institutions and governance fit for decarbonisation
play

Institutions and governance - Fit for decarbonisation Brussels, 30 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Institutions and governance - Fit for decarbonisation Brussels, 30 June 2015 Dr. Camilla Bausch Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Basis Guided by vision of 80%-95% emission reduction by 2050 Focus on how to


  1. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Institutions and governance - Fit for decarbonisation Brussels, 30 June 2015 Dr. Camilla Bausch

  2. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Basis Guided by vision of 80%-95% emission reduction by 2050 Focus on how to strengthen EU climate action  Mitigation  Policies / rule setting  Some aspects of favourable institutional set up  Touch on implementation issues  Not adaptation Approach: Literature study, interviews, case studies Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 2

  3. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu The Role of Law and Institutions Authors: Mehling, Bausch, Donat, Zelljadt Thematic focus:  Institutional and political structures  regulatory approaches  conflicts and challenges Country studies: EU, GER, PL, UK Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 3

  4. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu European governance & the low-carbon pathway Authors: Bausch, Roberts, Donat, Lucha Contributions by IVM: Munaretto, Walz, Dimitriou Thematic focus:  overlaps between climate and energy policy  de/centralisation of climate policies / rule setting Case studies:  EU ETS, RES support scheme, targets  electricity grid infrastructure Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 4

  5. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu European governance & the low-carbon pathway Centralisation:  Legal bindingness  Level of harmonisation  EU level institution building Sliding scale – regional approaches Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 5

  6. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some key insights - regulatory approaches  Due to different history and preferences, regulatory approaches differ between MS  Process of convergence due to learning and EU law  UK: FiT; GER: ETS  Not an obstacle for specific European policy approaches  New policy approaches might lead to court cases  Beware, as this is time consuming  Be prepared for surprises: Theoretically optimal solutions do not tend to be the ones implementable in practice – and effects are sometimes surprising Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 6

  7. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some key insights – de/centralisation  No fixed correlation between degree of centralisation and level of mitigation ambition  Instead decisive: Policy design & level of ambition  No perfect or even static equilibrium between central and decentral elements  Centralisation often a process  Not binary – often hybrid approaches  De/centralisation needs capacity and institution building  E.g. EU ETS registry Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 7

  8. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some recommendations What should be created/protected  structures which are politically “ risk resilient ” against a change in political landscape which is mitigation averse  Example: Commissioner for Climate Action  Freedom for frontrunners  Incentives for frontrunners  Example: EU ETS  Flexibility to be able to react  Example: ancillary investments for offshore meshed grid Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 8

  9. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some recommendations Create a learning system  In particular for new approaches:  Member States as policy laboratories (example: RES support)  Or learn from other countries (example: Chinese ETS pilots)  Implement monitoring and review mechanisms Highlight climate mitigation in centralised policy areas  e.g. trade For regional approaches: Identify / create incentives for RE expansion Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 9

  10. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some recommendations Increase centralisation  EU: GHG, RE & EEff targets backed by national targets  Important for • electricity grid planning • investment security • credibility at international level  EU & regional: Increase electricity grid integration / coordination Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 10

  11. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Some key insights – potentially unfeasible Would be good to have:  Priorisation of decarbonisation / climate protection over other goals Should not be a priority:  Change of primary law – competency for energy mix Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 11

  12. Ecologic Institute ecologic.eu Thanks! Ecologic Institute Pfalzburger Str. 43/44 10717 Berlin Dr. Camilla Bausch Germany director@ecologic.eu Tel. +49 (30) 86880-0 ecologic.eu Institutions & Governance 30.06.2015 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend