I-84 Danbury Project Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting No. 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

i 84 danbury project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

I-84 Danbury Project Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting No. 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I-84 Danbury Project Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting No. 3 September 24, 2019 0 Agenda PAC Membership and Recap of Outreach Efforts Perspective Gathering Exercise Project Need Project Need Check-in Project Purpose


slide-1
SLIDE 1

I-84 Danbury Project Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting No. 3

September 24, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

1

  • PAC Membership and Recap of Outreach Efforts
  • Perspective Gathering Exercise
  • Project Need
  • Project Need Check-in
  • Project Purpose
  • Project Purpose Check-in
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

PAC Membership and Recap of Outreach Efforts

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

PAC Membership

AAA Boehringer-Ingelheim Cartus City of Danbury:

Business Advocacy, Engineering, Health & Human Services, Library, Planning, Public Works, & Traffic

CityCenter Danbury CTrides Connecticut State Police Danbury Airport Danbury Commission for Persons with Disabilities Danbury Hospital Danbury Housing Authority Danbury Public Schools Danbury Museum & Historical Society Get Downtown Danbury Greater Danbury Chamber

  • f Commerce

Housatonic Area Regional Transit (HART) Housatonic Railroad Juniper Ridge Tax District League of Women Voters

  • f Northern Fairfield County

Motor Transport Association

  • f CT (MTAC)

New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Putnam County, New York Sierra Club Spring Street Neighborhood Sterling Woods Association Town of Bethel Town of Brookfield Town of New Fairfield Town of New Milford Town of Newtown Town of Redding Town of Ridgefield West Terrace Neighborhood Western Connecticut Council

  • f Governments (WestCOG)

Western Connecticut State University West Side District

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

Recap of f Outreach to to Date:

PAC Meetings

2

Stakeholder Meetings

34

Pop-Up Events

7

Public Open House

1

Survey Responses

178

Focus Group

3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Perspective Gathering Exercise

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Objectives of Today’s Meeting

6

▪ Better understand the unique perspectives of individual PAC members and constituencies ▪ “Check in” on local issues and priorities ▪ Provide context that will inform the development of Project Purpose & Need

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

Comment Card Exercise

From my perspective, the most pressing needs and deficiencies within the I-84 corridor in Greater Danbury are (list up to 3): In my opinion, the I-84 Danbury Project would be successful if it achieved the following:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Project Need

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

▪ Establishes the problem(s) ▪ Justified by data and research ▪ In the case of I-84 Danbury, project need has been quantified through the needs & deficiencies analysis, which is consistent with stakeholder input received to date.

What is is pro roje ject need?

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Key Pro roblems: ▪ Congestion ▪ Poor Mobility

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Key Pro roblems: ▪ Congestion ▪ Poor Mobility

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

Congestion is characterized by slower speeds, longer delays, and queuing. Causes of Congestion: ▪ Heavy Traffic Volumes ▪ Highway Design Deficiencies ▪ Weaving ▪ Crashes

What is is Congestion?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

I-84 Tra raffic Volumes

13

130,000

vehicles per day

110,000

vehicles per day

Original Design Capacity: 15,000

vehicles per day

= 10,000

vehicles per day

2016:

(Observed Traffic Volumes)

2040:

(Projected Traffic Volumes)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Heavy Tra raffic Volumes

14

▪ Morning peak hour congestion

  • ccurs primarily in westbound

direction (towards New York) ▪ Afternoon peak hour congestion occurs primarily in eastbound direction (towards Waterbury)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Highway Design Deficiencies

15 Sharp curves limit sight distance (Exit 3) Incomplete interchange (Exit 6) Short merging distances (Exit 4) Short ramp causes ramp queueing (Exit 5) Left hand exit (Exit 7) Insufficient shoulder widths (Exit 8)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Weaving

16 from Norwalk to Waterbury to New Milford from New York State

3 7 Heavy weaving (e.g. between Exit 3 and Exit 7) contributes to congestion and crashes ▪ Left hand exit ▪ Route 7 enters on the right and exits on the left ▪ Poor signage leads to driver confusion

Heavy Weaving Area

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cra rash Hotspots

17

▪ About one crash a day ▪ Mostly rear-end and sideswipe crashes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Key Pro roblems: ▪ Congestion ▪ Poor Mobility

18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

The ability of a transportation system to effectively move people and goods. Causes of Poor Mobility: ▪ Local traffic patterns ▪ Poor connections between the highway and key destinations ▪ Increased travel demand ▪ Low use of transit, biking, and walking

What is is Mobility?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

▪ Lack of alternative east-west routes ▪ 1/3 of highway traffic is local traffic ▪ Highway traffic diverts onto local roads to avoid congestion

Local Tra raffic Patterns

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

Poor Connections Between th the Highway and Key Destinations

▪ Danbury Hospital ▪ Major Employers ▪ Downtown Danbury

Danbury Hospital Accessibility

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22

In Increased Tra ravel Demand

One of the fastest growing regions in the State since 2010 ▪ City of Danbury estimated to have added over 4,300 new residents since 2010 ▪ Brookfield and Bethel also among the fastest growing towns in the State

Hartford New Haven Bridgeport Stamford Waterbury Norwich New London

I-84 Danbury Project Area

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23

Low Use of f Tra ransit, Biking, & Walking

▪ Over 90% of Danbury commuters drive to work ▪ Lower use of transit compared to

  • ther CT cities

▪ No marked bicycle lanes within Danbury city limits ▪ Gaps in sidewalk network within project area

Source: American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates: 2013-2017. Table B08006

4.4% 4.6% 4.9% 10.9% 11.8% 12.4% 14.7% 15.1% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%

Danbury Waterbury Connecticut Norwalk Bridgeport New Haven Stamford Hartford

Percent of Commuters who took Transit to Work: 2017

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Project Need Check-In

24

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25

Please take a keypad. ▪ Read the question. ▪ You have 15 seconds to press the numbered button that corresponds with your answer. ▪ You may change your mind; the last button pressed will be your recorded response. Let’s start with a practice question . . .

Project Need Check-in

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Project Need Check-in

What time of day works best for future Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meetings?

  • 1. Morning
  • 2. Midday (lunch time)
  • 3. Evening

0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Morning Midday (lunch time) Evening

26

slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

Please rate each of the following statements based on the weighting scale below:

Project Need Check-in

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Project Need Check-in

I routinely change my travel patterns or behavior in order to avoid congestion

  • n I-84.
  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

28

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Project Need Check-in

Traffic congestion on I-84 has gotten worse over the last five years.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

29

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Project Need Check-in

Traffic congestion on I-84 is hurting the local economy.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

30

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Project Need Check-in

Danbury’s local street network makes it difficult to travel between destinations within the city without using the highway.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

31

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Project Need Check-in

Improved access to rail and bus transit service is a need within the region.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Project Need Check-in

The expansion of the Park & Ride system along I-84 and Route 7 is a need within the region.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

33

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Project Need Check-in

I-84 acts as a barrier to bicycle and pedestrian travel.

  • 1. Strongly Disagree
  • 2. Disagree
  • 3. Neutral
  • 4. Agree
  • 5. Strongly Agree

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

34

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Project Purpose

35

slide-37
SLIDE 37

36

Why is is I-84 in in Danbury Im Important?

▪ One of the fastest growing regions in the state ▪ Major employment center ▪ Major commuter and freight route (10% trucks)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What is is pro roje ject purp rpose?

37

▪ What the proposed action will accomplish (i.e. the intended outcome), not the action itself ▪ Supplemented with goals and objectives

✓used to define full intent, desired outcomes ✓used to evaluate and compare alternatives

▪ PAC Role: provide local perspective to help CTDOT develop the project purpose

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Project Purpose Check-In

38

slide-40
SLIDE 40

39

Please rate each of the following questions using the weighting scale below:

Project Purpose Check-in

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important
slide-41
SLIDE 41

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project reduces congestion on the highway (I-84 and Route 7)?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

40

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project reduces congestion on adjacent local roadways?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

41

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project reduces crashes?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

42

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Project Purpose Check-in

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

43

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project reduces sharp curves and weaving?

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project improves connections between the highway and Danbury Hospital?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

44

slide-46
SLIDE 46

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project improves connections between the highway and businesses and employers?

Project Purpose Check-in

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

45

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project improves bike and pedestrian infrastructure near the highway?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

46

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Project Purpose Check-in

How important is it that the I-84 Danbury Project improves rest areas and pull-offs for trucks?

  • 1. Not important

2. 2 3. 3 4. 4

  • 5. Very important

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Not important 2 3 4 Very important

47

slide-49
SLIDE 49

48

Thank you! Please return your clickers

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Next Steps

49

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Next t Ste teps

50

▪ Next PAC Meeting #4 on November 20, 2019

✓ Summarize Feedback ✓ Share the Draft Purpose & Need Statement ✓ Concept Development Approach

▪ Develop and Analyze Concepts ▪ Determine Range of Alternatives

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Anticipated Pro roje ject Schedule

51

slide-53
SLIDE 53

52

Andy Fesenmeyer, P.E. Project Manager, Consultant Design 860-594-3228 Andy.Fesenmeyer@ct.gov Yolanda Antoniak, P.E. Project Engineer, Consultant Design 860-594-3197 Yolanda.Antoniak@ct.gov

Pro roject Contacts:

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Thank You!

53