Hard Choices LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 Reconnecting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hard choices
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hard Choices LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 Reconnecting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hard Choices LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 Reconnecting resource choices to student learning LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 Investing in student learning while reducing costs to address the budget imbalance are


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hard Choices

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Reconnecting resource choices to student learning

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Investing in student learning while reducing costs to address the budget imbalance are inextricably linked

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hard Choices Report Increase transparency and establish a set of facts Different approach to planning and budgeting

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hard Choices Report Increase transparency and establish a set of facts Different approach to planning and budgeting

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

1 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

English Math

LAUSD White African American Latino English Learners

4% 34% 30% 66% 40%

LAUSD White African American Latino English Learners

5% 24% 19% 57% 30%

LAUSD Students who Met or Exceeded Standards in English and Math by Ethnicity and English Language Learners Status Reading Math LAUSD Proficiency Rates in Reading and Math for Fourth and Eighth Grade Students by Ethnicity

2017 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Smarter Balanced Assessment Tests 2017 National Assessment Educational Progress (NAEP) 4th - African American 4th - Latino 8th - African American 8th - Latino

13% 12% 13% 17%

4th - African American 4th - Latino 8th - African American 8th - Latino

16% 15% 16% 13%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

66% 61% 57% 56% 33% 35% 38% 37% 1% 4% 5% 7% 6-8 3-5 0-2 years LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 2.7 years 2.5 2.4 2.1 Average Principal Duration In-School

Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD, page 31

LAUSD Principals In-School Duration Average by School Need

Lowest Need Schools Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Highest Need Schools

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Teacher Time Devoted to Planning, Collaboration, and Professional Learning Days Compared to Strategic Practice

Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD, page 27

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018 Teacher Individual Planning Per Day (minutes) Teacher Collaborative Time Per Week (minutes) Teacher Days Devoted to Professional Learning (days)

15 30 45 60

50 50

25 50 75 100

>0

90

2 4 6 8

2.9 7 Strategic LAUSD Practice Strategic LAUSD Practice Strategic LAUSD Practice

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

Weighted Per Pupil Funding by School Level

Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD

ES MS HS

$11,850 $10,660 $11,540

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Percent of Schools with Multiple School Designations by School Level

65% percent of high schools have more than one designation and 23% of high schools have 3 or more school designations

Districtwide ES MS HS

65% 38% 16% 27%

Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD , page 49

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-11
SLIDE 11 Capital Investment 2016-17 Budgeted Expenses Debt Service Operating Adult, Early Childhood (Not TK-12) Cafeteria Total General Fund Special Ed: Non-Public; Required Pass Throughs Total Available TK-12 *Pension and Healthcare Math Instruction English Instruction Per Pupil $17,800 $1,700 $600 $800 $14,700 $600 $14,100 $1,200 $1,000 $1,600 Cumulative Per Pupil $14,700 $14,100 $3,800 $2,600 $1,600

$9.1 $3.1 $0.4 $0.9 Special Funds $0.4 $7.5 General Fund $1.7 $0.5 $0.8 $7.2 $0.3 Total Budget Capital Investment *LAUSD 2016-17 Budget Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD, page 64. LAUSD 2016-17 Adjusted Budget (Dollars in Billions) *Both LA Unified and the Advisory Task Force included pension costs as a part of TK-12 operating expenses as reflected in the figure above, which brings per pupil spending to $14,700. ERS excluded pensions from its analysis of TK-12 operating expenses to ensure an accurate comparison with peer districts, which brings per pupil to $13,600

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

LAUSD Actual and Forecasted Revenue and Expenditure

Source: ERS Resource Map for LAUSD, page 11. LAUSD 2018-19 District Budget Preparations (Feb 2018)

6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Actual Forecast

Budget Deficit $400 M

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LAUSD Reserve Balance as a Percent of General Fund

Source: LAUSD 2016-17 Final Budget, Appendix E (Dollars in Millions)

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

5 10 15

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

3.42%

  • 3.31%

11.64% 10.61% 7.25% 3.42%

  • 3.31%
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Long-Term Plan

  • Investments in student learning,

teaching and school leadership

  • School funding based on student need
  • Remove structural deficit
  • Align resources with District goals

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Long-Term Plan

  • Investments in student learning,

teaching and school leadership

  • School funding based on student need
  • Remove structural deficit
  • Align resources with District goals

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Long-Term Plan

  • Investments in student learning,

teaching and school leadership

  • School funding based on student need
  • Remove structural deficit
  • Align resources with District goals

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Long-Term Plan

  • Investments in student learning,

teaching and school leadership

  • School funding based on student need
  • Remove structural deficit
  • Align resources with District goals

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018

Hard choices can no longer be avoided

Budget and Policy Post September 25, 2017

Update on School District Retiree Health Benefits

Introduction

Rising Cost of Retiree Health Benefits Placing Added Pressure on District
  • Budgets. Most school districts in California provide their retired employees with
health benefits at least until they reach age 65. These benefits are becoming an increasingly important issue for districts given their rising cost. Adjusted for inflation, districts today are spending about twice as much on retiree health benefits as they did in the early 2000s. This added cost pressure comes at a time when districts are facing other pressures—most notably, rising pension costs and expectations to enhance services for low­income students and English learners. Legislature Could Benefit From Better Understanding of These Issues. Knowing more about school districts’ retiree health benefits could help the Legislature in various ways. It could help the Legislature understand why certain districts spend more on these benefits than other districts. It also could help the Legislature better understand how proposals affecting the cost of health care could interact with district budgets. Additionally, it could help the Legislature better assess school districts’ overall fiscal health. This Web Post Provides an Update. The first section of this web post provides background—describing how retiree health benefits vary across districts, explaining how districts pay for these benefits, and reviewing associated disclosure

Los Angeles Unified School District

Report of the Independent Financial Review Panel

November 10, 2015 Prepared By: Maria Anguiano Delaine Eastin Michael Fine Bill Lockyer Darline Robles Miguel Santana Darrell Steinberg Peter Taylor Kent Wong
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Seize this time as an opportunity to build the public school district

  • ur communities deserves

LA Unified Advisory Task Force June 2018