SLIDE 1 I FIXED THE CUFF BUY MY PATIENT IS STIFF ? WHAT HAPPENED & WHAT I NEED FROM THE SURGEON
TODD S. ELLENBECKER, DPT, MS, SCS, OCS, CSCS CLINIC DIRECTOR & DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL RESEARCH SELECT PHYSICAL THERAPY SCOTTSDALE SPORTS CLINIC SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA VICE PRESIDENT, MEDICAL SERVICES ATP WORLD TOUR
SLIDE 2
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT STIFFNESS FOLLOWING RTC REPAIR ?
SLIDE 3
EARLY SURGERY WITH CAPSULAR RELEASE & DELAYED SURGERY WITH PRE-OP PT TO ADDRESS CAPSULAR RESTRICTION
IN ROM RETURN OR OUTCOME WITH EITHER METHOD…….
SLIDE 4
- RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW 43 PATIENTS NO ROM FOR 6 WEEKS
WITH FULL SLING IMMOBILIZATION
- SUBSET OF 10 PATIENTS DEEMED STIFF AT 6-8 WEEKS
– FF LESS THAN 100 DEGREES, AND ER LESS THAN 30 (PROM)
- AT 1 YEAR – NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN AROM &
FUNCTION “SLING IMMOB FOR 6 WEEKS DOES NOT RESULT IN
INCREASED LONG TERM STIFFNESS AND MAY IMPROVE TENDON HEALING”
SLIDE 5
- IDENTIFICATION OF RISK FACTORS WITH RTC
REPAIR
– CALCIFIC TENDONITIS, PASTA LESION, SLAP REPAIR, ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS & SINGLE TENDON RTC REPAIR
- MODIFICATION OF POST-OP PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS
WITH RISK FACTORS
- 79/152 RTC REPAIRS HAD MODIFIED PROTOCOL
- 0/79 PATIENTS HAS POST-OPERATIVE STIFFNESS
USING MODIFIED PROTOCOL WITH CLOSED CHAIN OVERHEAD MOVEMENT PATTERN APPLIED
- CONCLUSION: IN PATIENTS WITH RISK FACTORS,
CLOSED CHAIN OVERHEAD EXERCISE CAN BE EFFECTIVE TO PROVENT POST-OP STIFFNESS
SLIDE 6 PT: What do I need from the Surgeon ?
– Prescription
- Tear Size (ie Massive)
- Tendon(s) involvement
- Protocol to follow
- Complications
– Operative Report – Protocol
– PROM – AAROM, – AROM – Resistive Exercise
SLIDE 7 ELEMENTAL QUESTION:
WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF EARLY V DELAYED ROM AFTER ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
– BASIC SCIENCE
– EFFECT OF FIXATION METHOD AND REPAIR STRENGTH – EFFECT OF SPECIFIC RANGES OF MOTION (ROTATION / PLANE) – CLINICAL OUTCOMES VERSUS LABORATORY OUTCOMES – CLINICAL STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE TENDON LOADING YET DECREASE RISK OF STIFFNESS
SLIDE 8
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10 Park et al, 2008
Rehabilitation Parameters
- Passive ER Rom <5%
- f SS MVIC
- Active ER @ side
30% SS MVIC
300 N
90 N
SLIDE 11
POST OPERATIVE ROTATOR CUFF REHABILITATION PROTOCOL: MEDIUM – LARGE TEARS
SLIDE 12 REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
- INITIAL PHASE: (0-4 / 0-6 WEEKS)
– MODALITIES – PROM PROGRESSING TO AAROM /AROM – CAUTION WITH ACTIVE ABDUCTION – ROM RESTRICTIONS (?) – SCAPULAR STABILZATION – TAS REHAB
SLIDE 13
WHAT DOES BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH TELL US ABOUT SAFE RANGE OF MOTION FOLLOWING ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR ?
SLIDE 14
EFFECT OF ARM ELEVATION AND ROTATION ON THE STRAIN OF THE REPAIRED ROTATOR CUFF TENDON: A CADAVERIC STUDY
HATAKEYAMA & ITOI ET AL, AM J SPORTS MED 29(6):788-794, 2001
SLIDE 15 EFFECT OF ROTATION ON ROTATOR CUFF TENDONS
- 14 CADAVER REPAIRS (2 x 1.5) CM
- STRAIN MEASURED IN 30 DEGREES
OF ELEVATION IN THE:
– SCAPULAR PLANE – CORONAL PLANE – SAGITTAL PLANE
SLIDE 16 EFFECT OF ROTATION ON ROTATOR CUFF TENDONS
- SCAPULAR & CORONAL PLANES:
– INCREASED STRAIN IN 30 & 60° OF IR – DECREASED STRAIN IN 30 & 60° OF ER
– INCREASED STRAIN IN ALL POSITIONS RELATIVE TO CORONAL AND SCAPULAR PLANE POSITIONS
- CONCLUSION: ER OF UP TO 60° DECREASES
STRAIN IN REPAIRED ROTATOR CUFF TENDON IN 30° OF ELEVATION IN EITHER THE SCAPULAR OR CORONAL PLANES
SLIDE 17
THE EFFECT OF ARM POSITION ON STRETCHING OF THE SUPRASPINATUS, INFRASPINATUS, AND POSTERIOR PORTION OF THE DELTOID MUSCLES: A CADAVERIC STUDY
MURAKI ET AL, 2006 CLIN BIOMECHANICS 21:474-480
SLIDE 18 EFFECT OF X-ARM ADDUCTION ON RTC TENSION / STRETCHING
- NO SIGNIFICANT AFFECT OF X-ARM ADDUCTION AT 60
DEGREES ELEVATION ON THE SUPRAPSINATUS, AND INFRASPINATUS
- INFRASPINATUS: IR WITH EXTENSION INCREASED STRAIN
– IR @ 60 DEGREES ELEVATION AND X-ARM ADDUCTION DID NOT INCREASE STRAIN OVER NEUTRAL POSITION
– OBJECTIVE QUANTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC RANGES OF MOTION WHICH INCREASE TENSION ON THE RTC – KNOWLEDGE OF TEAR SIZE AND TENDON INVOLVMENT CRUCIAL TO ENSURE SAFE ROM USED IN POST-OP REHABILITATION
SLIDE 19
MANUAL THERAPY 12 (2007): 231-239
SLIDE 20
- DECREASED STRESS ON REPAIRED
SUPRASPINATUS TENDON WITH 30 DEGREES ABDUCTION WITH GH JOINT MOBILIZATION
- SAME STRESS AS RESTING POSITION
- CLINICAL APPLICATION:
SLIDE 21 CODMAN’S EXERCISE: PASSIVE RANGE OF MOTION ?
EMG OF SELECTED SHOULDER MUSCULATURE DURING UN-WEIGHTED AND WEIGHTED PENDULUM EXERCISES TYLER ET AL, NAJSPT 2006 1:2(73-79)
SLIDE 22
NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE B/T TYPES OF WEIGHTED & UNWEIGHTED CODMANS RTC GROUP HAD GREATER MUSCLE ACTIVATION
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
SLIDE 25
SLIDE 26
SLIDE 27
- Detrimental effects of paralysis
and immobilization
- Loss of scar volume and lower
ultimate load of repair with no stress applied to repaired tendon
SLIDE 28
- SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZE TEARS
- SLING USE – ABDUCTION
SLING/BRACE
- GROUP 1 – PROM 3-4 TIMES PER DAY
- GROUP 2 – NO PROM FOR 4-5 WEEKS
– 4 WEEKS SMALL TEAR – 5 WEEKS MEDIUM TEAR
SLIDE 29 KIM ET AL, 2012
– FOLLOW UP AT 3,6,12 WEEKS POST-OP
- NO SIG DIFFERENCE B/T GROUPS IN PROM
IN ANY PLANE OF MOTION
- NO DIFFERENCE IN VAS
- @ 12 MOS – NO CHANGE IN CONSTANT OR ASES
– DETACHMENT OF RTC REPAIR 12 MOS
- 12% GRP 1
- 18% GRP 2 (NO SIG DIFFERENCE)
– EARLY PROM DID NOT GUARANTEE ROM RETURN BUT DID NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE REPAIR !!!
SLIDE 30
SLIDE 31
RIBOH & GARRIGUES, 2014
SLIDE 32
RIBOH & GARRIGUES, 2014
SLIDE 33 CLINICAL APPLICATION:
GAINING EXTERNAL ROTATION ROM S/P RTC REPAIR
TENSION ON SUPRASPINATUS TENDON WITH ADDUCTED GLENOHUMERAL POSITION
SLIDE 34 REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
- GAINING EXTERNAL ROTATION
– ABDUCTION POSITION SEQUENCE
- INITIAL ER @ 45°
- EARLY PROGRESSION TO ER
WITH 80-90 ° ABDUCTION TO ADDRESS ANTERIOR/INFERIOR CAPSULE
DUE TO INCREASED STRESS ON SUPRASPINATUS REPAIR
SLIDE 35
IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACTIVE & PASSIVE ROM FOLLOWING ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR ?
SLIDE 36
– EARLY < 6 WEEKS POST-OP / DELAYED > 6WEEKS POST-OP
- NO SIG DIFFERENCE B/T EARLY & DELAYED AROM IN RE-TEAR
RATES:
– < 1 CM, 1-3 CM OR 3-5 CM FOR ANY FIXATION METHOD
- INCREASED RISK OF RE-TEAR:
– < 3 CM ONLY FOR SINGLE ROW REPAIRS – ALL FIXATION GROUPS >3 CM – >5 CM IN EARLY GROUP FOR SB FIXATION
SLIDE 38
SHORT TERM OUTCOME: EARLY RANGE OF MOTION FOLLOWING ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
SLIDE 39 Descriptive Report of Shoulder Range of Motion and Isometric Rotational Strength 6 and 12 Weeks Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
- Ellenbecker, TS
- LaSueur, D
- Sueyashi, T
- Bailie DS
SLIDE 40 Ellenbecker et al, 2016
TABLE 3. Comparison of isometric shoulder internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength values of the injured and uninjured extremities measured at 12 weeks (n=60 patients)
Position Injured Shoulder (Mean ± SD) Uninjured Shoulder (Mean ± SD) with (%) Difference External Rotation Strength 11 ± 6 16 ± 7 (28.5%) Internal Rotation Strength 20 ± 9 25 ± 10 (17%)
SLIDE 41
SLIDE 42
Thank-You