GENERALIZED PIVOTS GENERALIZED PIVOTS FOR VARIANCE COMPONENTS FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GENERALIZED PIVOTS GENERALIZED PIVOTS FOR VARIANCE COMPONENTS FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GENERALIZED PIVOTS GENERALIZED PIVOTS FOR VARIANCE COMPONENTS FOR VARIANCE COMPONENTS IN MIXED LINEAR MODELS IN MIXED LINEAR MODELS Barbora Arendack THE MODEL: Y = n-dimensional vector of observations X, A 1 = known matrices 2 I , ~
THE MODEL:
Y = n-dimensional vector of observations X, A1 = known matrices
u~N q0, 1
2 I ,~N n0, 2 I
covu,=0
, 1
2, 2 = unknown parameters
1
2≥0, 2 0
W 1 = A1 A1
T
THE TASK: construction of confidence intervals on 1
2
R A1⊈R X
Further we suppose
Invariance with respect to the group of translations in mean: Minimal sufficient statistics: maximal invariant
BX
T BX=I n−rank X
BX BX
T =M X =I n−X X T X − X T
spectral decomposition of V1
V 1=∑i=1
r
iE i
12...r≥0 1,.... ,r
Olsen, Seely, Birkes (1976)
V 1=BX
T W 1 BX
Balanced one-way random effects model
Y ij=iij ,i=1,... , I , j=1,... ,J
i~N 0,1
2 ,ij~N 0, 2 , mutually independent
U 1=S B
2~J 1 2 2I−1 2
between-groups sum of squares
U 2=SW
2 ~ 2I J−1 2
within-group sum of squares
1=J ,2=0
General case
U 1,... ,U r
U r~
2r 2
is not too restrictive supposing
Pivot
RU , 1
2
- distribution independent of all parameters
(1-α )100% confidence set find q1 , q2 such that Construction of confidence intervals on 1
2
U 1 11
2 2
~1
2 ,......,
U r−1 r−11
2 2
~r−1
2
, U r
2 ~r 2
U=U 1,...,U r
Pivot
Difficulties caused by nuisance parameters generalized inference Tsui, Weerahandi (1989), Weerahandi (1993) Extension of “classical” methods for testing and constructing confidence intervals in such a way that the quantities these methods are based on (pivots and test statistics) are let to be FUNCTIONS not only
- f the RESPECTIVE RANDOM VECTOR
and the parameter of interest but of the OBSERVED DATA and ALL THE PARAMETERS as well The only requirement:
- for each fixed data the generalized quantities behave
like their “classical” counterparts
GENERALIZED PIVOTS
U =U 1 ,...,U r u=u1 ,... ,ur
Generalized pivot: a function RU ,u , 1
2 , 2 with properties:
can find q1 ,q2 (1-α )100% confidence set For each observed u
A drawback The confidence set is constructed for fixed u, the distribution of usually depends on u, and so the set preserves the frequency properties of an (1−α )100% confidence set only conditionally, for given u, and its ACTUAL CONFIDENCE LEVEL must be CHECKED BY SIMULATIONS
RU ,u , 1
2 , 2
On the other hand Inclusion of observed data makes construction of expressions with distribution independent of nuisance parameters much easier
An example of a generalized pivot
U i i1
2 2
=Qi~i
2
U r
2 =V~r 2
ui i1
2 2
- bserved
value
- bserved
value
ur
2
1
2=
∑i=1
r−1
ui− ui i 1
2 2
2
ur ur
∑i=1
r−1
iui i 1
2 2
R=∑i=1
r−1
ui−Qiur V
∑i=1
r−1
iQi
robs= 1
2
Computing the bounds of the generalized interval R=∑i=1
r−1
ui−Qiur V
∑i=1
r−1
iQi For fixed u
P q/2≤R≤q1−/2=1−
Monte Carlo methods Numerical integration + numerical solving of the equation
Cu={1
2;q/2≤Ru ,u , 1 2≤q1−/2}={ 1 2; q/2≤ 1 2≤q1−/2}
Simulate the distribution of R by generating a large number of Q1 ,...., Qr-1 ,V – independent, chi squared distributed random variables
1−/ 2=PR≤q1−/2=P∑i=1
r−1
Q iiq1−/2ur V ≥∑i=1
r−1
ui
Negative bounds are put equal to zero
Unless r =2, R is far from being unique Zhou, Mathew (1994)
R=
∑i=1
r−1
ciui−Qiur V
∑i=1
r−1
i ciQi
nonnegative constants ci My suggestions for the choice of ci inspired by test statistics for testing the nullity of :
ci=1
ci=1/i ci=i
1
2
Another and not the only other generalized pivot Park, Burdick (2003)
∑i=1
r−1
ui i 1
2ur
V =∑i=1
r−1
ui i1
2ur 2
U r
∑i=1
r−1
U i i 1
2 2=∑i=1 r−1
Q i
the observed values are equal R defined as a solution for of the non-linear equation
1
2
- observed value is 1
2
Again, constants can be added However, with the computational attractiveness is lost Computation of bounds of the interval: Monte Carlo methods or numerical approach
ci≠1
∑i=1
r−1
Q i~
2
=∑i=1
r−1