HA International BioSet T BioSet T8000/T8500 PUNB binder system was - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ha international
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HA International BioSet T BioSet T8000/T8500 PUNB binder system was - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HA International BioSet T BioSet T8000/T8500 PUNB binder system was developed specifically to improve the foundry environment by: Reducing smoke and odor during pouring, cooling and shakeout Reducing Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HA International

BioSet T

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BioSet T8000/T8500 PUNB binder system was developed specifically to improve the foundry environment by:

Reducing smoke and odor during pouring, cooling and shakeout Reducing Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) emissions BioSet T8000/T8500 accomplishes this by using a new, non-hazardous, patented silica-based solvent in combination with bio-based methyl ester solvents.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Phenolic Urethane Targeted Strategy (Good, Better, Best)

System Emissions

BioSet T8000Pt1/T8500 Pt2

Best

Greatest environmental benefit with lowered resin levels, 35% reduction in HAPs and lowest smoke and odor at PCS Hybrid BioSet T8000 Pt1/Techniset 6435 Pt2

Better

Reduced resin usage with 15% reduction in HAPs and lower smoke and

  • dor at PCS

Conventional System Techniset F6000 Pt1/6435 Pt2

Good

Typical PUNB Performance and Emissions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Advantages over conventional PUNB systems:

Lower odor and smoke during pouring, cooling and shakeout Very low HAPs, low free formaldehyde Faster and higher strength development Similar work time/strip time as conventional systems

Benefits of using the Bioset T System:

Reduction in smoke and odor Reduced emissions Faster handling of cores and molds due to fast strength development Possible reductions in binder level up to 15%**

**Binder reductions will vary and depend greatly on individual foundry’s sand makeup.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Online Value and Environmental Impact Calculator for BioSet T

Annual Sand Usage (ton) 75,000 Part 2 Resin Type Low Solids Current Total Binder Content (%) 1.80% Part 1 Ratio 60% Current Part 1 Binder Cost/lb $1.55 Part 2 ratio 40% Current Part 2 Binder Cost/lb $1.45 % Catalyst (based on Pt1) 8% Current Catalyst Cost/lb $2.73 3% Your New Binder Level 1.75% BioSet T8000 Pt 1 Quoted Price/lb $1.65 Part 1 Ratio 60% Hybrid 6435 Pt 2 Quoted Price/lb $1.45 Part 2 ratio 40% Catalyst Quoted Price/lb $2.73 % Catalyst (based on Pt1) 6% BioSet T8000 Pt 1 Quoted Price/lb $1.65 Part 1 Ratio 60% BioSet T8500 Pt 2 Quoted Price/lb $1.55 Part 2 ratio 40% Catalyst Quoted Price/lb $2.73 % Catalyst 6% Price Difference per Ton Mixed Sand Your Annual Emitted HAPs (Pounds) Your Annualized Difference in Price Current System Conventional System Techniset F6000Pt1/Low Solids Pt2 163,134 Hybrid System Hybrid System BioSet T8000 Pt1/Techniset 6435 Pt2 Reduction in HAPs by 22.2%

  • $0.82

126,864

  • $61,583

BioSet T BioSet T8000 Pt1/T8500 Pt2 Reduction in HAPs by 33.5% $0.58 108,427 $43,177 Total Binder Reduction For BioSet Systems Current System *This calculator provides an estimated comparison of HAP reduction vs.costs. Although the information represented here is based on laboratory and field trial data, actual HAP and binder reduction will vary. Calculate the Impact of using BioSetT Enter Your Information in the Yellow Boxes System Current System Hybrid System BioSet T

Customer can enter their resin and pricing Calculates cost savings and HAP reductions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Print Ad Example

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In North America, TEOS has recently been introduced in no-bake applications Already in widespread use in Europe for nearly ten (10) years

– 10-15% of all UCB systems sold in Germany

Its primary benefit and advantage is smoke & odor reduction at pouring, cooling and shakeout

TEOS Solvent Application

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TEOS-based UNB’s

Key product characteristics:

Replaces aromatic solvents in Part 1 & 2 with TEOS

Provides excellent strength development and reactivity

Uses existing Activators/ Catalysts

Performs on a variety of different sands, including new and reclaimed

Very low smoke and odor at pouring

Lower HAP generation than Conventional UNB

Fully mechanical reclaimable

Conventional UNB TEOS UNB

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Work and Strip Time

Conventional vs. TEOS based UNB

New Silica, 1% Resin – 55/45 Pt1:Pt2

3.1 3.2 3.5 4.0

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Minutes Work Time Strip Time Conventional UNB TEOS based

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Strength Performance - New Sand

Conventional vs. TEOS based UNB

New Silica, 1% Resin – 55/45 Pt1:Pt2

149 176 195 249 213 285

50 100 150 200 250 300 Tensile, psi 10 min 60 min 24 hr Time After Strip

Conventional UNB TEOS based

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Work and Strip Time - Mechanically Reclaimed

Conventional vs. TEOS based UNB

Resin level - varies, 60/40 Pt1:Pt2

3.5 3.6 3.8 5.5 6.1 6.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Minutes Work Time Strip Time Conventional UNB -1.1% TEOS based - 1.1% TEOS based -0.9%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Performance - Mechanically Reclaimed Conventional vs. TEOS based UNB

Resin level - varies, 60/40 Pt1:Pt2

43 97 87 111 166 126 134 174 148

50 100 150 200 Tensile, psi 10 min 60 min 24 hr Time After Strip

Conventional -1.1% TEOS based - 1.1% TEOS based - 0.9%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Nose Knows

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Overview of Odor Measurements

Odor measurements (olfactometry) using a close-to-practice test sample at the Institute for Foundry Technology (IFG)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

35% reduction 60% reduction 75% reduction

Odor Comparison Conventional vs. TEOS UCB Systems

TEOS-based systems result in significant odor reductions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Emissions Testing

Emissions at PC&S were measured at UNI Metal Casting Center Used improved methodology Three systems compared:

Conventional UNB

Hybrid TEOS Part 1 / Conventional Part 2

Full TEOS UNB

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pouring, Cooling & Shakeout

Real Time VOC Measurement

– Hybrid TEOS Part 1 /

Conventional Part 2

27% reduction in Total Hydrocarbons (THCs)

– Full TEOS UNB

42% reduction in THCs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

ppm Time, min (0 = pouring)

Total VOCs; Pouring, Cooling, Shake Out

Conventional zero adjusted Hybrid THC zero adjusted Full TEOS THC zero adjusted

Conventional UNB: M ax 423.5 ppm Hybrid TEOSUNB: M ax 291.1 ppm Full TEOS UNB: M ax 119.1 ppm

Gas fired ladle preheater

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) Will we really see reduced binder levels?

  • Reduction in binder level will vary depending on each foundry’s sand
  • makeup. Tests have shown that if the sand conditions are good, lower

binders up to 15% percent are possible. High levels of fines in the sand will require greater resin levels in general due to greater surface area and therefore will limit the amount of reduction possible. HAI can test your sand in our laboratory and give an estimate of the overall benefits of using BioSet T. Does this system work with sand reclamation?

  • Our field trials have shown that the BioSet T system is similar to

conventional with regards to reclamation. How does BioSet T perform compared to conventional systems.

  • Work time and strip time are similar, and the BioSet T develops tensile

strength faster and to a greater level than a conventional PUNB system.

Frequently Asked Questions

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the system smoke?

  • Dramatic reduction in smoke
  • Small amount of white smoke observed after pouring; dissipates quickly

Is the system odorless?

  • Dramatic reduction in odor at pouring
  • Different, less persistent odor during coring and molding

Effect of lower flash point compared to conventional UNB‘s – does it make a difference, if yes how?

  • No issues in practice with flash point
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Summary

Key product characteristics:

– Very low smoke and odor at pouring – Lower HAP generation than Conventional UNB – Provides excellent strength development and reactivity

Resin level reduction

– Uses existing Activators/ Catalysts – Fully mechanically reclaimable