INVESTOR PRESENTATION November 14, 2017 Forward Looking Statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INVESTOR PRESENTATION November 14, 2017 Forward Looking Statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INVESTOR PRESENTATION November 14, 2017 Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward looking information or "forward looking statements" that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward looking


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INVESTOR PRESENTATION November 14, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TSX:DPM

2 This presentation contains “forward looking information” or "forward looking statements" that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward looking information and forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future prices of gold, copper and acid, toll rates, metals exposure and stockpile interest rate deductions, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the realization of mineral estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production and output, costs of production, capital expenditures (including sustaining capex, non-discretionary capex and discretionary capex), costs and timing of the development of new deposits, potential benefits of the rotary furnace installation, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, currency fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation. Often, but not always, forward looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made, and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any other future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements. Such factors include, among others: the actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of current reclamation activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices

  • f gold, copper and acid; possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as

anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining and smelting industries; delays in obtaining governmental approvals

  • r financing or in the completion of development or construction activities, fluctuations in metal prices and toll rates, as well as those risk

factors discussed or referred to in this presentation under and in the Company’s annual information form under the heading "Risk Factors" and other documents filed from time to time with the securities regulatory authorities in all provinces and territories of Canada and available at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements.

Forward Looking Statements

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TSX:DPM

3

Investment Highlights

Operating in mining friendly jurisdictions Strong resource and reserve base High quality, low cost, flagship asset Near term, low cost growth in gold production Growing exploration pipeline Strong balance sheet Strong management team Deeply undervalued

Strong Asset Base, Near Term Growth & Deeply Undervalued

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TSX:DPM

4

Company Overview

Share Price (C$ per share) $2.70 Shares Outstanding – Current 178,460,565 Market Capitalization – Current $380 M 52 week low – high (C$ per share) $1.87 – $3.70 Metals contained in concentrate produced Gold Copper 165,665 oz 38 Mlbs + Krumovgrad starting in Q4 2018 + 85,700 oz/yr AISC/oz Au (1,2) $747 Adjusted EBITDA $73 M Cash $22.0 M Investment portfolio (incl. warrants @ Nov. 10, 2017) $51 M Undrawn RCF $275 M Debt nil

Quick Glance 2016 Production Metrics

Dundee Corporation 20.4% GMT Capital Corporation 11.6% EBRD 9.9% Kopernik Global Advisors 3.5% USAA Asset Mgmt. 3.2%

Strong production with 50% growth starting in 2018 Strong liquidity position Long term shareholders Deeply undervalued

1, 2 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

Share Capital @ November 10, 2017 Liquidity Position (@ September 30, 2017) Top Five Shareholders

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TSX:DPM

5 Timok Gold Project Serbia Tsumeb Smelter Namibia Chelopech Mine Bulgaria Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. Nunavut, Canada Krumovgrad Gold Project Bulgaria

DPM’s Global Portfolio of Assets

Operating assets Development asset Late stage exploration assets Early stage exploration assets

Exploration JV Armenia Khalkos JV Val D’or, Quebec

Chelopech

  • Location: Chelopech, Bulgaria
  • Ownership: 100%
  • 2016 Production: 165,665 oz Au;

38.5 Mlbs Cu

  • Mine Life: 9+ years
  • Operation: Underground

Krumovgrad

  • Location: Southern Bulgaria
  • Ownership: 100%
  • Stage: Construction
  • Production: 100,000 oz (yrs 1-5)
  • Mine life: 8 years
  • Operation: Open pit
  • Commissioning: Q4 2018

Tsumeb

  • Location: Tsumeb, Namibia
  • Ownership: 100%
  • 2016 Concentrate Smelted: 200,000 tonnes
  • Operation: Specialty smelter
  • Location: Serbia
  • Ownership: 100%
  • Stage: Advanced exploration
  • Resource: 1.72 Moz

Timok Sabina Gold & Silver

  • Location: Nunavut, Canada
  • Ownership: 10.4%
  • Stage: Permitting
  • Production: 240,000 Au (yrs 1-8)
  • Operation: Open pit/underground
  • DPM’s equity stake: $51 M
slide-6
SLIDE 6

TSX:DPM

6

Bulgaria…

  • Overview:
  • Uninterrupted operations since 2003
  • Member of the EU since 2007
  • 4th largest gold producer in Europe
  • Stable regulatory environment & government
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 10%
  • Chelopech Royalty Rate: fixed at 1.5% of gross Cu, Au

and Ag metals

  • Krumovgrad Royalty Rate: sliding scale between 1%

and 4% of gross value of the Au and Ag metals

  • GDP Forecast: +2.8% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 5% of the GDP (2016)

Namibia…

  • Overview:
  • Political party stability
  • World’s 5th largest producer of uranium and 9th largest producer
  • f diamonds
  • Ranked in top 10 as Africa’s most attractive countries over last

5 years according to the Fraser Institute

  • Mining companies in the country include Glencore, Rio Tinto,

Anglo American, Paladin Energy, etc.

  • Corporate Tax Rate: 0% as Tsumeb has been granted Export

Processing Zone status

  • GDP Forecast: +5.3% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 11.5% of the GDP (Jan. 2017)

Serbia…

  • Overview:
  • EU candidate since 2012
  • Industry produces primarily copper, iron and steel –

3rd largest copper producer in Europe

  • Industry benefits from high level government support
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 15%
  • GDP Forecast: +3.0% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 2% of the GDP (2013)

Operating in Mining Friendly Jurisdictions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TSX:DPM

7

Strong Resource and Reserve Base

2.0 Moz 0.8 Moz

Proven and probable

Total Gold Ounces

Proven and Probable

Total Copper

1.4 Moz 0.01 Moz 1.7 Moz 3.8 Moz

Measured & Indicated Inferred

Total Gold Ounces

2.8 Moz 398 Mlbs

Measured & Indicated Inferred

Total Copper

2.8 Bnlbs

301 Mlbs

Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech Timok Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech

3.1 Moz

0.14 Moz

Chelopech Tulare Tulare

2.8 Bnlbs

37 Mlbs

4.0 Moz

3, 4, 5, 16 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

TOTAL MINERAL RESERVES (3,5,16) TOTAL MINERAL RESOURCES (4,5.16) Exclusive of Reserves

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TSX:DPM

8

HIGH QUALITY, LOW COST, FLAGSHIP ASSET

Chelopech

Location: Chelopech, Bulgaria Ownership: 100% 2016 Production: 165,665 oz Au; 38.5 Mlbs Cu Mine Life: 9+ years Operation: Underground

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TSX:DPM

9

57 133 196 153 118 99 87 82

300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 50 100 150 200 250 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 9 mos 2017

Cash Cost / tonne of ore processed (US$/t) (6) Ore Mined (Mt)

1.09 1.31 1.81 2.03 2.05 2.04 2.21 2.04-2.20 1.69

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F 9 mos 2017

56 55 46 40 40 37 33 32-36 33

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F 9 mos 2017

Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7) 2006 2015 2016

21.5 21.5 14.1

Total ore mined since 2006 (Mt) Ore Reserve (Mt)

16.3 19.8

Gold price trend

  • Growing throughput in recent years with
  • pportunity to optimize further
  • Continuing to optimize through innovation
  • Strong EBITDA despite lower metal prices
  • Continuing to expand LOM by replacing

reserves

6, 7 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38 Copper price trend (AuEq)

Chelopech – Continually Improving

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TSX:DPM

10

Chelopech Q3 Highlights

139 44 37 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 2017 Guidance

Payable gold in concentrate sold (000s oz) (8)

154-168

Cash cost/oz of gold sold (US$)

Net of by-product credits (8)

610 582 578 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 2017 Guidance

Metals contained in concentrate produced (8)

166 47 53 185-195 38.5 8 8.7 35-39 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 2017 Guidance Gold (000s oz) Copper (Mlbs)

Including payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold

9 mos = 148,000 oz 9 mos = 123,000 oz 580-640 9 mos = 567

  • On track to deliver increased 2017 guidance

(Total gold guidance increased 25,000 ozs in 2017)

8 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

48 9.5 42 541

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TSX:DPM

11

Chelopech – Next Phase of Optimization Underway

Change in mining method 0.5 mtpy 1.0 mtpy

Underground crushing and conveying; “Taking the lid off the mine” 1.0 mtpy 2.0 mtpy

Digital transformation

Phase 1 2003-2008 Phase 2 2009-2014 Phase 3 2015+

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TSX:DPM

12

Chelopech – Near Mine Exploration

Drilling demonstrates excellent potential for hosting additional resources:

  • New zone of breccia

pipes, the favourable host rock for ore, is found over 1500 m & is open to the east

  • Large areas remain

between drilled sections

  • Similar geology, alteration

and style of mineralization to that of the Central and Western orebodies

  • Opens up whole new area
  • ~18,000 m drill program

proposed for 2018-19 to infill existing holes at SEBP zone

  • Additional drilling planned

for Sharlo Dere, Krasta, and Vozdol targets

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TSX:DPM

13

TRANSITIONING TO FREE CASH FLOW

Tsumeb

Location: Tsumeb, Namibia Ownership: 100% 2016 concentrate smelted: 200,000 tonnes Operation: Specialty smelter

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TSX:DPM

14

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018F 2019F 2020F 2021F

(2)

Tsumeb – Increased Stability with Growth Potential

Total Capital Expenditures (US$M)

63 140 130 44 19 8

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 9 mos 2017 2017 Guidance

210- 240 240- 265 196 198 152 159 265- 300 200 300- 370

Production (‘000s tonnes)

Cash cost/t of con smelted (net of by product credits) Third Party con supplied to smelter (000s) Chelopech concentrate supplied to smelter (000s) Potential future capacity

$400-$485 240- 265

Growth Capital Sustaining Capital

sust: 10-15

 Secured processing outlet for Chelopech

  • Growing tolling business to build stand alone

cash flow generating business

  • Focused on stable operations at current

throughput

  • Option to expand to 370k tpa in the future

6, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

9 9 9 9 (6)

Major investment phase complete Major investment phase complete

growth: nil-2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TSX:DPM

15

Tsumeb Smelter Q3 Highlights

Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria

200 42 60 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 2017 Guidance

Complex Concentrate Smelted (‘000s t)

210-240

Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7)

9.7 10.5 3.2 2016 Q2 2017 Q3 2017

Planned shutdown Reduced O2 in Q2 & Q3

(5.0) Q1 2017 11 3.7 0.2 10-15 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 2017 Guidance

Sustaining Capital (US$M)

9 mos = $6.7 M 9 mos = $8.7 M 9 mos = 160

  • Continuing optimization and stability of facility
  • Strong performance in Q2 despite 18 day reduced oxygen
  • Successful commissioning of the new matte holding furnace
  • Transitioning to free cash flow

7 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

58 2.8

slide-16
SLIDE 16

NEAR TERM, LOW COST GROWTH

TSX:DPM

16

Krumovgrad

Location: Southern Bulgaria Ownership: 100% Stage: Construction Production: 103,000 oz (yrs 1-5 avg) Mine life: 8 years Operation: Open pit Commissioning: Q4 2018

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TSX:DPM

17

Krumovgrad – Robust Economics

Project Economics Robust with a 25% After-Tax IRR *

Production and Operating Costs (10, 17) Annual tons processed 775,000 t Gold grade 4.04 g/t Strip ratio 2.6:1 waste:ore (t:t) Annual gold production 85,700 oz Year 1 to 5 average 103,020 oz Annual silver production 38,700 oz Total cash cost per oz AuEq $403 Average Annual EBITDA (7) $66 million Year 1 to 5 average $85 million Construction capital $162 - $168 million NPV (5%) $250 million (adjusted for capital spent) First concentrate production Q4 2018 LOM 8 years

  • High grade low strip ratio open pit gold mine
  • Operating synergies with Chelopech
  • Fully funded with near term production in Q4 2018
  • Krumovgrad is at the key inflection point on the value curve

* @ US$1,250/oz Au

7, 10, 17 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TSX:DPM

18

Krumovgrad – Project Progress

Milestone

Actual/Expected Completion Construction permit RECEIVED AUGUST 9, 2016 Mobilize earthworks contractor to site and commence earthworks Q4 2016 Commence main civil/mechanical/electrical construction Q3 2017 Commissioning and start up Q3 2018 First concentrate production Q4 2018 Construction capital spent (@ September 30, 2017) $54.3 million Percent complete (@ September 30, 2017) 37%

First piece of steel erected onsite Oct 25 Earthworks in the process plant area

Earthworks Progress

Krumovgrad Project Facility Krumovgrad - Before

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TSX:DPM

19

Surnak prospect

KUPEL NORTH Discovery Hole KPDD009 8m at 12.81 ppm Au & 4.95 ppm Ag SKALAK SYNAP KUKLITSA KUPEL SURNAK SURNAK EXPLORATION TARGET (1) Exploration target potential of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t Au ADA TEPE (2) Proven and Probable Reserves Au: 806 Koz at 4.05 g/t Ag: 443 Koz at 2.2g/t

  • Surnak is one of six

registered Commercial Discoveries within the mine concession

  • Located 3 km west of Ada

Tepe

  • Sediment-hosted low

sulphidation epithermal gold veins like Ada Tepe

  • Last explored by DPM in

2004-5: gaps in the drill grid need infill drilling and mineralization not closed off

  • 3500 m diamond drill

program to test extension at Surnak as well as targets at Kupel, Kupel North, and Synap

Krumovgrad – Exploration

Surnak Exploration Target

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria

FUTURE GROWTH PIPELINE

TSX:DPM

ADVANCED EXPLORATION

20

Location: Serbia Ownership: 100% Stage: Advanced exploration Resource: 1.72 Moz

Timok

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TSX:DPM

21

Serbia Advanced Exploration

Timok Gold Project

  • Previously assumed sulphide

resource

  • Reviewing potential for oxides within

previous resource

  • Potential to significantly increase

mineable resource and improve economics

  • Drilling also continues at Korkan West

where a new oxide discovery was made in late 2016 (discovery hole 105m @ 1.21 g/t from surface)

  • Drilling of limestone hosted targets

also planned for 2018

Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au @ 1.54 g/t contained within 34.7 MT Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au @ 1.4 g/t contained within 0.4 MT

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TSX:DPM

22

Serbia Exploration

Timok Gold Project: Korkan West Discovery

KORKAN BIGAR HILL

KW Holes KO Holes

24 17 23 18 26 16 22 19 21 161 160 159

Timok Gold Project (1) Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au at 1.54 g/t Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au at 1.4 g/t KORKAN WEST

  • Near resource target drilled Nov.

2016

  • KW016: 105m at 1.21 g/t gold from

surface

  • Mineralization found over 600m

from KW24 to the KO Holes

  • Almost all reported intervals are
  • xide
  • Hosted by sandstones and

conglomerates – same as Bigar Hill and Korkan

  • High resolution IP survey

completed

  • Drilling resumed at the end of Sept.

2017 to expand zone east and west along strike

  • +3700 m in 2017 with additional

follow up in 2018

slide-23
SLIDE 23

TSX:DPM

23

Additional Upside Potential Through Equity Interests

  • 35km2 of prospective Abitibi geology located 25 km

west of Val d’Or

  • 10 km along strike to the east of the Doyon–

Bousquet-LaRonde gold camp

  • 8 km north of the Canadian Malartic mine
  • Expenditure of $2.5 M within first 3 yrs to earn 51%

with option to increase to 71% following an additional $3.5 M expenditure in the following 3 yrs

  • M&I resource – 5.3M oz Au
  • Inferred resource – 1.85M oz Au
  • Targeting Au production Q1 2021
  • Production of ~240k oz Au/year (yrs 1 through 8)
  • Project permit possible in Q4 2017
  • Value of DPM stake Nov. 1, 2017 = ~$46M

(incl. warrants)

Sabina Gold and Silver Corp. Back River Project, Nunavut DPM Ownership – 10.5% Khalkos Exploration Malartic Property, Quebec Joint Venture

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SUMMARY

TSX:DPM

GROWTH OPTIMIZATION INNOVATION

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TSX:DPM

25

Chelopech

  • Continue to
  • ptimize

performance

  • Digital

transformation

Smelter

  • Continue to
  • ptimize

performance

  • Transition to

free cash flow (Q2)

  • EIA approval
  • Commercial

agreements

  • Decision on

expansion

  • Commence

construction

  • Start ramp-up to
  • perate at expanded

capacity

  • Production at

expanded capacity

Krumovgrad

  • Construction
  • Construction

completion and commissioning (Q3)

  • First concentrate

production (Q4)

  • Ramp-up (Q1)
  • Commercial

production

Timok

  • Drilling of

Korkan West and other targets

  • Korkan West

resource estimate (Q1)

  • Metallurgical work
  • Scoping study
  • Prefeasibility

study

2017 2018 2019 2020

Key Value Generating Catalysts

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TSX:DPM

26

DPM Outlook – A Growing Low Cost Producer

AuEq Production by 2020 >350,000 oz at <$500/oz

715-785 2016 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F 747 750 680 560

All-in Sustaining Cost (US$/oz) (1)

Krumovgrad gold production commences Q4 2018 2016 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F Au Cu Ag

Gold Equivalent Production (000s oz)

(based on metals contained in concentrate produced)

254 377 329 275 278

1, 9, 15 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

25% 49%

15 15 15

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TSX:DPM

27

$1,892 $1,253 $10,473 $3,900 $3,740 $2,942 $2,694 $2,524 $2,355 $1,685 $1,282 $1,135 $1,065

TMAC Guyana Alacer Premier Roxgold Klondex Resolute DPM Argonaut Primero DPM + Krum Teranga Asanko

Deeply Undervalued Investment Opportunity

EV/2017E AdjCF 12 2017E All In Sustaining Costs (US$/oz) 6,12 EV/Reserves ($/oz) 12

(11)(13) (12)(13)

EV/2017E Gold Production ($/oz)

Undervalued on Mineral Reserves… … and Cash Flow … and Production … with AISC in lowest quartile

(13)

6, 11, 12, 13 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

$898 $730 $488 $176 $154 $147 $132 $103 $99 $61 $40

Roxgold Argonaut Klondex Guyana Resolute Premier Alacer DPM Primero Terenga Asanko

$610-$660 $715-$785 $829 $849 $871 $898 $956 $965 $1,020$1,026

$1,166 $1,293

DPM+Krum DPM Alacer Guyana Resolute Roxgold Klondex Argonaut Asanko Terenga Premier Primero

11

5.9x 2.7x 35.7x 21.4x 16.8x 10.9x 9.9x 8.3x 7.8x 7.5x 5.6x 5.6x

Teranga Premier TMAC Guyana Klondex Alacer Resolute Roxgold DPM Asanko Argonaut DPM + Krum

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TSX:DPM

28

Deeply Undervalued Investment Opportunity

Leverage Ratio 12 Debt to Capital P/NAV 12

Stability in operating jurisdictions Tsumeb capital program complete & transitioning to FCF Balance sheet deleveraged Krumovgrad permitting & near term growth DPM valuation

With a strong balance sheet… … and undervalued on P/NAV

Historical concerns have been addressed:

12 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

Roxgold Argonaut Klondex Premier Alacer Guyana Terenga Resolute DPM Primero Asanko

0.98x 0.82x 0.75x 0.64x 0.80x 0.56x 0.56x 0.51x 0.50x 0.51x 0.48x 39% 27% 22% 18% 13% 10% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Roxgold Asanko Guyana Primero Premier Klondex Terenga Argonaut Alacer Resolute DPM

slide-29
SLIDE 29

TSX:DPM

29

 Copper up 26% YTD  Chelopech produces approx. 35 MM lbs of Copper per annum,  Only 2018 hedged currently  Represents another significant value disconnect

03-Jan-17 03-Feb-17 03-Mar-17 03-Apr-17 03-May-17 03-Jun-17 03-Jul-17 03-Aug-17 03-Sep-17 03-Oct-17

DPM gold price Cu price

Deeply Undervalued Investment Opportunity

DPM undervalued compared to Cu & Au performance YTD

Source: DPM price – TMX Infosuite data; Au price – Kitco: London Fix Historical Gold prices; Cu price – CIBC Capital Markets data. All @ Nov. 6, 2017

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TSX:DPM

30

Investment Highlights

Operating in mining friendly jurisdictions Strong resource and reserve base High quality, low cost, flagship asset Near term, low cost growth in gold production Growing exploration pipeline Strong balance sheet Strong management team Deeply undervalued

Strong Asset Base, Near Term Growth & Deeply Undervalued

slide-31
SLIDE 31

THANK YOU

TSX:DPM Corporate Head Office: One Adelaide Street East, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2V9 T: 416 365-5191 Investor Relations T: 416 365-2549 jreid@dundeeprecious.com TSX:DPM www.dundeeprecious.com

30

slide-32
SLIDE 32

APPENDICES

TSX:DPM

31

slide-33
SLIDE 33

TSX:DPM

33

DPM Summary

Chelopech Krumovgrad Subtotal

~$70 MM ACF (1)(2) / yr

$80 MM first 5 yrs ACF (1)(2) / yr (~$65 MM LOM)

~US$150 MM ACF(1)(2) / yr

  • Exploration / mine life extension
  • Consistent track record of reserve

replacement

Sabina Equity (Incl. warrants) $51 M equity value (as at November 10) Tsumeb Timok Other Exploration / Assets Debt

Market Cap: $380 M Share Price: C$2.70

  • Transitioning to FCF positive
  • Delivered ~$10 MM EBITDA in Q2
  • 370 Ktpa potential capacity with

significant operating leverage and modest capital 1.7 MM oz resource in Serbia

  • Exploration
  • Oxide potential

Khalkos JV, Tulare and other Serbian licenses, Armenian JV, Kapan NSR Nil (as at September 30)

  • Exploration on original license

1 Adjusted Cash Flow defined as Cash Flow from Operations less Sustaining Capital Expenditures 2 As per latest NI 43-101 LOM plan at RBC Capital Markets metal price forecast (August 28, 2017)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

TSX:DPM

34

Business Strategy

slide-35
SLIDE 35

TSX:DPM

35

Mineral Resources (4,14,16,17) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech M&I Inferred 12.6 1.8 1.399 0.138 301 37 3.45 2.4 1.08 0.96 Krumovgrad Inferred (Upper Zone) 0.3 0.013 1.31 Timok Indicated Inferred 34.7 0.4 1.720 0.000 1.54 1.4 Tulare Inferred (Kiseljak) Inferred (Yellow Creek) 459.0 88.0 3.000 0.800 2,200 600 0.2 0.3 0.22 0.3 Total Mineral Resources Measured & Indicated Inferred 47.4 549.5 3.119 3.951 301 2,837 Mineral Reserves (4,14,16,17) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech Proven Probable 11.4 8.4 1.075 0.920 232 166 2.92 3.42 0.92 0.90 Krumovgrad Proven (Upper Zone) Proven (Wall) Probable (Upper Zone) Probable (Wall) 1.1 1.5 3.5 0.1 0.124 0.325 0.337 0.020 3.46 6.83 3.00 5.54 Total P&P Mineral Reserves 26.00 2.801 398 3.35

Strong Resources and Reserve Base

4, 14,16,17 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 38

slide-36
SLIDE 36

TSX:DPM

36

2017 Full Year Guidance (@ September 30, 2017)

US millions, unless otherwise indicated Chelopech Tsumeb Consolidated (5) Ore mined/milled (‘000s tonnes) 2,040-2,200

  • 2,040-2,200

Complex concentrate smelted (‘000s tonnes)

  • 210-240

210-240 Metals contained in concentrates produced (1)(2) Gold (‘000s ounces) 185-195

  • 185-195

Copper (million pounds) 35-39

  • 35-39

Payable metals in concentrate sold (2) Gold (‘000s) 154-168

  • 154-168

Copper (million pounds) 33-36

  • 33-36

Cash cost per tonne of ore processed ($) (3)(4) 32-36

  • 32-36

Cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits ($) (3)(4)(5) 580-640

  • 580-640

All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold ($) (3)(4)(5)

  • 715-785

Cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits ($) (3)(4)

  • 400-485

400-485 General & administrative expenses (3)(6)

  • 18-22

Exploration expenses (3)

  • 7-9

Sustaining capital expenditures (3) 13-15 10-15 23-30 Growth capital expenditures (3)

  • 73-81

1) Gold produced includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced of 55,000 to 60,000 ounces and payable gold sold includes payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold of 29,000 to 33,000 ounces. 2) Metals contained in concentrate produced are prior to deductions associated with smelter terms. 3) Based on foreign exchange rates and, where applicable, metal prices that approximate current rates and prices. The assumed copper price reflects the impact of 92% of 2017 payable copper production being hedged at $2.40 per pound. The assumed Euro and ZAR exchange rates reflect the impact of forward foreign exchange contracts. 4) Cash cost per tonne of ore processed, cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold and cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits, have no standardized meaning under GAAP. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of Q2 2017 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS. 5) Includes the treatment charges, transportation and other selling costs related to the sale of pyrite concentrate, and payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold. Cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by- product credits, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $550 and $600 in 2017. All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $715 and $785 in 2017. 6) Excludes mark-to-market adjustments on share-based compensation.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TSX:DPM

37

Hedge Position at September 30, 2017

Year of projected payable copper production Volume Hedged (lbs) % Hedged Average fixed price ($/lb) Balance of 2017 8,135,597 79% $2.40 2018 19,166,966 56% $2.62 QP Commodity Hedged Volume Hedged % Hedged Average fixed price Payable gold 16,880 oz 100% $1,290.62/oz Payable copper 3,659,669 lbs 100% $2.98/lb Payable silver 13,180 oz 100% $17.13/oz Year of projected operating expenses Foreign currency hedged Amount hedged in foreign currency % Hedged Average exchange rate Foreign currency/US$ Balance of 2017 Euro ZAR 2,700,000 180,000,000 19% 43% 1.1365 14.2157 2018 ZAR 475,681,917 29% 13.5909 Commodity Hedged Volume Hedged (oz) % Hedges Average ceiling price Floor Price Payable gold 11,250 27% $1,497/oz $1,200/oz Payable copper 12,698,611 37% $3.32/lb $2.80/lb Year of projected capital expenditures Foreign currency hedged Amount hedged in foreign currency Average exchange rate Foreign currency/US$ Balance of 2017 2018 Euro Euro 24,967,000 56,045,000 1.1175 1.1429

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TSX:DPM

38

Footnotes and Disclaimers

1. AISC per ounce of gold represents cost of sales at Chelopech less depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items plus treatment charges, penalties, transportation and other selling costs, sustaining capital expenditures, rehabilitation related to accretion expenses and an allocated portion of the Company’s G&A expenses less by-product revenues in respect of copper and silver including realized gains on copper derivative contracts divided by the payable gold in copper and pyrite concentrates sold. Based on metals prices that approximate current rates. The assumed copper prices reflect the impact of 92% of payable copper hedged at $2.40/lb in 2017 and 53% of payable copper hedged at $2.62/lb in 2018. 2. Chelopech figures as per 2016 public filings; AISC includes gold production in pyrites 3. Effective dates for Reserves – contained in the 2016 Annual Information form dated March 28, 2017 for the year ended December 31, 2016 4. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves 5. See slide 34 in Appendix for detailed Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates 6. A non-GAAP measure. Refer to the “non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the Q2 2017 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS 7. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before income tax plus depreciation and amortization, finance costs, impairment charges, unrealized losses/gains on derivative contracts and investments at fair value, minus interest income 8. Includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced 9. Forecast/guidance information is subject to a number of risks. 2017F is based on guidance issued in February 2017 and 2018 to 2020 forecast data is based on the completion of several growth projects within currently contemplated time frames. See “Forward Looking Statements” on slide 2 10. Krumovgrad figures as per latest NI 43-101 11. Source DPM Guidance midpoint, issued July 27, 2017 12. Source RBC Capital Markets, October 30, 2017; DPM balance sheet as at June 30, 2017 13. Includes DPM 2017E plus Krumovgrad LOM average as per June 6, 2016 press release using RBC Capital Markets’ metal prices 14. Contained in the 2016 Annual Information Form dated March 28, 2017 15. Based on Au of $1,250/oz, Cu of $2.75/lb, Euro/US$ = 1.09 and US$/ZAR = 13.00 16. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for Chelopech and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by Petya Kuzmanova, MIMMM, CSci, Senior Resource Geologist,

  • f the Company, under the guidance of CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed

and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Malcolm Titley, BSc, MAIG, Principal Consultant of CSA, Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the Company, and as relates to Mineral Reserves, Karl van Olden, BSc (Eng), GDE, MBA, FAusIMM, Mining Manager of CSA. Malcolm Titley, Ross Overall and Karl van Olden are Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101 and are independent of the company, with the exception of Mr. Overall who is not independent of the company. Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the company, who is a QP, as defined under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. 17. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for the Krumovgrad project and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Galen White, BSc (Hons) FAusIMM FGS, Director and Principal Consultant of CSA, and Julian Bennett, BSc ARSM FIMMM CEng, as relates to Mineral Reserves. Both Galen White and Julian Bennett are independent Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101. The NI 43-101 technical report (the “Krumovgrad Technical Report”) entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017, in respect of the study for the construction and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project disclosed herein, was filed November 7, 2017 on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Simon Meik, former Corporate Director Processing of the Company, and Edgar Urbaez, formerly Corporate Director, Technical Services, both of DPM, who are QPs and not independent of the Company, have reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained herein may be subject to legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of such Mineral Resources. See the Krumovgrad Technical Report for more information with respect to the key assumptions, parameters, methods and risks of determination associated with the foregoing Mineral Resource estimates. Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Mineral Resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities

  • laws. The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in NI 43-101 and recognized by Canadian securities laws but are not defined terms under the U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (“SEC Guide 7”) or recognized under U.S. securities laws. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be upgraded to mineral reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever by upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Accordingly, these mineral resource estimates and related information may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, including SEC Guide 7. Slide 19 – Krumovgrad Exploration 1 Previous exploration work at the Surnak Prospect, which includes over 10,800 metres of trenching and drilling, has been used to outline an exploration target of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t

  • Au. The exploration target potential was derived upon review of historic Mineral Resource estimates at Surnak, in combination with ongoing development of the 3D geologic model at Surnak. The potential ranges of tonnes and grade are

conceptual in nature are based on previous drill results that defined the approximate length, thickness, depth and grade of the portion of the historic Mineral Resource estimate. There has been insufficient exploration to define a current Mineral Resource and the company cautions that there is a risk further exploration will not result in the delineation of a current Mineral Resource. 2 For more information regarding the company’s current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, please refer to Dundee Precious Metals Annual Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement as at December 31, 2016 contained in our Annual Information Form, dated March 28, 2017, which is available on our website at http://www.dundeeprecious.com. Slide 22 – Serbia Exploration – Korkan West discovery For more information regarding the company’s current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, please refer to Dundee Precious Metals Annual Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement as at December 31, 2016 contained in our Annual Information Form, dated March 28, 2017, which is available on our website at http://www.dundeeprecious.com.