Influence of the K103N minor variants in Influence of the K103N - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

influence of the k103n minor variants in influence of the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Influence of the K103N minor variants in Influence of the K103N - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of Cologne Institute of Virology Influence of the K103N minor variants in Influence of the K103N minor variants in therapy-nave HIV-1 infected patients on therapy-nave HIV-1 infected patients on clinical outcome clinical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Influence of the K103N minor variants in therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected patients on clinical outcome Influence of the K103N minor variants in therapy-naïve HIV-1 infected patients on clinical outcome

slide-2
SLIDE 2

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Why? Why?

…with the method of direct sequencing only virus populations ≥ 20% can be detected. …it is important to detect mutations as soon as possible to avoid early virological failure … to know more about evolution of viral strains under changing drug conditions (e.g treatment interruption or transmitted resistance). ….in drug classes with a low genetic barrier such as NNRTIs one mutation (e.g K103N) is enough for drug failure.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

How? How?

…with a real time assay on the LightCycler 2.0 (Roche)

with Taqman- probes two different specific primerpairs

modified method after Lecossier et al. (K103N)

K103N and K103

X

amplification first primerpair: equal amplification of mutant and wt second primerpair: amplification of mutant and no amplification of wt

K103N

X

amp.

K103

X

no amp.

X

quantification of the two different products with standard plasmids

Calculation proportion of mutant (%)= (amount of mutant / general amount) x 100

slide-4
SLIDE 4

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

K103N

RT

What? What?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

K103N K103N

characteristics:

common reverse transcriptase mutation against non-nucleosidic-reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) for this drug class with a very low genetic barrier one mutation is sufficient to cause drug failure reported by Lecossier et al. a minority population with a K103N can get dominant under a treatment with EFV or NVP and leads to inefficacy of these drugs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Patients´ characteristics Patients´ characteristics

159 therapy naïve patients from the RESINA cohort 127 patients with HIV-1 subtype B, 32 non-B subtype 130 male, 29 female median time since infection: 0.25 years (range 0-18) VL 12 week after start of therapy available from 121 patients

slide-7
SLIDE 7

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 NRTI-mutants M41L 118 C, F, G, V 75 I, A 210 W 67 N 69 S 219 Q revertant RT 215 NNRTI-mutants 101 E 103 R 108 I 181 C 230 T

resistance associated mutations number of mutations

Population based sequencing Population based sequencing

no K103N detectable 17 patients with NRTI associated mutations (10.7 %) 10 patients with a revertant at position 215 6 patients with NNRTI mutations (3.8%)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

K103N Minority Assay K103N Minority Assay

Minority assay with a sensitivity of 0.2 % proven shows:

159 pats 32 pats. K103N 127 pats. K103 wt

20% minority resistance

slide-9
SLIDE 9

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Minority K103N Minority K103N

Higher frequency in non B subtypes 40.6% (13/32) Frequency in B subtype 15% (19/127)

Prevalence of non-B subtypes

2 4 6 8 10 12

S u b t y p A S u b t y p C C R F _ A E C R F _ A G S u b t y p G S u b t y p D S u b t y p J C R F _ C P X

Subtypen

patients

total minority

slide-10
SLIDE 10

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Clinical outcome Clinical outcome

121 patients were treated

(38 patients no therapy or lost in follow up)

NRTI backbone

(64% AZT+ 3TC 26% TDF+ FTC 10% other)

NNRTI 66%

(80 pats.)

34%

(41 pats.)

Non NNRTI treatment

fail success

min K103N no min K103N

24% (4 pats.) 68%

(23 pats.)

21%

(17 pats.)

79%

(63 pats.)

fail success fail succ 32% (13 pats.) 76% (13 pats.) 15% (9 pats.) 85% (54 pats.)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Patient nr. Proportion minority % Treatment failure 14 0.20 23 0.20 + 25 0.20 8 0.21 17 0.21 32 0.21 18 0.22 24 0.22 + 6 0.23 10 0.23 21 0.23 1 0.23 28 0.24 2 0.25 4 0.26 11 0.30 5 0.31 Patient nr. Proportion minority % Treatment failure 29 0.32 26 0.33 9 0.33 12 0.33 30 0.33 13 0.34 31 0.34 15 0.36 + 27 0.41 7 0.47 22 0.52 20 2.41 16 3.20 3 8.62 19 13.00 +

Threshold of failure? Threshold of failure?

no threshold for a minority amount and therapy failure can be found

slide-12
SLIDE 12

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Summary Summary

  • verall unexpected high prevalence of K103N in therapy- naïve

patients of 20% was found Population based sequencing:

10.7 % NRTI mutations 3.8% NNRTI mutations

no patient with minority harboured another major mutation difference in resistant minority populations K103N in HIV-1 subtype B (15%) vs. non B subtype (41%) Higher therapy failure rate in NNRTI-treated patients with minority than without minority (24% vs.15%), not significant No threshold of K103N minority and therapy failure could be found

slide-13
SLIDE 13

University of Cologne Institute of Virology

Thank you

Rolf Kaiser Martin Däumer Saleta Sierra Dörte Hammerschmidt Ibrahim Boussaad Jens Verheyen Elena Knops Claudia Müller Nadine Sichtig Herbert Pfister Susanna Trapp Monika Timmen-Wego Jürgen Rockstroh Gerd Fätkenheuer Mark Oette and colleagues Resina study group Stephanie Koch Arne Kroidl