Identification, characterization, and functional assessments of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

identification characterization and functional
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Identification, characterization, and functional assessments of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Identification, characterization, and functional assessments of isolated wetlands Dyukarev E.A. 1 , Gordov E.P. 1 , Dyukarev A.G. 1 , Autrey B. 2 , Lane C.R. 2 1 institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems SB RAS, Tomsk, Russia 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Identification, characterization, and functional assessments of isolated wetlands

Dyukarev E.A.1, Gordov E.P.1, Dyukarev A.G.1, Autrey B.2, Lane C.R.2

1 institute of Monitoring of Climatic and

Ecological Systems SB RAS, Tomsk, Russia

2 US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of

Research and Development, Cincinnati Ohio USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

n Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological

Systems SB RAS, Tomsk

n Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental

Medicine SB RAS, Novosibirsk

n Sukachev’ Institute of Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk n US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,

USA

ISTC project #4079 Identification, Characterization, and Functional Assessments of Isolated Wetlands of the Former Soviet Union

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Isolated wetland size

n Small sized wetlands are difficult to

delineate at satellite images.

n Small wetlands are more vulnerable to

external influence (climate change, water table lowering, pollution, antropogenic impact) than big stable peatlands with huge water and carbon storages.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Anthropogenic impact

n Oil and acid pollution of

soils during oil well exploitation

n Accident oil pollution n Gas flares emission n Disturbances in

hydrological regimes at linear industrial objects building

n Increase of fire

dangers at bog draining

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Climate change

n

Most intense warming in the continental areas Northern Hemisphere.

n

Changes in hydrological cycle due to changes in precipitations.

n

Ecosystem boundaries (Forest – Mire interface) is essentially changes under climatic impact.

IPCC 2011

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Landscape structure

1 – ancient river valley; 2 – denudation- accumulation plain; 3 – fluvial terrace, 4 – floodplain. Water wells line Depression in aquifer 177 water wells 250 000 m3 water daily

  • A. G. Dyukarev, N. N. Pologova State of Natural

Environment in the Tomsk Water Intake Area // Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2011, Vol. 4, No. 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

595 wetlands Total area – 25 636 ha 6,63 %

567 - isolated wetlands

Total area – 9 714 ha 2,51 %

22% 16% 10% 10% 9% 5%4%4% 2%2%2%2%2% 1%2%1%1%1%1%0%0%1%0%1% 5% 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 Wetland area, ha 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 No of obs 22% 16% 10% 10% 9% 5%4%4% 2%2%2%2%2% 1%2%1%1%1%1%0%0%1%0%1% 5% N = 567; Mean = 17,1; StdDv = 55,2; Max = 769,6; Min = 0,05 ha

50% S < 6,4 ha

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Isolated wetland classification

Bog Fen Dry

slide-9
SLIDE 9

T K D

n Site “T” –

“Timiryazevskoe” wetland

n Site “K” –

“Kirsanovskoe” wetland

n Site “D” – Dry

peatland

slide-10
SLIDE 10

n KR – pine-shrub-sphagnum

community – oligotrophic bog

n KF – open sedge-sphagnum fen n TR – pine-shrub-sphagnum

community – oligotrophic bog

n TF – open sedge-sphagnum fen

Site “T” Site “K”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Site “D”

n Dry peatland

Peatland with low level of bog waters and compacted

  • peat. Surface vegetation
  • transformed. Fire

dangerous area.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Site “T” Site “K”

n TR – pine-shrub-sphagnum

community – oligotrophic bog. 420 cm, C14 age – 5880 yr.

n TF – open sedge-sphagnum

  • fen. 320 cm, C14 age – 4000 yr

1a 1b 2a 2b Bog Fen Dry

n KR– pine-shrub-sphagnum

community – oligotrophic bog. 310 cm, C14 age – 5300 yr

n KF – open sedge-sphagnum

  • fen. 100 cm, C14 age – 3050 yr
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Peat sampling

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3050±120 5290±120 5078±115 1990±80 4017±100 5880±85 3296±80 2374±85 1807±75 1560±8 1118±70

КТ КР ТТ ТР

Peat stratigraphy

1- сфагны, 2 Sph.fuscum, 3 – Sph. angustifolium, 4 – Sph. magellanicum, 5- Sph. papilosum, 6- Sph. balticum, 7 – Sph. majus, 8 - Sph. cuspidatum, 9 –

  • Sph. fallax, 10 – Sph. nemoreum, 11
  • Sph. obtusum, 12-Sph. sect. Acutifolia,

13 - Scheuchzeria palustris, 14 - осоки, 15 – C. limosa, 16 – C. rostrata, 17 – C. lasiocarpa, 18- Menyanthes trifoliata, 19 – Equisetum, 20 – Eriophorum vaginatum, 21 – Calla, 22 - Pinus sylvestris, 23 - Oxicoccus palustris, 24 – злаки, 25 - Comarum palustre, 26 – травы, 27 – Phragmites australis, 28 - Theliptheris palustris, 29 – гипновые мхи, 30 – Drepanocladus, 31 – листовой опад, 32 – водоросли, 33 – кустарнички, 34 – Warnstorfia, 35 – древесина, 36 - Meesia triquetra, 37 - Pleurozium schreberi TF KR KF TR

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Site “T”. Peat depth map.

n 240 depth sampling n Maximal depth – 8 m n Median depth – 2,7 m n Peat storages – 395 127 m3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Carbon dioxide and methane emission

n Li-Cor LI-8100A (Li-

Cor Biogeoscience, USA) Automated Soil CO2 Flux System with Transparent Long-Term Chamber LI-8100-104

CO2 CH4 H2O CO2

n Infra-red gas analyzer OPTOGAZ-500.4 (OPTEC,

Russia). Static dark chamber method with

n Air sampled from the chamber was analyzed by

SHIMADZU GC-14b gas chromatograph at flame- ionization detector. Methane emission was calculated from concentration rise within the chamber.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CO2 and CH4 emission measurement

n Static dark

chamber method

n dt = 30 min n Twice per month n May – October n 2008 – 2012

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Peatland vegetation photosynthesis measurements Li-Cor LI-8100A Automated Soil CO2 Flux System

Methane sampling

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Seasonal variations of CO2 emission

Reconstruction from air temperature dependence F = a exp (b T) Q10 Dry = 1.69 Fen =1.70 Bog = 1.79

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Carbon cycle scheme

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Carbon turnover at studied peatlands

KR KF TR TF

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Спасибо за внимание!

Photo Charles R. Lane