Ham iltonian form ulation of reduced Vlasov-Maxw ell equations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ham iltonian form ulation of reduced vlasov maxw ell
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ham iltonian form ulation of reduced Vlasov-Maxw ell equations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ham iltonian form ulation of reduced Vlasov-Maxw ell equations Cristel CHANDRE Centre de Physique Thorique CNRS, Marseille, France Contact : chandre@cpt.univ-mrs.fr importance of stability vs instability in devices involving a large


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ham iltonian form ulation of reduced Vlasov-Maxw ell equations

Cristel CHANDRE Centre de Physique Théorique – CNRS, Marseille, France

Contact: chandre@cpt.univ-mrs.fr

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Outline

  • Hamiltonian description of charges particles and electromagnetic fields
  • Reduction of Vlasov-Maxwell equations using Lie transforms

Alain J. BRIZARD (Saint Michael’s College, Vermont, USA)

  • Reduced Hamiltonian model for the Free Electron Laser

Romain BACHELARD (Synchrotron Soleil, Paris) Michel VITTOT (CPT, Marseille) importance of stability vs instability in devices involving a large number of charged particles interacting with fields: plasma physics (tokamaks), free electron lasers Here: reduced models of such systems (easier simulation, better understanding of the dynamics)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motion of a charged particle in electrom agnetic fields Motion of a charged particle in electrom agnetic fields

( ) ( ) ( ) { } { } { }

2

, , , , , 2 , , ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ = + = ⋅ − ⋅ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎧ ⎪ ∂ ⎪ = − ⎪ ⎪ ∂ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ∂ ⎪ = ⎪ ⎪ ∂ = = ⎪ ⎩ p A q p q q q p p q q p q p p q

  • with

equations of motion : e t c f g f g H t eV H H H t f g m H

> > in canonical form > > in non-canonical form: physical variables

( ) ( ) { } { } { }

2 2

1 1 , , , , , , 2 ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + ⋅ × ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = + = ⋅ − ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ⎧ ⎪ = ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎛ ⎞ ⎨ × ⎟ ⎜ ⎪ ⎟ = + ⎜ ⎪ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = = ⎜ ⎪ ⎝ ⎠ ⎪ ⎩ B v x x v x v x x v v x v v v v B v E

  • with

equations of motion : f g f g H t m eV t f g m e m c e f H H g m c

( ) 1 , e t m c ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ = − ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ = v p A q x q

gyroscopic bracket

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definition: Ham iltonian system Definition: Ham iltonian system

{ } { } { } { } { } { } { }

{ }

{ }

{ }

{ }

{ }

  • a scalar function

, the Hamiltonian

  • a Poisson bracket

, with the properties antisymmetric , , Leibnitz law , , , Jacobi identity , , , , , ,

  • H

F G F G G F F GK F G K G F K F G K K F G G K F = − = + + + =

{ } { }

equations of motion ,

  • a conserved quantity

, dF F H dt F H = =

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Eulerian version: case of a density of charged particles Eulerian version: case of a density of charged particles

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

  • density of particles in phase space

, , 1 example: , , Klimontovitch distribution

  • evolution given by the Vlasov equation

i i i

f t f t t t N = δ − δ −

x v x v x x v v

3 3 2

  • Eulerian, not Lagrangian:

for any observable , we have ,

  • still a Hamiltonian system

Hamiltonian : 2 f e f f t m c d f dt t f m d xd v f ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = − ⋅ ∇ − + × ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = = ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ +

∫∫

v v E v B v F F F F H H

3 3

with , , eV d xd v f f f ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ ⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ δ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ δ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ = ⎥ ⎭ ⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎦

∫∫

F G G F

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Eulerian version: case of a density of charged particles Eulerian version: case of a density of charged particles

( )

( )

( )

3 3 3 3 3 2 2

  • an example:

( , ) , ,

  • functional derivatives

= + 1

  • here:

and 2

  • therefore:

f e d v f d xd v f t f f f f d xd v O f e m eV f f t ⎡ ⎤ ρ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ∂ρ δρ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎡ ⎤ = ρ = ⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪ ∂ δ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎭ δ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ + φ φ + φ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ δ δρ δ = δ − = + δ δ ∂ρ = ∂

∫ ∫ ∫

x x v x x v H H F F F H

3

with f e d v f ∂ ⎡ ⎤ − ⋅ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ∂

J J v x

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Variables: particle density f(x,v,t), electric field E(x,t), magnetic field B(x,t)

4 4 f e f f t m c c t c t ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = − ⋅ ∇ − + × ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ∂ = − ∇× ∂ ∂ = ∇× − π ∂ ∇ ⋅ = πρ ∇ ⋅ = v v E B v B E E B J E B where and

Vlasov Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell equations: self

Maxw ell equations: self-

  • consistent dynam ics

consistent dynam ics

> description of the dynamics of a collisionless plasma (low density)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3

2 , , , 4 4 , 8 m d xd v f d xd v f f e f d xd v m f d x x f f f c d ⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ δ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ δ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎡ ⎤ = + ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎡ ⎤ + π ⎡ ⎤ δ δ δ δ ⎢ ⎥ + π ⋅ ∇× − ∇× ⋅ ⎢ ⎥ δ δ δ δ ⎡ ⎤ π ∂ δ δ δ δ ⎢ ⎥ + ⋅ − ⎢ ⎥ ∂ δ δ δ δ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫∫ ∫∫ ∫

v v E E E B E E B B B E F G F G H F F G F G F G G Hamiltonian : with

3

, , , d f dt t d p f ∂ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = = ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ − ⎦ ∂

E E B B F F F F H Equation of motion for : Remark: et are conserved quantities antisymmetry, Leibnitz, div div Jacobi

Morrison, PLA (1980) Marsden, Weinstein, Physica D (1982)

Vlasov Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell equations... still a Ham iltonian system

Maxw ell equations... still a Ham iltonian system

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Elimination (or decoupling) of fast time and small spatial scales for a better

understanding of complex plasma phenomena

reduced polarization density / magnetization current / polarization current density

  • Can we represent the reduced Vlasov-Maxwell equations as a Hamiltonian system?

Hint: use of Lie transforms

  • Deliverables: Expressions of the polarization P and magnetization M vectors
  • reduced Maxwell equations in terms of and

4 4 4 , 4 where ,

R R R R

c t c t ∇ ⋅ = πρ ∂ = ∇× − π ∂ = + π = − π ∂ ρ = ρ + ∇ ⋅ = − ∇× − ∂ D H D D H J D E P H B M P P J J M

From m icroscopic to m acroscopic Vlasov From m icroscopic to m acroscopic Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell equations

Maxw ell equations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Reduced Reduced fields fields as Lie as Lie transform s transform s of

  • f f

f, , E E and and B B

( ) ( ) ( )

Given a functional , , , , , , , we define some new fields as 1 , , , 2 1 e , , , 2 , t t f t F f f f

⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ − + + ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎣ ⎦ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎡ ⎤ ⎟ ⎟ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎜ ⎜ = = − + + ⎟ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎜ ⎢ ⎥ ⎟ ⎟ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎡ − ⎢ ⎣ E x B x x v E E E D E H B B B B

  • S

L

S S S S S S S S 1 , , 2 Remark: If the variable is only a function of then e is only a function of The functionals transforms into f

⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎡ ⎤ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎜ ⎟ + + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎟ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ χ χ x x

  • S

L

S S e , resulting in a new Hamiltonian and a new Poisson bracket...

=

S

L

F F

slide-11
SLIDE 11

( ) ( )

3

1 e 1 4 1 1 e 4 4 so that 4 Reduced evolution operator e e e e ,e , e c d vf m f c t t

− − − −

⎛ ⎞ δ ∂ δ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = − = ∇× − + ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ π δ ∂ δ ⎝ ⎠ δ = − = ∇× + π δ ⎧ ⎪ = + π ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ = − π ⎪ ⎩ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ≡ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = = ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

P E B v M B E D E P H B M

  • S

S S S S S S

L L L L L L L

S S S F F F H F H

Polarization Polarization, , m agnetization m agnetization, , reduced reduced density density , , etc etc… …

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Reduced Reduced Vlasov Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell

Maxw ell equations equations

4 c t c t ∂ = ∇× − π ∂ ∂ = − ∇× ∂ D H J H D , 4 , 4 4

R

c t t c c t t t ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ = + − = ∇× − π ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ = + − = − ∇× − π + π ∇× ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ∂ ∂ ∂ D D D H J H H M H D P H H H H Reduced Vlasov equation 4 , F e F F t m c e f F f f f m ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = − ⋅ ∇ − + × ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ δ π ∂ δ ⎪ ⎪ = − − ⋅ + ⎨ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ δ ∂ δ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎭ v v D H v v E

  • S

S

guiding center theory / gyrokinetics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What What S S ? ?

e F f

⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ = ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ D E H B

S

L

  • Elimination of small spatial and fast time (averaging) scales of f(x,v,t) :

guiding-center gyrokinetics reduced models for free electron lasers

  • Use of KAM algorithms (at least one step process)
  • Advantages: preserve the structure of the equations,

invertible, symbolic calculus

( )

For F , homological equation , f f f f ⎡ ⎤ = + δ δ + = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ P S

collisionless plasmas (low frequency phenomena) ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭

Brizard, Hahm, Rev. Mod. Phys. (2007)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Strategies Strategies to to reduce reduce Vlasov Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell

Maxw ell equations equations

>rigorous: e > non-rigorous: truncate the Hamiltonian system

  • the equations of motion
  • the Hamiltonian and the Poisson bracket

> the canonical version provides a way

=

S

L

H H

  • ut...
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Reduced Reduced m odel for the Free Electron Laser m odel for the Free Electron Laser

From : Vlasov-Maxwell Hamiltonian To: Bonifacio’s reduced FEL Hamiltonian model … in a Ham iltonian way

( ) ( ) ( )

2

, , , 2 sin 2 , p H f I d dp f p I I ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ ⎡ ⎤ ⎟ ϕ = θ θ + θ −ϕ ⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎣ ⎦ ⎟ ⎜ ⎝ ⎠ ϕ

∫∫

with intensity and phase of the electromagnetic wave

( )

2 2 3 3 3 2

, 1 , 2 , d xd p f d x f ⎡ ⎤ = + ⎢ + ⎣ + ⎥ ⎦

∫∫ ∫

x p E p E B B H

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A Free Electron A Free Electron… … w hat w hat? ?

rms

u LEL

K

2

2 (1

) 2 λ λ γ = +

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vlasov Vlasov-

  • Maxw ell: canonical version

Maxw ell: canonical version

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

3 3 3 3 3

, , ( , , ) , , 1 , d xd p f f d xd p f f f d f f f x f f ⎡ ⎤ δ δ δ δ ⎢ ⎥ + ⋅ − = + = − = ∇× ⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ δ ⎢ ⎥ ∇ ⋅ − ⋅ ∇ ⎢ ⎥ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ δ ⋅ ⎢ ⎥ δ δ δ δ ⎣ ⎢ ⎥ = ⎣ ⎦ + ⎦ ⎦ ⎣

∫ ∫∫ ∫ ∫

E B Y A x p x p A x E Y A Y Y B A p p A

  • m

m m m m m m m

Bracke Change of va t: Hamiltonian: riables: canonical

  • F

G F G F G F F G G H

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3

2 , , 1 2

w w w

d x d x f t p t d xd − + ∇× + ∇× ⋅ ∇× + ∇ + + = − + + × −

∫∫ ∫

p A p A A Y A Y A A A A x A A x A x

  • m

B Translation of by a constant function (external field-undulator): canonical (canonical transformation racket: Hamiltonia n: )

  • H

( )

2 *

e 2 ˆ ˆ e 2

w w

ik z ik z w w w

a

= +

A A e e helicoidal undulator:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

One m ode for the One m ode for the radiated radiated field field

( ) ( )

* * * *

ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ 2 2 ˆ ˆ 2

ikz ikz ikz ikz

i i a a k a a a x y

− −

+ = − − = = + x y A e e e Y e e Paraxial approximation and circularly polarized radiated field e e where e e Remark: does not depend on and but depends on time (dynamical varia

  • (

)

2 3 3 2 * * * * * 2 * 3 3 *

ˆ e e 2 , ˆ ˆ 1 2 e e

ikz ikz w w ikz ik

d xd p f aa i a d xd p f f f f f ik V a a a a ikS k Vaa z a a a d

− −

⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ + ⎡ ⎤ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ δ ⎢ ⎥ ∇ ⋅ − ⋅ ∇ ⎢ ⎥ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ δ ⎢ ⎡ ⎤ − = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ + + − ⎦ = ⋅ ⎥ − + ⎣ ⎦ −

∫ ∫ ∫∫ ∫

p e e A A e p p

m m m m m m

b Bracket: Hamiltonian: le) F G F G F G F G G H F

( )

*

ˆ

z w

⋅ ∇× e A

z

L: interaction length V: interaction volume

ˆ x

ˆ y

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Dim ensional Dim ensional reduction reduction

( )

( ) (

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) (

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

, , , , , x y f f p t t x y f f z p x y x t y t

⊥ ⊥ ⊥ ⊥

⇒ = δ = = = = δ δ δ = = = = x p x p p p x p p

  • The fields do not depend on and

no transverse velocity dispersion if If then no modification of the distribution if (injecti

  • (

)

2 * * 2 * * 2 * *

ˆ , ˆ 1 2 e e 2

ikz ikz w w

dzdp f p aa ik V a a a a ik dzdp f p f z S k Vaa f p f i z a f a

⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ ⎡ ⎤ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ⎢ ⎥ − ⎢ ⎥ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ + + − − ⋅ + ⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ δ ∂ δ ⎢ − ⎦ = + ⎥ ⎣ ⎦

∫∫ ∫∫

e e A A

  • Bracket:

Hamilton

  • n at the cen

ian: ter) F G F F G F G F G G H

( ) ( ) ( )

( )

* 2 * *

, , ˆ , , ˆ e ˆ ˆ e e ˆ ˆ

ikz ikz w t w ik

E t E E t f p f z p k k z kt a a E E Vk aa t z t d a a

∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ = + − = + ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ∂ − ⋅ ∇× ∂ ∂ ∂ θ = θ = + − = = + =

e e A

  • a

a

Autonomization: with Time dependent transformation (canonical): Bracke with and F G F G F G F G H H

  • (

)

2 * * 2

ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ 1 e e

i i w w w

k d dp f p aa ia a a a p k k

θ − θ

= ⎛ ⎞ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ θ + + − − + − ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ ⎜ + ⎝ ⎠

∫∫

  • can

t: Ha

  • n

mi ical ltonian: H

vanishing

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Bonifacio Bonifacio’ ’s s FEL m odel FEL m odel

( )

* * 2

ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ 1 ˆ ,

w R R R R

k k d dp f p p f f f f p p p p p i kV a a a a p a ⎡ ⎤ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ⎢ ⎥ + θ − ⎢ ⎥ ∂θ ∂ ∂ = + γ ≡ + ⎡ ⎤ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ∂θ δ δ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ∂ δ ∂ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ δ ⎣ ⎟ ⎜ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎠ ⎦ ⎝

∫∫

  • Resonance condition:

with weak radiated field: Bracket: Hamiltonia

  • F

G F G F G F G F G

( )

( )

2 2 * 3

1 ˆ ˆ ˆ e e 2 , ,

i i w w R i R

a i d dp f f p a a p f d dp f p a a i I p f

θ − − ϕ θ

⎛ ⎞ + ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ θ θ − − = = ⎡ ⎤ = ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ θ − ∂θ δ ∂ δ ∂ δ ∂ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎜ θ ⎟ ⎜ γ ⎟ ⎜ γ δ ⎦ ⎝ ⎠

∫∫

Normalization Transformation (canonical) into intensity/ phase e canonic n: Bracket al :

  • F

G H F G F G

( ) ( ) ( )

2

2 s , 2 , co I d dpf p I I f p d dp f p ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + − ⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ = + θ θ θ − ∂ϕ ∂ θ ϕ ∂ ∂ θ ϕ

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫∫

Hamiltonian : H F G F G

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outlook:on Outlook:on the use of the use of reduced reduced Ham iltonian Ham iltonian m odels m odels

Contact: chandre@cpt.univ-mrs.fr References: Bachelard, Chandre, Vittot, PRE (2008) Chandre, Brizard, in preparation.

2 1 1

2 cos( ) 2

N N j j j j N

H N I p

= =

ϕ = + − θ

∑ ∑

100 200 0.5 1 1.5

z I/N

Long-range interacting systems : QSS, transition to equilibrium,… Gyrokinetics: understand plasma disruption, control,…