fund council ip group report 2014
play

Fund Council IP Group Report 2014 FC 14 Washington D.C. 5 November - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fund Council IP Group Report 2014 FC 14 Washington D.C. 5 November 2015 FC IP Group Paul Figueroa , Resident Legal Officer, USAID, Guatemala Bram de Jonge , Researcher, Law and Governance Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands


  1. Fund Council IP Group Report 2014 FC 14 Washington D.C. 5 November 2015

  2. FC IP Group § Paul Figueroa , Resident Legal Officer, USAID, Guatemala § Bram de Jonge , Researcher, Law and Governance Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands § Aline Flower, Associate General Counsel Global Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, U.S.

  3. The 2014 Reporting Cycle: The Process § Information received: ● Consortium’s Consolidated Intellectual Asset (IA) Report, including all Center IA Reports ● Discussions with the Consortiums legal team in Montpellier (15-17 April, 2015) ● Responses to FCIP Group’s follow-up questions

  4. Responses to 2013 Reporting and Recommendations § Centers to provide more information on ‘justifications’: ● How LEAs and RUAs further the CGIAR Vision ● Reporting improved § Centers to provide more information on all patent and PVP applications and trademarks registrations. ● Justifications for patent protection still need improvement § Centers to include a section on IA management in future CRPs ● Will be required in new CRPs

  5. Responses to 2013 Reporting and Recommendations § Centers to continue to strengthening IP capacity ● Capacity continues to improve § Consortium and Centers to analyse the requirements under the Nagoya Protocol. ● Consortium led several activities to build awareness and discuss compliance

  6. The 2014 Reporting Cycle: Overall Observations § Overall, there continues to be progress in terms of: ● Reporting ● Compliance ● IP capacity ● Oversight and communication ● Adoption of best practices

  7. The 2014 Reporting Cycle: LEAs Four Limited Exclusivity Agreements (LEAs): ● Three complied with the research and emergency exceptions ● One didn’t include research exception per deviation (approved by CO in 2013) ● One request for blanket deviation (not approved)

  8. The 2014 Reporting Cycle: RUAs 1 Restricted Use Agreement (RUA) ● Requested full copy of agreement for the first time ● Complied with Article 6.3

  9. The 2014 Reporting Cycle: IP Applications § PVP applications ● 5 Patent Cooperation Treaty applications ● 1 U.S. utility patent ● Centers complied with Article 6.4 ● More explanation about the connection with the CGIAR vision § Several trademark applications

  10. The FC IP Group Recommendations: § Centers: ● Provide market and dissemination strategy plans for patents ● Track impact of LEAs and RUAs on target beneficiaries ● Share best practices with other centers and leverage these resources when drafting agreements

  11. The FC IP Group Recommendations: § Consortium ● Clarify issues of interpretation in consultation with the FCIP Group ● Continue to build awareness regarding compliance with Nagoya and the Treaty

  12. Q&A Thank You Paul Figueroa Bram de Jonge Aline Flower

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend