There is a Role for Check Point Inhibitors in NMIBC
4th FOIU July 3-5, 2018
Inhibitors in NMIBC Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS Professor, Scott - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
There is a Role for Check Point Inhibitors in NMIBC Seth P. Lerner, MD, FACS Professor, Scott Department of Urology Beth and Dave Swalm Chair in Urologic Oncology Baylor College of Medicine 4 th FOIU July 3-5, 2018 Financial and Other
4th FOIU July 3-5, 2018
2
I have the following financial interests or relationships to disclose: Disclosure code FKD S Roche/Genentech S JBL S Viventia S BioCancell, Nucleix, QED, UroGen C UroGen, Vaxiion C
Redelman-Sidi et al, Nat Rev Urol 2014
BCG Mechanism of Action
1/3 BCG +IFN- BCG Response 10 100 1000 10000
IFN- (ng/12 hrs)
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
MB
1/10 BCG +IFN-
6
Lamm, DL et al, J Urol 163:1124, 2000
7
Lamm, DL et al, J Urol 163:1124, 2000
PPD + (n=23) PPD - (n=32) *
+ Censored
Time until recurrence (months) 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Recurrence-free survival (%)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Patients with high-risk bladder tumor PPD test TURBT BCG therapy Clinical
Biot, C., et al. Sci Transl Med 2012
(slide courtesy of R Svatek)
Repeated
Weeks 1 to 4
7 14 21
BCG s.c.
33-35
Single
Week 1
Single
Week 4
*
33-35
*
33-35
*
21
Instillation: PBS BCG BCG BCG BCG PBS Week(s) of treatment: W1-4 W1-4 W1-4 W1 W4 W1-4 Ø BCG s.c. 21 days prior to instillation BCG W1 Biot, C., et al. Sci Transl Med 2012
(slide courtesy of R Svatek)
BCG-naïve high risk NMIBC PPD Negative Prime: intradermal BCG (Tokyo strain 100 µl at 0.5 mg /ml) + Intravesical Tokyo BCG induction and maintenance (80 mg/dose) Intravesical Tokyo BCG induction and maintenance (80 mg/dose) Intravesical TICE BCG induction and maintenance (50 mg/dose)
PI: Robert Svatek, UT San Antonio
Lerner et al, Bladder Cancer 1:29, 2015)
12
FDA final guidance February 2018
13
Chen DS, Mellman I. Immunity 2013;39:1–10
Vandeveer, et al Cancer Immunol Res 4:452, 2016
16
Inman, et al Cancer 109:1499, 2007
surveillance for 18 mo. BCG unresponsive Ta/T1/Tis (TURBT) Atezolizumab
cysto cytol
Atezolizumab Atezolizumab Atezolizumab
cysto biopsy cytol
Atezolizumab Atezolizumab Atezolizumab
Atezolizumab maintenance q3wks for 9 cycles
Atezolizumab RFS @ 18 months q 3 weeks CR @ 25 weeks* (=6 months post TURBT) q 3 weeks 13 weeks*
60 daysof TURBT
5 days of registration
* time is relative to first dose of atezolizumab
Atezolizumab
PI: Black & Singh (Lerner) ECOG/ACRIN: T Bivalacqua Alliance: M Woods CCTG: W Kassouf
and PD-L1+)
and 12 mo)
mo, 12 mo)
Eligibility
(T1, HGTa, CIS)
histology
unresponsive
0, 1, or 2
>9 g/dL
Primary endpoint Secondary endpoints Exploratory endpoints
Target enrollment: 260
CIS ± Ta or T1 safety follow-up
2 Cohorts
Ta or T1
Cohort 1 Cohort 2
pembro 200 mg Q3w
BCG- unrepsonsive NMIBC Durvalumab + BCG
(6+3+3, n=12)
RP2D BCG- unresponsive NMIBC Durvalumab
(3+3, n=3-6)
DLT > 2/6 pts DLT < 5/12 pts DLT > 2/6, > 4/9, or > 5/12 pts DLT limit exceeded Full-dose BCG 1/3rd dose BCG Reduce BCG to 1/3rd dose BCG BCG dose Tested? Close DLT < 0/3 or 1/6 pts DLT limit exceeded Close Proceed to cohorts 2a/2b Durvalumab + EBRT
(6+3+3, n=12)
RP2D DLT < 5/12 pts DLT > 2/6, > 4/9, or > 5/12 pts DLT limit exceeded Close Cohort 1 Cohort 2a Cohort 2b
HCRN 16-243 ADAPT-BLADDER Trial – Phase 1 (n = 3-42 patients)
Courtesy Noah Hahn
*Randomize 1:1 to activated arms (additional arms may activate in the future) **1:1 randomization to Durvalumab + EBRT vs all other activated arms only at radiation qualified sites
Durvalumab + BCG
(n=48)
6m RFS Int/High Risk BCG- relapsing NMIBC Durvalumab + EBRT
(n=48)
6m RFS BCG
(n=48)
6m RFS Durvalumab
(n~28)
RESIDUAL NMIBC (All patients treated at RP2D)
HCRN 16-243 ADAPT-BLADDER Trial – Phase 2 (n = 144 patients)
Courtesy Noah Hahn