INVESTOR PRESENTATION March 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation march 2017 forward looking
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INVESTOR PRESENTATION March 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INVESTOR PRESENTATION March 2017 Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the S afe Harbor


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INVESTOR PRESENTATION March 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements

2

Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes “ forward-looking statements” that are made pursuant to the S afe Harbor Provisions of the Private S ecurities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, proj ected costs, prospects, plans and obj ectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, the words “ could,” “ believe,” “ anticipate,” “ intend,” “ estimate,” “ expect,” “ proj ect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on Parsley Energy, Inc.’ s (“ Parsley Energy,” “ Parsley,” or the “ Company” ) current expectations and assumptions about future event s and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subj ect to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of oil and natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating reserves and in proj ecting future rates of production, the production potential of our undeveloped acreage, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures and the risk factors discussed in or referenced in our filings with the United S tates S ecurities and Exchange Commission (“ S EC” ), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. Our production forecasts and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the undertaking and

  • utcome of future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or cost increases.

Industry and Market Data This presentation has been prepared by Parsley and includes market data and other statistical information from third-party sources, including independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. Although Parsley believes these third-party sources are reliable as of their respective dates, Parsley has not independently verified the accuracy

  • r completeness of this information. S
  • me data are also based on Parsley’ s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the third-party sources described

above. Oil & Gas Reserves This presentation provides disclosure of Parsley’ s proved reserves, which are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible— from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions (using unweighted average 12-month first day of the month prices), operating methods, and government regulations— prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. In this presentation, proved reserves attributable to Parsley as of 12/ 31/ 16 are estimated utilizing S EC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on S EC pricing, as adj usted for market differentials, transportation fees, and quality, of $39.36 / Bbl crude, $2.23 / Mcf gas, and $15.03/ Bbl NGL. References to our estimated proved reserves as of 12/ 31/ 16 are derived from our proved reserve report audited by Netherland, S ewell & Associates, Inc. (“ NS AI” ). We may use the t erm “ expected ultimate recoveries” (“ EURs” ) or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which terms include quantities of oil and gas that may not meet t he S EC’ s definitions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the S EC's guidelines strictly prohibit Parsley from including in filings with the S

  • EC. Unless otherwise stated in this presentation, such estimates have

been prepared internally by our engineers and management without review by independent engineers. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subj ect to substantially greater risk of being actually realized, particularly in areas or zones where there has been limited or no drilling history. We include these estimates to demonstrate what we believe to be the potential for future drilling and production by the Company. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from our properties will differ substantially. In addition, we have made no commitment to drill all of the drilling locations. Ultimate recoveries will be dependent upon numerous factors including actual encountered geological conditions, the impact of future oil and gas pricing, exploration and development costs, and our future drilling decisions and budgets based upon our future evaluation of risk, returns and the availability of capital and, in many areas, the outcome of negotiation of drilling arrangements with holders of adj acent or fractional interest leases. Our estimates may change significantly as development of our properties provides additional data and therefore actual quantities that may ultimately be recovered will likely differ from these estimates. Our related expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rat es from existing wells, the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity and activity that may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases. Unless otherwise noted, Net Present Value (“ NPV” ) estimates are before taxes and assume the Company generated EUR and decline curve estimates based on Company drilling and completion cost estimates that do not include facilities, land, seismic, general and administrative (“ G&A” ) or other corporate level costs.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Sustained Production Momentum

3

  • 4Q16 net production up 5%

versus 3Q16 and 79% Y/ Y

  • 16%

compound quarterly production growth rate over eleven quarters as a public company(2)

  • S

harp production traj ectory in 2017, culminating in estimated 4Q17 production of 75.0 – 85.0 MBoe/ d

  • Track record of efficient growth, with leading

production contribution per dollar

(1) While certain of Parsley’s previous disclosures have referenced “horizontal rigs” as only those rigs tasked to drill both the vertical and lateral portions of a horizontal well, “horizontal rigs” in the chart above represent all rigs utilized for horizontal drilling activity, some of which may be dedicated to and purposed for certain segments of the wellbore. “Spudder” rigs are excluded from the counts above. (2) Parsley completed its initial public offering on May 29, 2014; (3) Peers include CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, LPI, PXD, and RSPP. Calculations for peers based on reported data for prior periods and Nasdaq IR Insights consensus estimates as of 2/16/2017 for 4Q16. Parsley data based on actuals for all periods. Production from reported acquisitions excluded from calculations based on estimated monthly decline of 3%

Production Momentum Capital Efficient Production Growth(3)

10 20 30 40 50 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 Peer 7 PE 4Q15-4Q16 Boe/d Added per $MM of Capex 4Q15-4Q16 Organic Production Growth N/M

9.2 14.015.3 18.218.9 22.221.6 25.2 29.1 35.7 43.0 45.1 75.0 - 85.0

20 40 60 80 100 4 8 12 16 20 Net Production (MBoe/d) Rig Count(1) Horizontal Rigs Vertical Rigs Net Production (MBoe/d)

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Peer-leading operating costs driven by
  • ngoing focus on infrastructure optimization

and buildout

  • Favorable Midland D&C costs holding steady

despite rising completion intensity

Favorable Cost Trends

4 Midland Basin Drilling & Completion Costs ($MM)(2)

$3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 Peers PE

LOE vs. Peers ($/Boe)(1)

(1) Peers include CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, LPI, PXD, and RSPP. Source: company SEC filings; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral

$7.0 $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.2 $4.8 $4.7 $4.8 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 $3.56

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Expanding Premier Midland Basin Position

5

Midland Basin Acreage(2)

(1) Refer to slide 20 for spacing assumptions; (2) All maps reflect Parsley acreage as of end 4Q16 pro forma for all announced acquisitions as well as recently executed acreage trades

  • On February 7, announced acquisition of acreage and

associat ed asset s from Double Eagle Energy Permian LLC for $2.8 billion

  • ~71,000 net leasehold acres
  • ~3,600 net Boe/ d as of January 1, 2017
  • 23 drilled uncomplet ed wells
  • ~3,300 net horizont al drilling locat ions, including ~1,800

net locat ions in high priorit y t arget int ervals (Lower S praberry, Wolfcamp A, Wolfcamp B)(1)

  • S

t rat egic acquisition enhances qualit y, scale, and scope of Midland Basin acreage portfolio

  • All dept h right s across maj orit y of acquired acreage
  • Most ly operated wit h non-op acreage mainly dist ribut ed

around t he perimet er of acquisition foot print; average 25% working int erest on non-op acreage

  • Asset s concent rat ed in oil-rich basin core wit h st rong offset

well performance in all areas

  • S

ignificant foot print expansion increases operat ional capacit y, t ranslat ing t o a st ronger-for-longer growt h profile

  • Incremental value pot ent ial t hrough ongoing asset evolut ion

and high-grading pot ent ial; Double Eagle t o assist wit h t ransfer of operat ions and ongoing acreage t rades

MIDLAND GLASSCOCK UPTON REAGAN MARTIN HOWARD IRION DAWSON BORDEN ECTOR ANDREWS CRANE GAINES

Acquisition Summary

Gross / Net Leasehold Acreage ~167,000 / ~71,000 Gross / Net Hz Drilling Locations ~7,300 / ~3,300 Percent Net Locations Operated ~80% Consideration ~$1.4 B cash / ~$1.4 B equity Scheduled Close On or before April 20, 2017

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold: Operated Acquired Leasehold: Non-Op

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GLASSCOCK REAGAN UPTON MIDLAND MARTIN HOWARD

Midland Basin

Big Lake Fault

Sticking to the Sweet Spot

6 Overlapping Sweet Spots Wolfcamp Thickness Geothermal Gradient

Degrees Fahrenheit per 1000’ Depth

Temperature Sweet Spot Thickness Sweet Spot

Degrees Fahrenheit per 1,000’ Depth

Wolfcamp Drill Depth

Drill Depth Sweet Spot

  • More than 80%
  • f Double

Eagle net acreage inside sweet spot

  • Operating control on

86%

  • f acquired acreage

in the sweet spot

  • Acquiring more than

1,200 long lateral Lower S praberry and Wolfcamp A & B locations in sweet spot (lateral length of at least 7,500’ )

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Pro forma footprint represents

second-largest Midland Basin net acreage position among publicly traded E&P companies

  • Acreage situated in the heart of the

basin, mainly inside peer company footprints

Superior Midland Basin Acreage Position

7

708 179 150 146 125 90 88 85 61 40

MIDLAND UPTON GLASSCOCK REAGAN HOWARD MARTIN

Net Midland Basin Acres (000’s)(1)

Parsley + Double Eagle Callon Diamondback Energen RSP Permian Laredo SM Energy Map source: 1Derrick; (1) Source: Company presentations. Parsley acreage is as of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions announced 1/10/2017 and 2/7/2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Premier Permian Portfolio

8

Pro Forma Permian Position

  • ~227,000 net leasehold acres
  • Midland Basin: ~179,000
  • Delaware Basin: ~48,000
  • ~6,900 net royalty acres
  • ~4,300 net horizontal locations in priority target

intervals(1) Pro Forma Company Statistics

(1) Includes Wolfcamp A, Wolfcamp B, and Lower Spraberry in the Midland Basin and Upper Wolfcamp in the S. Delaware Basin; (2) As of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions announced 1/10/2017 as well as recent acreage trades; (3) As of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions announced 1/10/2017 and 2/7/2017, as well as recent acreage trades Parsley Energy Leasehold

  • Acquisition increases net acreage by 45%

, establishing commanding Permian presence

  • Expanded scale translates to:
  • Increased max rig count
  • Higher peak production potential
  • S

tronger-for-longer growth profile

  • Lower cost of capital
  • More favorable negotiating position for

services, equipment, and takeaway

156 227 Parsley Parsley + Double Eagle Net Leasehold Acres (000’s) 4,710 8,000 Parsley Parsley + Double Eagle Total Net Horizontal Locations

(2) (2) (3) (3)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

50 100 150 200 250 3 6 9 12 15 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17E 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E Net Leasehold Acres (000’s) Average Rig Count Average Rig Count Net Leasehold Acres

  • Planning to double operated rig count from 4Q16 to 4Q17 to drive value from acquired assets
  • Activity consistently scaled to match size of asset base and earn compelling returns on

invested capital

Accelerated Development Plan

9 Development Plan Accommodates Growing Asset Base

Note: 1Q17 and beyond based on end of 4Q16 acreage pro forma for actual and expected closings of announced acquisitions

Midland Basin Divest itures Acreage Expirat ions (At oka Right s) S . Delaware and Midland Basin Acquisit ions Glasscock Count y Acquisit ion S . Delaware and Midland Basin Acquisit ions Double Eagle Acquisit ion Reagan Count y Acquisit ion

slide-10
SLIDE 10

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 90 180 270 360 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(2) Days of Production Midland Basin

  • S. Delaware Basin

(1) Number of wells achieving a 30-day IP since 3Q16 quarterly update; 30-day IP’s are 3-stream; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime

Strong Productivity Across Asset Base

10

Midland Delaware Wells 18 2 Average Lateral Length 8,536’ 8,385’ 30-day IP (Boe/d) 1,446 1,791 30-day IP per 1,000’ (Boe/d) 172 224 % Oil 72% 70%

4Q16 Well Summary(1)

Parsley Leasehold Parsley Producing Wolfcamp Wells

  • S

trong, repeatable well results in both Midland and S

  • uthern

Delaware Basins

  • S

everal new company records in 4Q16

  • Highest IP24: Taylor 45-33-4601H – 3,205 Boe/ d

(1st Wolfcamp C well; Reagan County)

  • Highest IP30: Grace 45-1-4306H -- 2,194 Boe/ d (Upton

County)

  • Highest IP30 in S

. Delaware: Lincoln 4-1-4307H –

  • 1,929 Boe/ d (Reeves County)
  • Highest IP30 for 2-well Pad: Mary 18-18B-7-4202H &

4401H –

  • combined 3,386 Boe/ d (Upton County)
slide-11
SLIDE 11

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 Midland Basin Operators(2)

11

Top Midland Basin Well Performance

Average Gross Revenue per Lateral Foot in First Three Months ($)(1)

Parsley Energy

  • Parsley has the highest average gross revenue per lateral foot among select Midland

Basin operators, reflecting strong production rates and favorable product mix

  • Broadly distributed well set indicates consistent acreage quality and operational

excellence

(1) Sources: IHS, FBR & Co.; Assumes realized oil price of $50/Bbl and realized natural gas price of $3.00/Mcf; based on first three months of production data for wells with first production between September 2015 – August 2016; (2) Midland Basin operators include Apache, Approach, Broad Oak Energy, Callon, Chevron, Concho, ConocoPhillips, CrownQuest, Diamondback, Discovery Resources, Elevation Resources, Encana, Endeavor Energy, Energen, EP Energy, ExxonMobil, Forge Energy, Henry Resources, Hunt Oil, Laredo, Legacy Reserves, Occidental, Parsley Energy, Permian Resources, Pioneer, PT Petroleum, QEP, RSP Permian, SM Energy, Summit Petroleum, Surge Energy, and W&T Offshore

Parsley Wells Included in Analysis

Parsley Energy Leasehold Wells Online 9/2015 – 8/2016

MIDLAND GLASSCOCK UPTON REAGAN

slide-12
SLIDE 12

3,205 2,666 2,658 2,445 2,408 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

Taylor 45-33-4601H (Wolfcamp C) Kauffman S t C4-6-4307H (S . Del Upper WC) Bast 34-39-4412H (Lower WCB) Grace 45-1-4306H (Upper WCB) Robbie 17-8-4403H (Lower WCB)

Peak 24-hr IP (Boe/d)(1)

12

Unlocking Value in New Target Zones

1st Wolfcamp C Lateral

  • 2-mile Wolfcamp C well post ed

company-record 24-hour IP rat e

  • S

t rong pressure and high oil cut (67% ) suggest compelling economic profile

(1) 3-Stream; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral length

Strong Production Trend on 2-Mile Lower Spraberry Well Highest Parsley 24-hr IP Rates 2-Mile Lower Spraberry

  • Near-flat product ion profile

aft er seven mont hs of product ion

  • Could mat ch or exceed

Wolfcamp A/ B ret urn profile given low decline and high oil cut

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1)(2) Days of Production

Taylor 45-33-4601H (WC C) Dusek 45-4-2807H (L. Spby)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

REEVES

Record Well Results in Reeves County

13

  • Outstanding Reeves County well results among highest in the

company, making recent acquisition even more compelling

  • 1st drilled well, Lincoln 4-1-4307H, posted IP30 of 1,929

Boe/ d, representing strongest S . Delaware and 3rd highest company-wide IP30

  • 2nd drilled well, Kauffman S

t C4-6-4307H, posted second-highest company-wide IP24 of 2,666 Boe/ d

  • On January 10, announced acquisition of ~4,500 net leasehold

acres and ~3,800 net mineral acres in Reeves county

  • Added ~85 net locations in Wolfcamp and Bone S

pring benches with average ~9,500’ lateral length

(1) 3-Stream; normalized for downtime and to 7,000’ stimulated lateral; (2) 3-Stream

Reeves WC Wells Outperforming Type Curve by 55%

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 30 60 90 120 150 180 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days of Production

Highest Parsley 24-hr IP Rates

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold Parsley Completed Wells

3,205 2,666 2,658 2,445 2,408 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

Taylor 45-33-4601H (Wolfcamp C) Kauffman S t C4-6-4307H (S . Del Upper WC) Bast 34-39-4412H (Lower WCB) Grace 45-1-4306H (Upper WCB) Robbie 17-8-4403H (Lower WCB)

Peak 24-Hr IP (Boe/d)(2)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

$26.73 $8.04 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 2015 2016

$ / Boe

55 91 124 222 50 100 150 200 250 2013 2014 2015 2016

Robust Reserve Growth

14

  • Proved reserves up 80%

Y/ Y (oil up 85% Y/ Y) despite writing off remaining ~18 MMBoe of vertical PUD reserves

  • S

trong organic reserve replacement ratio of approximately 680%

(1)

  • PD F&D down 70%

Y/ Y to $8.04/ Boe(2) Strong Growth in Proved Reserves

Total Proved Reserves (MMBoe)

Oil (MMBbl) Gas (Bcf) NGL (MMBbl) Total (MMBoe) PDP 59.3 121.8 23.7 103.3 PDNP 1.9 2.2 0.6 2.8 PUD 75.4 99.7 24.2 116.2 Total Proved 136.6 223.7 48.5 222.3

124

  • 14
  • 4
  • 7

24 99 222

  • 50

50 100 150 200 250

YE15 Prod. Rev. Divest. Acq. Adds YE16

Note: Reserve summary as of 12/31/2016 and audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.; Data for Parsley only; not pro forma for pending acquisitions; (1) Organic reserve replacement ratio calculated as total 2016 reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing) divided by total 2016 production; excludes acquisitions and divestitures; (2) PD F&D calculated as total 2016 Capex (including Infrastructure and Other) divided by total 2016 proved developed reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing); excludes acquisitions and divestitures

Compelling PD F&D Costs(2)

+80% +300%

  • 70%
slide-15
SLIDE 15

2017 Capital Program – Pulling Value Forward

15

Unit Costs LOE ($/Boe) $4.23 $4.00 - $4.75 Cash G&A ($/Boe) $5.12 $4.50 - $5.25 Production & Ad Valorem Taxes (%

  • f Revenue)

6.1% 6.5 - 7.5% Capital Program Drilling & Completion ($MM) $400 $840 - $960 Infrastructure & Other ($MM) $96 $160 - $190 Total Development Expenditures ($MM) $496 $1,000 - $1,150 Activity Gross Horizontal Completions Midland Basin Delaware Basin Average Lateral Length 79 73 6 ~7,400’ 130 – 150 95 – 105 35 – 45 ~8,000’ Gross Vertical Completions 1 5 - 10 Average Working Interest 96% 85 – 95% Production Annual Production (MBoe/d) % Oil 2016A 38.3 67% 2017E 62 – 68 68 – 73%

  • Commit t ed t o earning healt hy ret urns on

acquired asset s via accelerat ed development pace

  • Head st art t oward significant product ion and

cash flow growt h given 2016 moment um and expansion of asset base and operat ional capacit y

  • Expect robust annual product ion growt h of 62-

78% in 2017, wit h st eady growt h during 1H17 and st eepening growt h t hrough t he end of t he year, culminat ing in expect ed 4Q17 net product ion of approximat ely 75-85 MBoe/ d

  • Plan t o allocat e ~65%
  • f capit al t o Midland

Basin, wit h t he balance t o t he S

  • ut hern

Delaware Basin

  • Planned rig addit ions associat ed wit h pending

Double Eagle acquisit ion t ranslat e t o approximat ely 40 horizont al spuds and 10 horizont al POPs in 2017, generat ing subst ant ial product ion moment um heading int o 2018

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Liquidity Summary ($MM) First lien credit facility(1) $598 Cash on hand $765 Total liquidity $1,363

  • Healthy financial position supports accelerated

development program

  • $1,363 MM of liquidity
  • Fully undrawn borrowing base of $875 MM, with

elected commitment of $600 MM

  • Favorable maturity schedule, with earliest notes

maturity in 2024

  • In February, Moody’s upgraded Parsley’s Corporate

Family Rating to B1 from B2

Strong Financial Position

16

Favorable Debt Maturity Schedule

$600

$650 $450

$875 $400 $1,100 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ($MM) Borrowing Base Senior Notes TOTAL

Committed Amount Borrowing Base 1H25 2H25

Note: All data as of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions and equity offerings announced 1/10/2017 and 2/7/2017 and issuance of new senior notes due 2025 announced on 2/7/2017; (1) Net of $2 MM letter of credit which does not change the status of the Company’s fully undrawn borrowing base

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Substantial Oil Hedge Position

17

  • Meaningful increase in oil

hedge position in view of anticipated production growth

  • Position extends into 2019
  • Parsley to assume Double

Eagle’s hedge positions upon closing of acquisition

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 10 20 30 40 50 60 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 WTI ($/Bbl) MBbls/d MBbls/d Hedged Weighted Average Long Put Price

Hedge positions as of 2/23/2017. Upon the closing of Parsley’s pending acquisition of Double Eagle, Parsley will assume Double Eagle’s existing hedge positions; (1) When NYMEX price is above put price, Parsley receives NYMEX price. When NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, Parsley receives the put price. When NYMEX price is below the short put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price plus the difference between the short put price and the put price; (2) Functions similarly to put spreads except that when index price is at or above the call price, Parsley receives the call price; (3) Premium realizations represent net premiums collected (from restructured positions) or paid (including deferred premiums), which are recognized as income or loss in the period of settlement; (4) Parsley receives the swap price; (5) When NYMEX price is above the call price, Double Eagle receives call price. When NYMEX is below the put price, Double Eagle receives the put price. When NYMEX is between call and put prices, Double Eagle receives the NYMEX price; (6) Double Eagle receives the strike price; (7) Includes Parsley positions and Double Eagle positions to be assumed by Parsley; excludes WTI and basis swaps

Oil Volumes Hedged(7)

1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 Parsley Energy: Put Spreads (MBbls/ d)

1

13.8 13.6 35.7 45.5 23.3 23.1 19.6 19.6 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $49.93 $49.93 $52.66 $52.80 $53.21 $52.14 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/ Bbl) $36.14 $36.14 $41.80 $41.95 $41.43 $42.14 $40.00 $40.00 Three Way Collars (MBbls/ d)

2

13.3 19.8 31.0 31.0 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 Call Price ($/ Bbl) $74.38 $75.28 $75.65 $75.65 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/ Bbl) $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Premium Realizat ion ($ MM)

3

($4.9) ($4.9) ($14.2) ($17.8) ($11.9) ($10.4) ($10.6) ($10.6) ($1.5) ($1.5) ($1.5) ($1.5) Mid-Cush Basis Swaps (MBbls/ d)

4

11.3 11.3 12.2 12.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Swap Price ($/ Bbl) ($1.00) ($1.00) ($1.05) ($1.05) ($0.95) ($0.95) ($0.95) ($0.95) Double Eagle: Collars (MBbls/ d)

5

1.5 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Call Price ($/ Bbl) $56.15 $59.73 $59.98 $61.31 $61.31 $61.31 $61.31 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $47.00 $46.75 $46.75 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 WTI Swaps (MBbls/ d)

6

1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 St rike Price ($/ Bbl) $53.42 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 Mid-Cush Basis Swaps (MBbls/ d)

4

4.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Swap Price ($/ Bbl) ($0.86) ($0.86) ($0.90) ($0.90) ($0.90) ($0.90)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Parsley Energy Overview

18

Market Snapshot Premier Permian Position

NYSE Symbol: PE Market Cap: $9,960 MM(1) Net Debt: $735 MM(2) Enterprise Value: $10,695 MM Share Count: 314 MM Midland Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: ~179,000 Delaware Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: ~48,000 4Q16 Production: 45.1 MBoe/d

Note: All data as of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions and equity offerings announced 1/10/2017 and 2/7/2017, as well as issuance of new senior notes due 2025 announced on 2/7/2017; (1) Calculated using 3/1/2017 closing price; (2) Net Debt is a Non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents.

  • Premier acreage
  • Leading growth profile
  • Robust returns
  • Abundant resource upside
  • S

trong financial position

  • Proven execution

Parsley Energy Leasehold

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Investment Highlights

19

SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Expansive, High-quality Drilling Inventory

20 Horizontal Drilling Inventory(1)

+240’

(1) As of end 4Q16 pro forma for acquisitions announced on 1/10/2017 and 2/7/2017, as well as for recently executed acreage trades; Location counts rounded to the nearest ten

  • Pending acquisition adds ~7,300

gross locations across currently counted target intervals

  • S

ignificant inventory upside in Midland Basin with higher well density potential in Wolfcamp and S praberry formations

  • Nearly 600 net Wolfcamp

locations in the S

  • uthern

Delaware Basin have a low average royalty burden of 15%

Parsley Double Eagle Acquisition PE Pro Forma Double Eagle Acquisition Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Wells per Section Midland Basin Middle Spraberry 270 210 720 330 990 540 5-6 Lower Spraberry 460 360 1,040 480 1,500 840 8 Wolfcamp A 710 530 1,180 520 1,890 1,050 8 Wolfcamp B 1,430 1,100 1,710 770 3,140 1,870 8-16 Wolfcamp C 810 620 580 280 1,390 900 8 Cline 710 570 1,180 520 1,890 1,090 8 Atoka 560 440 880 390 1,440 830 6 Delaware Basin 2nd Bone Spring 160 150

  • 160

150 4 3rd Bone Spring 160 150

  • 160

150 4 Wolfcamp 620 580

  • 620

580 16 Total 5,890 4,710 7,290 3,290 13,180 8,000

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Selected Operating Data – 4Q16

21

(1) Average prices shown in the table include transportation and gathering costs and reflect prices both before and after the effects of the Company’s realized commodity hedging transactions. The Company’s calculation of such effects includes both realized gains and losses on cash settlements for commodity derivative transactions and premiums paid or received on options that settled during the period

Three Months Ended Year Ended December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Net production volumes: Oil (MBbls) 2,811 1,462 9,368 4,807 Natural gas (MMcf) 3,812 2,711 13,463 10,339 Natural gas liquids (MBbls) 704 405 2,390 1,500 Total (MBoe) 4,150 2,319 14,002 8,031 Average net daily production (Boe/ d) 45,109 25,207 38,257 22,003 Average sales prices: (1) Oil, without realized derivatives (per Bbl) $ 46.76 $ 39.00 $ 41.34 $ 44.89 Oil, with realized derivatives (per Bbl) $ 49.41 $ 51.30 $ 47.56 $ 56.60 Natural gas, without realized derivatives (per Mcf) $ 2.91 $ 2.17 $ 2.30 $ 2.57 Natural gas, with realized derivatives (per Mcf) $ 2.91 $ 2.25 $ 2.30 $ 2.72 NGLs (per Bbl) $ 19.12 $ 14.48 $ 16.01 $ 15.79 Total, without realized derivatives (per Boe) $ 37.59 $ 29.65 $ 32.60 $ 33.13 Total, with realized derivatives (per Boe) $ 39.39 $ 37.50 $ 36.76 $ 40.33 Average costs (per Boe): Lease operating expenses $ 3.56 $ 5.57 $ 4.23 $ 7.83 Production and ad valorem taxes $ 2.15 $ 1.90 $ 1.99 $ 2.22 Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 15.10 $ 21.74 $ 16.70 $ 22.20 General and administrative expenses (including stock-based compensation) $ 5.61 $ 5.39 $ 6.04 $ 6.89 General and administrative expenses (cash based) $ 4.79 $ 4.41 $ 5.12 $ 5.87

slide-22
SLIDE 22

$0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60

NPV ($MM) Oil Price

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% $40 $45 $50 $55 $60

Rate of Return (% ) Oil Price

Strong Returns Across Portfolio

22 Type Well NPV(1) Type Well Returns(1)

(1) NGL price 40% of WTI; Gas $3/Mcf; Midland Basin: based on 1 MMBoe EUR type curve for 7,000’ stimulated lateral Wolfcamp A/B well; $4.8MM D&C; 100% WI, 75% NRI; $7,500/month fixed LOE; $2.00/BO variable LOE; Southern Delaware: based on 880 MBoe EUR type curve for 7,000’ stimulated lateral upper Wolfcamp well; $6.4MM D&C; 100% WI; $7,500/month fixed LOE; $2.00/BO variable LOE; Estimated ROR and NPV are pre-tax and unhedged

  • Robust well economics support accelerated growth obj ectives
  • Mineral rights produce significant uplift on already compelling S

. Delaware economics

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Double Eagle Acquisition Detail: Upton and Reagan

23

Ham B-1801HS Permian Resources Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 8,193’ 30-day IP: 1,044 Boe/d (85% Oil) Taylor 45-33-4404H Parsley Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 9,802’ 30-day IP: 1,325 Boe/d (84% Oil) (1) John Smoltz 33-30-4407H Parsley Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 7,492’ 30-day IP: 1,257 Boe/d (83% Oil) (1)

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold

Pegasus 3-3911H Concho Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 7,170’ 30-day IP: 1,347 Boe/d (80% Oil) Dusek 45-4-2807H Parsley Lower Spraberry Lateral Length: 10,114’ 30-day IP: 1,019 Boe/d (81% Oil) (1) Atkins 14-11-4202H Parsley Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 7,774’ 30-day IP: 1,634 Boe/d (83% Oil) (1) Morgan 25-26-11H Parsley Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 7,209’ 30-day IP: 1,000 Boe/d (87% Oil) (1) Grace 45-1-4306H Parsley Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 7,802’ 30-day IP: 1,875 Boe/d (83% Oil) (1) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 1

REAGAN UPTON

Note: The above well results are not intended to be representative of results for all wells across this acreage and individual well results may differ materially therefrom; well data from public sources, except as otherwise noted; 30-day IP’s and percent oil are 2-stream; (1) Company data

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Complementary additions to well-known and prolific Parsley acreage position

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Double Eagle Acquisition Detail: Midland and Glasscock

24

Riley B 1807-1WA Diamondback Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 7,173’ 30-day IP: 1,233 Boe/d (83% Oil) Cole Ranch 35-207H Energen Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 9,724’ 30-day IP: 1,067 Boe/d (76% Oil) Daniel SN 7-6 504H Energen Lower Spraberry Lateral Length: 9,897’ 30-day IP: 804 Boe/d (82% Oil)

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold

Pecan Acre 4SH Callon Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 4,644’ 30-day IP: 1,002 Boe/d (84% Oil) Gridiron S017LS Diamondback Lower Spraberry Lateral Length: 9,154’ 30-day IP: 1,502 Boe/d (89% Oil) Willow Lakes 34 SL-392HW Trail Ridge Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: ~5,000’ 30-day IP: 1,148 Boe/d (87% Oil) McClintic 2H Pioneer Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 7,198’ 30-day IP: 1,154 Boe/d (84% Oil) Calverley 9-4-2H RSP Permian Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 9,830’ 30-day IP: 1,577 Boe/d (86% Oil) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 1

GLASSCOCK MIDLAND

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S trong offset operator well performance in all three primary target formations

Note: The above well results are not intended to be representative of results for all wells across this acreage and individual well results may differ materially therefrom; well data from public sources, except as otherwise noted; 30-day IP’s and percent oil are 2-stream; (1) Company data

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Double Eagle Acquisition Detail: Martin and Howard

25

Tackleberry 43-42-1WA SM Energy Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 7,861’ 30-day IP: 2,262 Boe/d (90% Oil) Ripley 10-2 A-15WA SM Energy Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 6,886’ 30-day IP: 984 Boe/d (91% Oil) Talbot A-1SH Legacy Lower Spraberry Lateral Length: 7,704’ 30-day IP: 1,068 Boe/d (90% Oil)

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold

Jones Holton 502H Energen Lower Spraberry Lateral Length: 8,011’ 30-day IP: 1,611 Boe/d (92% Oil) Jones Holton 102H Energen Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 8,243’ 30-day IP: 1,131 Boe/d (93% Oil) Sale Ranch 25C-3H Pioneer Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 7,172’ 30-day IP: 1,398 Boe/d (85% Oil) Willow Lakes East 291H Trail Ridge Wolfcamp B Lateral Length: 8,268’ 30-day IP: 1,149 Boe/d (87% Oil) Waldron Eunice 3108WA Oxy Wolfcamp A Lateral Length: 6,760’ 30-day IP: 1,845 Boe/d (91% Oil) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 1

HOWARD MARTIN

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Robust and still-improving offset well results in emerging portions of the basin

Note: The above well results are not intended to be representative of results for all wells across this acreage and individual well results may differ materially therefrom; well data from public sources, except as otherwise noted; 30-day IP’s and percent oil are 2-stream; (1) Company data