Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan July 5, 2016 This evenings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

integrated wet weather improvement plan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan July 5, 2016 This evenings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan July 5, 2016 This evenings goal is to inform you about: 1. The challenge Lakewood faces controlling overflows 2. Input from the Clean Water Lakewood Taskforce 3. Potential control measures 4.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

July 5, 2016

Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

This evening’s goal is to inform you about:

  • 1. The challenge Lakewood faces

controlling overflows

  • 2. Input from the Clean Water

Lakewood Taskforce

  • 3. Potential control measures
  • 4. Planning-level financial estimate
  • 5. Next steps
  • 6. Timeline
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Our Challenge

⁞ Lakewood collection system and treatment plant perform well during dry weather and very minor rain events

⁞ Generally, whenever we have significant rain our sewer system overflows; discharging untreated sewage into lake and river

− ~68 overflow locations throughout Lakewood − many are not directly overflowing to lake or river, but

  • verflow to the storm sewer system and then to the lake or

river

⁞ Federal and OEPA mandate: Lakewood must control millions of gallons of sewer overflow that happen every year

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Why do we have overflows?

⁞ ~70% of land is impervious − streets, sidewalks, driveways, rooftops − limited areas where water can infiltrate ⁞ Many homes have gutters and foundation drains connected to the sanitary sewer ⁞ Storm laterals blocked with dirt and overflow to sanitary ⁞ Old, broken & cracked pipes that allow water to enter ⁞ ~30% of our sewers were designed in the horse and buggy era and were intended to overflow into the lake ⁞ Stormwater is unnecessarily collected and delivered to treatment plant

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Simplified combined sewer overflow (CSO) diagram In a typical year Lakewood discharges over 170 million gallons

  • f sewage mixed with stormwater to Lake Erie and Rocky

River.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lakewood’s NPDES Permit

⁞ NPDES= National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

− regulates discharges from pipes into nation’s waters − OEPA issues permits

⁞ City convinced OEPA that integrated planning was the best option for Lakewood to reduce overflows

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lakewood’s NPDES Permit

⁞ OEPA & City establish goals on permit, such as:

− Characterization study of sewer system − Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan (IWWIP) − Constructing an interim control measure that requires high rate treatment of wet weather flow − Continually monitoring all overflows − Eliminating cross connections within the sewer system − Insuring that there are no dry weather sewage discharges from the City’s outfalls

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Characterization - Comprehensive calibrated computer model of

the sewer system

slide-9
SLIDE 9

− A plan to eliminate or reducing overflows − Analyzing pollutant discharges − Engaging community − Determining financial capability − Performing sewer rate study

Three projects currently underway:

  • 1. Design of high rate treatment at WWTP
  • 2. Source control pilot study on Eldred,

Atkins & Delaware

  • 3. West-end CSO elimination

Integrated Wet Weather Improvement Plan (IWWIP) includes:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

In June of 2015 the city asked citizens to volunteer to provide public input

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Clean Water Lakewood Stats

⁞ ~20 consistent volunteers: educated and engaged on sewer system and overflow complexities ⁞ Met monthly July 2015-May 2016

− 2 field trips: Watershed Stewardship Center (Parma) & Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) − Many are interested to continue engaging with public on this issue

⁞ Identified potential control measures, reflecting community values and priorities ⁞ Evaluated public suggestions using the computer model and included the feasible alternatives in the IWWIP

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Clean Water Lakewood Resource Binder

  • Contains all handouts; a copy is in Council Office
  • Website also contains all handouts:
  • nelakewood.com/cleanwaterlakewood/
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Engagement strategies CWL task force identified

⁞ Neighborhood competitions on reducing runoff ⁞ Field trips to WWTP or Stewardship Center ⁞ Create display explaining sewer issues, something 3-D perhaps in library ⁞ Go out on lake and video when overflows occur ⁞ Print FAQ handouts, set up table at farmer’s market or local events ⁞ Create waste and storm water flow diagrams, place in public buildings

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Control measures the CWL task force suggested include:

⁞ Source control on public and private property* ⁞ Green infrastructure strategically located within the right of way (ROW)* ⁞ East end storage/diversion ⁞ Sewer separation

Goal: meet requirements of preventing overflows in a typical year of rain * Modeling showed these are very effective

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

CWL taskforce suggestions were modeled to determine if they were feasible and effective approaches

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Source Control: involves work on private &

public property

⁞ Homeowners often have both storm & sanitary connections, but:

− Gutters and/or foundation drains are connected to the sanitary sewer − Clogged storm downspouts and laterals that force water of out storm connection and into sanitary connection − Both of these cause rain water to enter sanitary sewer

⁞ Old, cracked pipes allow groundwater to leach into the sanitary pipes, adding unnecessary water ⁞ Conducted a pilot study on Eldred, Atkins, and Delaware to determine if properly connecting everyone’s pipes is an effective approach to eliminating or reducing overflows

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pilot Study, public side: Manhole separa?on

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Pilot Study, public side: Manhole separa?on

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pilot Study, private side: Connec?ng downspouts to storm lateral

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Installed sump pump in

basement

  • Pumps water from

around the foundaIon to the storm lateral, not the sanitary

Pilot Study, private side: rerouting foundation drains

slide-24
SLIDE 24

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169 181 193 205 217 229 Depth (inch) Flow (MGD) 5 Minute interval Count

City of Lakewood 0.5 Inch Rain Event 2015 PreconstrucLon vs. 2016 ParLal Post ConstrucLon

2015 Flow 2016 Flows 2015 City Hall Rain 2016 City Hall Rain

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Lakewood’s experience with Source Control at 50% completion of construction

LocaLon Pre- construcLon Volume (gal) Post ConstrucLon Volume (gal) ReducLon Atkins Avenue, Delaware Avenue, & Eldred Avenue 368,712 98,446 73% LocaLon Pre- construcLon Rate (mgd) Post ConstrucLon Rate (mgd) ReducLon Atkins Avenue, Delaware Avenue, & Eldred Avenue 2.557 1.562 39%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Green Infrastructure

⁞ Re-establishing natural processes to reduce runoff ⁞ Runoff infiltrates into ground, taken up by plants, and/or evaporates

− Bioretention and permeable pavement are the two types frequently discussed by taskforce

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Permeable pavers in municipal lots A, B, and C

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cross-section of permeable pavement

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Bioretention at Municipal Parking Lot C

slide-30
SLIDE 30

BioretenIon installed on Madison Avenue

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Madison Avenue Bio- retenIon

slide-32
SLIDE 32

BioretenIon on Madison Avenue

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Lakewood’s experience with Green Infrastructure

LocaLon Pre- construcLon Volume (gal) Post ConstrucLon Volume (gal) ReducLon

  • St. Charles Avenue

(Parking Lot A) 18,325 100% Warren Road (Parking Lots A&B) 42,404 20,467 52% Cook Avenue (Parking Lots B&C) 971,114 43,276 96% Gladys Avenue (Parking Lot C) 9,707 5,656 42% Madison Avenue (at Madison Park) 17,777 3,993 78%

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Lakewood’s experience with Green Infrastructure (continued)

LocaLon Pre- construcLon Rate (mgd) Post ConstrucLon Rate (mgd) ReducLon

  • St. Charles Avenue

(Parking Lot A) 0.314 100% Warren Road (Parking Lots A&B) 1.262 0.503 60% Cook Avenue (Parking Lots B&C) 17.410 1.751 90% Gladys Avenue (Parking Lot C) 0.258 0.136 47% Madison Avenue (at Madison Park) 0.429 0.082 81%

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Green Infrastructure Maintenance

⁞ City would be responsible for upkeep and maintenance

− Must ensure functionality − Must be “permanent”

  • If these two items are not met, EPA unlikely to approve GI as

part of the plan

⁞ City to train/hire people to perform maintenance ⁞ Currently tree lawns and sidewalks are responsibility of homeowner, this would change where green infrastructure is installed

slide-36
SLIDE 36

High Rate Treatment at WWTP

⁞ Will have a treatment capacity of 35 million gallons per day ⁞ Permanent facility is major commitment under NPDES permit

slide-37
SLIDE 37

East End Potential Options

⁞ Combined sewer area ⁞ Even with extensive green infrastructure, overflows would be active ⁞ Two potential approaches identified:

− Possibly increasing flow to NEORSD sewers along West 117th Street; or − Construct a 15 million gallon detention basin and pump station in Gold Coast neighborhood

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Areas for Sewer Separation

⁞ Sections of the following: Edgewater, Webb, Thoreau, Clifton ⁞ Separation has challenges similar to source control neighborhoods:

− Could require private property work − Only clean water connections allowed to new sanitary

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Planning-level Financial Estimate

Control Measure Cost EsLmate ($ million) Includes Private-side Source Control 60.6 Lateral lining, sump pump, downspout redirecIon, properly connected homes Public-side Source Control 60.6 Manhole separaIon, lining sewers, repairs Green Infrastructure 40 BioretenIon and permeable pavement High Rate Treatment 35 Located at Lakewood WWTP Miscellaneous 10 SeparaIon, pump staIons, storm sewers Total (not including East End) 206.2 East End OpLons Control Measure Cost EsLmate ($ million) Increase East End Flow to NEORSD ?? 15 MGal DetenIon Basin 60

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Sewer Rates Will Continue to Increase

Year Lakewood NEORSD Suburbs 2016 $5.58/ccf (0.75¢/ gal) $7.81/ccf (1.07¢/ gal) 2021 TBD $12.57/ccf (1.68¢/gal)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

IWWIP Report to OEPA is due September 1, 2016 and is to include:

⁞ Hydraulic characterization of Lakewood including yearly overflows ⁞ Pollutant model ⁞ Pilot study analysis ⁞ Public input program ⁞ Planning-level control strategies (source

control, green infrastructure, and high rate treatment)

⁞ Basis of design for high rate treatment ⁞ Planning-level cost estimate

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Source Control Green Infrastructure

PotenIal areas for Source Control and Green Infrastructure based on public input and analysis

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Timeline

Date Ohio EPA Requirement September 2014 New NPDES permit issued by OEPA September 2016 Design specificaIons of High Rate Treatment (HRT) due, as well as feasible alternaIves plan created March 2018 Submit a permit to install HRT plant, and begin construcIon within 6 months of permit being approved March 2019 Final IWWIP due with alternaIves analysis, financial analysis, and detailed plan for dealing with overflows September 2022 ConstrucIon of HRT is complete and reducing overflows at plant

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Questions?

⁞ Additional information is available that we are happy to provide.