How to Cope with the Curse of Dimensionality ? Henryk Wo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how to cope with the curse of dimensionality
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How to Cope with the Curse of Dimensionality ? Henryk Wo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Henryk Wo zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality How to Cope with the Curse of Dimensionality ? Henryk Wo zniakowski University of Warsaw and Columbia University 30 Years of IMSM, 1 Henryk Wo zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality Curse of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

How to Cope with the Curse of Dimensionality ?

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski University of Warsaw and Columbia University

30 Years of IMSM, 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Curse of Dimensionality

ε

error demand

d

the number of variables

n(ε, d)

the minimal cost Many problems suffer from the curse of dimensionality

n(ε, d) ≥ c (1 + C) d

for all d = 1, 2, . . . with c > 0 and C > 0.

30 Years of IMSM, 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

IBC

IBC = Information-Based Complexity

  • IBC is the branch of computational complexity that studies

continuous mathematical problems.

  • Typically, such problems are defined on spaces of functions of

d variables. Often d is large.

  • Typically, the available information is given by finitely many

function values. Therefore it is partial, costly and often noisy.

30 Years of IMSM, 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Multivariate Integration for Korobov Spaces

r = {rj}

with

1 ≤ r1 ≤ r2 ≤ · · · Hrj: 1-periodic f : [0, 1] → C, f (rj−1) abs. cont, f (rj) ∈ L2 f2

Hrj

=

  • 1

f(t) dt

  • 2

+ 1

  • f (rj)(t)
  • 2

dt

For d ≥ 1,

Hd,r = Hr1 ⊗ Hr2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Hrd

Usually, it is assumed that

rj ≡ r

30 Years of IMSM, 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Multivariate Integration

For f ∈ Hd,r we want to approximate

Id(f) :=

  • [0,1]d f(t) dt

≈ An(f)

  • Algorithms:

An(f) = φn(f(x1), f(x2), . . . , f(xn))

with xj ∈ [0, 1]d

  • Minimal Worst Case Error:

e(n, d) = inf

An

sup

fHd,r ≤1

|Id(f) − An(f)|

  • Information Worst Case Complexity:

n(ε, d) = min{ n | e(n, d) ≤ ε }

30 Years of IMSM, 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Theorem

Let rj ≡ r. Then there exists cr > 0 and Cr > 0 such that

n(ε, d) > cr (1 + Cr) d

Based on Hickernell+W [2001] and Novak+W[2001], see also Sloan+W[2001]

Multivariate integration for Korobov space with arbitrarily smooth functions suffers from the curse of dimensionality

30 Years of IMSM, 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

How to cope with the curse of dimensionality

  • switch to spaces with increased smoothness

with respect to successive variables

  • switch to weighted spaces, i.e., groups of variables are of

varying importance

  • switch to a more lenient setting, i.e, from the worst case

setting to the randomized or average case setting

30 Years of IMSM, 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Increasing Smoothness

Still the worst case setting and unweighted spaces with r1 ≤ r2 ≤ · · · .

But we now allow to increase rj Let

R := lim sup

k→∞

ln k rk

Theorem If R < 2 ln 2π then

  • no curse
  • n(ε, d) ≤ C ε−p(1+p/2)

with p := max(r−1

1 , R/ ln 2π) < 2,

i.e., strong polynomial tractability

Based on Papageorgiou+W [09], Kuo, Wasilkowski+W[09] 30 Years of IMSM, 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Weighted Spaces

Major research activities in last 20 years... In particular, for rj ≡ r and γ = {γj}, redefine Hrj,γj with

f2

Hrj ,γj

=

  • 1

f(t) dt

  • 2

+ 1 γj 1

  • f (rj)(t)
  • 2

dt

For d ≥ 1,

Hd,r = Hr1,γ1 ⊗ Hr2,γ2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Hrd,γd

30 Years of IMSM, 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Theorem

  • Gnewuch+W[08]

limd→∞

d

j=1 γj

d

= 0

iff no curse,

  • Hickernell+W[01]

lim supd→∞

d

j=1 γj

ln d

< ∞

iff polynomial tractability, i.e., n(ε, d) ≤ C dq ε−p

  • Hickernell+W[01]

j=1 γj < ∞

iff strong polynomial tractability, i.e., n(ε, d) ≤ C ε−p

30 Years of IMSM, 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

More Lenient Settings

From Worst Case Setting to

  • Randomized Setting
  • Average Case Setting

Average Case Setting ≤ Randomized Setting

30 Years of IMSM, 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Randomized Setting

  • Algorithms:

An,ω(f) = φn,ω(f(x1,ω), f(x2,ω), . . . , f(xn(ω),ω))

for a random ω

  • Minimal Randomized Error:

e(n, d) = inf

An

sup

fHd,r ≤1

  • E |Id(f) − An,ω(f)|21/2
  • Information Randomized Complexity:

n(ε, d) = min{ n | e(n, d) ≤ ε }

30 Years of IMSM, 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Monte Carlo Algorithm

An,ω(f) = 1 n

n

  • j=1

f(xj,ω)

with

xj,ω

iid with uniform distribution over [0, 1]d

  • n(ε, d) ≤ ε−2
  • no curse and strong polynomial tractability

30 Years of IMSM, 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Conclusions

  • Many multivariate problems suffer from the curse of

dimensionality in the worst case setting

  • We may sometimes break the curse of dimensionality by

– switching to spaces with increased smoothness with respect to successive variables – switching to weighted spaces, i.e., groups of variables are of varying importance – switching to a more lenient setting, i.e, from the worst case setting to the randomized or average case setting

30 Years of IMSM, 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Henryk Wo´ zniakowski Curse of Dimensionality

Book

More can be found in Tractability of Multivariate Problems Erich Novak and Henryk Wo´ zniakowski

  • Volume I:

Linear Information (2008)

  • Volume II:

Standard Information for Functionals (2010)

  • Volume III: Standard Information for Operators (2012)

30 Years of IMSM, 15