i
play

:i extensions ) characterizations for Galois Thin ( Equivalent - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Extension , Galois Galois Intermediate I : Extensions lame l Gal LEIF ) t.EE if ] ' tf Galois Elf is :i extensions ) characterizations for Galois Thin ( Equivalent - Gal ( EIF ) . Then and [ E : F) so let G - suppose


  1. Extension , Galois Galois Intermediate I : Extensions

  2. lame l Gal LEIF ) t.EE if ] ' tf Galois Elf is :÷÷i÷÷ extensions ) characterizations for Galois Thin ( Equivalent - Gal ( EIF ) . Then and [ E : F) so let G - suppose equivalent following : are the :÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷¥÷÷÷÷ Galois (4) Elf is

  3. long time ago : .it#i::iEii:::D Quotients ) me and Elf are Galois Cory ( Galois ÷÷÷÷÷:¥÷÷÷ " Gal ( E # Kaye , k , Gall KIF ) . and = WTNwHti , ' ' iff " ? this Galois ? intermediate extensions when are

  4. intermediate fields ) ( Conjugate ' Def n and and Tet FEKEE Galois be supper Elf , isomorphism exists there some . If FE KE E we say , Then Tle - side That T : k → I so conjugate to k . I is an equivalence relation ) " is " conjugate to Thin ( " I is conjugate to Kai by The given relation relation quintana . " is K an Through The motions . PI Go

  5. for conjugate fields ) Thin ( Alternate description - { I : I conj ( K ) and let Galois be - let EIF , K ) Then conjugate to is . retral ( EIF ) } = { t ( K ) conj ( K ) : - . we hat regal LEIF ) , " Z a. k fr PI For " ay , - idp . with ( Mk ) Ip an isomorphisms - : K -7 idk ) 4k is : ktk with to k conjugate T II be ' ' e " . , let For Galois Elli we and are Elk By Thur 51 , since . So rlk ) - TWI re Gal LEIA extends to some know . t . 1B

  6. - { K ) , Then - k HK ) have So : If conj ( K ) - we - re Gal ( EIF ) fr all . and of XT splitting field let x' - Le be Ex let E , - ⑥ ( WEE ) - ④ ( wt ) Ks and - k , - ④ ( Vz ) and ka - spaces They are as vector degree 3 so Each our is fields ? yes , Are Thy isomorphic as isomorphic ? . : arr ) → ④ ( wer ) build f " ' f can that we know we f root sending Vc to any by - 2) ' x' -2 Ff Q Q of idfirra 1352 ) ) . idk

  7. ⑥ ( w 't ) build 4,3 ( Va ) → Likewise can we : ④ → Q extends idea : that . , Ks } = { K Ceuj ( ki ) , .kz have Hence we D ? " " related to Galois ness Conjlk ) Hew is says if " Galois quotients " E. g. our , Gall Elk ) # Gal LEIF ) Galois , Then KIF is

  8. ⇒ intermediate Galois ness ) Chandu Eakins of Thy ( Equivalent and . Then let FE KEE Galois , be EIF let are egvinlent following . the H conj ( K ) = { K ) rly C- Gull Klf ) have ( " for of Gal ( EIF ) , all we ( iii ) Gal ( Elk ) A Gal ( EIF ) ( iv ) Khs Galois . is ' " happiness square of tf " use (a) ⇐ Ciii )

  9. 4) ⇒ Cii ) - ( K } ( oujlk ) Given : c- Gal ( KIF ) . 4k have foetal LEIF ) want : , we k to Hk ) them isomorphism always tha Note : is an show to We just need pointwise F fixes that . rt Gal LEIF ) . But all for HK ) - K : rt Gal LEIF ) ) = lock ) - Coujlk ) 1¥ { K ) . -

  10. Ci ) ⇒ Ciii ) the C- Gall KIF ) have firebrat LEIF ) we Given : : Gull Elk ) s Gal ( Elf ) want have f : Gul LEIF ) - ' GUICHE ) hypothesis . we By our homomorphism Xlr )=Hk by . is a given : olk ' idk } Kerl 4) = Lothal LEIF ) Further = Gaulle Ik ) . Gal LEIF ) . Gal ( Elk ) o 305 , By Dad

  11. Liu ) Ciii ) ⇒ Gal ( Elk ) s Gal LEIF ) Given : Galois . want KIF is : irreducible pile Fck ) i for all prove this by showing we'll and splits separable k , then plx ) with is root one m we already know Galois , in KUD . is Since Elf plus ) is , then root E has in ) plx Simon a roots E all in Leprnble and are . irreducibly Assume t th carthy that plxl has a least 2 at degree KID of fucker . in KCH , about in knew the root be we let a

  12. at the - linear fuhr be mob let 13,8 and non By separability a. 13,8 KCXT . are of plx ) in , know Galois , we distinct . Elf Since all is - p that ok ) TE Gul LEIF ) - so there is Sean . there is and so Galois Elk is 9 , hwk By , with - 8 Tlp ) TE Gall Elk ) - . some know Gul ( Elk ) o Gal ( EIF ) , we assume Since we have pe Gal CEIK ) , we lothal LEIF ) and for ay fixes K . ' - ' e Gal ( Elk ) particular , 9pct . In 4pct

  13. " ) should fix all - ' KEK Consider - ' Te ( o It r . . " 5) Ca ) - ' T @ we should ( r have AEK , Since - a . - - 1) (d) - ' ( t ( ok ) ) ) - ' t ( r " ) ( r Nate r = - ' ( t LPD = o - ' (8) - r - * a r (a) =p , last inequality fellows swim the where - ' ( p ) - d → a- so - r .

  14. Civ ) ⇒ Ci ) Galois is KIF Given : = { K ) . conj ( K ) want : - phis 'm TE Gul ( KIF ) isom all is fer an that Note SF . extends idf : F - that from k to k TEGAILKIF ) each know for 51 Theorem we By of , E -7 E extensions r : [ Eik ] may have we an element of Gal LEIF ? extension such is Evey T take this form ? . Gal LEIF ) demark at How my - LE : F ) - IGNKEIFH = ( K : FILE : K ) I Gul ( Klett CE :k ) - # of extras choices for T

  15. extension at retral ( Elf ) Since eade is an - K . HK ) have TE Gall KIF ) - we some , - { K ) Coujlk ) So - . 1¥

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend