HATCH-WAXMAN ACT: OVERVIEW What You Really Need To Know and Then - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hatch waxman act
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HATCH-WAXMAN ACT: OVERVIEW What You Really Need To Know and Then - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HATCH-WAXMAN ACT: OVERVIEW What You Really Need To Know and Then Some Richard T. Ruzich 1 Background of Hatch-Waxman Where Are The Cheap Drugs? Roche Products Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

HATCH-WAXMAN ACT: OVERVIEW What You Really Need To Know and Then Some Richard T. Ruzich

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Background of Hatch-Waxman

“Where Are The Cheap Drugs?”

  • Roche Products Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical

– 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984) – Testing in connection with FDA approval is patent infringement – Massive delays in generic drugs into market

  • Hatch-Waxman Enacted (1984)

– Provides for a safe harbor for FDA related submissions, 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) – Incentive to challenge patents with 180-day exclusivity period – Protects Brand Patents with automatic 30 month stay

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

The Notice Letter Dance

  • Paragraph IV certification—patents listed in

Orange Book are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed

  • Orange Book Listings—NDA holder required to

list patents that cover its drug

  • Only compositions and MOT patents listable
  • Notice of Acceptance for Filing—must send NL

within 20 days (355(j)(2)(B)(ii)); suit must be filed within 45 days of receipt by NDA holder

  • NL must contain detailed statement of facts/law
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Exclusivity Forfeiture – “Little aa, Little bb” Dates & 75 days after:

(aa) Final FDA approval of the ANDA or 30 months after the ANDA filing, whichever is earlier; AND (bb) (i) Final decision of patent invalidity or non-inf; (ii) court executed settlement or consent decree that enters final judgment of patent invalidity or non-inf; or (iii) FTF withdraws PIV certification or the NDA holder withdraws the patent information.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Reality Hits & Forfeiture Looms Apotex v. Daiichi (olmesartan)

  • Two patents listed – ‘599 & ‘703 patents
  • Mylan PIV’ed certified against both patents
  • After receiving NL, Daiichi disclaimed ‘703

patent

  • Mylan found to infringe ‘599 patent
  • Earliest entry date for Mylan is Oct. 25, 2016
  • Enter Apotex two years later
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

The Olmesartan Conundrum & Apotex Gets Trigger Happy

  • Apotex PIII’ed the ‘703 patent (now disclaimed)

and PIV’ed the ‘599 patent

  • Daiichi doesn’t sue Apotex, so Apotex files DJ
  • Initially dismissed by ND Illinois for lack of SMJ
  • Reversed on April 7, 2015 by Fed. Cir. holding

“The stakes over which the parties are vigorously fighting are concrete and substantial.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

What Is Apotex’s Objective? Get To the Market On Time!

  • Mylan is FTF, but is now blocked by ‘599 patent,

with entry date of Oct. 25, 2016

  • If Apotex gets TA and is successful against the

‘703 patent, then Mylan will forfeit

  • Little (aa) & (bb) dates generated
  • Apotex can possibly capture entire market or at

a minimum, enter the same time as Mylan

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

QUESTIONS