Institute for Government Nehal Davison, Senior Researcher December - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

institute for government
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Institute for Government Nehal Davison, Senior Researcher December - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Institute for Government Nehal Davison, Senior Researcher December 2015 Agenda Story of the Institute for Government How we seek to drive changes in government Why I came to New Zealand Some reflections on the Policy Project


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Institute for Government

Nehal Davison, Senior Researcher December 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Story of the Institute for Government
  • How we seek to drive changes in government
  • Why I came to New Zealand
  • Some reflections on the Policy Project
  • Questions for discussion

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

In the beginning…

Founded in n 1967 Ch Chairman 1992 1992-1998 Minister r of

  • f Sci

Science an and Inn nnovation 1998-2006

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Institute for Government was established in 2008

  • Independent charity with cross-

party and Whitehall governance working to increase government effectiveness.

  • Our funding comes from the

Gatsby Charitable Foundation, a Sainsbury Family Charitable Trust.

  • We work with all the main political

parties at Westminster and with senior civil servants in Whitehall, providing evidence-based advice.

  • We undertake research, provide the highest quality development
  • pportunities for senior decision makers and organise events to

invigorate and provide fresh thinking on the issues that really matter to government.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Our location

We e are e a short 10 min inute walk lk fr from mos

  • st

t government dep epartments and parlia rliament Seen as a ‘safe space’ for min inisters and civil civil ser ervants ts to

  • p
  • pen

enly ly dis iscu cuss th the e ch challe llenges

  • f
  • f government
slide-6
SLIDE 6

What we do

A more effective Whitehall New models of governance and public services Leadership for government Better policy making Parliament and the political process

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Combination of research and learning

Research reports L& L&D an and Workshops Events an and rou

  • undtables
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The wider policy landscape

Think Tanks Academia Charities & campaigning groups Research

  • rganisations

Consultancies

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Increasingly focusing on how to drive impact

PUBLIC SER ERVICE RE REFORM

IfG supports commissioners to be more effective in designing and managing markets in public services

MIN INISTERIAL EF EFFECTI TIVENESS

IfG supports ministers to perform more effectively in their roles

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ministerial effectiveness

Ou Our rese esearch ag agenda

  • How to support ministers be

more effective in their roles

  • How to manage a transition
  • pposition to government
  • How to make effective policies

in opposition Practical su support an and ch challe lenge

  • Ministerial team away days and

workshops

  • Expert briefings and seminars
  • 360 reviews
  • ‘Preparation for Government’

sessions for the opposition

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Example of our engagement

Ad Ad-hoc netw twork rking

  • p
  • pportunities for
  • r min

inisters an and sp special ad advi visers

  • Talks from former ministers and

special advisers

  • Safe space discussions

Ind Individual an and tea eam development

  • 360s
  • Team building and effectiveness

away days

Ri Rigorous ap approac ach to

  • pol
  • licymaking an

and prio rioritisation

  • Interactive workshops
  • Expert seminars
  • Inductions

Offer is is ope

  • pen to
  • all

all th three ee maj ajor part artie ies, but t dem emand var aries sign ignif ificantl tly 50 sem emin inars, workshops

  • r
  • r 360 reviews th

through whic ich we e have e en engaged

  • approx. 290 polit
  • litic

icians and advis visers

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Public services

Ou Our rese esearch ag agenda

  • How to effectively introduce

choice, competition and markets in public services

  • How to join up and integrate

public services around citizens Practical su support an and ch challe lenge

  • Develop practical frameworks

and tools

  • Run training sessions for

commissioners

  • Advocate for greater

transparency in contracting and outsourcing

  • Deep dive visits to local areas

to support efforts to collaborate on the ground

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Example of our engagement

Training ses essio ions De Developmen ent t of

  • f fr

frameworks and on

  • nlin

line d dia iagn gnostic ic tool

  • ols

to

  • help

elp com

  • mmis

issioners 8 res esea earch rep eports betw tween 2012- 2014 2014 Transparency taskforce

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why I chose to come to New Zealand

Imp mproving cap apability acr across ss the he ci civil ser service (e. (e.g. pol policy pr project) Work

  • rking ar

around silos silos to

  • de

deliver cr cross ss-cutting

  • u
  • utcomes

s (e. (e.g. BPS) S) Eng Engag aging ci citizens s in in the de design and and de delivery of

  • f

pu public ser services

Regular exchanges between the Institute for Government and New Zealand Public Service

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The Policy Project

“Lifting the policy game across the system”

The “problem”

  • The lack of a cross-government

view on what ‘good’ policy advice looks like.

  • Difficulties in finding, paying for

and retaining top talent.

  • Insufficient use of evidence and

user insights in the policy development process.

  • Limited focus on the capability

needed to meet future policy challenges. Collaboration and engagement central to the approach

  • 10 Tier 2

workshops

  • 19 inter-agency

workshops

  • Head of Policy

Profession speaker events “Improvement” products

  • Policy Quality

Framework

  • Policy Skills

Framework

  • Capability

Maturity Model My role

  • Case study charting origins,

development and influence

  • Workshop with core team to

take stock of progress, challenges and next steps

  • Advising on offer for supporting

ministers to ‘get the most out of the policy services available to them’

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • What mechanisms are there in New Zealand to drive

and influence changes in government?

  • How similar/different is this from the UK policy

landscape?

  • Which models appear to be most effective in the

New Zealand context?

  • What underpins this?

Questions for discussion