hb 493
play

HB 493 Priv ivate Pla lan Review Reform 2019 Spring Board Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HB 493 Priv ivate Pla lan Review Reform 2019 Spring Board Meeting Government Affairs Committee HB 493 Private Permitting Review & Inspection Act Chairman Kevin Tanner Majority Leader Mike Dugan O.C.G.A. 8-2-26 Existing law


  1. HB 493 Priv ivate Pla lan Review Reform 2019 Spring Board Meeting Government Affairs Committee

  2. HB 493 “Private Permitting Review & Inspection Act” Chairman Kevin Tanner Majority Leader Mike Dugan

  3. O.C.G.A. 8-2-26 • Existing law allows a local permitting authority to take 30 business days (about 6 weeks) to complete a plan review and 2 days to complete an inspection • If the local staff can’t complete your request in that time, applicant has the option to engage a private provider • Not utilized because of time delay and double cost $$$

  4. HB 493 Changes in the Law • Cities and counties SHALL publish all requirements and fees for building permit applications • No later than 5 business days after receipt of an application, a local building official SHALL notify the applicant whether or not the application is “complete”. Time taken to review for “completion” counts toward 30 day limit. • Notice of deficiencies shall be provided in writing and the 30 day limit will be “paused” while deficiencies are corrected.

  5. HB 493 Changes in the Law • When an applicant is notified that their application is “complete” they will also be notified as to whether the personnel “employed or contracted by such county or municipality” will be able to complete a plan review in 30 days (now about 4 weeks) or an inspection in 2 days

  6. HB 493 Changes in the Law • If local staff CANNOT complete the review or inspection within that time frame, an applicant SHALL have the option of retaining a private professional provider. • The applicant will pay only 50% of the required regulatory fee

  7. HB 493 Changes in the Law • If local staff determines they CAN provide the plan review or inspection within the time limits, an applicant may nevertheless choose to retain a private professional provider immediately. • The applicant would be required to pay a “convenience fee” equal to 100% of the regulatory fee

  8. HB 493 Changes in the Law • If a local permitting authority states its intent to complete the regulatory action within the required time limits and fails to do so, there SHALL be a “project initiation permit” issued to allow an applicant to begin work. • Any delays in processing which are outside the control of the city or county or through the fault of the applicant SHALL NOT count toward day limits

  9. HB 493 Changes in the Law • The private professional provider SHALL review plans to determine compliance with all applicable “regulatory requirements” • ”Regulatory Requirements” are determined by a county or municipality to be necessary for approval of plans, permits, or applications under this chapter; provided, however, that with respect to any application, such requirements shall include the Georgia State Minimum Standard Codes most recently adopted by the Department of Community Affairs and any locally adopted ordinances and amendments to such codes; applicable zoning ordinances and conditions; design standards; and other state and local laws, regulations, and ordinances applicable to the application in question.

  10. HB 493 Changes in the Law • The private professional provider SHALL be a licensed engineer or a licensed architect who is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with the applicant. • The private professional provider SHALL submit an affidavit that the plans reviewed comply with all applicable regulatory requirements • They SHALL also show proof of errors and omissions insurance for at least $1 MILLION per claim and $1 MILLION aggregate coverage for any project with a construction cost of $5 MILLION or less

  11. HB 493 Changes in the Law • A local government may provide for the pre-qualification of private professional providers by local ordinance to ensure that the firms or individuals providing the reviews or inspections are qualified experts in local codes and conditions. • An absence of such ordinance identifying pre-qualified providers does not prevent an applicant from engaging a private professional provider.

  12. So what’s the bottom line? • If time is of the essence, you can skip to the front of the line, provided you pay the government their full fee and your third party provider their full fee. • If cost is a bigger concern, allowing the guys in a hurry to go to a third party provider will also shorten your line, making the process more efficient for everyone. • There may be some growing pains among the local staff. Please forward non-compliance complaints to HBAG staff

  13. Questions? • Austin Hackney • Government Affairs Director • Home Builders Association of Georgia • ahackney@hbag.org

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend