INVESTOR PRESENTATION 1Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor presentation 1q 2017 forward looking statements
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 1Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 1Q 2017 Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the S afe Harbor Provisions


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INVESTOR PRESENTATION 1Q 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements

Forward-Looking Statements The information in this presentation includes “ forward-looking statements” that are made pursuant to the S afe Harbor Provisions of the Private S ecurities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, proj ected costs, prospects, plans and obj ectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, the words “ could,” “ believe,” “ anticipate,” “ intend,” “ estimate,” “ expect,” “ proj ect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on Parsley Energy, Inc.’ s (“ Parsley Energy,” “ Parsley,” or the “ Company” ) current expectations and assumptions about future event s and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subj ect to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of oil and natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating reserves and in proj ecting future rates of production, the production potential of our undeveloped acreage, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures and the risk factors discussed in or referenced in our filings with the United S tates S ecurities and Exchange Commission (“ S EC” ), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. Our production forecasts and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the undertaking and

  • utcome of future drilling activity, which may be affected by significant commodity price declines or cost increases.

Industry and Market Data This presentation has been prepared by Parsley and includes market data and other statistical information from third-party sources, including independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. Although Parsley believes these third-party sources are reliable as of their respective dates, Parsley has not independently verified the accuracy

  • r completeness of this information. S
  • me data are also based on Parsley’ s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the third-party sources described

above. Oil & Gas Reserves This presentation provides disclosure of Parsley’ s proved reserves, which are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible— from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions (using unweighted average 12-month first day of the month prices), operating methods, and government regulations— prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. In this presentation, proved reserves attributable to Parsley as of 12/ 31/ 16 are estimated utilizing S EC reserve recognition standards and pricing assumptions based on S EC pricing, as adj usted for market differentials, transportation fees, and quality, of $39.36 / Bbl crude, $2.23 / Mcf gas, and $15.03/ Bbl NGL. References to our estimated proved reserves as of 12/ 31/ 16 are derived from our proved reserve report audited by Netherland, S ewell & Associates, Inc. (“ NS AI” ). We may use the t erm “ expected ultimate recoveries” (“ EURs” ) or other descriptions of volumes of reserves, which terms include quantities of oil and gas that may not meet t he S EC’ s definitions of proved, probable and possible reserves, and which the S EC's guidelines strictly prohibit Parsley from including in filings with the S

  • EC. Unless otherwise stated in this presentation, such estimates have

been prepared internally by our engineers and management without review by independent engineers. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subj ect to substantially greater risk of being actually realized, particularly in areas or zones where there has been limited or no drilling history. We include these estimates to demonstrate what we believe to be the potential for future drilling and production by the Company. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from our properties will differ substantially. In addition, we have made no commitment to drill all of the drilling locations. Ultimate recoveries will be dependent upon numerous factors including actual encountered geological conditions, the impact of future oil and gas pricing, exploration and development costs, and our future drilling decisions and budgets based upon our future evaluation of risk, returns and the availability of capital and, in many areas, the outcome of negotiation of drilling arrangements with holders of adj acent or fractional interest leases. Our estimates may change significantly as development of our properties provides additional data and therefore actual quantities that may ultimately be recovered will likely differ from these estimates. Our related expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rat es from existing wells, the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity and activity that may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases. Unless otherwise noted, Net Present Value (“ NPV” ) estimates are before taxes and assume the Company generated EUR and decline curve estimates based on Company drilling and completion cost estimates that do not include facilities, land, seismic, general and administrative (“ G&A” ) or other corporate level costs.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Sustained Production Momentum

  • Raising FY17 and 4Q17 production guidance

ranges following strong first quarter growth

  • 1Q17 daily net production up 21%

versus 4Q16 and 88% Y/ Y

  • S

harp production traj ectory in 2017, culminating in estimated 4Q17 production of 78.0 – 88.0 MBoe/ d

  • 16%

compound quarterly production growth rate over twelve quarters as a public company(1)

(1) Parsley completed its initial public offering on May 29, 2014

Quarterly Production Trajectory Production Guidance (Net MBoe/d)

62 - 68 65 - 71 75 - 85 78 - 88 2017E (Previous) 2017E (Updated) 4Q17E (Previous) 4Q17E (Updated) 9.2 54.8 78.0 - 88.0 20 40 60 80 100 MBoe/d Net Production (MBoe/d)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Margin Expansion

$14.38 $20.74 $16.14 $17.77 $10.44 $22.10 $21.68 $27.09 $30.63

$9.63 $9.12 $7.63 $5.57 $5.25 $4.37 $4.15 $3.56 $3.57 $5.77 $5.91 $6.86 $4.41 $6.25 $4.28 $5.40 $4.79 $4.02 $2.64 $2.68 $1.75 $1.90 $1.58 $1.97 $2.12 $2.15 $2.26

$32.42 $38.45 $32.38 $29.65 $23.52 $32.72 $33.35 $37.59 $40.48 0% 30% 60% 90% $0.00 $15.00 $30.00 $45.00

1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17

Cash Margin (%

  • f Realized $/Boe)

$/Boe Cash Margin ($/ Boe) LOE ($/Boe) Cash G&A ($/Boe) Production & Ad Valorem Taxes ($/ Boe) Realizations ($/Boe) (unhedged) Cash Margin (%

  • f Realized $/ Boe)

Cash Margin Expansion

$3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 Peers PE

LOE vs. Peers ($/Boe)(1)

(1) Peers include CPE, CXO, EGN, FANG, LPI, PXD, and RSPP. Source: company SEC filings; (2) Cash margin is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as average sales price without realized derivatives less LOE, cash G&A, and production and ad valorem taxes; (3) Cash G&A is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as general and administrative expense less stock-based compensation expense

$3.57

  • S

ignificant margin expansion driven by favorable trends in realizations and

  • perating costs
  • Increasing oil volume as percent of total

production

  • Reduced transport costs with more oil
  • n pipe
  • Peer-leading LOE per BOE(1), with

automated well control and advantaged water sourcing and disposal costs

(3) (2)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(2) Days of Production Midland Delaware

(1) 3-stream; Normalized for downtime; Average IP30s and IP30s per 1,000’ reflect unweighted average of well set; (2) Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime; (3) Number of wells achieving a 30-day IP since 4Q16 quarterly update

Robust and Improving Well Results

Midland Delaware Wells(3) 18 1 Average Lateral Length 8,213’ 6,374’ 30-day IP (Boe/d) 1,429 1,686 30-day IP per 1,000’ (Boe/d) 180 265 % Oil 71% 62%

1Q17 Well Summary(1)

  • Consistently strong well results across acreage

footprint and well vintage

  • Length-normalized productivity improving even

as lateral lengths increase

163 167 171 180 6,800 7,100 7,300 8,200 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 135 145 155 165 175 185 2H15 1H16 2H16 1Q17 Stimulated Lateral Length (Ft.) IP30 per 1000' (Boe/d)

Midland Basin Normalized IP30s(1) 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Consolidating Acquired Acreage

  • Acreage trades increasing value of acquired

assets

  • Trading out of non-operated properties with

low working interest into operated properties with high working interest

  • ~35%

average working interest on acreage traded away

  • ~85%

average working interest on acreage traded for

  • Recent trades added ~155 net operated

locations with an average lateral length of ~7,000’ and extended ~70 net existing locations by ~4,000’ on average

  • Net of assets traded away, recent trades

added more than 900,000 net lateral feet to Parsley’s horizontal drilling inventory, equivalent to ~3,600 premium net acres with four target intervals

Midland Basin Acreage Trades

Leasehold Acquired via Trade Leasehold Traded Away Parsley Energy Leasehold HOWARD GLASSCOCK MIDLAND MARTIN UPTON REAGAN

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 10 20 30 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Daily Production (Boe/d)(1) Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B L Spraberry

(1) 3-stream

Rapid Integration Program

First Martin County 3-Well Pad Posting Impressive Rates

  • S

t rong result s from, and act ive plan for, newly acquired asset s

  • Planning for 30+ well spuds across acquired acreage in 2017
  • First 3-well pad complet ed in sout heast Mart in Count y

delivering impressive result s from all t hree t arget int ervals

  • 1.5-mi lat erals t arget ing t he Lower S

praberry, Wolfcamp A, and Wolfcamp B averaging 1,300+ Boe/ d each

230’ 260’

Lower S pby WC A WC B WC C Dean

400’ 200’

S t rain Ranch Type Log

Strain Ranch 3-well Pad

2017 Planned Operated Pads on Acquired Acreage

Parsley Leasehold

Active Development of Acquired Assets

MARTIN MIDLAND UPTON GLASSCOCK REAGAN HOWARD

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

25 50 75 100 125 150 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Cumulative Production (MBoe)(1) Days on Production

Dusek 45-4-2807H Currie Neal 47-2811H Strain Ranch 12-13-2815H

Jul 2016 Jan 2017 Mar 2017

(1) 3-stream; Normalized to 7,000’ stimulated lateral and for downtime

Ramping up Lower Spraberry Development

Strengthening Lower Spraberry Results

  • Impressive Lower S

praberry result s across Midland Basin acreage posit ion

  • Increased product ivit y on each successive Lower S

praberry well

  • Healt hy rat es, high oil cut s, and relat ively low drilling

cost s yield at t ractive economics

  • Approximat ely 30 Lower S

praberry wells planned for next t welve mont hs

  • Ext ensive inventory wit h ~1,500 locat ions and upside

pot ent ial from t ight er lateral spacing and mult iple landing zones

POP Dat e

Strain Ranch 12-13-2815H Dusek 45-4-2807H Currie Neal 47-2811H

Parsley Leasehold MARTIN MIDLAND GLASSCOCK HOWARD UPTON REAGAN

Encouraging Lower Spraberry Results Span Midland Basin Acreage

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

50 100 150 200 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 20 40 60 Cumulative Production (MBoe) Daily Production (Boe/d) Days of Production

Emerging Wolfcamp C Play

  • Taylor Wolfcamp C well in Reagan County among the most

prolific Midland Basin wells on record through first 60 days, recovering more than 100,000 barrels of oil(1)

  • S

everal additional Wolfcamp C wells planned in 2017

  • Wolfcamp C landing zone is discrete new target, ~600’ below

Lower Wolfcamp B landing zone

  • Wolfcamp C play fairway characterized by:
  • 600-1,200’ gross thickness
  • S

ubstantial reservoir pressure

  • Favorable thermal maturity
  • S

ignificant resource potential

  • Recent acquisitions have supplemented substantial Wolfcamp C

inventory, with more than 900 locations in the fairway of the play

First Wolfcamp C Well Outpacing 1 MMBoe Type Curve by ~95%

(2)

NW SE

Wolfcamp C Interval

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DEAN WC A WC B WC C CLINE S TRAWN DEAN WC A WC B WC C CLINE ~1,200’ ~400’ (1) Normalized for downtime; (2) 3-stream; Normalized for downtime

Wolfcamp C Fairway

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Glasscock Nose CBP

Increasing GOR and decreasing reservoir pressure to southeast (red arrows) WC C Play Fairway Taylor 45-33-4601H

MARTIN MIDLAND UPTON HOWARD GLAS S COCK REAGAN

200’ 400’ 600’ 800’ 1,000’ 1,200’

1,200’

10 mi.

GROS S THICKNES S

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 30 60 90 120 150 180 Oil Cut % Days of Production 2-Stream 3-Stream

Impressive Production Trends in Northwest Pecos County

  • Parsley setting the pace for long-lateral development in the

S

  • uthern Delaware Basin
  • S

trong length-normalized production as lateral lengths increased, affirming robust long-lateral capital efficiency

  • All Trees Ranch laterals among the top-20 company

highest in terms of 180-day oil production per 1000’

  • Trees Ranch wells averaging 86%
  • il(1) after 180 days of

production

  • Currently targeting three distinct Wolfcamp flow units on

Trees Ranch acreage and expect to drill across much of the position over coming months

(1) 2-stream; (2) Normalized for downtime

Consistently Strong Normalized Rates Across Lateral Lengths(2)

Parsley Energy Leasehold 2017 Wells Planned or In Progress

17.7 16.4 16.8 81 128 166 50 100 150 200 5 10 15 20

1-mi: Trees 16-1H 1.5-mi: Trees 65-64-4307H & 65-36-4307H Avg 2-mi: Trees 14-15-4301H

180-Day Cumulative Oil Prod. (MBo) 180-Day Cumulative Oil Prod. / 1000' (MBo)

Strong, Stable Oil Cuts in Pecos County

Completed Horizontal Wells

PECOS

Trees Ranch 2017 Development Program

Completed Vertical Wells

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Healthy financial position supports accelerated

development program

  • More than $1.6 billion of pro forma liquidity
  • Fully undrawn borrowing base of $1.4 billion, with

company-elected commitment of $1.0 billion

  • Favorable maturity schedule, with earliest notes

maturity in 2024

  • In February, Moody’s upgraded Parsley’s Corporate

Family Rating to B1 from B2

Strong Financial Position

Favorable Debt Maturity Schedule

$1,000

$650 $450

$1,400 $400 $1,100 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ($MM) Borrowing Base Senior Notes

Committed Amount Borrowing Base 1H25 2H25

(1) As of end 1Q17; (2) As of end 1Q17 pro forma for closing of Double Eagle acquisition on April 20, 2017 and entry into the Third Amendment to Parsley’s Revolving Credit Agreement on April 28, 2017; (3) Committed portion; Net of letters of credit which do not change the status of the Company’s fully undrawn commitment amount

Liquidity Summary

$598 $997 $1,917 $616 $2,514 $1,613 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 As Reported Pro Forma ($MM) First lien credit facility Cash on hand

(1) (2) (3)

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Substantial Oil Hedge Position

  • Increased oil hedge position

in view of anticipated production growth

  • More than 80%
  • f consensus
  • il volumes hedged in 2H17

with substantial protection in place in 2018

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 WTI ($/Bbl) MBbls/d MBbls/d Hedged Weighted Average Long Put Price

Hedge positions as of 5/4/2017; (1) When the NYMEX price is above the put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price. When the NYMEX price is between the put price and the short put price, Parsley receives the put price. When the NYMEX price is below the short put price, Parsley receives the NYMEX price plus the difference between the short put price and the put price; (2) Functions similarly to put spreads except that when the index price is at or above the call price, Parsley receives the call price; (3) Premium realizations represent net premiums paid (including deferred premiums), which are recognized as income or loss in the period of settlement; (4) When the NYMEX price is above the call price, Parsley receives the call price. When the NYMEX is below the put price, Parsley receives the put price. When the NYMEX price is between the call and put prices, Parsley receives the NYMEX price; (5) Parsley receives the strike price; (6) Parsley receives the swap price; (7) Excludes swaps

Oil Volumes Hedged(7)

2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 Put Spreads (MBbls/ d)

1

10.4 35.7 45.5 26.7 26.4 26.1 26.1 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $53.10 $52.66 $52.80 $52.81 $51.88 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/ Bbl) $38.10 $41.80 $41.95 $41.88 $41.88 $40.00 $40.00 Three Way Collars (MBbls/ d)

2

13.3 19.8 31.0 31.0 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 Call Price ($/ Bbl) $74.38 $75.28 $75.65 $75.65 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 $80.40 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Short Put Price ($/ Bbl) $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Premium Realization ($MM)

3

($4.8) ($14.2) ($17.8) ($13.0) ($11.5) ($10.8) ($10.8) ($1.5) ($1.5) ($1.5) ($1.5) Collars (MBbls/ d)

4

1.5 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Short Call Price ($/ Bbl) $56.15 $59.73 $59.98 $60.41 $60.41 $60.41 $60.41 Put Price ($/ Bbl) $47.00 $46.75 $46.75 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 $45.67 Swaps (MBbls/ d)

5

1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 St rike Price ($/ Bbl) $53.42 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 Total MBbls/ d Hedged 12.9 40.2 50.0 43.5 49.7 60.6 60.6 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 Mid-Cush Basis Swaps (MBbls/ d)

6

11.3 16.7 16.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Swap Price ($/ Bbl) ($1.00) ($1.00) ($1.00) ($0.91) ($0.91) ($0.91) ($0.91)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Updated 2017 Guidance

Unit Costs LOE ($/Boe) $4.00 - $4.75 $3.50 - $4.50 Cash G&A ($/Boe) $4.50 - $5.25 $4.00 - $5.00 Production & Ad Valorem Taxes (%

  • f Revenue)

6.5 - 7.5% 6.0 - 7.0% Capital Program Drilling & Completion ($MM) $840 - $960 $840 - $960 Infrastructure & Other ($MM) $160 - $190 $160 - $190 Total Development Expenditures ($MM) $1,000 - $1,150 $1,000 - $1,150 % Non-Operated 3 – 5% Activity Gross Operated Horizontal Completions Midland Basin Delaware Basin Average Lateral Length 130 – 150 95 – 105 35 – 45 ~8,000’ 130 – 150 95 – 105 35 – 45 ~8,000’ Gross Operated Vertical Completions 5 - 10 5 - 10 Average Working Interest 85 – 95% 85 – 95% Production Annual Net Production (MBoe/d) % Oil 4Q17 Net Production (MBoe/d) 2017E (Previous) 62 – 68 68 – 73% 75 – 85 2017E (Updated) 65 - 71 68 – 73% 78 - 88

  • Poised for efficient production growth
  • Increasing FY17 and 4Q17 production

guidance

  • Decreasing operating cost estimates
  • No change to capital budget

Quarterly Completion Cadence

Midland Basin Delaware Basin Capital Allocation (%

  • f 2017E capex)

60 – 70% 30 – 40%

2017E Capital Allocation

22 25 - 35 35 - 45 40 - 50 1Q17 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E

Gross Operated Horizontal Completions

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Parsley Energy Investment Summary

Market Snapshot Premier Permian Position

NYSE Symbol: PE Market Cap: $9,487 MM(1) Net Debt: $884 MM(2) Enterprise Value: $10,371 MM Share Count: 314 MM Permian Basin Net Leasehold Acreage: ~230,000 Midland Basin: ~178,000 Delaware Basin: ~52,000 Permian Basin Net Royalty Acreage: ~7,000 1Q17 Net Production: 54.8 MBoe/d

Note: All data as of end 1Q17 pro forma for closing of Double Eagle acquisition on April 20, 2017; (1) Calculated using 5/3/2017 closing price; (2) Net Debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents.

  • Premier acreage
  • Leading growth profile
  • Robust returns
  • Abundant resource upside
  • S

trong financial position

  • Proven execution

Parsley Energy Leasehold

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Investment Highlights SUPPLEMENTARY SLIDES

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 Midland Basin Operators(2)

Top Midland Basin Well Performance

Average Gross Revenue per Lateral Foot in First Six Months ($)(1)

Parsley Energy

  • Parsley has the highest average gross revenue per lateral foot among select Midland

Basin operators, reflecting strong production rates and favorable product mix

  • Broadly distributed well set indicates consistent acreage quality and operational

excellence

(1) Sources: IHS, FBR & Co. Midland Basin: Operator Productivity and Location Analysis dated April 19, 2017; Assumes realized oil price of $50/Bbl and realized natural gas price of $3.00/Mcf; based on first six months of production data for wells with first production between August 2015 – July 2016; (2) Midland Basin operators include Apache, Approach, Broad Oak Energy, Callon, Chevron, Concho, ConocoPhillips, CrownQuest, Diamondback, Discovery Resources, Elevation Resources, Encana, Endeavor Energy, Energen, EP Energy, ExxonMobil, Forge Energy, Henry Resources, Laredo, Legacy Reserves, Occidental, Parsley Energy, Permian Resources, Pioneer, PT Petroleum, QEP, RSP Permian, SM Energy, Summit Petroleum, Surge Energy, and W&T Offshore

Parsley Wells Included in Analysis

Parsley Energy Leasehold Wells Online 8/2015 – 7/2016 MIDLAND GLASSCOCK UPTON REAGAN

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Robust Well Economics

Midland Basin Drilling & Completion Costs ($/Lateral Ft.)

$40 WTI

$1,034 $918 $905 $765 $784 $708 $659 $675 $758 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 $0 $300 $600 $900 $1,200 $1,500 Average Lateral Length (Ft.) D&C Costs ($/Lateral Ft.)

$60 WTI $50 WTI

$0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% $5.0 MM D&C $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C ROR NPV $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% $5.0 MM D&C $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C ROR NPV $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 0% 40% 80% 120% 160% 200% $5.0 MM D&C $5.5 MM D&C $6.0 MM D&C ROR NPV Current D&C Costs

  • S

trong well economics would remain compelling even with lower oil prices and/ or higher costs

  • Drilling and completion costs remain

favorable; 1Q17 D&C costs per foot impacted by increased R&D spending and lower average lateral lengths

Midland Basin ROR and NPV Sensitivities

Note: Economics based on 1 MMBoe type curve; NGL price 40% of WTI; Gas $3/Mcf

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Shale Scale in the Midland Basin Core

Midland Basin Acreage

  • On April 20, closed acquisit ion of acreage and associat ed

asset s from Double Eagle Energy Permian LLC

  • ~71,000 net leasehold acres
  • ~3,600 net Boe/ d as of January 1, 2017
  • 23 drilled uncomplet ed wells
  • ~3,300 net horizont al drilling locat ions, including ~1,800

net locat ions in high priorit y t arget int ervals (Lower S praberry, Wolfcamp A, Wolfcamp B)

  • S

t rat egic acquisition enhances qualit y, scale, and scope of Midland Basin acreage portfolio

  • All dept h right s across maj orit y of acquired acreage
  • Most ly operated wit h non-op acreage mainly dist ribut ed

around t he perimet er of acquisition foot print; average 25% working int erest on non-op acreage

  • Asset s concent rat ed in oil-rich basin core wit h st rong offset

well performance in all areas

  • S

ignificant foot print expansion increases operat ional capacit y, t ranslat ing t o a st ronger-for-longer growt h profile

  • Incremental value pot ent ial t hrough ongoing asset evolut ion

and high-grading pot ent ial

MIDLAND GLASSCOCK UPTON REAGAN MARTIN HOWARD IRION DAWSON BORDEN ECTOR ANDREWS CRANE GAINES

Acquisition Summary

Gross / Net Leasehold Acreage ~167,000 / ~71,000 Gross / Net Hz Drilling Locations ~7,300 / ~3,300 Percent Net Locations Operated ~80% Consideration ~$1.4 B cash & ~39.8 MM shares(1)

Parsley Energy Leasehold Acquired Leasehold: Operated Acquired Leasehold: Non-Op (1) LLC Units and shares of Class B common stock STERLING MITCHELL

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Gross Net Wells per Section Midland Basin Middle Spraberry 990 560 5 / 6 Lower Spraberry 1,490 860 8 Wolfcamp A 1,870 1,070 8 Wolfcamp B 3,180 1,860 8 / 16(2) Wolfcamp C 1,470 920 8 Cline 1,910 1,120 8 Atoka 1,460 860 6 Delaware Basin 2nd Bone Spring 160 150 4 3rd Bone Spring 160 150 4 Wolfcamp 620 580 16(2) Total 13,310 8,130

Expansive, High-quality Drilling Inventory

Horizontal Drilling Inventory(1)

+240’

(1) As of end 1Q17 pro forma for Double Eagle acquisition closed 4/20/17 as well as for recently executed acreage trades; Location counts rounded to the nearest ten; (2) 16 wells per section reflects two landing zones; (3) Priority target zones include Lower Spraberry, Wolfcamp A, Wolfcamp B, and Delaware Wolfcamp

  • Extensive inventory of premium drilling locations provides

visibility to years of high-return production growth

  • S

ubstantial inventory upside in Midland Basin with higher well density potential in Wolfcamp and S praberry formations

  • Nearly 600 net Wolfcamp locations in the S
  • uthern Delaware

Basin with a low average royalty burden of 15%

  • Double Eagle acquisition boosted priority net locations by

more than 70% , significantly increasing peak production potential

2,520 4,360 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Before Double Eagle Wit h Double Eagle Net Locat ions in Priorit y Target Zones(3)

Double Eagle Net Inventory Uplift +73%

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

$26.73 $8.04 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 2015 2016

$ / Boe

55 91 124 222 50 100 150 200 250 2013 2014 2015 2016

Robust Reserve Growth

  • Proved reserves up 80%

Y/ Y (oil up 85% Y/ Y) despite writing off remaining ~18 MMBoe of vertical PUD reserves

  • S

trong organic reserve replacement ratio of approximately 680%

(1)

  • PD F&D down 70%

Y/ Y to $8.04/ Boe(2) Strong Growth in Proved Reserves

Total Proved Reserves (MMBoe)

Oil (MMBbl) Gas (Bcf) NGL (MMBbl) Total (MMBoe) PDP 59.3 121.8 23.7 103.3 PDNP 1.9 2.2 0.6 2.8 PUD 75.4 99.7 24.2 116.2 Total Proved 136.6 223.7 48.5 222.3

124

  • 14
  • 4
  • 7

24 99 222

  • 50

50 100 150 200 250

YE15 Prod. Rev. Divest. Acq. Adds YE16

Note: Reserve summary as of 12/31/2016 and audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.; Data for Parsley only; not pro forma for pending acquisitions; (1) Organic reserve replacement ratio calculated as total 2016 reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing) divided by total 2016 production; excludes acquisitions and divestitures; (2) PD F&D calculated as total 2016 Capex (including Infrastructure and Other) divided by total 2016 proved developed reserves additions and revisions (technical and pricing); excludes acquisitions and divestitures

Compelling PD F&D Costs(2)

+80% +300%

  • 70%

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Selected Operating Data – 1Q17

(1) Average prices shown in the table include transportation and gathering costs and reflect prices both before and after the effects of the Company’s realized commodity hedging transactions. The Company’s calculation of such effects includes both realized gains and losses on cash settlements for commodity derivative transactions and premiums paid or received on options that settled during the period

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

  • Dec. 31, 2016

March 31, 2016 Net production volumes: Oil (MBbls) 3,394 2,811 1,731 Natural gas (MMcf) 4,419 3,812 2,944 Natural gas liquids (MBbls) 800 704 425 Total (MBoe) 4,931 4,150 2,647 Average net daily production (Boe/ d) 54,789 45,109 29,088 Average sales prices:(1) Oil, without realized derivatives (per Bbl) $ 50.01 $ 46.76 $ 30.06 Oil, with realized derivatives (per Bbl) $ 48.52 $ 49.41 $ 46.73 Natural gas, without realized derivatives (per Mcf) $ 2.82 $ 2.91 $ 1.88 Natural gas, with realized derivatives (per Mcf) $ 2.80 $ 2.91 $ 1.88 NGLs (per Bbl) $ 21.77 $ 19.12 $ 11.04 Total, without realized derivatives (per Boe) $ 40.48 $ 37.59 $ 23.52 Total, with realized derivatives (per Boe) $ 39.44 $ 39.39 $ 34.42 Average costs (per Boe): Lease operating expenses $ 3.57 $ 3.56 $ 5.25 Production and ad valorem taxes $ 2.26 $ 2.15 $ 1.58 Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 13.99 $ 15.10 $ 18.66 General and administrative expenses (including stock-based compensation) $ 4.88 $ 5.61 $ 7.29 General and administrative expenses (cash based) $ 4.02 $ 4.79 $ 6.25

21