instructional design of a programming course
play

Instructional Design of a Programming Course A Learning Theoretic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Instructional Design of a Programming Course A Learning Theoretic Approach Michael E. Caspersen Jens Bennedsen ICER 07, Atlanta, 15-16 September 2007 U N I V E R S I T Y O F A A R H U S Department of Computer Science Calibration of


  1. Instructional Design of a Programming Course  A Learning Theoretic Approach Michael E. Caspersen Jens Bennedsen ICER ’07, Atlanta, 15-16 September 2007 U N I V E R S I T Y O F A A R H U S Department of Computer Science

  2. Calibration of Expectations ;-) Reviewers’ Comments (excerpt) Does the paper have a clear theoretical basis? 5: Very clear and strong, well-documented with citations Does the paper have a strong empirical basis? 1: No data collected What it is This work presents our attempt at improving (the instructional design of) an introductory programming course by incorporating selected results of cognitive science and learning theory. Consider it a first step... 2

  3. Theses and Research Question Theses Revealing the programming process to novices eases and promotes the learning of programming. Teaching skill as a supplement to knowledge promotes the learning of programming. Research Questions What is the foundation in learning theory that supports (or contradicts) the theses above? 3

  4. Agenda Background Motivation, model-based programming, course context Learning-Theoretic Foundation Cognitive (architecture, load theory, and apprenticeship) Pattern-Based Instruction Direct injection of cognitive schemas Instructional Design Macro and micro perspective Conclusion Future work, evaluation, how? Discussion... 4

  5. Agenda Background Motivation, model-based programming, course context Learning-Theoretic Foundation Cognitive (architecture, load theory, and apprenticeship) Pattern-Based Instruction Direct injection of cognitive schemas Instructional Design Macro and micro perspective Conclusion Future work, evaluation, how? Discussion... 5

  6. Grand Challenges in Computing Perception of computing Promote an improved and ultimately Innovation very positive public image of computing, ensuring that public Provide simpler models of computing as a Competencies gains respect for the field and the discipline and have this reflected in a professionals who practice within it. better mix of high quality computing Ensure that the quality of computing skills courses that genuinely accommodates a Formalism and competence are recognized as broad spectrum of student ability and important by graduates throughout their interest Grand Challenges career, and put in place an infrastructure Ensure that students of computing in Computing About e-learning to provide support and guidance on a see relevant mathematics and career-long basis. (GCC ’04) formalism in a very positive light, as Establish e-learning as a credible, providing support, guidance and Pre-university issues viable complement to face-to-face illumination. Education and Research education. Rationalize the situation at the pre-university level and direct it towards the promotion of Programming issues computing to would-be students of computing. Newcastle upon Tyne Create for students a smooth transition from Understand the programming 29-31 March 2004 school to university by enthusing and informing process and programmer practice to potential students and by creating a positive influence affecting pre-university computing. deliver effective educational transfer of knowledge and skills. 6

  7. GCE 4: Programming Issues A Summary 1. Incorporate the results of “ The particular concern is that, psychological studies into our after more than forty years of curricula and textbooks. teaching an essential aspect of 2. Establish student aptitude for our discipline to would-be programming. professionals, we cannot do so 3. Understand the programming reliably. ” process and programmer practice to deliver effective educational transfer of knowledge and skills. 4. Encourage students to practice “ Indeed, there are perceptions programming . that the situation has become worse with time. ” 5. Establish assessment methods that assess individual programming competency effectively. 7

  8. Failure Rates Universities Students Avg. fail rate Total 54 5,513 33% Non US 17 2,653 41% Average failure rate for introductory programming courses Internal report of community Many European universities colleges in a coalition to reported failure rates of more improve their retention rates in than 50%. computing: One school reported an avg. The maximum failure rate failure rate over a ten year reported was 95% period of 90%! 8

  9. Programming Education Research Over the past 25 years, study after study, even multi- institutional and multi-national studies, have provided empirical evidence that students cannot program and that the major problems they experience are composition- based  how to put the pieces together. It is not syntax! We have a long-standing problem of international scale, which we are aware of, and yet we persist to teach programming primarily by explaining language constructs and show-casing finished programs even though it is procedural knowledge and strategies for putting the pieces together, that is needed! From language issues to programming skills 9

  10. In Short... “Houston, we have a problem!” 10

  11. Course Description Aims: The participants will after the course have insight into principles and techniques for systematic construction of simple 7 weeks (a quarter) programs and practical experience with implementation of specification models using a standard programming language and 1/3 of the students time selected standard classes. 4 lecture hours per week Goals: Upon completion the participants must be able to 4 lab hours per week (pair programming) apply fundamental constructs of a common PL identify and explain the architecture of a simple program Weekly mandatory assignment (individual) identify and explain the semantics of simple specification models implement simple specification models in a common PL ~ 400 students per year (mixed group) apply standard classes for implementation tasks. ~ 20 TAs Evaluation: Each student is evaluated through a practical examination where the student solves a simple programming task. 11

  12. Programming as a Modeling Process The process involves identification of concepts and phenomena in the referent system and representation of these in the model system. Design Conceptual Model Specification Model The process consists of three subproceses: Analysis Implementation Abstraction in the model system (implementation) Abstraction in the referent system (analysis) Modeling (design) Implementation Model Problem/vision No Particular ordering is imposed on the subprocesses. Reference System Model System 12

  13. General Approach Model-Based Programming tasks starts from a specification model. The specification model is expressed as a class model with functional specifications of all methods. Progression Models become increasingly complex during the course. Associated systematic programming techniques (at three levels). Language issues are covered “by need”. Programming Techniques Inter-class structure: Standard coding patterns for the implementation of relations between classes Intra-class structure: Class invariants and techniques for evaluating these Method structure: Algorithmic patterns and loop invariants. 13

  14. Course Progression Design Conceptual model Specification model Analysis Implementation Implementation model Problem/vision Problem domain Model 14

  15. Model-Based Progression Stand-alone class A Shape, Crayon, Person, Die, Date, Heater, Account, ... Simple association and composition 2 2 A B A B DieCup, ClockDisplay, ... Recursive Association Person (lover and fiancee), 0..1 * Person (friends) A A Animal (parents, brood), ... Association (to another class) Car-Person (isOwnedBy), 0..1 * A B A B Track-Playlist (contains) Implementing an interface Comparable and Comparator * A B I Use of Collections.sort(), etc. 15

  16. Agenda Background Motivation, model-based programming, course context Learning-Theoretic Foundation Cognitive (architecture, load theory, and apprenticeship) Pattern-Based Instruction Direct injection of cognitive schemas Instructional Design Macro and micro perspective Conclusion Future work, evaluation, how? Discussion... 16

  17. The Human Cognitive Architecture Learning Long-term memory: recoding/chunking New information is Schemas (unconscious) processed in WM to form knowledge encoding decoding structures called schemas stored in Working memory: decision LTM. Integration (conscious) Schemas Senses Muscles Memory structures that permit us to treat a large amount of information elements Environment as one. 17

  18. Cognitive Load Theory Cognitive load: the load on working memory during problem solving, thinking, reasoning, ... Cognitive load theory: a universal set of learning principles that are proven to result in efficient instructional environments as a consequence of leveraging human cognitive learning processes The fundamental axiom of CLT: that learning outcome is optimized when cognitive load fully utilizes the capacity of working memory with elements that allow for optimal schema acquisition 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend