SLIDE 1
Introduction to Neural Coding Maneesh Sahani - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Introduction to Neural Coding Maneesh Sahani - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Introduction to Neural Coding Maneesh Sahani maneesh@gatsby.ucl.ac.uk Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit University College London Term 1, Autumn 2008 The CNS Neocortex Cortical layers Neural signals (in vivo) Aggregate aggregate
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Neocortex
SLIDE 4
Cortical layers
SLIDE 5
Neural signals (in vivo)
Aggregate
- aggregate fields – EEG, MEG, LFP
- aggregate membrane voltage – die imaging
- metabolism – fMRI, PET, intrinsic imaging
Single neuron
- extracellular – single neuron, spike sorting, cell attach
- intracellular – sharp electrode, whole cell
SLIDE 6
Senses
How many senses do you have?
- taste (gustation)
- smell (olfaction)
- hearing (audition)
- sight (vision)
- touch (somatosensation)
- pain (nociception)
- body configuration (proprioception)
- acceleration and balance (vestibular sense)
SLIDE 7
Neocortical senses
SLIDE 8
Sensory areas
SLIDE 9
Common features of neocortical senses
- common pathways: receptors – subctx nuclei – thalamus – primary ctx – higher ctx
- thalamic loops between cortical areas
- feedback
- parallel hierarchy
- alternate pathways – tectal, para-lemniscal
SLIDE 10
Common processing
- receptor discretisation – sampling
- receptive fields
- contrast sensitivity – Weber’s law
- adaptation
– neural vs. psychological – adaptation to higher features – mismatch negativity – statistical adaptation
SLIDE 11
Quantifying responses
- receptive fieds
- motor fields
- stimulus-response functions
- sensory computation and encoded variables
- tuning curves
SLIDE 12
Optimality of coding
- “impedence” matching between different components
- matching to natural statistics
- matching to behaviourally relevant features
- redundancy reduction
SLIDE 13
The eye and retina
SLIDE 14
Centre-surround receptive fields
SLIDE 15
Colour at the retina
SLIDE 16
Centre-surround models
Centre-surround receptive fields are commonly described by one of two equations, giving the scaled response to a point of light shone at the retinal location (x, y). A difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) model:
DDoG(x, y) = 1 2πσ2
c
exp
- −(x − cx)2 + (y − cy)2
2σ2
c
- −
1 2πσ2
s
exp
- −(x − cx)2 + (y − cy)2
2σ2
s
- −10
−5 5 10 −10 −5 5 10 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 −10 −5 5 10 −0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
SLIDE 17
Centre-surround models
. . . or a Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG) model:
DLoG(x, y) = −∇2
- 1
2πσ2 exp
- −(x − cx)2 + (y − cy)2
2σ2
- −10
−5 5 10 −10 −5 5 10 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 −10 −5 5 10 −0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
SLIDE 18
Linear receptive fields
The linear-like response apparent in the prototypical experiments can be generalised to give a predicted firing rate in response to an arbitrary stimulus s(x, y):
r(s(x, y)) =
- dx dy D(x, y)s(x, y)
The receptive field centres (cx, cy) are distributed over visual space. If we let D() represent the RF function centred at 0, instead of at (cx, cy), we can write:
r(cx, cy; s(x, y)) =
- dx dy D(cx − x, cy − y)s(x, y)
which looks like a convolution.
SLIDE 19
Frequency effects
Thus a repeated linear receptive field acts like a spatial filter. We can consider its frequency response. Both DoG and LoG models are bandpass. Taking 1D versions:
fmax −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
centre Gaussian surround Gaussian difference frequency response
fmax 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Gaussian second derivative (ω2) product frequency response
SLIDE 20
Edge detection
Bandpass filters emphasise edges:
- rginal image
DoG responses thresholded
SLIDE 21
Thalamic relay
SLIDE 22
Visual cortex
SLIDE 23
Orientation selectivity
SLIDE 24
Linear receptive fields – simple cells
Linear response encoding:
r(t0, s(x, y, t)) = ∞ dτ
- dx dy s(x, y, t0 − τ)D(x, y, τ)
For separable receptive fields:
D(x, y, τ) = Ds(x, y)Dt(τ)
For simple cells:
Ds = exp
- −(x − cx)2
2σ2
x
− (y − cy)2 2σ2
y
- cos(kx − φ)
SLIDE 25
Linear response functions – simple cells
SLIDE 26
Simple cell orientation selectivity
SLIDE 27
Drifting gratings
s(x, y, t) = G + Acos(kx − φ)cos(ωt)
SLIDE 28
Separable and inseparable response functions
Separable: motion sensitive; not direction sensitive Inseparable: motion sensitive; and direction sensitive
SLIDE 29
Complex cells
Complex cells are sensitive to orientation, but, supposedly, not phase. One model might be (neglecting time)
r(s(x, y)) =
- dx dy s(x, y) exp
- −(x − cx)2
2σ2
x
− (y − cy)2 2σ2
y
- cos(kx)
2 +
- dx dy s(x, y) exp
- −(x − cx)2
2σ2
x
− (y − cy)2 2σ2
y
- cos(kx − π/2)
2
But many cells do have some residual phase sensitivity. Quantified by (f1/f0 ratio). Stimulus-response functions (and constructive models) for complex cells are still a mat- ter of debate.
SLIDE 30
Other V1 responses
- end-stopping
- blobs and colour
- surround effects
- . . .
SLIDE 31