implementation of a fluid model for the non linear
play

Implementation of a fluid model for the non-linear interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Summary Implementation of a fluid model for the non-linear interaction between runaway electrons and background plasma V. Bandaru 1 , M. Hoelzl 1 , G. Papp 1 , P. Aleynikov 2 , G. Huijsmans 3 1 Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching,


  1. Summary Implementation of a fluid model for the non-linear interaction between runaway electrons and background plasma V. Bandaru 1 , M. Hoelzl 1 , G. Papp 1 , P. Aleynikov 2 , G. Huijsmans 3 1 Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching, Germany 2 Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany 3 ITER Organization, Saint Paul Lez Durance, France EFTC, Athens, Oct-2017 Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons

  2. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Runaway electrons – basic overview Summary • Rapid fall of collision frequency at high energies, Free acceleration or “runaway” of electrons • 𝑤 𝑑 ≈ 6𝑤 𝑈𝑓 in a normal Tokamak discharge • Runaway of only distribution tails • Further, • At 𝐹 > 𝐹 𝑑 , runaway of thermal electron population * , • Typical 𝐹/𝐹 𝑑 ~10 −2 Larger E-fields necessary for significant runaway electron generation Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons * Dreicer, 1959 Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  3. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Scenario in a disruption Summary JET Field stochastization Large radial transport Thermal quench Large toroidal E RE generation Wesson et al. 1989 Implications for large tokamaks (like ITER) • Up to 70% conversion to RE current * Hollmann PoP 2015 Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons • If unconfined => potentially severe localized surface damage * Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  4. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Runaway confinement and MHD Summary • RE confinement depends on flux-surface restoration timescale • Plasma stability is strongly affected by REs • RE  MHD is hence important and is also highly non-linear Larger aim: Understand the coevolution of disruption and runaway electrons using a fluid model Scope of this talk: A fluid model for REs in the MHD code JOREK, tested with artificial thermal quenches Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  5. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Non-linear MHD code JOREK * Summary • Single fluid reduced-MHD code • Realistic toroidal X-point geometries • Includes 3D resistive wall effects Numerics • Flux-aligned 2D Bezier finite-elements • Fourier decomposition in the toroidal direction • Full implicit time-stepping • Preconditoning + GMRES iterations Flux-aligned 2D Bezier finite elements • MPI + OpenMP parallelized Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Routinely used to simulate ELMs and disruptions * Huijsmans et al., NF 2007 Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  6. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches RE fluid model Summary REs considered as a separate fluid species Total current density: Runaway current density: Integrating the drift-kinetic equation over the velocity phase-space yields Dreicer source (small angle Coulomb scattering) * Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons * Connor et. al., NF (1975) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  7. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches RE fluid model Summary Avalanche growth (large angle knock-on collisions) * Other governing equations (full form) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons * Rosenbluth et al., NF (1997) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  8. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Test cases with pseudo thermal quenches Summary Equilibrium plasma quenched by sudden step-up of perp. thermal conductivity RE source triggering thresholds * Circular plasma 𝑆 = 1.65𝑛, 𝑏 = 0.6𝑛, I = 0.67MA Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons (sim. to ASDEX-U) * Stahl et. al., PRL (2015) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  9. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Runaway conversion Summary Case B Case A RE Conversion = 29.4% RE Conversion = 39.5% Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Qualitatively similar behaviour observed experimentally Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  10. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Peaking of RE profiles Summary Case A Case B Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Reduced peaking for larger conversions Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  11. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Growth rates Summary Case B Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons RE current growth saturates when E-field diffusion dominates Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  12. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Preliminary comparison with GO * Summary Much slower quench Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons * GO: Existing 1D RE code * Pokol et al., EPS conf. (2017) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  13. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Outlook Summary • Improved near-threshold treatment * • Investigate the non-linear interaction of resistive-kink modes with peaked RE beams • Simulate the interaction of REs with a real disrupted plasma • Detailed comparison to ASDEX-U and other machines Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Nardon et al., PPCF (2017) * Embreus et al., REM talk. (2017) Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons

  14. Summary Backup Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Vinodh Bandaru

  15. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches References Summary 1. P. Helander, D. Grasso, R.J. Hastie, A. Perona, Resistive stability of a plasma with runaway electrons, Phys. Plasmas 14 , 122102 (2007). 2. J.W. Connor, R.J. Hastie, Relativistic limitations on runaway electrons, Nucl. Fusion 15, 415 (1975). 3. M.N. Rosenbluth, S.-V. Putvinski, Theory for avalanche of runaway electrons in Tokamaks, Nucl, Fusion 37, 1355 (1997). 4. P. Helander, L.-G. Eriksson, F. Andersson, Suppression of runways electron avalanches by radial diffusion, Phys. Plasmas 7, 4106 (2000). 5. P. Aleynikov, B.N. Breizman, The theory of two threshold fields for relativistic runaway electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 155001 (2016). Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons

  16. Introduction RE fluid model Tests on pseudo-quenches Summary Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons Fluid model for post-disruption runaway electrons

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend