GW170817: Anatomy of the GW chirp
Credits : NASA Goddard
Eric Chassande-Mottjn
AstroPartjcule et Cosmologie (APC) CNRS Univ Paris Diderot
GW170817: Anatomy of the GW chirp Credits : NASA Goddard Eric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GW170817: Anatomy of the GW chirp Credits : NASA Goddard Eric Chassande-Mottjn AstroPartjcule et Cosmologie (APC) CNRS Univ Paris Diderot Outline GW170817 from a GW-only perspectjve Basics about the chirp and some details about its
Credits : NASA Goddard
AstroPartjcule et Cosmologie (APC) CNRS Univ Paris Diderot
– Basics about the chirp and some details about its
– What can we learn from the GW signal alone? – Next steps and prospects
chirp mass
LIGO-Virgo LIGO only LIGO-Virgo sky localizatjon fjnal
(28 deg2)
rapid
(31 deg2)
(190 deg2)
tc + 40 min: 1st LV announcement
candidate BNS in H1 associated with GRB large glitch in L1 issue with V1 data transfert
tc + 1h05 : Fermi report
preliminary localizatjon = 1100 deg2
tc + 1h30 min: LV update
H1-only loc. and distance = 37 ± 12 Mpc
tc + 5h : LIGO Virgo loc. = 30 deg2 distance = 40 ± 8 Mpc
Too late for Australia and South Africa!
DAC saturatjon in test mass positjon feedback control
1 per ~20 mins
If the glitch rate remains the same, > 10 % probability that a loud glitch
post- merger matuer/tjdal efgects inspiral
Inspiral
(point partjcle approx.)
locatjon and orientatjon)
fjttj ttjng the waveform coherently in all detectors using Bayesian sampling methods
Phase matching: measurement accuracy scales with 1/Ncycles With Ncycles ≈ 3000 from 30 to 1000 Hz detector-frame chirp mass … then mass ratj tjo, spins and matu tuer efg fgects
Abbotu et al, Phys. Rev. Letu. 119, 161101 (2017)
Updated, more precise estjmates coming soon (betuer calibratjon, waveforms models, use of EM informatjon)
chirp mass uncertainty equal mass – 1.36 Msun
tjdal/matuer efgects
Tidal deformation by the gravity gradient due to companion
changes the grav. potentjal and thus the orbital motjon/GW signal
Effect observable in the final tens of GW cycles before merger fGW > 400 Hz – Keplerian orbital radius ~ 60 km
comparable to NS radius
NS radius (EoS) mass Love number (EoS)
Selectjon of EoS from J. S. Read et al
large star small star excluded
Update coming soon (betuer param estjmates, waveforms systematjcs, direct constraints on EoS)
post- merger
Post-merger scenarios
–
prompt collapse to a black hole → quasi normal mode at 6 kHz
–
hypermassive NS; livetjme ~ 1 s [preferred] → f-mode at 2-4 kHz
–
supramassive NS; livetjme ~ 10−104 s
–
stable NS
→ magnetar, bar mode or
r-mode instability
Abbotu et al,
Deeper and more complete search (including long duratjon, days) coming soon
hrss < 2-8 ×10−22 Hz−1/2
htups:/ /arxiv.org/abs/1710.05901 htups:/ /arxiv.org/abs/1710.05877
~1 hour about each detectjon
–
Binary parameters obviously but also physics of NS/EoS of dense matuer and tests of post-merger scenarios
–
Tests of General Relatjvity (GW polarizatjons, dipole radiatjon, etc)
–
Unantjcipated implicatjons on fundamental physics (alt. models for gravity, limit on num of spacetjme dimensions)
–
1–50 BNS expected in O3 (12 months)
–
4-80 BNS/yr for 2020+ at/near design sensitjvity