ing/Vnde-merger Iris Gemeinbck 1 *originally - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ing/Vnde-merger Iris Gemeinbck 1 *originally participle/gerund-merger *but trying to keep forms and functions apart, gerund = function as i see it Outline forms: present participle, deverbal noun why is there a problem? distribution
Iris Gemeinböck
1
*originally “participle/gerund-merger” *but trying to keep forms and functions apart, gerund = function as i see it
forms: present participle, deverbal noun why is there a problem? distribution of endings for participle, noun an additional player: the infinitive gerund?
2
infinitive writ -an past participle (ge-)writ -en present participle writ -ende, -inde, -and (de-)verbal noun writ -ing
3
*all these forms nonfinite, i.e. not marked for person, number, tense
*4 difgerent kinds, like in present-day english, but separate suffjxes *present participle similar to form in German: schreibend, stehend, gehend, “Kurz will 2. kindergartenjahr verpflichtend” (orf.at) *variant of -ing = ung; ing for abstract female nouns from weak verb stems: blessing, loving (Irwin) *ung, had all but vanished by ME period
present participle
inde (ing), and, ende
deverbal noun
(ung), ing
‘ing-forms’ (infinitive?)
4
*forms merged during ME period *acc to Lass infinitive involved as well, also has variants with -ing suffjx *next, look at distributions of present participle forms and noun
and(e) end(e) ind(e), ing(e)
5
*e in brackets is dative-form *rough division into north, midlands, south, from Lass and van Gelderen
M1 M2 M3 M34 M4 125 250 375 500
end(e) and(i,e) ind(e) ing(e), yng(e)
6
*normalized, per 100000 words, actual numbers not that important, but proportions *acc. to Lass -and should be inflected -andi, but also found -ande; no Northern texts in m1 *found -end without e, not listed in Lass *also: no andi, but many ande *found very popular spelling variant of ing with y *as ing gets more popular, ind (also south) vanishes, rest are also reduced *and stays longer, forms kept separate in north for longer period!
M1 M2 M3 M34 M4 375 750 1125 1500
ing(e), yng(e) participle ing(e), yng(e), ung(e) nouns
7
*ung ending disappears after M1, instances included in same category as ing/yng *only one instance in M3: the conseillung of hem *spelling with y preferred in M2-M4 *number of nouns with -ing seems stable, not influenced by rise of present participle ing- form
OE: inflected for dative -enne (later -anne) southern, southwestern, south midlands ME
until 14th century (Lass 1992: 145)
8
*nominative of the infinitive -an (beran, habban...) *could be inflected *-ende similar to present participle *-inge related to -ing of noun, -e from OE dative of -ing; *could not find any examples in corpus (only monosyllabic words, no suffjx...)
infinitive: neuter noun? present participle: verbal adjective verbal noun: derived noun infinitive lost suffix (noun-like)
ing suffix
adjectives lexical nouns complement to auxiliaries (progressive) verbal nouns (gerunds)
today
9
*verbal adj. from IE *Germanic derived noun, feminine abstract *many forms with same suffjx, all nonfinite -> syntactic confusion *period of variation (Roger Lass) *result: ing-form has many functions *lexical nouns: blessing, (teaching)
and(e) end(e) ind(e), ing(e)
10
*theory (Grzega): influence of London area after ties to Normandy were broken *spread from South/East Midlands region *also: but also confusion, phonetic change
taking a sabbatical
surprised us.
position of noun phrase: John’s anger surprised us. internal verb phrase structure: John takes a sabbatical.
John’s
11
*function, not separate form; “verbal noun” bc noun-ing acquired verbal properties, syntactic *example from present-day English *also: John taking a sabbatical *some scholars: verb-like properties of ing-constructions acquired in ME period *Donner: this type of construction did not exist in ME, except for a few cases.
late development unambiguous gerundial constructions:
mainly in Reginald Pecock (philosophical texts translation from Latin more from 15th century onwards (Donner 1986)
1993)
12
*unambiguous: not only noun-like characteristics, but have direct object, not prepositional phrase ‘of’ after (like ‘the painting of the walls’, instead: ‘painting the walls’)
“ bakbytyng_VAG me_PRO ,_, for_P +tat_C ich_PRO folwed_VBD godene” (cmearlps.m2, Earliest Prose Psalter) “+tat_C it_PRO may_MD lufe_VB hym_PRO verraly_ADV ,_, feland_VAG comforth_N and_CONJ delyte_N in_P hym_PRO ,_, owtkastyng_VAG worldes_N$ thoghtes_NS” (cmrollep.m24, Richard Rolle’s Epistles) “in_P wirkyng_VAG profitabel_ADJ thynges_NS” (cmrollep.m24, Richard Rolle’s Epistles)
13
*present participle seems to have direct object, occurs in noun position, or where modern gerundial constructions would be *first two are subjectless gerunds *second: actually mixed suffjxes, but similar construction! *especially last example looks like modern gerundial construction, often preceded by preposition, then direct object *acc to corpus description all unambiguous gerunds marked as present participles, not nouns
It’s a mess. some claims not substantiated separate forms from functions ‘constructions’, patterns
14
*many ing forms tagged as present participles, but function as adjectives *diffjcult to separate what is adjective+noun, gerund+direct object *claims: infinitive forms with ende, ing not found *some researchers use ‘gerund’ for all participial ing-forms, don’t distinguish functions *alternatively: look at patterns/constructions
find texts with different forms? qualitative analysis of ing-forms: function, gerundial? any other interesting research questions?
15
*2 options: find texts with mixed forms, see how they were used by individual authors/ scribes *second (will prob do): find gerundial constructions, especially in earlier periods *could help describe the coalescence of present participle and noun-ing
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 1993. “The coalescence of the participle and the gerund/gerundive: an integrated change”. In Aertsen, Henk; Jeffers, Robert J. (ed). Historical linguistics 1989 : papers from the 9th international conference on historical linguistics, Rutgers University, 14-18 August 1989. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 59-71. Blake, Norman (ed). 1996. The Cambridge history of the English language: 1066-1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Donner, Morton. 1986. “The gerund in Middle English”. English studies: a journal of English language and literature 67(5), 394-400. Gelderen, Elly van. 2006. A history of the English language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Grzega, Joachim. 1999. “A new view on why, how and how far ing prevailed over ind”. VIEWS: Vienna English Working Papers 8(1), 34-43. Irwin, Betty J. 1967. The development of the -ing ending of the verbal noun and the present participle from c. 700 to c. 1400. PhD thesis, The University of Wisconsin. Tajima, Matsuji. 1996. “The common/objective-case subject of the gerund in Middle English”. NOWELE 28-29, 569-577.
16