Inequality and Inequity Franois Bourguignon Paris School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

inequality and inequity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Inequality and Inequity Franois Bourguignon Paris School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Inequality and Inequity Franois Bourguignon Paris School of Economics Luxembourg, January 2017 1 Inequality at center stage Inequality issues at center stage The general increase in inequality The US case An explanation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Inequality and … Inequity

François Bourguignon

Paris School of Economics Luxembourg, January 2017

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Inequality at center stage

  • Inequality issues at center stage

– The general increase in inequality – The US case – An explanation of recent surprise voting results (Brexit, Trump, …)?

  • What issues ?

– Perception of inequality (Brookings/Jean Jaurès 2010 survey) – "Some are more unequal than others": deserving and undeserving rich (Leslie Mc Call) – Did Trump swing voters vote against income inequality? – A disappearing middle class? – The concern about future generation

  • Inequality of WHAT? (Sen)

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Two views on inequality

  • Inequality of economic 'outcomes' (earnings, income,

standard of living, welfare..): IOut

  • Inequity, or inequality of opportunity ("inégalité des

chances"): 'assets' an individual is endowed with and that directly or indirectly generate economic outcomes (IOpp)

  • Two concepts strongly linked (IOpp → IOut ) but not identical
  • The Marathon race illustration (with handicaps)
  • Which inequality concept should be used for policy making,

within both a social justice and economic efficiciency perspective?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline

  • 1. Definition issues
  • 2. Measurement: observability issues

− Intergenerational earnings mobility as an example

  • 3. Policy issues: Equality vs. Efficiency

− The inequality and growth conundrum

  • 4. Why Iopp and Iout are the two faces of the same coin pointing

to complementary policies

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Definition issues:

Equity (Iopp ) vs. inequality (Iout)

5

Circumstances Education, Assets, Social background, Individual traits (gender, race, migrant status..) Outcomes Earnings Income Living standard Health status … Individual decisions ('efforts') Labor supply, entrepreneurship, smoking, Unplanned random events (luck) Economic sphere Market mechanisms including market imperfections Policies, including redistribution, market regulation, .. Preferences (1) (4) (5) (3) (6) (2) (8) (7)

Inequality/Iout Inequity/Iopp

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Libertarians vs. Egalitarians/Utilitarians

Libertarians:

  • Only that part of inequality that is not under individual

responsibility – i.e. circumstances - should matter

  • Inequality in circumstances should be compensated

Egalitarians/Utilitarians:

  • Only the inequality of outcome matters and should be

minimized …

  • … while taking into account the need to preserve economic

incentives

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 2. Measurement: observability issues
  • Are people 'responsible' for their preferences and 'efforts'?

– 'Efforts' highly dependent on 'circumstances'

  • At the same time, many 'circumstances' are essentially

unobservable – e.g. family culture. → Not possible to go beyond determining how much Iout is due to observed Iopp

– Only a lower bound of actual Iopp can be estimated

  • But extremely useful to know whether the share of Iout

coming from observed Iopp is going up or down … and how other components of Iout behave!

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Illustration: The Great Gatsby curve

  • IGE = intergenerational elasticity of earnings (fathers/sons) = square root
  • f share of inequality explained by parents earnings

Figure 3. The Great Gatsby curve

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Time variations in inequality and IGE in the US

0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

IGE Year

Estimated Intergenerational Earnings Elasticity (IGE) and Income Inequality in the US: 1940-2000

Inequality: Share of Top 10% gross income (right-hand scale) Intergenerationalelasticity : All ages (left hand scale) Intergenerationalelasticity : 40-44 years old (left hand scale)

Source: from Aaronsson and Mazumder (2008)

Income Inequality 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Generalizing to all observed circumstances

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 3. Policy issues: Equality vs. Efficiency
  • Preceding argument abstracts from economic (in)efficiency

issues

  • Is it the case that a less inegalitarian or inequitable society is

performs better in aggregate economic terms ?

  • Bu then, what does matter ? Equity or inequality?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The growth-inequality conundrum

Growth and inequality in a sample of growth spells Source: Ostry, Berg and Tsangarides (2014)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Economic growth and inequality

  • Would reducing outcome inequality accelerate growth?

Probably not.

  • The inequality of opportunity through market imperfections

entails both slower growth and more income inequality

  • The role of market imperfections

– Capital markets – Inequality in access to quality education, decent job (discrimination), justice – Inequality in distribution of political power – Endogenous redisrinution slowing down growth

  • Overall, inequity may matter as much for efficiency than

inequality

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 4. But… the inequality of income matters too
  • Demand side of the economy (the US crisis)
  • Income inequality creates inequality of opportunity for the next

generation (China example)

  • Hence what is the optimal policy?
  • Policy of equalizing opportunities and redistribution through

taxes: −

To generate revenues allowing for the equalizing of opportunities − To prevent the intergenerational transmission − But this has a cost in terms of growth

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 5. Conclusion
  • No duality and no choice to be made:

Fighting inequality for social justice and economic efficiency requires attacking it on its two fronts, outcome and

  • pportunity!
  • Many unkowns: 'optimal inequality', 'perception vs. reality',

'sensitivity', …but huge progress made in the understadning of inequality policy

  • Be prepared to face future inequality implications of technical

change

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

THANK YOU

16