information in MC and data for selecting anode piercing tracks - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

information in mc and data for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

information in MC and data for selecting anode piercing tracks - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Update on correcting timing information in MC and data for selecting anode piercing tracks Joshua Thompson DRA Meeting 27/02/19 You Inst Logo Anode piercing tracks diagram Stephen requested a diagram showing the process of selecting


slide-1
SLIDE 1

You Inst Logo

Update on correcting timing information in MC and data for selecting anode piercing tracks

Joshua Thompson DRA Meeting 27/02/19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

You Inst Logo

Anode piercing tracks diagram

  • Stephen requested a diagram showing the process of selecting

anode piercing tracks:

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

You Inst Logo

Resolving MC timing issue

  • The wide spread of time differences in MCC11 (l) strongly suggested

that the flashes were not being correctly matched to tracks and the matches were through random coincidence.

  • To establish whether this was due to an offset between the timing

systems, I have plotted the time difference between anode piercing track candidates and all flashes in each event (r). A clear peak is visible at 250 µs, which corresponds to an offset in MCC11 which I had not been accounting for previously.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

You Inst Logo

Resolving data timing issue

  • The spread in the data (l) looked similarly wide and incorrect.

Using the same technique, I looked at the time differences in data (r).

  • Using the flash time as stored, no peak can be seen but there is

an unusual pattern in the number of flashes matched against the time difference.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

You Inst Logo

Examining flash times closely

  • I have previously shown the shortened flash time window, from

roughly -800 to +900 µs (c).

  • When zooming in to the end points, these values are more

precisely -750 (l) and 915 µs (r). These are exactly 1/3 of the photon detector readout window, which runs from -2.25 to 2.75 ms.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

You Inst Logo

Correcting flash times

  • I have taken these stored values and multiplied by 3 to give a

corrected flash time.

  • Comparing this corrected flash time to reconstructed t0 shows a

clear peak, close to zero, which strongly suggests that this corresponds to correctly matched particles.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

You Inst Logo

MC Matched flash time difference

  • Correcting for these issues, I have produced plots of the

matched flash time to reco time difference for MCC11 and data.

  • In MCC11 (l, zoomed in r), the matching now produces a narrow

peak which looks to correspond to correctly matched anode piercing tracks and flashes.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

You Inst Logo

Time difference in data

  • The peak is not as narrow in the data, but it does appear to be

centred fairly well, with a small offset that is not otherwise accounted for yet.

  • However, no cuts have been applied yet beyond a nominal

minimum 20 PE and 5 cm track length, so applying cuts of this nature will likely narrow the peak region.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

You Inst Logo

Initial purity in MC

  • For the MC, I have taken tracks matched to MC particles which

start/end at the anode plane and treated these as true anode piercing tracks.

  • In the peak region, there is little difference between the two

distributions, with a -2 to +1 µs cut giving 95.4% purity of ‘true’ anode piercing particles selected in this way, for MCC11, with no

  • ther cuts applied, and 64.0% efficiency.

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

You Inst Logo

Next Steps

  • I will implement the T0Offset parameter for the MC, in case this

changes in future productions.

  • Further studies on the purity using the MC, including studying

the method of determining true anode piercing particles and determining which cuts to apply to select tracks.

  • Further ahead, using cryostat side hits to corroborate data

selection and determine purity.

  • Then we can start using anode piercing tracks to actually study

space charge!

27/02/19 Joshua Thompson | Corrected timing information for selecting APT 10