Independent School District 659 Longfellow DO/ALC Greenvale Community Center Board Presentation Update October 28, 2019
• Planning / Design Process
Planning Process To be successful, a Core Planning Group must: » Be empowered to make decisions » Be willing to make decisions » Request information, not a decision from input givers » Be a manageable size to allow for a faster timeline
Design Process Project Phases: » Schematic Design » Putting the Pieces in the Right Locations » Core Planning Groups Significant » Design Development Input » Moving from 2D to 3D » User Group Meetings » Coordination » Construction Documents » Drawings / Contracts for Bidding » Bidding » Construction » Occupancy
• Longfellow Renovation Design
Longfellow Renovation Core Planning Group • Met 3 times: Arleene Gallardo, ISD #659 » September 19, 2019 Jordan Streiff, ISD #659 » September 26, 2019 Chris Neset, ISD #659 » October 10, 2019 Hope Langston, ISD #659 Andrea Nelson-Walker, ISD #659 • Developed Criteria Stephanie DeAdder, ISD #659 Lisa Bethke, ISD #659 Mary Czech, ISD #659 Emily Grote, ISD #659 Dorothy Cohan, ISD #659 Molly Viesselman, ISD #659 Mary Grace Hanson, ISD #659 Jim Kulseth, ISD #659 Stephany Stromme, ISD #659 Daryl Kehler, ISD #659 Jackie Dulac, ISD #659 Val Mertesdorf, ISD #659 Matt Hillmann, ISD #659 Kim Briske, ISD #659 Anita Aase, ISD #659 Sara Pratt, ISD #659 Cheryl Hall, ISD #659
Site
Referendum Scope Program Overview » 5 – 10 additional parking » Renovate classrooms into District Office functions PROPOSED ADDITIONAL ADDITION PARKING SPACES
• Guiding Principles
Guiding Principles » The building should be safe and secure while being warm and welcoming for staff, students and visitors. » The office suites should provide equitable opportunities for natural daylight . » The design should separate ALC students from District Office operations where possible to limit interruptions of either group. » The office suites should include opportunities for flex/soft seating for collaboration. » The original character of the building should be maintained while supporting the collaborative culture of the District Office. » The District Office functions should be able to be secured after hours. » The office suites should contain ways to secure individual departments information and materials from others. » The design should minimize loss of green space for the ALC.
• Design Criteria
Design Criteria (1 of 5) » Finance – 5 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. – Dedicated storage that is lockable for petty cash, etc. » HR – 3 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. – Not visible from Main Entry. – Cubicles need separation for conversations on employee benefits. » Nutrition – 2 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. » Building and Grounds – 2 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. » Enrollment – 1 person – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. – Near Main Entry for parents. – Include flex/drop in space for parents filling out paperwork.
Design Criteria (2 of 5) » Special Services – 3 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 4-6. » Teaching and Learning – 2 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. » Assessment – 1 person – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. » Technology – 2 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 3-4. » Superintendent – 2 people – 1 Private Office w/ meeting space for 6-8. – Anita’s work station immediately adjacent.
Draft Design Criteria (3 of 5) » The main reception should have space for two people who will interact with visitors and help direct them. » Use of card readers at the doors along the hallway will be used to prevent access into spaces as needed. » Most people visiting the District Office are staff members and new staff for training. » The existing cubicles will be reused in the new suite as they are relatively new. » Enrollment does not have to be near the entry. Having a drop in office near the main entry would be sufficient during enrollment season and could be used by other departments as well. » HR, Finance, Nutrition and Buildings & Grounds should be located near each other (“operations” suite). » Teaching & Learning, Special Services, Assessment, Tech and the Superintendent should be located near each other (“instructional” suite). » Private offices require windows and interior walls will be partially glass to allow some daylight to filter into the center of the room.
Draft Design Criteria (4 of 5) » There should be a clear path for visitors to the Board Room. » The Board Room needs to accommodate 50 people and be able to be split into two rooms for trainings and other meetings. » Staff Lounge to have capacity for 18-20 people. » Storage and records for the District Office needs to include space for working and sorting (curriculum deliveries). » Plan storage to be separate for ease of B&G access. » Provide conference spaces of various sizes , focusing on medium size (6- 12 people) – One should be located for more confidential conversations
Draft Design Criteria (5 of 5) » The design should include single occupant restrooms to be unisex and have a urinal as well. » The design needs to support the required deliveries of curriculum and other materials. » If possible, there should be a separate entry for ALC students. » The work room should be a separate space from the staff lunchroom / lounge. » The work room will be shared with the ALC staff. » Mailboxes in the work room will be for the District Office staff and the ALC mailboxes will remain on the upper level. » Provide a dedicated area for the creation of staff badges » The badging station and high speed scanner cannot share a computer.
• Core Group Bubble Diagram
Schematic Design Diagram: Lower Level
Schematic Design Diagram: Main Level
Schematic Design Diagram: Office Suite
Board Room Layout
Office Suite Axon
Office Suite 3D
• Greenvale Park • Renovation Design
Greenvale Renovation Core Planning Group • Met 4 times: Val Mertesdorf, ISD #659 » September 19, 2019 Clarice Grabau, ISD #659 » September 26, 2019 Matt Hillmann, ISD #659 » October 10, 2019 Martha Donahoe, ISD #659 Breezy Barrett, ISD #659 • Developed Criteria Erin Bailey, ISD #659 Bonnie Johnson, ISD #659 Melissa Bernhard, ISD #659 Jim Kulseth, ISD #659 Amy Goerwitz, ISD #659 Kevin Larson, St. Olaf Annie Kruse, ISD #659 Dr. Tracie Kreighbaum, ISD #659 Robert Coleman, Parent Pam Moening, ISD #659 Veronica Gamino, Community Action Center Kyle Roth, ISD #659 Anika Rychner, Community Action Center Sara Line, ISD #659
Site
Greenvale Park Renovation Site Plan per process with City of Northfield Stormwater Pond Existing Proposed Playground Practice Field Proposed Location Playground Location REMODEL: BUILDING-WIDE AGE APPROPRIATE & ADA New Greenvale Park UPGRADES, Elementary Building CONTROLLED ENTRY Lincoln Parkway
Referendum Diagram » Renovations to convert for use as Early Childhood / Early Ventures / Community Ed programming, other community partners » Renovations to create secure vestibule at main entry
• Guiding Principles
Guiding Principles » The building should be safe and secure while being warm and welcoming for students, staff, parents and visitors. » The programs within the building should be located for ease of access and wayfinding for families and other visitors. » There should be a separate entry for Early Ventures that parents access with fingerprint readers.
• Design Criteria
Draft Design Criteria (1 of 3) » The building secure entry vestibule needs to be larger to accommodate more visitors and circulation space. » The main office space needs to accommodate 4 work stations in the reception area. » The Community Education (ABE) classrooms should be located directly next to the main entrance . » There needs to be a variety of conference room sizes to support operations, including: – Small meetings (4-6, small, at least 1) – IEP meetings (10-12, medium-sized, at least 2) – Large training sessions (20+, large, at least 1) » There should be a work room separate from a staff lounge. » The staff lounge should be capable of having 25 people at one time.
Draft Design Criteria (2 of 3) » Early Ventures, Hand in Hand, and ECSE classrooms should be located near each other as some students access these programs within the same day. » ECFE, Community Education/ABE and CAC should be near each other. » ECFE classrooms should be located within the building so that they are easy to access for families . – Separation between parent rooms and child rooms. » There should be an area within the building to do large meetings or trainings, likely in the current media center. » The kitchen is to remain as is for future programming flexibility.
Recommend
More recommend
