Global Developments A round Tobacco Track a n d Trace a n d H o w - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

global developments a round tobacco track a n d trace a n
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Global Developments A round Tobacco Track a n d Trace a n d H o w - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global Developments A round Tobacco Track a n d Trace a n d H o w They Relate to the US Alex Finkel International Tax StampAssociation What This PresentationCovers About ITSA Illicit cigarette trade in US compared to rest of world


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Global Developments A round Tobacco Track a n d Trace a n d H o w They Relate to the US

Alex Finkel International Tax StampAssociation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What This PresentationCovers

  • About ITSA
  • Illicit cigarette trade in US compared to rest of world
  • Measures that could be used to curbillicit trade
  • Measures that are being used and with what results
  • Update on EU track and trace system (EUTPD)
  • Recommendations and conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

About ITSA

slide-4
SLIDE 4

About ITSA

  • Formed 2015 by 10 founder members with a primary objective to

promote a unified voice of the tax stamp providers and promoter of global standards.

  • ITSA has the following 3 priorities:

1. Active role in developing ISO 22382 for tax stamps – published 2018 – targeting the content, security features, issuance and examination of excise tax stamps 2. Advocate for using tax stamps under international tobacco laws – EU Tobacco Products Directive and WHO FCTC Protocol 3. Sharing of knowledge and expertise and advice togovernment authorities on their national excise management and related supply chain control programmes.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

23 Members

3 HQs in NorthAmerica, 1 in Latin America, 15 in Europe 4 inAsia. 1 member is a state security printer

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Standards Organizations Collaboration

  • ISO 22382:2018 – Tax Stamps
  • ISO 16678:2014 and ISO 22381:2018 – Interoperability
  • ISO 12931:2012 – AuthenticationSolutions
  • ISO 14298:2013 – Security Printing Processes
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Illicit Cigarette Trade Comparison US vs. Rest of World

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Illicit Trade

  • 10-12% global cigarette

consumption

  • $40-50 billion global tax loss

RoW

  • 7-21% total US cigarette

consumption

  • 1.24-2.91 billion packs
  • $2.95-$6.92 billion tax loss

United States

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 report, Preventing and Reducing Illicit Tobacco Trade in the United States Euromonitor International, 2015

Estimates

  • Primary form: smuggling, incl

counterfeiting and cheap whites

  • Primarily foreign production
  • Main driver: weak governance
  • Primary form: cross-state activity
  • Almost all domestically produced
  • Main driver: tax differences

Forms and Drivers

slide-9
SLIDE 9

State Cigarette Excise Tax Rates

Per 20-pack

, <J °'- HI

t"\.

s3.20V

Mi!l!!mlil; Breal<doon a taxstamp prkeis:

S 3.04 ExciseTax Prepaid SatesTax $3.628 Total S t a m pPrice

Nole:Federalexciselaxis$1.01perpack.

N YC

$1.50

D.C.: Rate adjusted annu lyon O ctober 1 (starting in2012 ).

Rate includes S2.5::l

e x c i s e p lu saM u ally

a : : : lju s t e d surtax in lieu

  • ls es tax.

Over $3.00 $2,0 1 - $3.00 SI 51 -S2.00 $1.01 - $1.50 .50 -$1.00 < .50

  • Jan. 1,2019
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Measures to Eliminate Illicit Trade

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Overarching Measures

  • Recommendations presented by the CDC in its 2015 report

and echoed by the World Bank, the Framework Convention Alliance, ISO standards, ITSA and the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 1. Adopt comprehensive federal approach with one agency leading efforts 2. Strengthen enforcement

  • 3. Enhance federal, state and local surveillance and

evaluation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Individual Elements of a Comprehensive Approach

  • Federal Track and Trace program
  • State-level ‘three-legged stool’ approach
  • Federal and state public education
  • Tribal tobacco policies

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015 report, Preventing and Reducing Illicit Tobacco Trade in the United States

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Definition and Benefits of Secure Track and Trace?

Tracking Tracing Systematic real- time monitoring of the movement of products through the supply chain Occurs during or after enforcement action and involves reconstructing the flow of products to identify the point of diversion into illicit/licit channels.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What are the Core Functions of Track and Trace?

  • Ability to verify quantity produced or imported
  • Verify correct tax payments
  • Track products through supply chain
  • Trace products back to source
  • Ensure product authenticity through the application of

secure product markings at point of manufacture or distribution

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Minimum Data Required

  • Date and location of manufacture
  • Manufacturing facility
  • Intended market for retail sale
  • Product description
  • Secure unique identifier
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Critical Elements of Track and Trace

  • Real-time control on all production/distribution lines
  • Track and Trace code activation on

production/distribution lines

  • Linking of SKU with Track and Trace code
  • Push-button device for authenticating fiscal mark and

product

+ +

INDEPENDENCE SECURITY RELIABILITY

slide-17
SLIDE 17

US Federal Agencies who have the Authority to Implement a Federal Track and Trace System FDA TTB

Family Smoking and Prevention Act

  • f 2009

Has FET collection authority; recommended to congress in 2010 “ to work with the FDA on the development of any tobacco product tracing system so that the system can be used to the extent possible for enforcement purposes.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Why Haven’t They Done It Yet?

  • Federal Regulators struggle over the question whether a

track-and-trace system should be a national system or

  • ne that is implemented by a State protecting itscitizens

and revenues.

  • Although improving, low-tax states have historically had

limited incentive to adopt track and trace

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Individual Elements of a Comprehensive Approach

  • National track and trace system
  • State-level ‘three-legged stool’
  • Federal and state public education
  • Tribal tobacco policies
slide-20
SLIDE 20

State-Level – Three-Legged Stool

Licensing Product marking Enforcement

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Measures Currently Being Used a n d the Results

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tax Stamps with Traceability Function

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Holographic and DigitalSecurity
  • Unique Identifier for State Track and Trace
  • Adopted 2014

MICHIGAN

slide-24
SLIDE 24

By the Numbers

Revenues increased by $15.7M (1.8%) 1st 12 months post implementation vs total revenues 12 months prior. Revenues increased by $29.8M (3.4%) 1st 12 months post implementation vs forecasted revenues for the same time period under previous program. Program self-funded through increased revenue. Investment in program paid back in less than 1 year

MICHIGAN

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ECUADOR

$7.64 MMincrease

Tax Collection Mar 17 – Feb 18

58,000 tobacco packs

Seizures Mar 2018

244% More

Seizures than 2016 for spirits and tobacco OVERT

  • Colour shifting
  • Fine line
  • Latent Image

SEMI-COVERT

  • Double polarization of

colour shifting ink

  • UV Ink

COVERT

  • Forensic marker

authenticated by specialized lab equipment

Aggregation & Track & Trace in Distribution Chain

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Example of What Not to Do… INDIA

2013 Uttar Pradesh 2013 New Delhi

In 2013, Indian states of Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi transitioned from a holographic tax stamp to a plain label with a QR code and serial number for track and trace – but no physical security features – the number of fake codes soared.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

28

A Case Study: Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi

slide-28
SLIDE 28

EU Track a n d Trace

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Why EU System is not considered Best Practice

NO GUARANTEE OF SECURITY NO GUARANTEE OF INDEPENDENCE NO GUARANTEE OF SECURITY

slide-30
SLIDE 30

WHO Protocol vs EUSystem

WHO FCTC Protocol EU System Secure unique identifier Unique identifier (but not necessarily secure) 5 security features thatare separate from the unique identifier Global information-sharing Each tobacco company focal point selects and appoints primary data storage provider No delegation of tasks to Allows delegation of some tobacco industry tasks to industry

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Key Areas of Concern With EU System

  • EUTPD should not be considered as a blueprint
  • Conflicts with Protocol by allowing key obligations to be

delegated to tobacco industry – conflict with Article 8.12

  • Independent third parties don’t have sufficient control over unique

identifiers

  • Data storage providers with historical links to industry appointed as part
  • f system
  • Security feature required to authenticate pack but not unique identifier –

conflict with Article 8.3

  • Only 1 out of 5 authentication elements must be sourced from

independent provider

  • Time stamp requirement adds complexity and little value in enforcement
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Recom m en d a tion s a n d Conclusion

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ISO 22382 Recommendations

  • Develop a track and trace system for tax stamps
  • Use multi-layer security in tax stamps
  • Don’t delegate key obligations to tobacco companies
  • Do not rely on third party suppliers with links to tobacco

industry developments

  • Require that unique identifier includes only elements listedin

Protocol, not longer list in EU system

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The Basic Equation

+

TRACEABILITY

=

HIGH SECURITY +

$ € £ Increased tax revenues

AUTHENTICATION

Traceability in itself is NOTAuthentication

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Thank you!