how states can control pharmacy benefit manager contract
play

How States Can Control Pharmacy Benefit Manager Contract Costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How States Can Control Pharmacy Benefit Manager Contract Costs through Reverse Auctions Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:30 4:30 pm Eastern This webinar is supported by Arnold Ventures. 1 Trish Riley, Executive Director , National Academy for


  1. How States Can Control Pharmacy Benefit Manager Contract Costs through Reverse Auctions Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:30 – 4:30 pm Eastern This webinar is supported by Arnold Ventures. 1

  2. Trish Riley, Executive Director , National Academy for State Health Policy Christin Deacon, JD , Assistant Director of Health Benefit Operations and Policy and Planning, New Jersey Division of Pensions and Benefits, Department of Treasury Alysha Fluno, PharmD, MBA , Chief Pharmacy Officer, Truveris Questions and Discussion

  3. Leading the Charge How The State Of New Jersey Cut Pharmacy Costs Without Cutting Member Benefits Christin Deacon Director of Health Benefit Operations and Policy and Planning New Jersey Division of Pensions and Benefit Department of Treasury, New Jersey Alysha Fluno Chief Pharmacy Officer Truveris NASHP – July 28, 2020

  4. The Challenge State of New Jersey – by the Pharmacy benefit plans numbers • Large plan with many stakeholders • 700,000+ members • Multiple, complex plan design • Annual spend of $2.2b and formularies • 11 million+ claims • Expensive • Long-term relationship with • Hard to measure and manage incumbent PBM • It’s a black box! 4

  5. “We are rooting out PBM profiteering at the Reverse expense of New Jersey taxpayers and public employees.” Auction We are achieving enormous savings without any Legislation cuts in public employee benefits and no compromises in the quality of health care for hard working public employees and their families.” 5

  6. A fresh approach: The PBM reverse auction • Innovative, forward-thinking approach • Scalable reverse auction platform • Granular analysis of 100% of claims • Levelled playing field among bidders for objective comparison • Dynamic, competitive PBM marketplace lowered prices • Entire process: weeks not months THE PROCESS SELLERS SELLER AGREES SELLERS SUBMIT BUYER COMPARE IMPROVE BASED BUYER COMPARE BUYER AWARDS TO CONTRACT BIDS ROUND 1 BIDS ON BLINDED ROUND 2 BIDS CONTRACT TERMS RESULTS Pre-Qualification Step 6

  7. SELLERS IMPROVE SELLER AGREES TO SELLERS SUBMIT BUYER COMPARE BUYER COMPARE BUYER AWARDS BASED ON CONTRACT TERMS BIDS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS CONTRACT PBMs are BLINDED RESULTS invited to bid  RFP summary dashboard 7

  8. Creating a SELLERS IMPROVE SELLER AGREES TO SELLERS SUBMIT BUYER COMPARE BUYER COMPARE BUYER AWARDS BASED ON level playing CONTRACT TERMS BIDS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS CONTRACT BLINDED RESULTS field –terms, classification, & pricing  Terminology and definitions are set and agreed-to upfront  Helps state conduct side-by-side contractual comparisons  The classification of drugs can unnecessarily increase spend and can impact rebate performance  PBMs input proposed discounts  This can be analysed on a claim-by-claim basis to give a more accurate proposal *Sample, deidentified data 8

  9. SELLERS SELLER AGREES BUYER BUYER SELLERS SUBMIT IMPROVE BASED BUYER AWARDS First round TO CONTRACT COMPARE COMPARE BIDS ON BLINDED CONTRACT TERMS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS RESULTS results  Detailed comparisons by PBM  Forecasted total drug spend for side-by-side comparisons  Estimated savings by PBM  Comparisons includes readjudication of 100% historical claims data by each proposed PBM contract *Sample, deidentified data 9

  10. SELLERS Round 1 SELLER AGREES BUYER BUYER SELLERS SUBMIT IMPROVE BASED BUYER AWARDS TO CONTRACT COMPARE COMPARE BIDS ON BLINDED CONTRACT results: PBMs TERMS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS RESULTS see how their bids compared and improved  Scored weighed by importance to the plan –configurable by plan  Objective, third-party scoring, no misaligned incentives *Sample, deidentified data 10

  11. SELLERS SELLER AGREES BUYER BUYER SELLERS SUBMIT IMPROVE BASED BUYER AWARDS TO CONTRACT COMPARE COMPARE BIDS ON BLINDED CONTRACT TERMS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS Second RESULTS round results  Estimated savings by PBM  Review improvement from first round *Sample, deidentified data 11

  12. SELLERS SELLER AGREES BUYER BUYER SELLERS SUBMIT IMPROVE BASED BUYER AWARDS TO CONTRACT COMPARE COMPARE BIDS ON BLINDED CONTRACT TERMS ROUND 1 BIDS ROUND 2 BIDS RESULTS Contract awarded  Bidder award WINNER PBM B $8.3b $6.69b 1.6b Savings *Sample, deidentified data 12

  13. PBM reverse auction process: Bid results 2017 WINNER Review of PBM round 1 B results and feedback is $8.3b $6.69b provided to sellers 1.6b Savings 13

  14. Beyond the RFP: Ensuring ongoing PBM accountability and contract oversight  The state employs continual contract performance monitoring for PBM accountability *Sample, deidentified data 14

  15. Ongoing PBM accountability and oversight sample results Topical Limits on Prenatal Vitamin Dermatologic Lost/Stolen Meds 2019 2020 2019 $1.1 Million $346,000 $12.5 Million 2018 2020 $86.9 Million Additional identified savings potential 2019 Specialty 30/90-day Supply Probiotic Rx/OTC Exclusions 2018 2020 2019 $42 Million $960,000 $12.6 Million IV Fluid and Custom Specialty Additional Injectable DAW Override Criteria Injections Drug List Exclusions 2019 2018 2020 2018 $1 Million $2.2 Million $1.2 Million $1.5 Million 15

  16. Court ordered rebid 16

  17. PBM reverse auction process: Bid results 2019 Compare Request for Compare Compare round 1 bids bids round 2 bids round 3 bids 6.1b 6.1b 6.1b Review of 6.1b 6.49b Review of 6.38 6.35b 5.92b 5.81b 5.98b round 2 b round 1 5.92b 5.71b 5.8b results and results and feedback is feedback is provided to provided to sellers sellers Sellers see Round 1 Round 3 Round 2 competitive Sellers submit 1 st Sellers submit 3 rd Sellers submit 2 rd comparison ‘Sharpen round of bids round of bids round of bids their pencils’ 480m $6.1b $5.7b PBM WINNER B Savings 17

  18. Accrued savings over the life of the PBM contract $3,500,000,000 $3.057 Billion  $1.602 Billion 2017 RFP $2.813 Billion $3,000,000,000 $2.654 Billion  $403 Million 2018 Incremental Savings $2,500,000,000  $567 Million 2019 $1.875 Billion Incremental Savings $2,000,000,000  $485 Million 2019 RFP $1,500,000,000  $3.057 Billion Total Savings $1,000,000,000 $776 Million $500,000,000 $0 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017 RFP 2018 Actual Savings 2019 Actual Savings 2019 RFP 18

  19. Cutting Costs Without Cutting Benefits truveris.com/SONJ 19

  20. Q&A Please type your questions into the chat box.

  21. Thank you! Your opinion is important to us. After the webinar ends, you will be redirected to a web page containing a short survey . Your answers to the survey will help us as we plan future NASHP webinars. This webinar is supported by Arnold Ventures.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend