Investor With great opportunity comes great responsibility Lisa - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor With great opportunity comes great responsibility Lisa - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Era of the Investor With great opportunity comes great responsibility Lisa Hunt @ LisaKidd Hunt May 8, 2018 /lisa-hunt-schwab #0518-8FX7 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab), Member SIPC offers brokerage services and products. The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Era of the Investor

With great opportunity comes great responsibility

Lisa Hunt May 8, 2018

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (Schwab), Member SIPC offers brokerage services and products. The information provided here is for general informational purposes
  • nly and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice.
#0518-8FX7

@LisaKiddHunt

/lisa-hunt-schwab

slide-2
SLIDE 2 Charles Schwab

Q1 New Jobs: 616K

  • January: 200K
  • February: 313K
  • March: 103K

Consumer Confidence 128.7

NFIB Small Business Optimism Index March: 104.7 Wages Unemployment 4.1%

Layoffs

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 4.6.18; National Federation of Independent Business,4.18; Bureau of Economic Analysis,4.27.18; Conference Board Report, 4.24.18; Reuters, U.S. trade deficit narrows on exports; jobs market tightening, 5.3.18

Q4-17 2.9% Q1-18 2.3%

GDP

16th month in top 5% of 45 years of surveys

slide-3
SLIDE 3 Charles Schwab

Data, Value & Innovation

slide-4
SLIDE 4 Charles Schwab

“A client’s last best experience anywhere is their new minimum expectation everywhere.”

slide-5
SLIDE 5 Charles Schwab
slide-6
SLIDE 6 Charles Schwab
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Charles Schwab

Modern Experiences + (Price)(Value)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone

  • r something
slide-9
SLIDE 9 Charles Schwab

Edelman is unaffiliated with Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

slide-10
SLIDE 10 27 24 23 20 19 17 13 12 10 9 9 8 7 7 5 3 3
  • 2
  • 3
  • 10
  • 10
  • 13
  • 13
  • 17
  • 17
  • 21
  • 37
China UAE
  • S. Korea
Sweden Malaysia Poland Turkey Spain Russia Ireland Indonesia Mexico Japan Argentina Hong Kong The Netherlands Germany France U.K. Canada Singapore Australia Colombia India
  • S. Africa
Brazil Italy U.S.
  • 2

16 markets with Typical Changes in Trust

Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. Trust Volatility Measure. The net year-over-year (2017-2018) percentage point change across the four institutions (TRU_INS). General population, 28-market global total. For more details on how the Trust Volatility Measure was calculated, please refer to the Technical Appendix.

Aggregate percentage point change in trust in the four institutions, and change from 2017 to 2018

The Polarization of Trust

6 markets with extreme Trust Gains 6 markets with extreme Trust Losses

slide-11
SLIDE 11 Charles Schwab Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, U.S. The Trust Index is an average of a market's trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. Informed Public and General Population, U.S.

Trust Crash in U.S.

Business Media NGOs Government

  • 9
  • 10
  • 14
  • 5
  • 22
  • 20
  • 30
  • 22

2018 2017

43

TRUST INDEX

45

TRUST INDEX

9-point decrease Fell from 8th to 18th place

General Population

23-point decrease Fell from 6th to last place

Informed Public

Y-to-Y Change − +

Change from 2017 to 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12 Charles Schwab 43 30 31 32 32 32 33 33 34 35 35 39 40 42 42 43 43 43 44 45 47 48 49 52 55 56 61 68 71 Global 28 Turkey Australia Japan Sweden U.K. France Ireland Poland Russia
  • S. Africa
Argentina
  • S. Korea
Germany U.S. Brazil Colombia Hong Kong Spain Italy Malaysia Mexico Canada Singapore The Netherlands UAE India Indonesia China Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General population, 28-market global total.

Percent trust in media, and change from 2017 to 2018

Media Now Least Trusted Institution

Trust Neutral Distrust

Distrusted in 22 of 28 of markets

l llllllllllllllllllllllllllll

+5
  • 1
  • 1
+4 +3 +4
  • 4
  • 1
  • 5
  • 5
  • 2
+1
  • 3
+5 +1 +4
  • 2
+1 +12
  • 5
+1 +6

Y-to-Y Change − +

slide-13
SLIDE 13 Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) S11. For whom did you vote for in the last Presidential election? General population, U.S., among Trump (n=373) and Clinton (n=502) voters.

▪ Percent trust in each institution, Trump vs. Clinton voters

U.S. Trust in Media Diverges Along Voting Lines

47 57 35

27

54 47 35

61

Business Media NGOs Government

difference in trust in the media

34pt

Trump Voters Clinton Voters

22-point decline since the election

slide-14
SLIDE 14 63 61 54 50 50 47 46 44 41 39 35 Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CRE_PPL. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible), question asked of half of the sample. General population, 28-market global total.

Percent who rate each spokesperson as very/extremely credible, and change from 2017 to 2018

An Opportunity for Brands

+3 +1

  • 6

+4 +1

  • 1

+3 +7 +6 +12 +6

Person like yourself at all-time low

− Y-to-Y Change +

Technical expert Academic expert A person like yourself Financial industry analyst Successful entrepreneur Employee NGO representative CEO Board of directors Journalist Government

  • fficial/regulat
  • r
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Source: 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_AGR. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree), question asked of half of the sample. CEO_EXP. Below is a list of potential expectations that you might have for a company CEO. Thinking about CEOs in general, whether they are global CEOs or a CEO who oversees a particular country, how would you characterize each using the following three-point scale? (Most important responsibility, code 3), question asked of half of the sample. General population, 28- market global total.

Business is Expected to Lead, Building Trust is Job One

Percent who say that CEOs should take the lead on change rather than waiting for government to impose it Most Important Expectations for a CEO

64%

60% 64% 68% 69%

Their company is trusted Their products and services are high quality Business decisions reflect company values Profits and stock price increase

slide-16
SLIDE 16 Charles Schwab

Innovation & Protection

slide-17
SLIDE 17 Charles Schwab

Our responsibility is greater than ever

slide-18
SLIDE 18 Charles Schwab

Personal data has become the most important currency

slide-19
SLIDE 19 Charles Schwab

Protecting Sensitive Data

Collection: Limit the collection of sensitive data to that which is

directly relevant and necessary to accomplish a specified purpose.

Usage: Preventative and detective controls to limiting access to

sensitive data to authorized users.

Sharing: Policies to protect information when it needs to be shared

with external entities.

slide-20
SLIDE 20 Charles Schwab

Protecting Sensitive Data

Disposal: Securely eradicate, dispose, or destroy sensitive data when

appropriate.

Overarching Program Best Practices: Controls and policies to

maintain a robust information security environment.

slide-21
SLIDE 21 Charles Schwab

▪Access ▪Security & Responsibility ▪Transparency & Permissions ▪Scope of Access & Use

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

slide-22
SLIDE 22 Charles Schwab

Access

Customers may use third parties to access their financial account data and SIFMA member firms believe such access should be safe and secure.

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

slide-23
SLIDE 23 Charles Schwab

Security & Responsibility

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

Customers should not have to share their confidential financial account credentials (personal IDs & passwords) with third parties. Customers deserve assurances that anyone accessing their financial account data will keep it safe and secure, adopt the same data and security standards followed by regulated financial institutions, and take full responsibility for any data that they receive and provide to others.

slide-24
SLIDE 24 Charles Schwab

Transparency & Permissions

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

Customers should first receive a clear and conspicuous explanation of how third parties will access and use their financial account data, and then be able to consent affirmatively to this activity before it begins. Customers should be able to withdraw their consent easily and at any time with confidence that third parties will delete and stop collecting their financial account data and delete any access credentials or tokens.

slide-25
SLIDE 25 Charles Schwab

Scope of Access & Use

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

Customer information available to share with third parties typically includes financial account data such as holdings, balances, and transaction information, and does not include other non-public and confidential personal information. For customer protection, account activities such as third-party trading, money or asset movement, client verification, and other services that go beyond financial account data aggregation should be subject to separate agreements and require separate informed affirmative consent.

slide-26
SLIDE 26 Charles Schwab

▪Access ▪Security & Responsibility ▪Transparency & Permissions ▪Scope of Access & Use

SIFMA Data Aggregation Principles

slide-27
SLIDE 27 Charles Schwab

SIFMA Resources

For Member Firms: www.SIFMA.org For Investors: www.projectinvested.com

slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Q&A

@LisaKiddHunt

/lisa-hunt-schwab

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Thank you

@LisaKiddHunt

/lisa-hunt-schwab