Gerry W. Beyer Governor Preston E. Smith Regents Professor of Law - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gerry W. Beyer

Governor Preston E. Smith Regents Professor of Law Texas Tech University School of Law

1

 Whose will contained a detailed provision requiring

beneficiaries to not become physically of psychologically dependent on alcohol, legal drugs, or illegal drugs?

• A. John Mahoney
• B. Vic Damone
• C. Hugh Hefner
• D. Mary Tyler Moore

2

 What animal received a detailed obituary in The Eagle

newspaper in Bryan, Texas?

• A. Dog
• B. Cat
• C. Chicken
• D. Hamster

3

 Jeffrey Rigel died in August 2017. He requested eight

member of his favorite team to be his pallbearers so the team could “let him down one last time.” Which team disappointed him?

• A. Cleveland Browns
• B. Dallas Cowboys
• C. Detroit Lions
• D. Philadelphia Eagles

4

5

 The trial court held that the gift of the farm and pasture

lands to the three grandchildren totally adeemed. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, ademption was total.
• B. Affirmed, the favored grandchild lacked standing to raise the

issue.

• C. Reversed, there was a partial ademption.
• D. Reversed, there was no ademption.

6

7

8

 The trial court held that all siblings (half and whole)

shared equally as beneficiaries. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, because full siblings have priority over half siblings.
• B. Affirmed, because the remainder interest was not vested in

father.

• C. Reversed, because all siblings must share equally in

testamentary gifts.

• D. Reversed, because the remainder was vested and thus passed

into the trust via the joint will when father died.

 The will provided that it was the testator’s

“desire” that the ranch stay “intact as long as possible.”

9

 The trial court held the executor could sell the land.

The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, because the request was precatory.
• B. Affirmed, because the executor may always sell estate

property.

• C. Reversed, because the request was mandatory.
• D. Reversed, because a beneficiary may request that the

executor not sell items belonging to the estate.

10

 “The rest and residue of my estate * * * to my husband

* * * to do with as he desires. Upon the death of my husband * * *, I give * * * any of the rest and residue of my estate* * * that he may own or have any interest in to my son * * *.”

11

 How did the appellate court classify this devise?

• A. Fee simple.
• B. Life estate with remainder to son.
• C. Fee simple determinable with executory interest to son.
• D. Fee simple subject to son’s executory interest.

12

 Now [Son] I leave the rest to you * * * Understand the land

is not be sold but passed on down to your children * * *. TAKE CARE OF IT AND TRY TO BE HAPPY.”

13

 The trial and appellate courts held Son received a

fee simple interest. What interest did the Texas Supreme Court determine this devise granted?

• A. Fee simple.
• B. Life estate in Son with remainder to his children.
• C. Fee simple determinable in Son with reverter to Father.
• D. Fee simple subject to an executory limitation in Son.

14

15

 The trial court concluded that it could not enforce

an oral promise to make a will. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, because there was insufficient credible

evidence of the oral statements.

• B. Affirmed, because the contract must be in writing.
• C. Reversed, because Texas recognizes oral will contracts.
• D. Reversed, because Texas allows an oral will contract to

be established by promissory estoppel and detrimental reliance.

16

17

 The trial court awarded damages against the

defendant for tortiously interfering with the plaintiffs’ inheritance rights. The appellate and Texas Supreme Court:

• A. Affirmed, because the evidence was sufficient.
• B. Reversed, because the evidence was insufficient.
• C. Reversed, because Texas has yet to recognize tortious

interference as a cause of action.

• D. Reversed, because the amount of damages was

excessive.

18

19

 The trial court charged the family allowance against the

entire community estate. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed.
• B. Affirmed, but reduced the amount of the allowance.
• C. Reversed, because the amount of the allowance was too

high.

• D. Reversed, because only the decedent’s share of community

property may be used to satisfy the family allowance.

20

21

 The trial court held that the applicant (executor) was in default

in probating the predeceased spouse’s will because the decedent was in default. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, because the applicant was in default on her own.
• B. Affirmed, because the predeceased spouse’s default is attributed to

the executor.

• C. Reversed, because the applicant was not in default.
• D. Reversed, because the predeceased spouse’s default is not

attributed to the executor.

22

23

 The trial court determined that the applicant’s excuse for

being late, “I did not think it necessary to probate the will,” was insufficient. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed ,because the excuse was insufficient.
• B. Reversed, because the excuse was sufficient.
• C. Remanded to the trial court for greater exploration of the facts.
• D. Recommended that the proponent be jailed for contempt for

filing his wife’s will late.

24

25

 The trial court appointed a receiver to take possession of

estate property during the pendency of a will contest. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed.
• B. Reversed, as receiverships are not allowed in will contest cases.
• C. Reversed, because the court abused its discretion in appointing

a receiver.

• D. Remanded for the trial court to ascertain more facts.

26

27

 The trial court approved a settlement. The appellate

court:

• A. Affirmed.
• B. Reversed, because a party objecting claiming he was under the

influence of prescription medication when he signed.

• C. Reversed, because the there was insufficient evidence that the

claimant was adopted by estoppel.

• D. Instructed the parties to renegotiate the agreement.

28

29

 The trial court determined the marriage was void even though

the action was brought after the husband’s death. The appellate court:

• A. Affirmed, because the wife was the husband’s former in-home health

aide.

• B. Affirmed, because there was sufficient evidence of husband’s lack of

capacity to enter into the marriage.

• C. Reversed, because a marriage cannot be set aside after the death of
• ne of the spouses.
• D. Reversed, because the wife was not included in the husband’s will.

30

31

 The decedent “reserved during her life, the full possession, benefit and

use” of the property “as well as the rents, issues, and profits thereof and the unilateral power of sale of any or all of the [property] with or without the consent of [the remainder beneficiary].” The decedent transferred the land before death. The trial court determined the remainder beneficiary had no interest. The appellate court:

A.

Affirmed.

B.

Reversed, because a grantor may not reserve a power to sell.

C.

Reversed, because the deed provisions were against public policy.

D.

Remanded because the deed was ambiguous and additional fact-finding is necessary.

32

33

 The trial court determined that checking a box labeled

“multiple-party account with right of survivorship” and initialing next to the box did not give the account the survivorship

• feature. The appellate court:
• A. Affirmed, because survivi0rship accounts are not allowed in Texas.
• B. Affirmed, because the necessary Estates Code language was not

present.

• C. Reversed, because the account clearly indicated rights of survivorship.
• D. Reversed, because extrinsic evidence should have been examined to

determine the true nature of the account.

34

35