holman highway 68 highway 1 roundabout
play

Holman Highway 68 / Highway 1 Roundabout Planning Commission May - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Holman Highway 68 / Highway 1 Roundabout Planning Commission May 14, 2013 Congestion Roundabout Project Need Long Traffic Qs and excessive delay on E/B Holman Hwy 68 Qs extend well beyond CHOMP Impact to public safety / access


  1. Holman Highway 68 / Highway 1 Roundabout Planning Commission May 14, 2013

  2. Congestion

  3. Roundabout Project Need  Long Traffic Q’s and excessive delay on E/B Holman Hwy 68  Q’s extend well beyond CHOMP  Impact to public safety / access to hospital  Operations / Safety at PB Gate  Acceleration from Holman Hwy to southbound Hwy 1 entrance ramp  Reduction in crashes and crash severity  Dramatic Emission Reduction - as compared to signal

  4. Operations 1400 30 1200 25 1000 20 800 RAB AM 15 Signal AM 600 RAB PM 10 400 Signal PM 5 200 0 0 2015 2030 2015 2030 2015 Control Control Queue Queue Queue Delay Delay (EB) (EB) (SB Off)

  5. Interim Signal Alternative 2015 + Project PM Peak 660

  6. Existing Condition 2015 + Project PM Peak 660

  7. Existing Traffic Signal Condition

  8. Existing Traffic Signal Condition

  9. What About Converting the Existing Intersections?

  10. Roundabout Holman Highway 5/2/2013 11

  11. Design Optimization-Overlay Beverly Manor Holman Highway 5/2/2013 12

  12. Design Optimization-Overview Tighter Radius = Slower Speed, Slower Speeds = Less Merge Distance Req’d Less Downstream Merge Distance Req’d Longer Merge Distance Improved Pedestrian Safety Improved Lane Utilization Improved Improved Entry/View Angle Channelization Separation of Decision Making / Improved Signing and Lane Choice 5/2/2013 13

  13. Design Optimization Improved Entry/View Angle Separation of Decision Making / Improved Signing and Lane Choice 5/2/2013 14

  14. Design Optimization – Off Ramp Tighter Rad = Slower Speed Defined Intersection 125’ merge distance Req’d Movements = Simplified Driver Decisions = Safer Improved Bike Lane Delineation “Built To Deliver” 5/2/2013 15

  15. Design Optimization Improved View Angles (12 deg.) Sends Correct Priority Message Entering Yield to Circulating Traffic “Built To Deliver” 5/2/2013 16

  16. Design Optimization “Built To Deliver” 5/2/2013 17

  17. The Timing is Right  Pebble Beach Project Approved  Concept Plan Complete  Stakeholders On-Board  Relinquishment In Process

  18. Next Steps  Engineering Design  Project Report Amendment  EIR Addendum  Public Outreach and Education  Construction

  19. Design Optimization - Challenges Large RT Radius = Higher Speed Merging Thru Down- Stream Intersection Un-Defined Intersection Vehicular and Bicyclists Safety Concerns Longer Merge Distance Lane Choice/Complexity Compressed Decision Making Dist. Difficult to Sign “Built To Deliver” 5/2/2013 20

  20. Design Optimization - Challenges Very Short Merge Distance Lane Utilization Truck/Freight Flat Entry Angle Concerns Poor View Angle to Left Priority Confusion / Merge Behavior Entry-Circulating Crashes “Built To Deliver” 5/2/2013 21

  21. Interim Layout

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend