SLIDE 1
August 23, 2012
AB 109 Evaluation: Interim Evaluation and Long-Term Evaluation Planning
1
Agenda
Introductions AB 109 Interim Evaluation Overview Project Timeline CCP Evaluation Priorities Next Steps
2
Interim Evaluation and Long-Term Evaluation Planning August 23, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Interim Evaluation and Long-Term Evaluation Planning August 23, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
County of Santa Clara Community Corrections Partnership 1 AB 109 Evaluation: Interim Evaluation and Long-Term Evaluation Planning August 23, 2012 Agenda 2 Introductions AB 109 Interim Evaluation Overview Project Timeline CCP
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Introductions
Resource Development Associates (RDA)
Established in 1984 Systems approach to performance assessments, planning,
- rganizational development, grant writing and evaluation
Outcomes-based, emphasizing efficient and effective use of resources
and actionable results
Related Projects
San Mateo Co. AB 109 Local Implementation Plan Development San Mateo Co. Sheriff’s Office In-Custody Programming Plan Santa Clara Co. MHSA Innovation Project Evaluation:
Transitional MH Services to Newly Released County Inmates
3
SLIDE 4
Project Overview
Project Objectives:
Assess the progress of the AB 109 implementation plan, and determine
program outcomes for the County’s realigned population
Make recommendations about the longterm evaluation of the AB109 program
Project Timeline
August 2012 to February 2013
Evaluation Design and Policy Research and Data Analysis
Workgroup: Steering Committee:
Javier Aguirre, Office of
the County Executive
Fran Palacio, Office of
the County Executive
Joseph Mensah, Probation Kakoli Banerjee, DADS
4
- Kathy Sanchez, ISD/CJIC
- Neelam Wadhwani, Sheriff/
Department of Corrections
- Anthony Holguin, Mental Health
Department
SLIDE 5
Interim Evaluation
Evaluation questions:
To what extent has the program been implemented as planned? To what extent have AB109 offenders improved outcomes, particularly
recidivism?
What are the results and lessons of Year 1?
Activities
Develop evaluation plan and logic model Conduct interviews with service providers and AB109 and 1170(h)
- ffenders
Analyze client-level data (e.g., units of service, outcomes, etc).
5
SLIDE 6
Options for Long-term Evaluation
Key questions
What are SCC’s evaluation priorities? How are similar counties implementing their AB109 programs? What is SCC’s data capacity? What are SCC’s data needs? What are the options for long-term evaluation of AB109
implementation?
Activities
Interviews and surveys IT site visit
6
SLIDE 7
Project Timeline
TASK Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Assess SCC priorities Determine evaluation options Assess SCC data capacity Report on evaluation options Develop evaluation plan Collect and analyze data Report on program implementation and outcomes
7
SLIDE 8
Next Steps
By September 30, 2012
Conduct online survey of CCP members (or designees) to determine
evaluation priorities
Key informant interviews with Public Safety & Justice Committee leaders Report on evaluation priorities Develop evaluation plan and lead evaluation work-session with Data Assess IT capacity for data collection related to evaluation
By October 15, 2013
Conduct interviews and survey with CCP representatives from
the 12 largest California counties
Assess evaluation approaches and activities
8