Healthy Streets Operation Center Local Homeless Coordinating Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

healthy streets operation center
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Healthy Streets Operation Center Local Homeless Coordinating Board - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Healthy Streets Operation Center Local Homeless Coordinating Board November 20, 2019 Cri risis is in Sa n San n Fr Franc ncisco isco Homelessness 8,011 people experiencing homelessness on any given night in San Francisco 17%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Healthy Streets Operation Center

Local Homeless Coordinating Board November 20, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cri risis is in Sa n San n Fr Franc ncisco isco

Homelessness

  • 8,011 people experiencing homelessness on any given night in San

Francisco

  • 17% increase in homelessness in the HUD PIT Count
  • 19% increase in unsheltered homelessness

Public Health Crisis

  • 69% of people experiencing homelessness report having a disability
  • 4,000 people experiencing homelessness are duel diagnosed with mental

illness and a substance use disorder

  • ~24,000 injection drug users in San Francisco
  • Since 2008, the meth overdose mortality rate has risen from 1.8 to 11.5

per 100K San Franciscans Calls for Service

  • Between 3,000 - 4,000 311 calls for service monthly to HSOC
  • Between 3,000 - 4,000 911 calls for service monthly to HSOC

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

95%

have a history of alcohol use disorder 65% utilized the ED but only 6% utilized the Sobering Center

22%

had involuntary psychiatric holds 3% are currently conserved 11% are currently assigned an intensive case manager

In San Francisco 4,000 (1 in 5) individuals experiencing homelessness have a history of co-occurring psychoses and substance use disorders…

40%

have cycled in and out of homelessness for more than 13 years 29 died in FY1819

28%

had at least one county jail interaction in FY1819 The average number

  • f incarcerations is

2.3

40%

are 50+ years of age The average age

  • f death for

homeless adults is 51 113 individuals are 18-24 years of age

35%

identify as Black/African American Blacks outnumber Whites in this population

74%

have a serious medical condition 12% HIV/AIDS 65% CHF 35% Hypertension 4% Renal Failure

80%

used urgent/emergent care services in FY1819 223 individuals used over 24 services

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Bloo

  • ombe

berg rg Ha Harv rvard rd City Le Leade ders rship hip Ini nitiative iative

  • HSOC has brought multiple city departments together in an

unprecedented collaboration to address the crisis of unsheltered homelessness and unhealthy street behavior.

  • Despite the level of collaboration, HSOC could be more

effective at achieving its goals.

  • HSOC will receive support from the Bloomberg Harvard City

Leadership Initiative over the next six months:

  • Refocus HSOC
  • Define the strategies and tactics to achieve our goals

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

HSOC Charter

Controller’s Office

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overv rview

The Healthy Streets Operations Center (HSOC) launched in January 2018. HSOC uses a unified command structure and a collective impact model to coordinate the efforts of City agencies involved in addressing street homelessness and behaviors that affect quality of life.

Note: HSOC is only a portion of individual departments’ overall responsibilities.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HS HSOC Vision

  • n & G

Goa

  • als

Vision: ion: San Francisco’s streets are healthy for everyone and those experiencing homelessness, marginally housed, or in need of social connections and healthcare have access to the appropriate resources and services.

  • 1. Increase in people connecting with

appropriate health and social services

  • 2. Reduce the number of highly vulnerable

people on the streets

  • 3. Reduce the number of tents and

vehicles inhabited by people experiencing homelessness

  • 4. Increase the City’s responsive to

community concerns

  • 5. Increase the safety and cleanliness of

San Francisco’s streets

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HS HSOC Activ tivities ities

Connecting People to Care Planned, Proactive Engagements Responding to Service Requests Coordinating across Departments

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Con

  • nne

necting cting Peop

  • ple to C
  • Care

re

Goals ls

  • 1. Ensure that everyone living

unsheltered on the street is assessed and connected to appropriate health and social services.

  • 2. Ensure that the most vulnerable

individuals are expedited to services and housing.

  • 3. Reduce the number of deaths of

homeless individuals through enhanced planning, care coordination and service linkage.

Sample mple of Activities vities

  • 1. Training of field staff
  • 2. Daily triage and weekly case

conferencing of referrals by DPH, HSH and EMS-6

  • 3. Shared Priority List
  • 4. Placements by SFPD and HOT

into temporary beds

  • 5. Health fairs and other outreach

activities by HOT and DPH

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Plann nned d and nd Pro roactive active Eng ngage ageme ments nts

Goals ls

  • 1. Use data to proactively,

collaboratively, and urgently address encampments and locations where behaviors of community concern and/or criminal activity are creating unsafe and unsanitary conditions.

  • 2. Maintain a city free of large

encampments, and reduce the

  • verall number of tents,

improvised structures, and inhabited vehicles throughout the city.

Sample mple of Activities vities

  • 1. ERT/VERT conducts multi-week
  • utreach in advance of

encampment resolutions.

  • 2. Quarterly tent and vehicle count

to identify areas needing

  • utreach and resolution.
  • 3. Special collaborative operations

to address behavioral health needs.

10 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Respo pond nding ng to Se

  • Serv

rvice ice Requ quests ts

Goals ls

  • 1. Improve the quality and

consistency of the City’s response to service requests about encampments and street conditions.

Sample mple of Activities vities

  • 1. Co-located dispatch with DEM,

SFPD, Public Works and HOT consulting on responses.

  • 2. Consolidated routing from 911

and 311.

  • 3. Customer call-backs to gather

detail and improve response.

11 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Coo

  • ord

rdinating nating acro ross ss Depa partme rtments nts

Goals ls

  • 1. Enhance the effectiveness and

efficiency of the City’s response through collaboration, data sharing, and transparency between departments.

Sample mple of Activities vities

  • 1. Operational and planning

meetings to identify areas of need, share departmental information, and coordinate responses.

  • 2. Case conference meetings to

plan client-centered interventions.

  • 3. Data working group meetings to

review trends, identify

  • perational issues, and plan

improvements.

12 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recent HSOC Policy Changes

Department of Emergency Management

13 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Recent nt HS HSOC Pol

  • licy

icy Cha hang nges

  • 1. Discontinued the use of 7-day beds for the HSOC set
  • asides. These 15 beds are now time-limited beds with a

minimum stay of 30 days.

  • 2. Launched the Joint Priority Project
  • 3. Piloting a new police encounter tracker

14 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HS HSOC OC Re Response sponses s to to LH LHCB CB Questions uestions Enforcement (Q. 11-13) SFPD

15 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Enf nforceme

  • rcement

nt

  • SFPD is responsible for ensuring the overall safety of the

public in San Francisco and enforcement is at times a part of those efforts.

  • When responding to public safety issues, the SFPD leads

with services with a focus on diverting individuals into care.

  • If there is an immediate safety risk, SFPD will assess the

situation take appropriate action.

16 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Enf nforceme

  • rcement

nt

  • When interacting with people experiencing homelessness, SFPD

leads with services to connect individuals with shelter and services, depending on availability and interest.

  • SFPD calls upon HSH and DPH for additional support and services.
  • SFPD uses enforcement strategies as needed to address illegal

activity on the streets, including:

  • Blocking a sidewalk after being offered services
  • Addressing a public nuisance that can not be resolved with services
  • Assessing situations in which an individual poses a threat to themselves or
  • thers

17 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SFP FPD Data a on Quali lity ty of Life Citati ations ns & B Booking ng (Q (Question tion 11)

601 898 490 190 215 131

2017 2018 2019

ALL SFPD QUALITY OF LIFE CITATIONS & BOOKING

Quality of Life Citations Quality of Life Bookings

  • Quality of life citations and

booking fluctuate

  • vertime.
  • Only 3.1%

1% of calls to HSOC resulted in citation.

  • Only 0.5%

5% of calls to HSOC resulted in an arrest.

18 18

** 2019 Includes Q1, Q2, and Q3 Data**

slide-19
SLIDE 19

All SFPD Quality of Life Citations (Question 13)

601 898 490 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 2017 2018 2019 19 19

SFPD “Quality of Life” Citations: 2017 - 2019

** 2019 Data Includes Q1, Q2, and Q3 Data**

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SFPD Data Regarding Citations & Bookings (Question 12)

20 20

2019 SFPD “Quality of Life” Citations & Bookings

162 97 231 47 42 42

Q1 Q2 Q3

Citations Bookings

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Services Offered by HSOC Officers

Since August 2019, HSOC officers from SFPD have engaged

  • ver 6,290 people living on the streets, largely in response to

311 calls, and have made the following service referrals & connections:

21 21

Service ice Referr erred ed Conne nect cted ed Navigation Center 547 385 Shelter 414 14 CASC 1099 220 Sobering 63 33 SFHOT 608 NA DPH 80 NA EMS-6 2 NA LEAD 57 15 Other 10 1

slide-22
SLIDE 22

HS HSOC OC Re Response sponses s to to LH LHCB CB Questions uestions Bag & Tag (Q. 14) Public Works

22 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Bag and Tag Data (Question 14)

23 23

2019 Public Works Bag & Tag Data

Month th Bag & Tag Even ents Items ms Receiv ived ed Visits its to the Yar ard Occurr rrences Wher ere e No Items ems Were Found Occurr rrences Where ere Items ms Were e Found d and d Ret eturned ed Januar ary 90 198 18 1 17 Febr bruar ary 70 140 12 6 6 March 54 240 9 5 4 April il 65 213 5 5 May 98 238 9 9 June 72 169 19 7 12 July 70 146 18 13 5 August st 48 111 6 3 3 Septembe ber 64 138 8 4 4 Octobe

  • ber

61 207 12 3 9 Total tal 709 2104 116 42 74

slide-24
SLIDE 24

HS HSOC OC Re Response sponses s to to LH LHCB CB Questions uestions Services (Q. 1-10) HSH & DPH

24 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Shelter & Services: Number of Beds and Bed Types (Question 1)

~3,400 emergency shelter beds in San Francisco:

  • HSOC set aside = 15 time-limited beds for a minimum of 30 days

SFHOT, both in their role in HSOC and independently, make a variety of shelter placements:

  • One-night beds when available
  • 41 SFHOT set-aside shelter beds within the traditional shelter

portfolio

  • Navigation Center placements – time-limited unless the client is

already identified as a priority through Coordinated Entry, in which case the client may stay until housed.

25 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Outcomes of Beds Offered (Question 2)

  • HSOC connects people to the front door of services but is not

responsible for the service outcomes.

  • HSOC does not have the ability to track client level outcomes

after the point that they are handed off to the receiving system of care.

  • HSH will continue to track shelter and navigation center data

and is working to update its database to track the HSOC time-limited placements separately from the Outreach time- limited placements.

26 26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Breakdown of Bed Types (Question 3)

  • There are currently 2,499 temporary shelter beds in San Francisco for

adul ults ts, including:

  • 600 Navigation Center Beds
  • 41 HOT shelter set aside beds
  • 15 HSOC beds (part of the 600 Navigation Center beds)
  • HSH has moved away from dividing navigation center beds by “pathway

to housing” or “time limited.” Instead, a client’s stay type will be determined by their Coordinated Entry prioritization:

  • Pathway stays = coordinated entry priority for PSH placement
  • Navigation Center vacancies are allocated between Coordinated Entry for

unsheltered priority clients and SFHOT to support street outreach.

27 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

HSOC Set Aside Beds (Question 9)

As of November 12, 2019, the 15 Navigation Center beds reserved for HSOC placements were all time-limited stays, with a minimum 30 day stays.

28 28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

311 or 911 Regarding Vehicular Encampments & Services to People Living in Vehicles (Question 5)

  • SF311 does not have a process nor provides an option for reporting

inhabited vehicles as those requests currently go through non- emergency police.

  • The Vehicle Encampment Resolution Team (VERT) work is driven by the

quarterly tent and occupied vehicle count, not calls to 311.

  • VERT resolves about 1 to 2 vehicle encampments per month.
  • On average VERT engages 16 people per resolution. The most

commonly accepted service is a placement to a Navigation Center, which averages 2 placements per vehicle resolution.

  • The City is opening a pilot Vehicle Triage Center to provide services to

people living in their vehicles.

29 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

HSOC Response to Vehicular Homelessness (Question 8)

Vehicle cle Encampment mpment Out utre reac ach h

  • VERT uses the quarterly tent/

vehicle count to plan its work, not 311 calls.

  • VERT is part of HSOC’s proactive

work.

  • VERT conducts outreach to

determine whether individuals need services and what types of services are appropriate.

Result ults

  • VERT resolves about 1 to 2

vehicle encampments per month.

  • VERT has resolved 7 vehicular

encampments since April.

  • On average VERT engages 16

people per resolution.

  • 2 Navigation Center placements

per vehicle resolution.

30 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

311 & 911 Calls to HSOC (Question 4 & 6)

31 31

Despite recent expansion of services, the need still far exceeds the service and shelter system capacity.

3,464 3,295 3,877 4,249 3,996 3,915 5,523 4,160 4,919 4,875 4,107 3,969

MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER

HSOC MONTHLY CALLS: MAY AY – OCTOBER 2019

311 C Calls alls t to H

  • HSOC

SOC 911/0123 Calls to H Calls to HSOC SOC

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32 32

Street-to-Home

1

311 → HSOC → Street Outreach Team

2

Case Conference → Street-to-Home Plan

3

PES → Care Team Coordination

4

Hummingbird → Residential Treatment

5

Navigation Center → Home

Service ices: s: Joint t Pri riority

  • rity List
slide-33
SLIDE 33

What’s different? We’re taking a population-focused, interagency approach that builds on evidence-based practices to

IDENTIF TIFY ENGAGE GE PRIORITI ORITIZE ZE

  • 1. Prioritize via

Coordinated Entry Assessment

  • 2. Rank based upon DPH

health conditions

  • Activate Alerts
  • Appoint Single Care

Coordinator As needed, appoint:

  • HSH Housing Navigator
  • Case Manager
  • “High Intensity Care

Team” first responders

  • 1. Develop “Street-to-

Home” plans

  • 2. Prioritize:
  • Housing
  • Treatment slots
  • In-home support
  • Benefits

33

Service ices: s: Joint t Pri riority

  • rity List
slide-34
SLIDE 34

HSOC Response to 311 Calls about Encampments (Question 7)

  • Through HSOC, SFPD and Public Works are primary respondents to 311

calls about encampments.

  • Through HSOC, HSH and DPH primarily provides proactive

ctive se servi vices ces:

  • Outreach
  • ERT/VERT
  • Health Fairs
  • Joint Priority List
  • Other proactive operations
  • SFPD and Public Works conduct reactive work, responding to specific

service requests and offering services to individuals they engage through that response.

  • The responding officers from HSOC have undergone extensive training in

working with people experiencing homelessness and the services that are available to them. HSOC officers lead with services.

34 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Services (Question 4)

A portion of HSOC’s work is responsive to 311 and 911 calls and a portion is providing proactive services:

  • DPH Outreach since August 2019*:
  • 1,415 engagements
  • 540 people referred to services (maybe more than 1 referral per

person)

  • Homeless Outreach Team since July 2019*:
  • 3,853 outreach engagements
  • 2,572 (67%) people accepted services

* 3 months of data*

35 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Services (Question 4)

EMS-6: Encounters, Referrals & Connections Since August 2019

36 36

Service ice Referr erred ed Conne nect cted ed Sobering Center 114 72 Shelter 49 33 Navigation Center (HSOC 7 night beds) 26 19 Navigation Center (time- limited beds) 12 6 Detox 39 12 Psychiatric Services 28 24 Substance Use/ Duel Diagnosis Treatment 16 4 284 170

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Services Offered by HSOC Officers (Question 4 & 6)

Since August 2019, HSOC officers from SFPD have engaged

  • ver 6,290 people living on the streets, largely in response to

311 calls, and have made the following service referrals & connections:

37 37

Service ice Referr erred ed Conne nect cted ed Navigation Center 547 385 Shelter 414 14 CASC 1099 220 Sobering 63 33 SFHOT 608 NA DPH 80 NA EMS-6 2 NA LEAD 57 15 Other 10 1

slide-38
SLIDE 38

HSOC Effectiveness (Question 10)

Servic ice e Requests ts Januar uary y 2018 18 Oc October 2019 % Chang nge

Homeless-related requests for service 12,223 requests 7,088 requests

  • 42%

Average call response time 123 hours 38 hours

  • 69%

Citywi ywide de Tent Counts ts July 2018 October 2019 % Change

Tents/structures Approx 568 Approx 447

  • 21%

Sites with 6+ tents/structures 17 sites 9 sites

  • 47%

38 38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

HSOC Effectiveness (Question 10)

39 39

  • Creation of streamlined response operation
  • Improved data and impact collection
  • Strengthened collaboration between

departments

  • Increased integration of services
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Governance Structure

Department of Emergency Management

40 40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Inc ncide ident nt Com

  • mmand

nd Syste tem

  • Incident Command System (ICS) is the best practice model

for managing emergencies across the nation

  • Policy oversight by Mayor’s Office and Department Heads
  • Centralized location at the Emergency Operations Center

increases efficiency and coordination between departments

41 41 HSOC Management Operations Planning Logistics Finance/ Administration Public Information Policy Group LHCB: Quarterly meetings to make recommendations

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Succe ccesse sses wi with h Uni nifie fied d Com

  • mmand

and

  • Allows Departments to work together toward a common goal
  • Creates a mutual understanding of requirements and
  • perations across all Departments
  • Routes all street-related incident calls through a single

location

  • Performs operations based on pre-established objectives
  • Prioritizes City resources effectively
  • Improved overall City understanding and responsiveness to

crisis on the streets

42 42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

HS HSOC & LH LHCB

43 43

  • LHCB can offer input into HSOC through quarterly meetings
  • Recommend that future meetings be more focused on LHCB

input and recommendations.

  • HSOC can provide written responses to LHCB’s questions
  • Spend quarterly meetings taking input and recommendations from

LHCB