implementing semiring based constraints using mozart
play

Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart Alberto - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart Alberto Delgado Carlos Alberto Olarte Jorge Andres Perez Camilo Rueda 1 1 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali Mozart/Oz Conference 2004 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C.


  1. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart Alberto Delgado Carlos Alberto Olarte Jorge Andres Perez Camilo Rueda 1 1 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali Mozart/Oz Conference 2004 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  2. Motivation CSP CSP is an expressive approach for modelling many real life problems, but it is not flexible enough to deal with: Over-constrained settings Preferences Non-crisp constraints Uncertainties SCSP SCSP extends CSP by allowing preferences, uncertainty, probabilities and similar ideas. Some proposals: Fuzzy CSP [Dubois,93] Partial CSP [Freuder,92] VCSP [Schiex,95] C-semirings [Bistarelli,97] Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  3. Motivation Cont. The problem There are not many solvers for SCSP. Most of them using CLP: CLP(FD,S) [Georget,98] Semiring integration with CHR [Bistarelli, 02] Evaluation-based semiring Meta-Constraints [Kelleher,03] But, what about CCP? Our contribution To integrate mechanisms for handling semiring-based constraints into the Mozart system. Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  4. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  5. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  6. C-semiring formalism Defines a semiring structure � A , + , × , 0 , 1 � where : A is the set of possible valuations × is used to combine constraints + is the operator to order the elements in A ( a ≥ s b iff a + b = a ) 0 , 1 are the min and max elements in A Some instances: Classic CSP: �{ false , true } , ∨ , ∧ , false , true � Fuzzy CSP: �{ x | x ∈ [0 , 1] } , max , min , 0 , 1 � Weighted CSP: �ℜ + , min , + , + ∞ , 0 � Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  7. C-semiring formalism (cont.) Some Definitions A Constraint System is a tuple � V , D , S � where V is a set of variables, D the variable domains and S a c-semiring A Constraint is a tuple � def , con � where con is a set of variables and the function def : D | con | → A represents the tuple valuations. Given c 1 = � def 1 , con 1 � and c 2 = � def 2 , con 2 � , the Constraint Combination c 1 ⊗ c 2 is the constraint c 3 = � def 3 , con 3 � with def 3 ( t ) = def 1 ( t ↓ con 1 con 3 ) × def 2 ( t ↓ con 2 con 3 ) and con 3 = con 1 ∪ con 2 A Soft CSP ( SCSP ) is a tuple � C , con � where C is a set of constraints and con a set of variables Sol(P) : The solution of the SCSP P = � C , con � is the constraint � c i ∈ C ↓ con Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  8. An Example Given the SCSP: Using S Fuzzy , def Sol ( P ) (2 , 1) = min (0 . 6 , 0 . 2 , 0 . 4) = 0 . 2, def Sol ( P ) (1 , 1) = 0 . 3 and � 2 , 1 � ≤ s � 1 , 1 � Using S Weighted , def Sol ( P ) (2 , 1) = +(0 . 6 , 0 . 2 , 0 . 4) = 1 . 2, def Sol ( P ) (1 , 1) = 1 . 1 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  9. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  10. How does CCP work in Mozart Propagation Propagators impose constraints narrowing the variable domains Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  11. How does CCP work in Mozart Distribution Propagation is not complete. When a computation space becomes stable two choices are created: in most cases X i = V and X i � = V Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  12. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  13. Soft Propagators We provide propagators (soft ones) dealing with the c-semiring formalism concepts They exploit standard mechanisms ( CPI ) for extending Mozart with new constraint systems and user-defined constraints Each propagator implements a filter and a valuation ( def ) function. The latter is computed only when the propagator becomes entailed , saving space and time. Filter is written according to the valuation function Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  14. Current Implementation Propagators Soft propagators for: LessThan , Equal , AllDiferent , UnaryPreference , nPreference , Distance constraints. Useful mechanisms that make expressing soft statements easier Softness Degree : Makes propagators harder or softer minLevel of preference ( α ): Rejects solutions where def ( t ) < s α Mechanisms to extend our implementation An abstract class to create new soft-propagators Classes and procedures handling semiring operations Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  15. How does it work? Let X ∈ [3 .. 5] , Y ∈ [1 .. 10] and Z ∈ [2 .. 6]. Imposing { Soft.lt X Y } and { Soft.lt Y Z } we get: minLevel=0.5 and SDegree=0.4 mLevel=0.6 , SDegree=0.5 def ( � 2 , 3 � ) = 1 . 0 Soft.lt is like FD . lt and only def ( � 3 , 3 � ) = 1 . 0 − 0 . 4 = 0 . 6 tuples where d i < d j are def ( � 3 , 2 � ) = 1 . 0 − 0 . 4 − 0 . 4 = allowed. 0 . 2 ≤ s 0 . 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  16. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  17. An over-constrained timetabling problem Problem To allocate conferences with preferences and disjoint constraints a a C. Schulte, G. Smolka. Finite Domain Constraint in Mozart Solution in [Schulte,Smolka. 2004] FD.atMost: enforcing the maximum number of parallel sessions FD. < : imposing precedence constraints FD.distinct: enforcing disjoint constraints Turning it over-constrained Adding some precedence constraint, the solver fail Solution?: Changing FD. < : by Soft. < and/or FD.distinct by Soft.distinct Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  18. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  19. Frequency Assignment Problem This problem tries to assign communication channels to radio links from limited spectral resources. constraints x i = f i pre-assigned frequency (soft) | x i − x j | > d ij when x i and x j may interfere together (soft) | x i − x j | > δ ij defines a duplex link (hard) Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  20. Frequency Assignment Problem (cont.) The Model Use S weighted c-semiring Use Soft.eq to impose pre-assigned constraints and Soft.distance for imposing interference ones Use FD.distance to define duplex links # Vars # Cons Time(ms) 14 20 0 36 27 0 56 167 10 86 338 20 121 543 70 158 795 90 200 1322 140 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

  21. Outline Introduction 1 C-semiring formalism CCP in Mozart Implementing Soft Constraints 2 Soft Propagators Results / Examples 3 An over-constrained timetabling problem Frequency Assignment Problem Imposing Preferences Conclusions 4 Future Work 5 Delgado A., Olarte C., Perez J. and Rueda C. Implementing Semiring-Based Constraints using Mozart.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend