IMPROVED DOWNHOLE GAS SEPARATORS IN SRP SYSTEMS Renato Bohorquez - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

improved downhole gas separators in srp systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IMPROVED DOWNHOLE GAS SEPARATORS IN SRP SYSTEMS Renato Bohorquez - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Houston, Texas September 12 15, 2006 IMPROVED DOWNHOLE GAS SEPARATORS IN SRP SYSTEMS Renato Bohorquez The University of Texas at Austin OUTLINE PROBLEM DESCRIPTION GRAVITY DRIVEN SEPARATORS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop

Houston, Texas September 12 – 15, 2006

IMPROVED DOWNHOLE GAS SEPARATORS IN SRP SYSTEMS

Renato Bohorquez The University of Texas at Austin

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 2

OUTLINE

  • PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
  • GRAVITY DRIVEN SEPARATORS
  • EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
  • RESULTS
  • CONCLUSIONS
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 3

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

100% liquid pump barrel fillage is desired. Otherwise:

  • Decreased volumetric

efficiency

  • Fluid pound
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 4

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

Incomplete liquid barrel fillage using a “poorboy” gas separator

Delayed opening

  • f traveling valve
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 5

GRAVITY DRIVEN SEPARATORS

Gas bubble’s position in separator annulus:

Vgas=Vliquid-Vslip

(downward velocity)

Vslip=6 in/s for low viscocity fluids – Bubble size – Fluid viscocity – Density difference

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 6

Varying liquid velocity during the upstroke in separator annulus

plunger liquid plunger annular

A V V A =

Conventional, Dplunger=1in, Ls=86in, 8.45spm, 200BPD

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 7

Gas bubble flow path over several strokes

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5 10 15 20

time (s) bubble position (in) .

Conventional Pump. D Conventional Pump. Ddip tube

dip tube=1.5 in,

=1.5 in, D Dplunger

plunger=1 in, Ls=86 in , 8.45 SPM

=1 in, Ls=86 in , 8.45 SPM

1st Stroke 2nd Stroke 3rd Stroke

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 8

Vnet=Vavg. upstroke (downward) - Vavg. downstroke (upward) Vnet ≤ 0 : No gas enters dip tube Vnet > 0 : Gas will enter dip tube (if upstroke duration = downstroke duration)

Gas bubble’s net velocity,Vnet Is a long downhole gas separator needed ? 6 ft is enough (Lisigurski)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 9

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

LABORATORY FLOWLOOP SCHEMATIC

Allows intermittent flow

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 10

Intermittent flow conditions

Automated butterfly valve Program motor to set pumping speed i.e. Open for 3 s. and close for 3 s. 10 SPM

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 11

RESULTS

Increased number of holes in a “poorboy” Extra foot with 12 more 3/8” holes

Will this improve the

  • perational range?
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 12

Poorboy 1 Poorboy 6 (12 holes along 1 ft) (24 holes along 2 ft)

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 13

Changing entry port geometry

PATTERSON ECHOMETER

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 14

Can we go beyond 6 in/s ?

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 15

Separator annular area effect

Mud Anchor – Dip tube annular area Using 1 in. OD DT: 5.154 in2 Using 1.5 in. OD DT: 4.172 in2 19% less space than with 1 in. DT Bubble size inside separator

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 16

The ‘pump’ stroke

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 17

Smaller annular space allows more gas bubbles coalescence

Hence, higher gas bubble rise velocity

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 18

As well as increased liquid velocity

At similar superficial liquid velocities, the liquid holdup is smaller for smaller annular spaces

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 19

Entry port position relative to perforations

32’’

Entry ports above the perforations Entry ports in front the perforations

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 20

Placing entry ports in front the perforations is better than above

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 21

CONCLUSIONS

  • What we learnt before (Lisigurski and Guzman):

– If we have enough rathole to set the pump intake below the perforations (at least 6 ft), we do not need a downhole gas separator. – Multiple rows of slots are not necessary. – The width of the slot is not important, but the total area is. – Maximize diameter of the dip tube (avoid high pressure drops). – It is not necessary to have a long dip tube (6 ft is enough).

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 22

  • Developments:

– Increasing the number of holes in a “poorboy” separator improves the operational range. – Having an entry port area half the size of the mud anchor-dip tube annular area is sufficient (as seen with the “poorboy” with 24 holes). – Changing the entry port geometry has no significant impact on downhole gas separator efficiency. – Placing the separator entry ports in front of the perforations is better than placing them above the perforations (Guzman). – Decreasing the separator annular area

  • Increases bubbles coalescence.
  • Increases liquid effective velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 23

CONCLUSIONS

  • Future work:

– Centrifugal downhole gas separators (early testing already in progress) – Study effect of pumping speed – Study effect of changing liquid’s viscocity

  • All gravity driven separators tested are limited by the

6 in/s threshold; and,

  • changing the entry ports configuration does not have a

significant impact.

  • So, changing the inside of the separator should be tried.
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Sept. 12 - 15, 2006

2006 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop 24

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION ANY QUESTIONS ?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special thanks to: Omar Lisigurski, Manuel Guzman, Tony Bermudez, Victor Ananaba, Dagoberto Romer

Yates Petroleum Inc.