Group Care Quality Standards Assessment: Pilot Test Orientation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

group care quality standards assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Group Care Quality Standards Assessment: Pilot Test Orientation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Group Care Quality Standards Assessment: Pilot Test Orientation SHAMRA BOEL-STUDT, PH.D. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY AFFILIATE, FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR CHILD WELFARE KEN BENDER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOYS TOWN NORTH FLORIDA BRAD GREGORY


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Group Care Quality Standards Assessment: Pilot Test Orientation

SHAMRA BOEL-STUDT, PH.D. ▪ FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY ▪ AFFILIATE, FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR CHILD WELFARE KEN BENDER ▪ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOYS TOWN NORTH FLORIDA BRAD GREGORY ▪ VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS, FLORIDA SHERIFFS YOUTH RANCHES XIOMARA TURNER ▪ STATE FOSTER CARE LICENSING SPECIALIST, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ZANDRA ODUM ▪ PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, OCW, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Learning Objectives

  • 1. Discuss the background, purpose, and goals of

the Core Quality Standards for Group Care Initiative

  • 2. Describe the development and purpose of the

Group Care Quality Assessment

  • 3. Identify the purpose of the pilot study of the

Group Care Quality Assessment

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quality Standards for Group Care Initiative

 Project Phases  I: Development of Core Quality Standards for Group

Care

 II: Development of Quality Assessment Tool  III: Pilot Test of Quality Assessment Tool  IV: Field Test of Quality Assessment Tool  V: Implementation of Quality Assessment Tool  VI: Validation of Quality Assessment Tool

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Phase I: Development of Core Quality Standards for Group Care

Group Care Quality Standards Workgroup Purpose

 The Group Care Quality Standards workgroup was established by the

Department of Children and Families and Florida Coalition for Children (FCC) to develop a set of quality standards for Department licensed residential child care agencies, specifically residential group homes. Responsibilities

 Engage the Florida Institute for Child Welfare and residential group care

providers to collaborate in the development of quality standards.

 Analyze research surrounding quality standards for residential group care

settings.

 Establish a set of core quality standards common to residential care settings.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Group Care Quality Standards Workgroup Project Timeline

5

Pre-Meetings December 2014 Literature Review January-February 2015 Workgroup Kickoff Meeting April 2015 Stakeholder Review/Surveys May-July 2015 Draft Standards Presentations to the Secretary September 2015 Handoff to the Institute November- December 2015

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Eight Domains of Quality Practice for Residential Group Care

Quality Standards for Group Care (2015):

 Assessment, Admission, & Service/Treatment Planning  Positive, Safe Living Environment  Monitor & Report Problems  Family, Culture, & Spirituality  Professional & Competent Staff  Program Elements  Education, Skills, & Positive Outcomes  Pre-Discharge/Post-Discharge Processes

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Phase II: Development of Group Care Quality Assessment Tool

Quality Assessment Tool Goal

 Children and youth in residential group homes receive high quality

care Objectives

 Assess the extent that services in group care meet core quality

standards in each practice domain

Create rating scale designed to assess core quality standards

Develop system for implementing assessment of quality in residential group care

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Development of Quality Assessment Tool

Benefits

 Represents significant investment in group care  No cost to group home provider  Provides documented evidence of quality services and efforts to

invest in continuous improvements

 Proactive response to call for increased accountability

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Group Care Quality Assessment Project Team

 Project Lead Team:

 Florida Institute for Child Welfare/Florida State University  Florida Department of Children and Families

 Key Consultants/Reviewers:

 Group Care Quality Standard Workgroup – Subcommittee  Boys Town National Research Institute  Florida Coalition for Children  Child advocates  Former foster youth  Child welfare academics

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Group Care Quality Assessment Project Timeline

10

Project Handoff from DCF December 2015 Draft Scale & Implementation Protocol January 2016 – August 2016 Pilot Test November 2016- January 2017 Field Test February-July 2017 Data Analysis/Finalization

  • f Tool

July-September 2017 Statewide Roll-Out September- December 2017 Year One Validation January 2018- February 2019 Year Two Validation January 2019- February 2020

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Development of Quality Assessment Tool

Potential issues/concerns

 Time consuming  How will group homes be assessed?  How information will be used?

Guidelines for development

 Flexible/allows individualized approaches  Equitable  Informed by multiple key stakeholders  Reliable/valid measure  Ease of implementation

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Development of Quality Assessment Tool

1.

Distilling & Operationalizing standards (Nov. – Feb.)

2.

Crosswalk standards with state licensing code (Feb. – March)

3.

Selection of priority standards (April – May)

4.

Draft assessment tool (June)

5.

Develop draft implementation plan (July)

6.

Content validation review (July)

7.

Finalize pilot assessment tool (Aug.)

12

Consult Review Revise

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Development of Quality Assessment Tool

Multi-dimensional

Subscales measure eight practice domains

 Items represent standards of practice within each domains

Multi-informant

Service Provider Form

Youth Form

 Document Verification Form

Time-oriented (past 12 months) On-line survey Five-point Likert-type scale

 Rate statement based on how well it represents service provision or conditions in

group home

 (1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = somewhat, 4 = mostly, 5 = completely)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Development of Quality Assessment Tool

Means-based scoring

 Subscale = average score on items within subscale  Total = average score across subscale  Global = Average subscales score across raters; Average total score

across raters

Interpretation

 Items – level of attainment of specific standards (e.g. inclusion of MDT in

service planning)

 Subscale – level of attainment of standards in a practice domain (e.g.,

Assessment, Admission, & Service/Treatment Planning)

 Total – Overall attainment of quality standards across practice domains

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phase III: Pilot Test of Quality Assessment Tool

Purpose

 Data-driven development process  The pilot is designed to collect field data and stakeholder feedback to inform the

next phase of development of the assessment tool and implementation protocol.

Example Pilot Questions:

 Data sources: What appear to be the best, most reliable data sources?  Item performance: How do different/similar respondents respond to survey items?  Sampling: In what ways does the sampling strategy need to be developed to

accurately accommodate varying operational structures of group homes across the state and to reduce potential for sampling biases?

 Scaling/scoring: Based on survey responses, what adjustments need to be made to the

scaling and scoring of the assessment tool?

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pilot Test of Quality Assessment Tool

Timeline: November 2016 – January 2017 Setting/Sample

 Central Region  n = 11 group homes

Procedures

Licensing specialists provide oversight & facilitate access

to assessment surveys

For each group home, all three forms completed On-going technical support/Weekly progress calls

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What happens after the pilot?

Debriefing meeting – January 2016 (TBD)

 Research team will provide a brief report of what we

learned from pilot

 Discuss implementation of assessment with pilot

participants

What challenges were encountered? What could be improved? What went well?  Respond to stakeholder questions  Discuss next steps

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What happens after the pilot?

Analysis of survey & implementation data

 Use of data to adapt assessment:

Adjustments to implementation protocol Adjustments to survey design Item reduction and revision Adapt scaling and scoring procedures as needed

 Preparation for field test

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Moving Forward

19

Pilot Test November 2016- January 2017 Field Test February-July 2017 Data Analysis/Finalization

  • f Tool

July-September 2017 Statewide Roll-Out September- December 2017 Year One Validation January 2018- February 2019 Year Two Validation January 2019- February 2020 Phase III Phase IV Phase V Phase VI

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Contacts

Shamra Boel-Studt Phone: (850) 644-9712 Email: sboelstudt@fsu.edu Xiomara Turner Phone: (850) 717-4659 Email: Xiomara.Turner@myflfamilies.com

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Questions?

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank You!!!

22