global chang s conjecture and singular cardinals
play

Global Changs Conjecture and singular cardinals Monroe Eskew (joint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Global Changs Conjecture and singular cardinals Monroe Eskew (joint with Yair Hayut) Kurt G odel Research Center University of Vienna July 5, 2018 Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 1 / 21 Introduction Theorem (L


  1. Global Chang’s Conjecture and singular cardinals Monroe Eskew (joint with Yair Hayut) Kurt G¨ odel Research Center University of Vienna July 5, 2018 Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 1 / 21

  2. Introduction Theorem (L¨ owenheim-Skolem) Let A be an infinite model in a countable first-order language. For every infinite cardinal κ ≤ | A | , there is an elementary B ≺ A of size κ . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 2 / 21

  3. Introduction Theorem (L¨ owenheim-Skolem) Let A be an infinite model in a countable first-order language. For every infinite cardinal κ ≤ | A | , there is an elementary B ≺ A of size κ . Generalizing this, ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) says that for every structure A on κ 1 in a countable language, there is a substructure B of size µ 1 such that | B ∩ κ 0 | = µ 0 . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 2 / 21

  4. Introduction Theorem (L¨ owenheim-Skolem) Let A be an infinite model in a countable first-order language. For every infinite cardinal κ ≤ | A | , there is an elementary B ≺ A of size κ . Generalizing this, ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) says that for every structure A on κ 1 in a countable language, there is a substructure B of size µ 1 such that | B ∩ κ 0 | = µ 0 . If κ 1 = κ + 0 and µ 1 = µ + 0 , this is equivalent to an analogue of L¨ owenheim-Skolem for a logic between first and second order. This logic includes a quantifier Qx , where Qx ϕ ( x ) is valid when the number of x ’s satisfying ϕ ( x ) is equal to the size of the model. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 2 / 21

  5. Lemma Suppose κ, λ ≤ δ and κ λ ≥ δ . Then there is a structure A on δ such that for every B ≺ A , | B ∩ κ | | B ∩ λ | ≥ | B ∩ δ | . Corollary 0 ≥ κ 1 , then µ min( µ 0 ,ν ) If ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) , ν ≤ κ 0 , and κ ν ≥ µ 1 . 0 Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 3 / 21

  6. Lemma Suppose κ, λ ≤ δ and κ λ ≥ δ . Then there is a structure A on δ such that for every B ≺ A , | B ∩ κ | | B ∩ λ | ≥ | B ∩ δ | . Corollary 0 ≥ κ 1 , then µ min( µ 0 ,ν ) If ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) , ν ≤ κ 0 , and κ ν ≥ µ 1 . 0 Global Chang’s Conjecture For all infinite cardinals µ < κ with cf( µ ) ≤ cf( κ ), ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ). Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 3 / 21

  7. Approximations to GCC Theorem (E.-Hayut) It is consistent relative to a huge cardinal that ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ) holds whenever ω ≤ µ < κ and κ is regular. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 4 / 21

  8. Approximations to GCC Theorem (E.-Hayut) It is consistent relative to a huge cardinal that ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ) holds whenever ω ≤ µ < κ and κ is regular. Theorem (E.-Hayut) It is consistent relative to a huge cardinal that ( ℵ ω +1 , ℵ ω ) ։ ( ℵ 1 , ℵ 0 ) while for all n < m < ω , ( ℵ m +1 , ℵ m ) ։ ( ℵ n +1 , ℵ n ) . It turns out that this was optimal; it is the longest initial segment of cardinals on which GCC can hold. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 4 / 21

  9. We say ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ν ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) holds when for all A on κ 1 , there is B ≺ A of size µ 1 with | B ∩ κ 0 | = µ 0 , and ν ⊆ B . This is preserved under ν + -c.c. forcing. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 5 / 21

  10. We say ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ν ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) holds when for all A on κ 1 , there is B ≺ A of size µ 1 with | B ∩ κ 0 | = µ 0 , and ν ⊆ B . This is preserved under ν + -c.c. forcing. Lemma Suppose ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ ν ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) . 1 If κ 0 = µ + ν 0 , then ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ µ 0 ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) . 2 If λ ≤ µ 0 and there is κ ≤ κ 0 such that κ 0 = κ + ν and κ λ ≤ κ 0 , then ( κ 1 , κ 0 ) ։ λ ( µ 1 , µ 0 ) . Lemma Suppose µ <ν = µ , and ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ) . Then ( κ + , κ ) ։ ν ( µ + , µ ) . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 5 / 21

  11. Scales If κ is a singular cardinal, and � κ i : i < cf( κ ) � is an increasing sequence of regular carindals cofinal in κ , � f α : α < λ � ⊆ � i < cf( κ ) κ i is a scale for κ if it is increasing and dominating in the product (mod bounded). Shelah proved that singular κ always carry scales of length κ + . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 6 / 21

  12. Scales If κ is a singular cardinal, and � κ i : i < cf( κ ) � is an increasing sequence of regular carindals cofinal in κ , � f α : α < λ � ⊆ � i < cf( κ ) κ i is a scale for κ if it is increasing and dominating in the product (mod bounded). Shelah proved that singular κ always carry scales of length κ + . A scale � f α : α < κ + � is good at α when there is a pointwise increasing sequence � g i : i < cf( α ) � such that this sequence and � f β : β < α � are cofinal in each other. A scale is bad at α when it is not good at α . A scale is simply called good if it is good at every α such that cf( α ) > cf( κ ). Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 6 / 21

  13. Scales If κ is a singular cardinal, and � κ i : i < cf( κ ) � is an increasing sequence of regular carindals cofinal in κ , � f α : α < λ � ⊆ � i < cf( κ ) κ i is a scale for κ if it is increasing and dominating in the product (mod bounded). Shelah proved that singular κ always carry scales of length κ + . A scale � f α : α < κ + � is good at α when there is a pointwise increasing sequence � g i : i < cf( α ) � such that this sequence and � f β : β < α � are cofinal in each other. A scale is bad at α when it is not good at α . A scale is simply called good if it is good at every α such that cf( α ) > cf( κ ). Lemma (Folklore) If κ is singular and ( κ + , κ ) ։ cf( κ ) ( µ + , µ ) and µ ≥ cf( κ ) , then there is no good scale for κ . Moreover, every scale � f α : α < κ + � for κ is bad at stationarily many α of cofinality µ + . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 6 / 21

  14. Conflict at singulars Lemma (E.-Hayut) Suppose κ is singular and ( κ ++ , κ + ) ։ ( κ + , κ ) . Then κ carries a good scale. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 7 / 21

  15. Conflict at singulars Lemma (E.-Hayut) Suppose κ is singular and ( κ ++ , κ + ) ։ ( κ + , κ ) . Then κ carries a good scale. We use a few known results. First due to Shelah: If µ < κ are regular, S κ + µ is the union of κ sets each carrying a partial square. Corollary If κ is regular, then there is a sequence �C α : α < κ + , cf( α ) < κ � forming a ”partial weak square.” Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 7 / 21

  16. Conflict at singulars Lemma (E.-Hayut) Suppose κ is singular and ( κ ++ , κ + ) ։ ( κ + , κ ) . Then κ carries a good scale. We use a few known results. First due to Shelah: If µ < κ are regular, S κ + µ is the union of κ sets each carrying a partial square. Corollary If κ is regular, then there is a sequence �C α : α < κ + , cf( α ) < κ � forming a ”partial weak square.” Lemma (Foreman-Magidor) For all κ , there is a structure A on κ ++ such that any B ≺ A witnessing ( κ ++ , κ + ) ։ κ ( κ + , κ ) has cf( B ∩ κ + ) = cf( κ ) . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 7 / 21

  17. Conflict at singulars We use Chang’s Conjecture to transfer the partial weak square on κ ++ to one on κ + that is defined at every ordinal of cofinality > cf( κ ). Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 8 / 21

  18. Conflict at singulars We use Chang’s Conjecture to transfer the partial weak square on κ ++ to one on κ + that is defined at every ordinal of cofinality > cf( κ ). How? If B ≺ ( H κ +2 , ∈ , �C α : α < κ ++ � ) witnesses CC, then: 1 ot( B ∩ κ ++ ) = κ + . 2 |C α ∩ B | ≤ κ for all α ∈ B ∩ κ ++ . 3 C ∩ B = C for any C ∈ C α ∈ B . 4 B ∩ α is cofinal in α iff cf( α ) � = κ + . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 8 / 21

  19. Conflict at singulars We use Chang’s Conjecture to transfer the partial weak square on κ ++ to one on κ + that is defined at every ordinal of cofinality > cf( κ ). How? If B ≺ ( H κ +2 , ∈ , �C α : α < κ ++ � ) witnesses CC, then: 1 ot( B ∩ κ ++ ) = κ + . 2 |C α ∩ B | ≤ κ for all α ∈ B ∩ κ ++ . 3 C ∩ B = C for any C ∈ C α ∈ B . 4 B ∩ α is cofinal in α iff cf( α ) � = κ + . This is enough to carry out the well-known construction of a good scale from weak square. Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 8 / 21

  20. Singular GCC Singular Global Chang’s Conjecture For all infinite µ < κ of the same cofinality, ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ). Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 9 / 21

  21. Singular GCC Singular Global Chang’s Conjecture For all infinite µ < κ of the same cofinality, ( κ + , κ ) ։ ( µ + , µ ). Theorem (E.-Hayut) It is consistent relative to large cardinals that the Singular GCC holds below ℵ ω ω . Monroe Eskew (KGRC) GCC and singulars July 5, 2018 9 / 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend