GEODEMOGRAPHICSAND SPATIAL MICROSIMULATION: USING SURVEY DATA TO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geodemographicsand spatial microsimulation using survey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GEODEMOGRAPHICSAND SPATIAL MICROSIMULATION: USING SURVEY DATA TO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jens Kandt UCL Geography 16 April 2015 GEODEMOGRAPHICSAND SPATIAL MICROSIMULATION: USING SURVEY DATA TO INFER HEALTH MILIEU GEOGRAPHIES HEALTH BEHAVIOURS IN LONDON Smoking: Physical inactivity: London Health Commission(2014) THE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GEODEMOGRAPHICSAND SPATIAL MICROSIMULATION: USING SURVEY DATA TO INFER HEALTH MILIEU GEOGRAPHIES

Jens Kandt · UCL Geography· 16 April 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HEALTH ‘BEHAVIOURS’ IN LONDON

London Health Commission(2014)

Smoking: Physical inactivity:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE GEOGRAPHY OF HEALTH ‘BEHAVIOURS’

Behaviour vs. practice

slide-4
SLIDE 4

UNDERSTANDING SOCIETY LONGITUDINAL STUDY

  • Lifestyle survey
  • Panel with

n > 40,000

  • Since 2009
  • Whole UK
slide-5
SLIDE 5

THE HEALTH MILIEUS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

THE HEALTH MILIEUS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

THE HEALTH MILIEUS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

THE HEALTH MILIEUS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

INFERRING MILIEU GEOGRAPHIES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SPATIAL MICROSIMULATION

Matching (‘constraint’) variables

1. education 2. age 3. job status 4. tenure 5. hh.composition 6. marital status 7. NSSEC status 8. health 9. cars

  • 10. hh.size
  • 11. disability
  • 12. ethnicity
  • 13. children
  • 14. unpaid care
  • 15. sex
slide-11
SLIDE 11

GEOGRAPHY OF HEALTH MILIEUS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

‘INTERNAL’ VALIDATION

var age car children disability econ.active education ethnicity hh.comp. marital NSSEC tenure C.E.(%) 11.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 6.6 0.0 6.8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LOAC category X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10

  • A. Intermediate Lifestyles

1.14 1.12 0.99 1.06 0.78 0.77 0.82 0.95 1.45 0.99

  • B. High Density & High Rise Flats

1.30 1.21 1.07 1.09 0.65 0.87 0.72 1.01 1.28 0.88

  • C. Settled Asians

1.12 0.92 1.24 0.99 0.79 0.64 0.92 1.39 0.86 1.01

  • D. Urban Elites

0.76 0.90 0.83 0.77 1.51 1.76 1.20 0.69 0.60 0.95

  • E. City Vibe

0.92 0.99 0.89 0.95 1.21 1.30 1.11 0.83 0.88 0.94

  • F. London Life Cycle

0.62 0.79 0.84 0.86 1.49 1.29 1.40 0.82 0.71 1.16

  • G. Multi-Ethnic Suburbs

1.21 1.16 1.03 1.05 0.69 0.77 0.74 1.24 1.16 0.92

  • H. Ageing City Fringe

0.75 0.83 1.00 1.17 1.14 0.85 1.24 0.91 0.97 1.18 Milieus

‘EXTERNAL’ VALIDATION: LONDON OAC (Longley & Singleton 2014)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CONCLUSIONS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CONCLUSIONS

Milieu approach vs. conventional geodemographics

dimension milieu segmentation conventionalgeodemographics analytical unit individual area theory social theory ecological reasoning spatial patterns hypothesisgiven zonal‘evidence’ ecological description ecological output continuousdegrees discrete classes dynamic extension direct indirect

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Acknowledgements Paul Longley, UCL · Jenny Robinson, UCL · James Cheshire, UCL · Nicola Shelton, UCL

THANK YOU.