higher dimensional massive bi gravity constructions and
play

Higher dimensional massive (bi-)gravity: Constructions and solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Higher dimensional massive (bi-)gravity: Constructions and solutions Tuan Q. Do Vietnam National University, Hanoi Based on PRD93(2016)104003 [arXiv:1602.05672]; PRD94(2016)044022 [arXiv:1604.07568]. Hot Topics in General Relativity and


  1. Higher dimensional massive (bi-)gravity: Constructions and solutions Tuan Q. Do Vietnam National University, Hanoi Based on PRD93(2016)104003 [arXiv:1602.05672]; PRD94(2016)044022 [arXiv:1604.07568]. Hot Topics in General Relativity and Gravitation 3 (HTGRG-3) XIIIth Rencontres du Vietnam ICISE, Quy Nhon, July 30th - August 5th, 2017 1 / 26

  2. Contents Motivations 1 Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms 2 Simple solutions for a five-dimensional massive gravity 3 Simple solutions for a five-dimensional massive bi-gravity 4 Conclusions 5 2 / 26

  3. I. Motivations The massive gravity [gravitons have tiny but non-zero mass] has had a long and rich history since the seminal paper by Fierz & Pauli [PRSA173(1939)211] . van Dam & Veltman [NPB22(1970)397] and Zakharov [PZETF12(1970)447] showed that in the massless limit, it cannot recover GR. Vainshtein pointed out that the nonlinear extensions of FP theory can solve the vDVZ discontinuity problem [PLB39(1972)393] . Boulware & Deser claimed that there exists a ghost associated with the sixth mode in graviton coming from nonlinear levels [PRD6(1972)3368] . Building a ghost-free nonlinear massive gravity, in which a massive graviton carries only five ”physical” degrees of freedom, has been a great challenge for physicists. de Rham, Gabadadze & Tolley (dRGT) have successfully constructed a ghost-free nonlinear massive gravity [1011.1232, 1007.0443] . The dRGT theory has been proved to be ghost-free for general fiducial metric by some different approaches, e.g., Hassan & Rosen [1106.3344, 1109.3230] . The dRGT theory might be a solution to the cosmological constant problem. 3 / 26

  4. I. Motivations An interesting extension of dRGT theory is the massive bi-metric gravity (bi-gravity) proposed by Hassan & Rosen, in which the reference metric is introduced to be full dynamical as the physical metric [1109.3515] . For interesting review papers, see de Rham [1401.4173] ; K. Hinterbichler [1105.3735] ; Schmidt-May & von Strauss [1512.00021] . It is noted that most of previous papers have focused only on four-dimensional frameworks, which involve only the first three massive graviton terms, L 2 , L 3 , and L 4 . There have been a few papers discussing higher dimensional scenarios of massive (bi)gravity theories, e.g., Hinterbichler & Rosen [1203.5783] ; Hassan, Schmidt-May & von Strauss [1212.4525] ; Huang, Zhang & Zhou [1306.4740] . However, these papers have not studied the well-known metrics in higher dimensions, e.g., the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW), Bianchi type I, and Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metrics. We would like to investigate whether the five-dimensional (bi)gravity theories admit the above metrics as their solutions. 4 / 26

  5. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms Recall the four-dimensional action of the dRGT massive gravity [1011.1232, 1007.0443] : S 4d = M 2 d 4 x √− g � � � p R + m 2 g ( L 2 + α 3 L 3 + α 4 L 4 ) , 2 where M p the Planck mass, m g the graviton mass, α 3 , 4 free parameters, and the massive graviton terms L i defined as L 2 = [ K ] 2 − [ K 2 ]; L 3 = 1 3[ K ] 3 − [ K ][ K 2 ] + 2 3[ K 3 ] , L 4 = 1 12[ K ] 4 − 1 2[ K ] 2 [ K 2 ] + 1 4[ K 2 ] 2 + 2 3[ K ][ K 3 ] − 1 2[ K 4 ] . Square brackets: ν ) 2 ; [ K 2 ] ≡ tr K µ ν ; [ K ] 2 ≡ (tr K µ [ K ] ≡ tr K µ α K α ν ; and so on . The square matrix K µν is defined as � K µ ν ≡ δ µ f ab ∂ µ φ a ∂ α φ b g αν , ν − φ a ∼ St¨ uckelberg fields; g µν ∼ (dynamical) physical metric , f ab ∼ non-dynamical reference (fiducial) metric of massive gravity . 5 / 26

  6. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms Recall the four-dimensional action of the massive bi-gravity [1109.3515] : √ � d 4 x √ gR ( g ) + M 2 � S 4d = M 2 d 4 x f R ( f ) g f � d 4 x √ g � � + 2 m 2 M 2 U 2 + α 3 U 3 + α 4 U 4 , eff where � 1 � − 1 U i = 1 + 1 2 L i ; M 2 eff ≡ . M 2 M 2 g f The square matrix K µν is defined as K µ ν ≡ δ µ � f µα g αν , ν − g µν ∼ (dynamical) physical metric , f µν ∼ full dynamical reference (fiducial) metric . 6 / 26

  7. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms We will construct higher dimensional terms L n > 4 by applying the well-known Cayley-Hamilton theorem for the square matrix K µν . In algebra, there exists the well-known Cayley-Hamilton theorem: any square matrix must obey its characteristic equation . In particular, given a n × n matrix K with its characteristic equation, P ( λ ) ≡ det( λ I n − K ) = 0, then P ( K ) ≡ K n − D n − 1 K n − 1 + D n − 2 K n − 2 − ... +( − 1) n − 1 D 1 K + ( − 1) n det( K ) I n = 0 , where D n − 1 = tr K ≡ [ K ] and D n − j (2 ≤ j ≤ n − 1) are coefficients of the characteristic polynomial. For n = 2, the following characteristic equation: K 2 − [ K ] K + det K 2 × 2 I 2 = 0 , which implies after taking the trace det K 2 × 2 = 1 ∼ L 2 � [ K ] 2 − [ K 2 ] � 2 . 2 7 / 26

  8. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms For n = 3, the corresponding characteristic equation: K 3 − [ K ] K 2 + 1 [ K ] 2 − [ K 2 ] � � K − det K 3 × 3 I 3 = 0 , 2 which leads to det K 3 × 3 = 1 ∼ L 3 � [ K ] 3 − 3[ K 2 ][ K ] + 2[ K 3 ] � 2 . 6 For n = 4, the corresponding characteristic equation: K 4 − [ K ] K 3 + 1 [ K ] 2 − [ K 2 ] K 2 � � 2 − 1 [ K ] 3 − 3[ K 2 ][ K ] + 2[ K 3 ] � � K + det K 4 × 4 I 4 = 0 , 6 which gives det K 4 × 4 = 1 ∼ L 4 [ K ] 4 − 6[ K ] 2 [ K 2 ] + 3[ K 2 ] 2 + 8[ K ][ K 3 ] − 6[ K 4 ] � � 2 . 24 The higher dimensional graviton terms L n > 4 must vanish in all four-dimensional spacetimes. 8 / 26

  9. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms The higher dimensional terms L n > 4 = det K n × n / 2 can be constructed from the Cayley-Hamilton theorem to be L 5 1 � [ K ] 5 − 10[ K ] 3 [ K 2 ] + 20[ K ] 2 [ K 3 ] 2 = 120 − 20[ K 2 ][ K 3 ] + 15[ K ][ K 2 ] 2 − 30[ K ][ K 4 ] + 24[ K 5 ] � , L 6 1 � [ K ] 6 − 15[ K ] 4 [ K 2 ] + 40[ K ] 3 [ K 3 ] − 90[ K ] 2 [ K 4 ] 2 = 720 + 45[ K ] 2 [ K 2 ] 2 − 15[ K 2 ] 3 + 40[ K 3 ] 2 − 120[ K 3 ][ K 2 ][ K ] � + 90[ K 4 ][ K 2 ] + 144[ K 5 ][ K ] − 120[ K 6 ] , L 7 1 � [ K ] 7 − 21[ K ] 5 [ K 2 ] + 70[ K ] 4 [ K 3 ] − 210[ K ] 3 [ K 4 ] 2 = 5040 + 105[ K ] 3 [ K 2 ] 2 − 420[ K ] 2 [ K 2 ][ K 3 ] + 504[ K ] 2 [ K 5 ] − 105[ K 2 ] 3 [ K ] + 210[ K 2 ] 2 [ K 3 ] − 504[ K 2 ][ K 5 ] + 280[ K 3 ] 2 [ K ] − 420[ K 3 ][ K 4 ] � + 630[ K 4 ][ K 2 ][ K ] − 840[ K 6 ][ K ] + 720[ K 7 ] . 9 / 26

  10. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms A five-dimensional scenario of massive gravity [1602.05672] : S = M 2 � d 5 x √− g � � p R + m 2 g ( L 2 + α 3 L 3 + α 4 L 4 + α 5 L 5 ) , 2 The corresponding five-dimensional Einstein field equations: � R µν − 1 � + m 2 2 Rg µν g ( X µν + σ Y µν + α 5 W µν ) = 0 , X µν = − 1 2 ( α L 2 + β L 3 ) g µν + ˜ X µν , ˜ � K 2 � X µν = K µν − [ K ] g µν − α µν − [ K ] K µν � µν + L 2 � K 3 µν − [ K ] K 2 + β 2 K µν , Y µν = − L 4 Y µν = L 3 2 K µν − L 2 2 g µν + ˜ Y µν ; ˜ 2 K 2 µν + [ K ] K 3 µν − K 4 µν , W µν = − L 5 2 g µν + ˜ W µν , W µν = L 4 2 K µν − L 3 µν + L 2 ˜ 2 K 2 2 K 3 µν − [ K ] K 4 µν + K 5 µν , 10 / 26

  11. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms Here α = α 3 + 1, β = α 3 + α 4 , and σ = α 4 + α 5 . Note that Y µν = 0 in four dimensional spacetimes [Do & Kao, PRD88(2013)063006] but � = 0 in higher-than-four dimensional ones . Similarly, W µν = 0 in five dimensional spacetimes but � = 0 in higher-than-five dimensional ones. The constraint equations associated with the existence of fiducial metric: W µν − 1 t µν ≡ ˜ X µν + σ ˜ Y µν + α 5 ˜ 2 ( α 3 L 2 + α 4 L 3 + α 5 L 4 ) g µν = 0 . Due to these constraint equations the Einstein field equations for g µν become 2 Rg µν ) − m 2 ( R µν − 1 g 2 L M g µν = 0; L M ≡ L 2 + α 3 L 3 + α 4 L 4 + α 5 L 5 , ⇒ ( R µν − 1 2 Rg µν ) + Λ M g µν = 0 (Bianchi constraint , ∂ ν L M = 0) , with Λ M ≡ − m 2 g L M / 2 as an effective cosmological constant. 11 / 26

  12. II. Cayley-Hamilton theorem and ghost-free graviton terms Ghost free issue Follow the analysis of dRGT papers [1011.1232, 1007.0443] by considering the tensor X ( n ) µν and its the recursive relation: n n ! � µν L ( n − m ) X ( n ) ( − 1) m 2( n − m )! K m µν ( g µν , K ) = ( K ) der m =0 + K αβ X ( n − 1) X ( n ) µν = − n K α µ X ( n − 1) g µν . αν αβ For the 4D case X (4) µν ( g µν , K ) ∼ Y µν = 0 → X ( n > 4) ( g µν , K ) = 0 → no µν ghostlike pathology arises at the quartic or higher order levels with arbitrary physical and fiducial metrics. Similarly, for the 5D case X (5) µν ( g µν , K ) ∼ W µν = 0 → X ( n > 5) ( g µν , K ) = 0 → µν any ghostlike pathology arising at the quintic or higher order levels must disappear, no matter the form of physical and fiducial metrics. The similar conclusion is also valid for higher-than-five massive gravity theories. 12 / 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend