income inequality in the u s by state metropolitan area
play

Income Inequality in the U.S. by State, Metropolitan Area, and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Income Inequality in the U.S. by State, Metropolitan Area, and County Sommeiller E., Price M. 4 th edition Regional inequality & national inequality alike ? NATIONWIDE Piketty & Saez, Income Inequality in the United States,


  1. Income Inequality in the U.S. by State, Metropolitan Area, and County Sommeiller E., Price M. 4 th edition

  2. Regional inequality & national inequality alike ? • NATIONWIDE – Piketty & Saez, Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-2002 . – Saez, Striking It Richer. • STATE- or COUNTY-LEVEL – EPI, Pulling Apart

  3. Top 1 / bottom 99 by state, 2015 • Nationwide, the top 1 percent of families earned 26.3 times as much income as the bottom 99 percent in 2015. • New York (44.4), Florida (39.5), Connecticut (37.2), Nevada (32.7), Wyoming (31.2), Massachusetts (30.9), California (30.7), Illinois (27.0), New Jersey (24.3), and Washington (24.2). • Mississippi (16.4), Nebraska (16.3), Vermont (16.2), North Dakota (15.8), New Mexico (15.5), Maine (15.4), West Virginia (15.3), Iowa (14.7), Hawaii (13.7), and Alaska (12.7).

  4. Top 1 / bottom 99 by metropolitan area, 2015 • Nationwide, the top 1 percent of families earned 26.3 times as much income as the bottom 99 percent in 2015. • The 10 metropolitan areas displaying the largest gaps between the top 1 percent and the bottom 99 percent mostly concentrate in Florida. • Except the Jackson metropolitan area spanning Wyoming & Idaho with the largest income gap (132). • In the 10 metropolitan areas with the smallest income gaps, the top 1 percent earned between 5.4 and 8.5 times the income of the bottom 99 percent of families.

  5. Top 1 / bottom 99 by county, 2015 • Nationwide, the top 1 percent of families earned 26.3 times as much income as the bottom 99 percent in 2015. • Teton county, Wyoming (142.2), New York county, NY (113), La Salle, TX (92.1), Collier, FL (90.1), Monroe, FL (81.3), Palm Beach, FL (77.9), Pitkin & San Miguel, Colorado (72.2 & 69.2), Walton, FL (68.5) and Indian River, FL (67.2). • In the 10 counties with the smallest income gaps, the top 1 percent earned between 5 and 6 times the income of the bottom 99 percent. They mostly concentrate in the two Dakotas, Alaska, Nebraska & Virginia.

  6. Local top income thresholds, 2015 • The national income threshold for entering the top 1% of families in 2015 is $421,926. • By state (min-max) : Connecticut $700,800 and Arkansas $255,050. • By metro area (min-max) : $1.7 million in Jackson, Wyoming-Idaho and $121,339 in Rio Grande City, Texas. • By county (min-max) : $2.25 million in Teton, Wyoming and $98,832 in Liberty, Georgia.

  7. US top income threshold, 2015 • The national income threshold for entering the top 1% of families in 2015 is $421,926. • By state, highest share : 17.4% in California. – Lowest share : 0.11% in Vermont. • By metro area, highest share : 14.9% in New York- Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA. – 638 metropolitan areas out of 916 score less than 0.02% but more than 0. • By county, highest share in New York, NY (6%). – 2 603 counties out of 3 061 display a share below 0.02%, but none scores 0.

  8. Top income growth since 1949 Share of total growth captured by... 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% … top 1%, … bottom 99%, … top 1%, … bottom 99%, pre-1980 pre-1980 post-1980 post-1980 expansions expansions expansions expansions United States Northeast Midwest South West

  9. The new Gilded Age Top 1% income share, U.S. & regions, 1917-2015 % 25 United States Northeast 20 Midwest 15 South 10 West 5 1917 1927 1937 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1997 2007

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend