GEMINI incident Oct 2007 Review of contingency arrangements Paul - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gemini incident oct 2007 review of contingency
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GEMINI incident Oct 2007 Review of contingency arrangements Paul - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GEMINI incident Oct 2007 Review of contingency arrangements Paul Gallagher National Grid National Grid Gas Operations Contents Timeline of events Shipper agent role Logistical issues Logistical issues Capacity


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GEMINI incident – Oct 2007 Review of contingency arrangements

Paul Gallagher National Grid National Grid Gas Operations

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

Timeline of events “Shipper agent” role Logistical issues Logistical issues Capacity auctions

C i ti

Communications processes Conclusions and Issues identified Lessons learnt High level plan going forwards High level plan going forwards

slide-3
SLIDE 3

NG Contingency Timeline for Gemini Incident

15:00 – Gemini Oracle software upgrade completed with slight delay 05:40 – Internal approval for NG to take on ‘shipper agent’ upgrade completed with slight delay 17:00 – Reports that shipper API’s were failing and APX files were not being NG to take on shipper agent role 07:52 – Incident room set up to run shipper processes 16:00 – Testing all clear

Monday Tuesday Thursday Friday

received 17:00 – 22:10 – CSC Incident Support Manager engages all support teams 14:45 – Overrun charges for 23rd suspended 10:30 – First WDDSEC auction held since Sunday 21st

Sunday 21st October Monday 22nd October Tuesday 23rd October Wednesday 24th October Thursday 25th October Friday 26th October

08:00 – Incident Controller is appointed for National Grid 12:00 – Overrun charges for 24th suspended 14:15 – Gemini goes live for shipper testing, issue ith t ti l d t appointed for National Grid 14:05 – Notification from a shipper that they believed they could access other Users data suspended 14:30 – First DISEC auction held since Sunday 21st with potential data corruption identified and resolved 21:30 – Full access to Gemini restored 14:30 – Shipper access to Gemini removed at NGG request 22:45 – Contingency arrangements 5 Co t ge cy a a ge e ts initiated

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“Shipper agent” role

Under code contingency, normal approach for loss of

Gemini is to manage via a single faxed EOD position from Gemini is to manage via a single faxed EOD position from each shipper each day

However, during this incident Gemini remained available to

N ti l G id National Grid users

This meant that near to normal commercial processes could

continue if shipper interface issues could be resolved continue if shipper interface issues could be resolved

Decision therefore taken by NG do more than contingency

arrangements required by acting as an agent for shippers

to allow nominations and trade details to be entered into Gemini

to allow nominations and trade details to be entered into Gemini, to allow outputs to be fed back to shippers

Seen by NG as a proactive approach to facilitating market

  • perations

Allowed shippers to trade and re-balance through the day Allowed NDM demand attribution process to be meaningful to

p g support daily balancing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Information flows – Normal operations

Balance NET ENERGY POSITION ENTRY Balance Positions EXIT ENTRY Supply Nominations Storage Nominations LDZ Demand Forecast NDM Exit nominations EXIT

GEMINI

Storage Nominations OTC Trades (Buy) LDZ Demand Forecast Daily Metered Nominations OTC Trades (Sell) OCM Trades OTC Trades (Sell) OCM Trades Entry Capacity Position Entry Capacity Auction Bid Shipper Entry KEY Bids ENTRY CAPACITY pp y APX via file transfer DN System Provision

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Information flows – During contingency

Balance NET ENERGY POSITION ENTRY Balance Positions EXIT ENTRY Supply Nominations Storage Nominations LDZ Demand Forecast NDM Exit nominations EXIT

GEMINI

Storage Nominations OTC Trades (Buy) LDZ Demand Forecast Daily Metered Nominations OTC Trades (Sell) OCM Trades OTC Trades (Sell) OCM Trades Entry Capacity Position Entry Capacity Auction Bid KEY DN Bids ENTRY CAPACITY DN NG Manual Process 1 NG Manual Process 2

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Process undertaken for management of nominations and trade data nominations and trade data

Dedicated incident room for shipper communications set up

Comm nit informed of approach b ANS and NG ebsite

Community informed of approach by ANS and NG website

Shippers contacted periodically through the day to

request updated positions that required entering into GEMINI

request updated positions that required entering into GEMINI

provide feedback to shippers on latest position recorded in GEMINI

Communication method agreed with each shipper (either

b l d t f il t b t) verbal updates, faxes or e-mail to box account)

Dedicated individual for a specific group of shippers

Comm nication operated in a NG Shipper direction onl

Communication operated in a NG – Shipper direction only

to manage workload and provide equality of access

Contingency fax pro-forma’s made available to users via Contingency fax pro forma s made available to users via

the NG website to support the process (although they are already defined under the contingency arrangements)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Logistics of contingency arrangements

Shift process initiated to cover 07:00 to 03:00 for each day

25 t ff t th ki d

25 staff to cover the working day 13 staff covering out of hours business Each shift supported by a Supervisor and a Gemini technical expert Agents organised around shipper groups / families

107 Staff called in to support operations in total

80 NG staff/managers 27 Call Centre & xoserve staff (based in Solihull & Hinckley)

Contingency room established for the duration of the incident using IT,

phone and process equipment set up at short notice p o e a d p ocess equ p e t set up at s o t

  • t ce

Huge amount of data being handled manually, for example there were

1360 e-mails received in incident room alone

Catering facilities organised for all shifts

an army marches on its

Catering facilities organised for all shifts – an army marches on its

stomach !

Staff incident helpline set up to manage ongoing shift requirements and

notifications of attendance notifications of attendance

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Entry Capacity – Auction Regime

DADSEC DISEC

Day ahead (I)

WDDSEC

On the Day hourly (F)

RMSEC

Month ahead (F) Day ahead * 3 (F) Entry

AMSEC

Long term (F) Capacity Requ

QSEC

Long term (F) irement Gas Day x F – Firm I – Interruptible

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Entry Capacity – Incident Response (1)

22nd & 23rd October

No capacity auctions carried out after removal of shipper access to

Gemini system D i i t k d t l k f hi i ibilit i ith

Decision taken due to a lack of shipper visibility, issues with

managing offline of auction process, and prioritisation of resources.

Although the capacity auction regime was not operational, NG

g p y g p , closely monitored and managed the physical situation over this period.

With no opportunity for shippers to correct their positions from With no opportunity for shippers to correct their positions from

previous auctions for the 23rd, overrun charges that may have been applicable were waived for that day.

NG Issued communications explaining the above on the 23rd via

ANS and its website

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Entry Capacity – Incident Response (2)

24th October

Second contingency team set up to deal purely with capacity issues

F b d DISEC ti h ld (f d 25th) fi t t it t bid f

Fax based DISEC auction held (for gas day 25th) – first opportunity to bid for

interruptible capacity

Operated as a sealed pay as bid auction (via fax pro-formas and website information

provision)

Capacity trades between users clarified by NG and pro formas provided to ensure these Capacity trades between users clarified by NG and pro-formas provided to ensure these

could be entered into Gemini.

Allocations phoned back to shippers

Overrun charges waived.

25th & 26th October

25th & 26th October

Fax based WDDSEC auction held for the first time for firm capacity using contingency

arrangements communicated via the website.

DISEC auction held using similar arrangements as previous day.

DISEC WDDSEC

Decision taken to NOT waive overrun charges for 25th & 26th as users had option to

partake in DISEC and WDDSEC auctions for the day.

QSEC RMSEC DADSEC DISEC

Graphical representation of the Capacity Auctions held for the Gas Days during the incident

AMSEC

21st 22nd 23rd 24th 25th 26th 27th

Timeline (Oct 07)

28th

Gas Days

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Industry Communications

Communications managed via a variety of processes and systems to ensure

maximum coverage: maximum coverage:

Specific Issues Trades, Positions, Nominations, C t t D t il Trade & Nom Confirmation

User and industry Feedback

Contact Details

Feedback & Questions

Gemini Incident

Community Communications Public Communications Private Communications

Key Messages Communications To GEMINI users

Teams

& Supporting Information To GEMINI users

Over 100 ANS & SUREFAX t O er 30 ebsite comm nications messages sent Over 30 website communications

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions with respect to contingency arrangements arrangements

Proactive stance from NG in taking on “shipper agent” role New and untested contingency arrangements set up very

quickly given number of complex logistical issues that needed to be resolved needed to be resolved

Generally worked well given complexity and logistical size

  • f the role taken on and the limited experience of NG staff
  • f the role taken on and the limited experience of NG staff

in undertaking the normal shipper role

Positive feedback received from a number of shipper Positive feedback received from a number of shipper

  • rganisations, however some concerns also raised

Going forward there are a number of issues associated with

g contingency arrangements to be addressed by both NG and the wider market community

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Issues arising from contingency arrangements

Contingency arrangements :

Community awareness of, and preparedness for use of, existing contingency

arrangements arrangements

Appropriateness of existing contingency arrangements for such events – Noting the

requirement for a “Shipper Agent” role.

Shipper agent role :

Contingency staff carrying out unfamiliar roles with limited training Inaccuracies and delays in data entry by contingency staff Issues with notifications of trade data to NG (both within day and in after the day

reconciliation faxes) reconciliation faxes)

problems validating trades when only one party was providing info Amount of after the day reconciliation required Issues resolution and level of expertise of contingency and shippers staff to manage this

C i di i l i i f hi

Concern over uni-directional communication from shipper agents Impact of role on shipper scheduling charges

Communications

User details previously provided to NG out of date despite frequent exercises User details previously provided to NG out of date despite frequent exercises Users not being available when contacted

Wrong numbers, unmanned workstations, Company Receptions or Security Lodges

Problems arising from lack of user readiness for dedicated ANS and SUREFAX systems

Diffi lti t ti t it ti

Difficulties contacting users post capacity auctions Did NG use all available options in the most effective manner ?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Contingency – lessons learnt (end to end processes)

Preparedness

D sting off contingenc proced res onl hen things go rong

Dusting off contingency procedures only when things go wrong

doesn’t work

NG and Shippers require training on contingency arrangements

Communication

Speed, frequency, clarity, accuracy, targeted, 2 way, recorded

Resources

Resources

Accessible, ready, trained

Facilities Facilities

Appropriate, tested

Procedures

Up to date, regularly reviewed, tested

Prioritisation

U d t d b ll

Understood by all

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What next for contingency arrangements?

NG will take forward lessons learned on commercial

incident management incident management

Need broader review of Gemini contingency arrangements

and procedures

I iti l k l d ith / T t t l k t

Initial work planned with xoserve / Transporters to look at:

Responsibilities Approach

R

Resources Prioritisation & decision making Testing arrangements

Outputs in early April

Outputs in early April Industry engagement required to discuss:

U i t / t ti

User requirements / expectations Potential improvements Development approach

Implementation

Implementation