General Civil Aviation Authority of UAE CAR M Presentation ACC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
General Civil Aviation Authority of UAE CAR M Presentation ACC workshop November 2015 Hatem Dibian Manager Air Operators &CAMO & Henry Angel Senior Inspector CAMO & Air Operators Contents Flight Permit SMS CAR
General Civil Aviation Authority of UAE CAR M Presentation ACC workshop November 2015
Hatem Dibian – Manager Air Operators &CAMO & Henry Angel Senior Inspector CAMO & Air Operators
discrepancies
a flight test for the purpose of Airworthiness Review Certificate issue or endorsement , especially for used
is generally left to the discretion of the AW inspector.
aircraft flight characteristics and the functioning in flight of the aircraft do not differ significantly from those acceptable to the aircraft type and as approved by the aircraft designer
3
inspectors attend this test and will notify the
an application 5 days in advance in a form and manner prescribed by the GCAA IB 06/2015
4
insurance policy for aircraft, crew, passengers, third party personnel and property damage liability shall be submitted with the application. The policy shall clearly specify coverage of flights under Flight Permit conditions.
must have a Certificate of Fitness for Flight issued in accordance with section 11 of chapter 2 of part V.
5
FLIGHT TEST SCHEDULES
accordance with a schedule approved by the GCAA, and shall contain details of the aircraft type to which it refers and include flight test reference number, issue number and date.
6
that the Principle Inspectors responsible for CAMO organizations will arrange for meetings with their organizations’ counterparts in order to include Maintenance interval exceedance as a SPI for 2016. Such
2015, to the GCAA this inclusion with achievable and practical SPT.
(srm@gcaa.gov.ae), the following data as specified below:
and engine cycles using the attached form for data effective from 1 October, 2015. The data provided monthly should be submitted to the GCAA by mid of the following month.
the State Acceptable Level of Safety Performance (ALoSP) for 2014, the concerned service providers are requested to provide the consolidated monthly data (combined total for all types operated) for 2014 with regard to flight hours flown, number of departures and engine cycles, by 15 October 2015 using the same form.
the 1st of June 2015
the requirements of the MMEL as the GCAA at this point in time is not approving the MMEL but is accepting the approved MMEL from state of design . CAR MEL has been reformatted and amended to be in line with EASA requirements and to merge GCAA CAAP 48
been made obsolete once CAR MEL was published.
procedures laid down in the MEL preamble shall prevail
which has been approved by the state of design ( i.e Boeing MMEL approved by the FAA & Airbus MMEL approved by EASA.) The exception is Embraer MMEL where approved by the Brazilian Authority is not accepted by the GCAA and EASA’s approved MMEL for these aircrafts is required.
The main points relevant to the introduction of CAR MEL are as follows:
maintenance procedures to the document
Essential Equipment ( NEFs) which could either be part of the MEL or as a supplement to the document. This arrangement has to be discussed with the PAI
contained in the MEL’s Preamble .
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
industry on the above NPA
contradictions with in the text of the last CAR M proposal
ensure no contradictions and clear instructions are made
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
carry out an operational check for no-failure .every 12 months, download and analyse at least a whole flight recording to check that all mandatory parameters are active and are of acceptable quality . This recording should be preserved, at least until replaced by a more recent one. The purpose of this is to ensure that, in the event of an accident/incident, air accident investigators have access to a readout from the flight recording system that is representative of the actual aircraft conditions prior to the event.
carry out an operational check for no-failure.
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
engineering units to evaluate the validity of all recorded parameters. Particular attention should be given to parameters from sensors dedicated to the FDR(DFDR). Parameters taken from the aircraft’s electrical bus system need not be checked if their serviceability can be detected by
The read-out facility should have the necessary software to accurately convert the recorded values to engineering units and to determine the status of discrete signals.
A sampling of 10% of the fleet should be carried out within the 24 month period examining the recorded signals on the CVR by a re-play of the CVR recording. While installed in the aircraft, the CVR should record test signals from each aircraft source and from relevant external sources to ensure that all required signals meet intelligibility standards, and
Where practicable, during the annual l examination (i.e. AMP task), a sample of in-flight recordings of the CVR should be examined for evidence that the intelligibility of the signal is acceptable.
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
units to evaluate the validity of all recorded parameters. Particular attention should be given to parameters from sensors dedicated to the FDR(DFDR). Parameters taken from the aircraft’s electrical bus system need not be checked if their serviceability can be detected by other aircraft systems.
The purpose of this is to ensure that, in the event of an accident/incident, air accident investigators have access to a readout from the flight recording system that is representative of the actual aircraft conditions prior to the event
The read-out facility should have the necessary software to accurately convert the recorded values to engineering units and to determine the status of discrete signals.
A sampling of 10% of the fleet should be carried out within the 24 month period examining the recorded signals on the CVR by a re-play of the CVR recording. Furthermore, Where practicable, during the 24 month period examination (i.e. AMP task), a sample of in-flight recordings of the CVR should be examined for evidence that the intelligibility of the signal is acceptable.
aircraft source and from relevant external sources to ensure that all required signals meet intelligibility standards.
Reserved
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
are required to develop procedures to comply with maintenance requirements of the Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT), including fixed, portable and automatically deployable ELT devices. In order to allow detection of dormant failures performing the following minimum maintenance actions are required to be included in the maintenance
airworthiness must be followed.
conditions which may cause corrosion to develop in circuit boards and battery compartments. As a minimum, a corrosion inspection shall be performed in accordance with CMM requirements.
be performed in accordance with CMM requirements, in accordance with the ELT manufacturers approved technical data. International guidelines
CAR M 302 Appendix I ( CVR/FDR)
are required to develop procedures to comply with maintenance requirements of the Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT), including fixed, portable and automatically deployable ELT devices. In order to allow detection of dormant failures performing the following minimum maintenance actions are required to be included in the maintenance
airworthiness must be followed.
conditions which may cause corrosion to develop in circuit boards and battery compartments. As a minimum, a corrosion inspection shall be performed in accordance with CMM requirements where available OR when ELT is subject (but not limited to) repair, overhaul or ULB battery replacement.
be carried out in accordance with the CMM interval for operational test requirements, and also in accordance with the ELT manufacturers approved technical data. International guidelines on the timing of such tests, if carried out in-situ, should also be followed.
GCAA Highlights on Operator’s field discrepancies
ensuring that requirements for the issuance of a C of A / ARC/ C of A for export are adhered to:
with CAR 21.147(b)(2)(i) and 21.147(b)(3) shall be issued no more than 60 days before presentation of the aircraft to the GCAA.
insurance requirements and require that insurance certificates must be issued in SDR unit.
airworthiness review the last applicable AD bi-weekly is properly registered and recorded in the airworthiness review report completed by the airworthiness review Staff;
GCAA Highlights on Operator’s field discrepancies
staff who is going to sign the airworthiness review certificate
documented review and the physical survey of the aircraft.
mal-practices and have been instructed to reject any application not meeting the above requirements. Hence, the GCAA urges you to disseminate this Safety Alert to any person (including ARC Staff) involved in the concerned processes.
AIR ARABIA MRM PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
GENERAL
INTRODUCTION
Hayman Riad
Training Captain
Married, 2 Sons (18 and 22)
Tennis & Reading
2 years
GENERAL
INTRODUCTION
NOTE: The statements in green will be mentioned by the presenter but will not appear in the GCAA PPT
continued effort to promote a healthy safety culture through special emphasis on the quality of human factor training throughout all departments;
factor training; (it is followed by DRM, TRM and GRM)
maintenance operations (the requirement of flight operations,
training, safety and quality head of departments. It is a sincere effort to improve the relationship amongst maintenance teams as well as between flight ops teams and maintenance teams)
GENERAL
OBJECTIVE The objective of this presentation is:
Approach for our Maintenance Teams to enhance our healthy safety culture.
human factor bridge between flight operation and maintenance teams as well as amongst maintenance teams.
GENERAL
MRM SPECIFIC
First Part
– Philosophy of MRM – Worker’s Health & safety; – NORMS; – Reporting; (Air Arabia special emphasis requirement); – Effective Communication (Air Arabia special emphasis requirement).
GENERAL
COMMON GROUNDS
Second Part
personal skills desired for both flight ops & maintenance teams, such as:
– Threat & Error Management; (adapted for Maintenance) – Situational Awareness; – Workload & Stress Management; – Assertiveness;
GENERAL
COMMON GROUNDS
Third Part
skills desired for both teams, such as:
– Leadership Styles; – Teamwork; – Decision Making Model; – Conflict Resolution;
GENERAL
MRM SPECIFIC
Fourth Part
– As we introduced the cognitional & behavioral modules that may lead to undesired results; – We will now introduce an unwanted result and try to trace it back, through group work and facilitation, to the specific behaviors that lead to it; – We end it all up with an immediate feedback module.
GENERAL
ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE START?
FIRST PART
PHILOSOPHY, HEALTH & SAFETY, NORMS, COMMUNICATION
FIRST PART
MRM PHILOSOPHY (I)
– Increase health & safety – Reduce human error – Reduce the effect of human error – Enhance teamwork – Increase situational awareness – Improve effective communication.
NOTE: Human Error, Teamwork and Situational Awareness’ common understanding will be collected and displayed on a flip chart at this point and revisited at the end of part 3.
FIRST PART
MRM PHILOSOPHY (II)
– The philosophy of MRM is based heavily on how maintenance operations differ from flight operations. – The aviation maintenance technicians' work environment is viewed as encompassing a great variety of tasks in varied settings with a great number of people. – Because the tasks and work differ vastly from one domain to the other, the basic plan for “attacking” concepts like human error, teamwork, and safety also differ.
FIRST PART
MRM PHILOSOPHY (III)
– SAFETY CULTURE of Air Arabia; – REPORTING & REPORTING CULTURE; – THE DIRTY DOZEN & SAFETY NETS; – EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION: is built in every module and sub-module, hence it
will be limited to verbal and non-verbal and cross culture issues we have at Air Arabia. However, it will be revisited constantly through every module as we explore the contents of this program.
FIRST PART
THE DIRTY DOZEN
SAMPLE
HUMAN FACTOR EXAMPLE SAFETY NET Lack of Comm. The next shift will know what to do when they see it Communicate clearly Complacency Didn’t find anything wrong and I’ve looked 10 times Never sign off anything you did not do Knowledge This is the third time it does this, I’ve done it a couple of times and it didn’t do that Don’t rely on your memory, use the updated approved manual
ANY QUESTIONS SO FAR?
SECOND PART
TEM , SA, W/LOAD & ASSERTIVENESS
SECOND PART
MAKE SENSE
be administered and digested in one pill by the trainee?
across all cultures and attitudes.
NOT ALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GCAA, I WILL SELECT ONLY 2, DUE TO TIME CONSTRAINT (45 MIN)
SA SA & & TEM: M:
MOST IMPORTANT
GOOD SA = EFFECTIVE TEM
SECOND PART
THIRD PART
LEADERSHIP, TEAMWORK, DECISION, CONFLICT
THIRD PART
Associating the remaining common NOTECHS
aware of EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE fundamentals to promote TEAMWORK and RESOLVE or avoid any CONFLICT that may arise during MX operations and reach a sound decision using the company’s risk assessment DECISION MAKING MODEL: – Leadership Styles; – Teamwork; – Decision Making Model; – Emotional intelligence & culture; – Conflict Resolution.
THIRD PART
ABY DECISION MAKING MODEL
– FACTS – OPTIONS – RISKS & BENEFITS – DECISION – EXECUTION – CHECK/COMPARE
FOURTH PART
CASE STUDY
FOURTH PART
CASE STUDY
QUALITY DEPARTMENT: ANY IDEAS? OR SHALL WE USE A GENERIC CASE?
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN
DEVELOPED IN HOUSE FOR CRM, DRM AND MRM
THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENSURE QUALITY
DEPARTMENTS REGARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
MAINTENANCE & IMPROVEMENT OF ALL PROGRAMS
References:
ANY QUESTIONS ?
CRM RECURRENT
THANK YOU ALL FOR ATTENDING
FOR ANY HUMAN FACTOR QUERIES: – CONTACT ME ON: hraid@airarabia.com – OR +971501981179
e-Enabling - Evolving the Regulations
AUH November 2015
Marc-Christian Reichle
SM Configuration & eEnabling Etihad Airways
Agenda: Etihad’s e-enabling route to life Two OEM’s – Two Approaches Summary
Agenda
Etihad’s e-Enabling Route to Life
2013 2014 2015
Q1 2014 Test implementation of Ground Tools April 2014 1st Lab Visit to test IT implementation and business processes August 2014 2nd Lab Visit to finalize tests and proof pre- production installation Q3/Q4 2014 Installation of Gatelink at Airport February 2015 2nd 787 June 2015 3rd & 4th 787 August 2015 5th 787 Q2/Q3 2013 Analysis of OEM documents Q3/Q4 2013 Development of IT Infrastructure model Q4 2013 Development of business processes 3rd September 2014 e-Enabling audit ended in acceptance of e-enabling processes and Ops Q4 2014 Base Maintenance and 147 Training Organisation approval for B787 Last two weeks in December 2014 1st A380 delivery & 1st B787 delivery Q3 2015 Preparation for e-Enabling Infrastructure on Midfield Terminal September 2015 1st 787 C-Check in Middle East for customer aircraft
170 … 50 40 30 20 10
2015 2016 … near future
Etihad’s e-Enabling Route to Life
71 B787-9/-10 25 B777x 10 A380-800 62 A350-1000
Two OEM’s – Two Approaches
e-Enabling Requirements
ALS Part 6 & Security Handbook ANSOG
Configuration Reports
process
Log Files
A380 B787
ANSOG – Airplane Network Security Operator Guidance
Two OEM’s – Two Approaches
e-Enabling Requirements
ALS Part 6 & Security Handbook ANSOG
Configuration Reports
process
Log Files
A380 B787
ANSOG – Airplane Network Security Operator Guidance
New challenges – e-Enabling Requirements ALS Part 6
with FAA requirements
Security Handbook
ANSOG
A OEM independent, comprehensive guidance is missing.
Airbus Boeing
New challenges – e-Enabling Requirements
A380 ALS Part 6 A380 Security Handboo k ANSOG
a e-Enabling dedicated TPM chapter
created a equivalent checklist for ALS Part 6
Etihad’s Approach:
TPM – Technical Procedure Manual
CAME & e-Enabling TPM
Two OEM’s – Two Approaches
e-Enabling Requirements
ALS Part 6 & Security Handbook ANSOG
Configuration Reports
process
Log Files
A380 B787
ANSOG – Airplane Network Security Operator Guidance
New challenges – Configuration Reports
Complex
No standard
Every aircraft model comes with a new report format. The complete configuration is splitted into multiple reports Limited usability due to complexity
New challenges – Configuration Reports
an in-house developed software solution
to develop and integrate this function into the MIS
feedback for future improvements
Etihad’s Approach:
TPM – Technical Procedure Manual MIS – Maintenance Information System
Two OEM’s – Two Approaches
e-Enabling Requirements
ALS Part 6 & Security Handbook ANSOG
Configuration Reports
process
Log Files
A380 B787
ANSOG – Airplane Network Security Operator Guidance
New challenges – Log Files
Processing Archiving Amount and size of logs From 100 MB up to 4.5 GB per flight and aircraft Process and potential benefit
Guidance from the OEM’s is limited
New challenges – Log Files
a minimum of 6 months
evaluate security logs
Etihad’s Approach:
TPM – Technical Procedure Manual MIS – Maintenance Information System
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Q1 '15 Q2 '15 Q3 '15 Q4 '15 A380 B787 Giga Bytes
Summary
e-Enabling is introducing a new era in how we operate and maintain aircraft. Due to the fast developing technology, operators, authorities and 3rd party service providers are challenged to cope up with the speed in
– onboard and on ground – and keeping it up-to-date
making any concessions in regards of safety and security
for the development to come
Summary
It is time and on us to find solutions to close the gaps between …the technological advance and the guiding elements. …the different approaches chosen by the OEMs.
Questions?
Thank You!
Zahid Munawar, Manager Engineering Safety
CAR 21 Presentation
14th Airworthiness Consultative Committee Meeting – Nov 2015
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015 69
70
Presentation comprises two sections
Q & A
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Introduction
71
Design Organizations, Production Organization Approvals and Design Change Approvals are business as usual For Type Acceptance, 3 Models have been accepted:
Nine more applications are being processed
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Updates on CAR 21 Activities
72
Continued - Nine more applications for Type Acceptance
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Updates on CAR 21 Activities – continued
73
New Rule – MOA issued Intermediate step to CAR 21 Subpart G POA Does not require any prior overseas approval CAR 21 Subpart G POA will only be issued on existing
GCAA Production Specialist will soon joining the GCAA
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Manufacturing Organization Approval
74
For manufacturing on a small scale, there are challenges CAR 145 – Too restrictive [fabrication IAW CAR 145.42(c), MITCOM and FITCOM for a particular MSN only]. POA per CAR 21 subpart G - too demanding. Manufacturing Organization Approval provides the middle path without compromising the safety It’s a new concept The MOA regulatory requirements reflect POA requirements adapted to small scale production
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Manufacturing Organization Approval
75
MOA is for only for manufacturing of non-critical parts with no airworthiness impact upon parts failure. Parts produced under MOA can be installed on any UAE registered aircraft. Can be manufactured in bulk, sent to stores as spares and traded / sold as well. MO Exposition and Quality System Agreement with Design Organizations A multi-faceted organization can use its existing technical resources.
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Manufacturing Organization Approval
76
MOA Holder can sign a UAE Manufacturing Release Certificate Form 299 in the same way a Form 1 would be issued GCAA has been in touch with the industry MOA Workshop was held at Emirates There are quite a few potential applicants
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Manufacturing Organization Approval
77
MOA Holder will be required to file ROSI whenever a failure is reported Benefits include:
Flexibility Lower cost of manufacturing Intermediate step towards CAR 21 Subpart G POA approval
ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
Manufacturing Organization Approval
78 ACC Meeting – Nov 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
5 November 2015 Mohammad Al Shamali–Airworthiness Inspector
CAR 145
ACC MEETING
CONTENT: The MORC scheme, CAR 145 E-Service enhancements, The EWIS requirement
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Progress on the MORC scheme Draft Regulation (Consolidated and reviewed by GCAA) E-Services matters discussed with IT Team (IT team will propose a process to allow MORC-AS to support E-Services Applications. Q-Pulse Matters discussed with PRP ( PRP will cater MORC Requirements. GCAA will provide training to qualify MORC-AS to process MORC application. Procedures (AWP) and Guidance Materials will be developed to support the MORC process and implementation. MORC Regulation (NPA) to be completed by end of Nov, 2015.
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
CAR 145 e-Services Enhancement:
New Enhancement:
Allowing CAR 145 Applicant to select LINE & BASE Maintenance for the same Location and Aircraft Rating, to avoid duplication – (DONE) “Request For More Information” to be included for Officers Review (for FAMO Application) (DONE) GCAA AMO Approval No. (Old & New) – The Old or incorrect Approval No. exists on the Application and FAMO Certificate generated from e-Services. (DONE) To introduce on the APPLICATION Form, system to provide selectable scope of LINE Maintenance, to be added with selection of L1, L2, L3 & L4 with Definition (Drop Down) and L5 to be “Free Text” to allow Applicant to enter
145 False information disclaimer with the option of pop up as accept / decline to be added (DONE)
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING CAR 145 e-Services Enhancement: New Enhancement ( Continued )
“Request Revision” dropdown – To be amended to “Request for More Information” (DONE) Option for “Other Doc” for Inspector/Officers Action (DONE) List of Aircraft Rating to be arranged in Alphabetical order (DONE) Under “Search All Application” on the Dash Board – to add “Export to Excel” (DONE) “Request Revision” dropdown – Only to list document relevant to CAR 145 – Agreed and AW Coordinator to provide List to amend current list – Current List provided – (DONE)
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING CAR 145 e-Services Enhancement: New Enhancement ( Continued )
User manual or user guide is under review Format of AMO Certificate printed from e-Services, format & quality not acceptable – (Redesigned, to be verified with CAR-145 team) “Internal communication” Option to be added as per DAW request PREVIEW of active and history of e-Services CAR 145 AMO and e-Services CAR145 Post Holders Applications (In progress, will be completed till Monday) Renewal of CAR 145: Renewal validity option for 1,2 or 3 years – Accepted in the enhancement stage. . (Complete, will be installed during this weekend and available from Sunday 1st November)
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
To allow CAR 145 Applicant to select LINE & BASE Maintenance for the same Location and Aircraft Rating, to avoid duplication –
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
“Request For More Information” to be included for Officers Review (for FAMO Application)
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
scope of LINE Maintenance, to be added with selection of L1, L2, L3 & L4
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
GCAA AMO Approval No. (Old & New) – The Old or incorrect Approval No. exists on the Application and FAMO Certificate generated from e-Services.
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Option for “Other Doc” for Inspector/Officers Action –
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
List of Aircraft Rating to be arranged in Alphabetical order
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Excel”
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Under “Search All Application” on the Dash Board – to add “Export to Excel”
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
(NOTE – This is in addition to presentation given by CAR M in the previous Meeting) The release of the EWIS requirement: Standalone AMC 001 was published in September 2015 (Adopted from EASA AMC 20-22 – Annex III to ED Decision 2008/007/R of 29/08/2008) Full compliance with the AMC will be required by end of December 2016. Where compliance with some AMC’s is not practical, organizations may propose alternative means of compliance which can serve the objective of the AMC for GCAA acceptance.
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Applicability
25 November 2015
Group Applicability 1 Qualified staff performing EWIS maintenance 2 Qualified staff performing maintenance inspections on wiring systems 4 Qualified staff performing general maintenance/inspections not involving wire maintenance. (LRU change is not considered wire maintenance) 5 Qualified staff performing other engineering or planning work on in-service aeroplane. 6 Other service staff with duties in proximity to EWIS 7 Flight Deck Crew 8 Cabin Crew
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
EWIS Groups 1 and 2 Groups 1 and 2 have been merged to cover: Qualified staff members who perform wiring systems maintenance and their training is based on their job description and the work being done by them (e.g. avionics skilled workers or technicians cat B2). It also includes staff members who perform EWIS inspections (but not maintenance) and their training is based on their job description and the work being done by them (e.g. inspectors / technicians cat B1/B2). Modules included in the training are as follows: Module A General EWIS Practices Module B Wiring Practices Documentation Module C Inspection Module D Housekeeping Module E Wire Module F Connective Devices
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
EWIS Groups 4 and 5 Groups 4 and 5 have been merged to cover: Qualified staff performing general maintenance/inspections not involving wire maintenance (LRU change is not considered wire maintenance). They perform maintenance on aeroplanes that may require removal/reconnection of electrical connective devices (e.g. inspectors/technicians cat A or B1) Also Qualified staff performing other engineering or planning work on in-service aeroplanes and are personnel who are authorized to design mechanical/structure, systems installations, modifications and repairs, or personnel who are authorized to plan maintenance tasks. Modules included in the training are as follows: Module A General EWIS Practices Module C Inspection Module D Housekeeping Module E Wire Module F Connective Devices
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
EWIS Groups 6, 7 and 8 EWIS Groups 6, 7 and 8 are aimed at other service staff with duties in proximity to EWIS. These staff members are personnel whose duties would bring them into contact/view of aeroplane wiring systems. This would include, but not be limited to: Aeroplane cleaners, cargo loaders, re-fuelling staff, lavatory servicing personnel, de-icing personnel, push back personnel, flight deck crew and cabin crew. Modules included in the Group 6 training are as follows: Module A General EWIS Practices Module C Inspection Module D Housekeeping Module E Wire The Modules included in the Groups 7 and 8 training are as follows: Module A General EWIS Practices Module C Inspection Module D Housekeeping Module E Wire
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING Objectives of the training course After completing the course, the participant will – depending on the modules covered – be able to: describe or demonstrate the safe handling of aircraft electrical systems including line replaceable units (LRUs), tooling, troubleshooting procedures and electrical measurement describe or demonstrate the structure and navigation of the applicable aircraft wiring system overhaul or wiring practices manual describe the different types of inspection, human factors in inspections, zonal areas and typical damage describe contamination sources, materials and cleaning and protection procedures describe or demonstrate the correct identification of different wire types, their inspection criteria and damage tolerances and repair and preventive maintenance procedures describe or demonstrate the procedures to identify, inspect and find the correct repair for typical types of connective device found on the aircraft type concerned demonstrate the procedures for replacing all the parts of typical types of connective device found on the aircraft type concerned
25 November 2015
CAR 145 ACC MEETING
Any Question?????
25 November 2015
flydubai CAR M Subpart I
David Lewis Head of Engineering November 2015
ARC Staff
50
Manhours Per Review
ARC Renewals to Date
Month CMR
Average Discrepancies Per Review
Approval & first ARC
Resource Operations Control Improvement
VALUE
GCAA 15b Endorsement AWF-IPD-006 Controlled Environment
Questions?