 10/22/2018. Permits represent only active permits filed within the past 6 months that have not yet started drilling. (2) All market data based on VNOM’s unit closing price on 10/26/2018. (3) Pro forma for increase in revolving credit facility that closed in October.

Viper Mineral Assets Market Snapshot(2)

NASDAQ Symbol: VNOM Market Cap: $4,499 million Net Debt: $280MM / Liquidity: $275 million(3) Enterprise Value: $4,779 million Unit Count: 124 million Distribution Yield: 6.4% (3Q ‘18 annualized) Net Royalty Acreage: 13,908 (38% FANG-operated)

Active Hz. Rigs on Viper’s Acreage by Operator

VNOM royalty acreage FANG royalty acreage FANG acreage Pending FANG acquisitions

FANG 6 CXO 5 PRIVATE 3 EOG 2 BP 2 APA: 1 APC: 1 COP: 1 CVX: 1 PXD: 1 SM: 1 OTHER 6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

3Q18 3Q17

Year Over Year Growth and Forward Outlook

Source: Partnership data and filings. Financial data as of 9/30/2018. (1) Illustrative impact of increasing realized oil price on annualized distributions based on Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 average production guidance range and Q3 ‘18 actual costs. Natural gas price reflects Q3’18 actual and is not sensitized. NGL realizations based on Q3 ‘18 actuals, relative to WTI. (2) $54.51 was actual realized price for Q3 ‘18.

2018 Production and Cost Outlook Year Over Year Growth

2017 FY ‘18E

Targeting over 50% y/y production growth in 2018 Illustrative Impact of Increasing Oil Realizations on Annualized DPU Using Production Guidance(1)

Adjusted EBITDA Distributions per Unit ROACE Cash Margins ($/Boe) Net Royalty Acres Daily Production

MBoe/d

$0.20 - $0.40

Gathering & Transportation

$8.00 - $11.00

DD&A

$0.75 - $1.25

Cash G&A

Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl)

(per unit, annualized)

(2)

4Q ‘18E / 1Q ‘19E

12,611 18,384 9,173 13,908 $33.02 $39.96 $39 $72 $0.34 $0.58 13.0% 15.5% 11.0 18.50 - 20.00 16.75 - 17.25

$1.43 $2.00 $2.17 $2.19 $2.38 $2.58 $2.77 $2.16 $2.35 $2.37 $2.58 $2.79 $3.00

FY17 Actual $50.00 $54.51 $55.00 $60.00 $65.00 $70.00

Low End of Guidance High End of Guidance

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

 Viper has outgrown public royalty peers on a per unit basis due to significant organic growth driven by Diamondback’s drill bit and targeted, high visibility acquisitions

Viper: Proven Differentiated Growth Story

Source: Partnership data and filings. Data as of 9/30/2018. (1) Cash margins calculated as realized price per boe less LOE, gathering and transportation, production taxes and cash G&A expenses per boe. (2) Peers include BSM, PSK, DMLP and KRP.

Normalized Boe/d Per Million Unit Growth(2)

 Viper’s acquisition strategy is focused on

growing production on a per unit basis

 Viper buys assets with years of visible

production growth

 Unlike working interest E&Ps, Viper does not

require cash flow reinvestment to grow

 Focused on Permian Basin, which has proven

to have the most growth in North America due to superior single-well economics Cash Margins (1)

$33.88 $30.37 $44.55 $44.42 $45.54 $39.96

90% 91% 92% 90% 91% 91% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 2015 2016 2017 1Q '18 2Q '18 3Q '18 Cash Margin (% of Realized $/Boe) $/Boe

Cash Margin ($/Boe) Cash G&A G&T

  • Prod. taxes

+396% Peer 4, -19% Peer 3, +7% Peer 1, +44% Peer 2, +16% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% 500% 2Q '14 3Q '14 4Q '14 1Q '15 2Q '15 3Q '15 4Q '15 1Q '16 2Q '16 3Q '16 4Q '16 1Q '17 2Q '17 3Q '17 4Q '17 1Q '18 2Q '18 3Q '18

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Viper has Distributed $5.23/Unit Since its IPO

Source: Partnership data and filings. Data as of 9/30/2018. (1) Return on average capital employed (“ROACE”) defined as adjusted EBIT divided by average total assets for current and prior period less average current liabilities for current and prior period.

Industry Leading Return on and Return of Capital

Cumulative Quarterly Distributions Since IPO ($/Unit)

$0.250 $0.250 $0.190 $0.220 $0.200 $0.230 $0.149 $0.189 $0.207 $0.258 $0.302 $0.332 $0.337 $0.460 $0.480 $0.600 $0.580

9.8% 8.8% 4.7% 7.1% 5.9% 7.3% 3.2% 7.2% 8.8% 11.3% 13.0% 12.9% 13.0% 17.8% 17.0% 18.3% 15.5%

3Q '14 4Q '14 1Q '15 2Q '15 3Q '15 4Q '15 1Q '16 2Q '16 3Q '16 4Q '16 1Q '17 2Q '17 3Q '17 4Q '17 1Q '18 2Q '18 3Q '18

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% $- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 3Q '14 4Q '14 1Q '15 2Q '15 3Q '15 4Q '15 1Q '16 2Q '16 3Q '16 4Q '16 1Q '17 2Q '17 3Q '17 4Q '17 1Q '18 2Q '18 3Q '18 ROACE(1) Distributions ($/Unit) Cumulative Distributions Quarterly Distribution ROACE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

92 20

42 83 112

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

11,451 2,457

3,172 9,173 13,908

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

69,085 3,359

18,179 39,037 72,444

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

557 27

239 354 584

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

132 17

30 114 148

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

16,323 2,061

2,300 12,611 18,384

At IPO 3Q '17 3Q '18

Mineral acres provide organic growth without spending capital on drilling or operating expenses

Acquisitions further contribute to accretive growth

Operators have significant inventory and undeveloped resource remaining on Viper’s current asset base, providing years of embedded organic growth at no additional cost

Viper’s Total Production and Distribution per Unit are Up 46% and 72% Year Over Year

Net Production

$0.20

Net Royalty / Mineral Acres(1)

Per unit (in mm)

(Boe/d per mm units) (Boe/d) (Net acre per mm units) (Net royalty acres)

High Quality Growth Focused on Per Unit Returns

EBITDA

2Q '18 2Q ‘18 2Q ‘18 2Q ‘18 2Q ‘18

Source: Partnership data and filings. Note: 2Q ‘18 per million unit measures shown pro forma for July equity offering. (1) Net royalty acres reflect all acquisitions closed through 9/30/2018.

Per unit (in mm) Per unit (in mm)

($,000)

2Q ‘18

(EBITDA per mm units)

Increase from 2Q ‘18 Increase from 2Q ‘18 Increase from 2Q ‘18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Benchmarking Viper Against Yielding E&P C-Corps

'19 Capex ($bn)

Note: Dividend and CAPEX figures reflect consensus estimates as of 10/26/2018 per FactSet. 2019 estimated forward yield is calculated as 2019 estimated consensus dividends per Bloomberg divided by 10/26/2018 closing prices. Peers include APA, APC, COP, HES, MRO, MUR, NBL, OXY, PSK. (1) Reflects LQA yield as of 10/26/2018. LQA stands for “last quarter annualized.” LQA represents 3Q distribution for all peers who have announced.

 Viper offers industry leading growth and returns of capital, without the capital requirements of traditional working interest E&P companies

LQA Yield + 2019E Forward Yield(1)

$-- $-- $1.3 $2.5 $2.6 $3.1 $3.4 $5.1 $5.3 $6.2 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 6 Peer 9 Peer 8 Peer 4 Peer 1 Peer 7 Peer 5 6.4% 4.6% 3.2% 2.7% 2.7% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.1% 7.6% 4.6% 3.2% 3.4% 2.7% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.1% 14.0% 9.2% 6.3% 6.1% 5.3% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 2.1% Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7 Peer 8 Peer 9 LQA Yield 2019E Forward Yield

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Source: Partnership data and filings. Present acreage as of 9/30/2018.

Acquisition Machine Continues to Consolidate

 Since IPO in Q3 2014, Viper has closed over $1 billion in acquisitions across 273 transactions; continue to use size, scale and expertise to consolidate the fragmented private minerals market

IPO (6/18/2014) Present (9/30/2018) $521.2 $340.4 $205.6 $43.9 $57.7

2014: 2 deals 2015: 30 deals 2016: 63 deals 2017: 113 deals 2018: 65 deals

Closed Acquisitions ($MM): Acreage Breakdown: ⧫ Midland: 3,168 Acreage Breakdown: ⧫ Midland: 6,129 ⧫ Delaware: 7,098 ⧫ Eagle Ford: 681

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Basin Key Counties Selected Operator(s) Size (NRA) Purchase Price ($mm) 3Q ‘18 Production (Boe/d) 3Q ’18 Annualized Cash Flow (1) 4Q ’18E Production (Boe/d) Midland Delaware Eagle Ford

Drop Down

Pecos 1,696 $175 893 $14.3 1,093

Deal 1

Howard Reagan Various 263 $30 184 $3.0 258

Deal 2

 

Loving Reeves Ward Midland Various 200 $22 111 $1.8 96

Deal 3

DeWitt Karnes Gonzales 681 $126 1,227 $23.6 1,105

Deal 4

Howard 90 $14 105 $1.7 91

Other FANG- Operated

 

Reeves Pecos Ward Midland 545 $56 286 $4.6 302

Other Non- Operated

 

Loving Reeves Martin Midland Various 873 $97 430 $6.9 542

Totals

4,347 $521 3,236 $55.9 3,487

2018 Acquisition Summary

Through the First Three Quarter of 2018, VNOM has Completed 65 Acquisitions Worth ~$521 Million

Source: Partnership data and filings. Acquisitions include all closed deals through 9/30/2018. (1) Calculated as 3Q ’18 realized price of $43.98/boe * 3Q ‘18 production for Permian deals. Eagle Ford deal calculated as 3Q ‘18 realized price of $52.80/boe * 3Q ‘18 production.

/

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Source: Partnership data and DrillingInfo. (1) Average for pads highlighted on map.

Active, Visible Development on Viper’s Acreage

Shift toward pad development throughout the Permian Basin benefits Viper; better visibility to development and permit conversion ratios on Viper’s concentrated acreage

Zuma 3 Unit: 3-well pad Mewbourne Viper NRI: 21.9%

A

Goodnight Unit: 3-well pad EOG Viper NRI: 7.3%

B

State EOT Whale Unit: 3-well pad Diamondback Viper NRI: 10.5%

C Permit filed Well spud Well completed First production

Process of active development: Cumulative days since permit(1):

82 211 234 A B C D E

Bombardier C Unit: 4-well pad Diamondback Viper NRI: 16.0%

D

Harvard McClintic 31-30: 2-well pad Endeavor Viper NRI: 18.8%

E

VNOM royalty acreage FANG royalty acreage FANG acreage Pending FANG acquisitions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

3,328 3,253 2,138 1,043 931 861 780 681 403 261 230

  • 500

1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Pecos Spanish Trail Reeves Midland - Other Loving Howard Other Eagle Ford Glasscock Ward Martin FANG-operated 3rd Party-operated

 Viper has a concentrated 13,227 net royalty acres in the Permian Basin and 681 net royalty acres in the Eagle Ford; ~38% of total acreage is operated by Diamondback

Source: Partnership data and filings and DrillingInfo. Net Royalty Acres reflect all acquisitions closed through 9/30/2018. (1) DrillingInfo as of 10/22/2018. Notable operators in “Other” category include: JAG, CDEV, Endeavor, EGN, PDCE and OAS.

Significant Undeveloped Resource Potential

Acreage Breakdown by County

FANG-operated acreage:

Viper Permit Exposure to Third Party Operators(1)

Other /

2,202 2,102 245 195 500 Pecos Spanish Trail Howard Glasscock Other

112 95 46 33 28 21 19 16 15 12 9 8 7 7 5 40 80 120

Midland Permits Delaware Permits Eagle Ford Permits

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Drop Down Visibility from Diamondback

Diamondback: Delaware Basin

♦ Following the first drop down, Diamondback still owns 1,186 net royalty in Pecos and Reeves counties which are expected to be dropped down at a later point ♦ ~85% operated by Diamondback; FANG-operated portion is almost 50% the size of both current FANG-

  • perated Pecos County and Spanish Trail

♦ Diamondback continues to concentrate development

  • n acreage with royalties owned by Diamondback and

Viper due to improved economics

Source: Partnership data and filings. Data as of 9/30/2018.

FANG royalty acreage First drop down acreage FANG-operated

Energen Minerals

Net Delaware Basin Counties Royalty Acres Lea 3 Loving 30 Reeves 71 Ward 55 Winkler 37 Total Delaware 195 Net Midland Basin Counties Royalty Acres Gaines 27 Glasscock 7 Howard 1 Martin 25 Reagan 11 Total Midland 71

♦ In addition to owning 266 net royalty acres, Energen has an estimated company wide ~77% NRI delivering $60-80mm of cash flow related to the >75% NRI at current production

Diamondback: Midland Basin Andrews / Martin Counties Upton County

♦ Diamondback owns ~575 net royalty acres in the Midland Basin, primarily in Andrews, Martin and Upton counties

Expansive Opportunity Set for Further Accretive Drop Downs, Primarily Operated by Diamondback

VNOM royalty acreage FANG acreage FANG mineral acreage

Q3 Acquisition

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

How Viper Defines a True “Net Royalty Acre”

Source: Partnership data and filings. Data as of 9/30/2018.

Acreage Definition Comparison Viper’s Formula for Net Royalty Acreage

 Methodology for deriving “Net Royalty

Acreage” differs widely across the industry

 Many companies calculate assuming there

are eight royalty acres for every one net mineral acre (NMA)

 Viper derives its total net royalty acreage

from net mineral ownership taking into consideration the royalty interest AND all

  • ther burdens

Net Mineral Acres

Lease Royalty

and other burdens

Net Royalty Acres

NRA Example Assuming Standard ¼ Royalty

640-acre section 100% Mineral Interest Mineral Acres 640 NMA Mineral Acres 640 NMA Royalty Acres 160 NRA Royalty Acres 1,280 NRA

Viper believes its methodology more accurately defines its acreage for which it will receive revenue

111,265 13,908 40,000 80,000 120,000

Viper Net Royalty Acres (Normalized to 1/8) Viper Net Royalty Acres

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

$4.02 $8.37 $8.83 $8.96 $9.29 $9.67 $10.23 $10.54 $11.13 $11.17 $11.28 $11.88 $12.34 $12.39 $12.65 $12.68 $12.91 $13.16 $13.65 $14.08 $14.74

$0 $4 $8 $12 $16

$/Boe

LOE

  • Prod. taxes

G&T Cash G&A

Industry Leading Cash Margins

Source: Partnership data and filings, and Bloomberg. E&P’s include AREX, CDEV, CPE, CXO, ECA, EGN, EOG, JAG, LPI, MTDR, NBL, PDCE, PE, PXD, QEP, REN, SM, WPX and XEC (1) Cash margins calculated as realized price per boe less LOE, gathering and transportation, production taxes and cash G&A expenses per boe. (2) Cash operating expenses calculated as the sum of LOE, gathering and transportation, production taxes and cash G&A expenses per boe.

Viper Cash Margins Versus Permian E&Ps(1) Viper Operating Costs Versus Permian E&Ps(2)

91% 82% 82% 80% 77% 75% 75% 74% 73% 72% 71% 71% 70% 70% 69% 67% 66% 66% 57% 56% 56% $39.96

$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

$/Boe

Cash Margin (% of Realized $/Boe)

% of Realized Price Cash Margin ($/Boe)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Maintain Financial Flexibility

Borrowing base increased to $555 million in connection with Fall 2018 redetermination Pay Substantially All Cash Available for Distribution to Unitholders No Hedging

No capital requirements = no need to “protect” a capital program No Direct Operating or Capital Expenses

Focus on mineral interests preserves low-cost structure

Expected production and ad valorem taxes of 7.0% of royalty income (1)

Operators bear capital burden, allowing Viper to grow

  • rganically without having to reinvest cash flow

Trading Liquidity Has Increased

Viper's Corporate tax status election opens up a broader investor base

Financial Overview

Financial Strategy Viper Capitalization

Source: Partnership data and filings, and Bloomberg. Note: (1) Includes production taxes of 4.6% for crude oil and 7.5% for natural gas and NGLs and ad valorem taxes. (2) Pro forma for increase in revolving credit facility, which closed in October.

(units/day)

2018 Guidance

Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 Net Production - Mboe/d 18.50 – 20.00 Total 2018 Net Production - Mboe/d 16.75 – 17.25 Oil Production - % of Net Production 69% - 73% Unit Costs ($/boe) Gathering & Transportation $0.20 - $0.40 Cash G&A $0.75 - $1.25 Non-Cash Equity Based Compensation $0.50 - $0.75 Depletion $8.00 - $11.00 Production and Ad Valorem Taxes (% of Revenue) 7% ~2.5x increase in volume YTD 2018 relative to 2017

Cash $17 $17 Revolving Credit Facility 297 297 Borrowing Base 475 555 Availability Under Revolver 179 259 Liquidity $195 $275 Net Debt / Annualized Q3 EBITDA 1.0x 1.0x ($ in millions) Pro Forma(2) 9/30/2018

200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 2015 1Q '16 2Q '16 3Q '16 4Q '16 1Q '17 2Q '17 3Q '17 4Q '17 1Q '18 2Q '18 3Q '18

Average Quarterly Daily Trading Volume

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Final Thoughts

Viper Energy Partners offers yield, significant production growth, drop down visibility and upside to strength in commodity prices Change to corporate tax status simplifies tax reporting and allows for a larger investor universe and a more liquid and attractive currency Deal flow remains robust and continues to increase Acquisitions focused on unitholder accretion: current yield, cash flow growth and visibility, acreage valuation, NAV Minerals ownership offers organic growth without any capital costs or

  • perating expenses

Significant growth in assets and production; Net royalty acres and production increased by 52% and 46% respectively, year over year

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 Viper Energy Partners LP 500 West Texas Ave., Suite 1200 Midland, TX 79701 www.viperenergy.com Kaes Van’t Hof, President (432) 221-7430 minerals@viperenergy.com Adam Lawlis, Director, Investor Relations (432) 221-7430 ir@viperenergy.com