http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/ Fostering ELA CCSS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/ Fostering ELA CCSS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/ Fostering ELA CCSS through Web 2.0 at the Secondary Level ETEC 690, Spring 2014 University of Hawaii at Manoa Carly Mounts 3rd year Educational Technology masters student at the University
Fostering ELA CCSS through Web 2.0 at the Secondary Level
ETEC 690, Spring 2014 University of Hawaii at Manoa
Carly Mounts
3rd year Educational Technology master’s student at the University of Hawaii Manoa 6th year secondary education teacher (social studies & English)
*Email: cmounts@hawaii.edu
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Literature Review Purpose and Objectives of Project
Methodology
Instructional Strategies, Technologies, Participants Website tour
Findings & Discussion Conclusion
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
1 2 4 5 6 3
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
1 2 4 5 6 3 HOW DO EDUCATORS MEET THE TECHNOLOGY NEEDS OF 21ST CENTURY LEARNERS?
EDUCATORS’ ULTIMATE GOAL = COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
8 7
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Literature Review
Students have new learner characteristics, influenced by technology that must be addressed in educational environments
Prensky, 2001; Skiba & Barton, 2006; Berk, 2010
National Common Core State Standards put technology at the forefront of education
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief of State School Officers, 2010
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Literature Review
Shift from teacher-centered to student-centered learning environments through technology integration
Hargadon, 2009; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2010
Lack of knowledge and experience with basic web tools by teachers and students
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2010
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Literature Review
Lack of professional development to assist teachers in technology integration
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System (FRSS), 2009
WEB 2.0? WEB 2.0?
What Web 2.0 tools would you recommend for secondary educational environments?
TYPE RESPONSE IN THE WHITE BOX BELOW OR IN THE CHAT BOX, PLEASE!
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Purpose of Project
Develop a web-based learning module to be evaluated on content and design Educate secondary teachers about specific Web 2.0 tools
VoiceThread, Google Forms, Prezi, and Weebly
Connect each tool to a specific English Language Arts Common Core State Standard (ELA CCSS)
sample lesson plans and activities
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Purpose of Project
Develop a web-based learning module to be evaluated on content and design Educate secondary teachers about specific Web 2.0 tools
VoiceThread, Google Forms, Prezi, and Weebly
Connect each tool to a specific English Language Arts Common Core State Standard (ELA CCSS)
sample lesson plans and activities
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Purpose of Project
Develop a web-based learning module to be evaluated on content and design Educate secondary teachers about specific Web 2.0 tools
VoiceThread, Google Forms, Prezi, and Weebly
Connect each tool to a specific English Language Arts Common Core State Standard (ELA CCSS)
sample lesson plans and activities
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Objectives of Project
Improve secondary teachers’ attitude and experience with Web 2.0 Provide a resource for teachers’ future use Emphasize the shared responsibility of developing students’ literacy and technology skills
http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
John Keller’s ARCS MODEL of Motivational Design
Attention
user friendly language multi-media visuals self-paced with continuous access to site
Relevance
simple and useful Web 2.0 tools relevant and personal activities to familiarize oneself Cross-curricular lesson examples with specified ELA CCSS access to additional resources
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
John Keller’s ARCS MODEL of Motivational Design
Confidence
informed learners of purpose of project navigational directions explained on homepage Learner objectives for each tool Engaging and meaningful activity and lesson examples
Satisfaction
Learner guidance provided by examples Simple and consistent design of each page Continued access to website and additional resources
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Technologies
Weebly
free online web-hosting site drag and drop builder unlimited pages within personalized site
Google Forms
pre and post surveys collect data
ScreenR
video tutorials
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- Homepage
http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- Homepage
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- Homepage
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- VoiceThread
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Website Tour- Post-Survey
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Participants
recruited through personal emails 8 total- 5 male, 3 female, age range 20s to 60s All from same high school on Oahu range of 2-25+ years of teaching varying in content areas and grade level (English, social studies, science, foreign language) basic knowledge of Web 2.0 interested in technology integration
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Pre-Survey Findings- Background Knowledge
8/8 had some type of Web 2.0 account 7/8 were somewhat familiar with Web 2.0 6/8 only used Web 2.0 for personal/social reasons
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Pre-Survey Findings- Current Use
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Pre-Survey Findings- Current Use
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Post-Survey Findings-Module Content
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Post-Survey Findings-Module Content
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Post-Survey Findings- Module Design
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Post-Survey Findings- Module Design
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Discussion- Comparing Attitudes
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Conclusion- Suggestions
“Make lessons related to actual student/teacher assignments” “Hard time getting through content” “Links to additional resources would have been helpful”
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Discussion- Positive Comments
“An excellent source of information that will certainly help me in my endeavor to be the most effective teacher I can be for my students.” “Very easy to understand and extremely informative.” “I think this is inspirational and is something we could all use.”
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
Conclusion- Future Plans
Update website for continual use Add additional lesson examples to existing pages Add additional Web 2.0 pages and resources Share website with my colleagues and receive feedback from a larger audience Use website within my own learning environment Have students use tools for individual assessments
INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY FINDINGS/DISCUSSION CONCLUSION
MAHALO!
ETEC Ohana: Professors, peers, and critical friends group TCC audience members
Questions and Comments?
http://webtoolsforsecondaryteachers.weebly.com/
*Email: cmounts@hawaii.edu
Image Citations:
1.http://www.retiremend.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/baby-and- ipad.jpg 2.http://organicbabyuniversity.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ iStock_000018436508XSmall.jpg 3.http://blogs.cio.com 4.http://www.themarlincompany.com 5.http://blog.syracuse.com/voices/2008/02/large_0212%20sleep.jpg 6.http://danentmacherpsychotherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ teens-technology.jpg 7.http://www.siliconrepublic.com/fs/img/news/201308/rs-426x288/ videoconference.jpg