From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social Rights - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

from the delors white paper 1993 to the eu pillar of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social Rights - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social Rights (2016), what future for the fight against poverty in Europe? EAPN CONFERENCE Thursday 16 June 2016 Brussels From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social


slide-1
SLIDE 1

From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social Rights (2016), what future for the fight against poverty in Europe?

EAPN CONFERENCE

Thursday 16 June 2016 – Brussels

slide-2
SLIDE 2

From the Delors White Paper (1993) to the EU Pillar of Social Rights (2016), what future for the fight against poverty in Europe?

Brussels, 16 June 2016

Workshop 3: Policy Domains and addressing Poverty

Marija Babovic EUISG

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis, European Commissioner for the Euro and Social Dialogue

"Europe is still facing problems resulting from the financial and sovereign debt crisis: poverty, social exclusion, inequality and high

  • unemployment. (…) The Pillar of Social Rights

is part of our work to strengthen Economic and Monetary Union and is envisaged for the euro

  • area. However, we will make sure that non-

euro Member States are fully involved in the consultation process and can join the initiative if they wish to do so.”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Is the cause of the problem diagnosed correctly?

  • Are poverty, social exclusion, inequality and high unemployment problems

„resulting from the financial and sovereign debt crisis‟? Or these problems are consequence of deeper system‟s failure, TOGETHER with financial and sovereign debt crisis?

  • What are the chances of social pillar to be effective and to bring social justice,

quality of life and convergence if it is „part of our work to strengthen Economic and Monetary Union‟? What is the purpose of Economic and Monetary Union? Have we confused means for objectives?

  • Have we learned from the past? Last decade showed us clearly that

Economic and Monetary Union without Social Union is faced with severe

  • problems. Social rights are not only related to labour mobility and labour

market integration. They are grounded in our basic understanding of what socially just system is and how responsibilities and benefits should be distributed across different groups, societies and across the European Union. Is it possible to build common market, or protect labour force when we see the crash of solidarity, xenophobia, lack of integration of minorities, segregation in housing, schools, on the labour market?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Composition of social pillar

Equal opportunities and access to the labour market Fair working conditions Adequate and sustainable social protection Skills, education and life-long learning Conditions of employment Integrated social benefits and services Flexible and secure labour contracts Wages Health care and sickness benefits Secure professional transitions Health and safety at work Pensions Active support for employment Social dialogue and safety of workers Unemployment benefits Gender equality and work-life balance Minimum income Equal opportunities Disability benefits Long-term care Childcare Housing Access to essential services

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Main questions?

  • How the interventions within the defined policy domains interact with other

relevant policies?

  • Is everything there or we are missing some „building blocks‟ of social pillar?
  • How social pillar policy will be implemented and not fall in the trap that it

remains a “shopping list” of principles? Will the implementation of social pillar interventions lead to concrete outcomes in policy and practice?

  • How interventions in different policy domains of Social Pillar should be

related and coordinated?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Main gaps

1. Skills, education and life-long learning: Nothing is said about inclusive education, combating segregation and discrimination, second chance education, and financial support to ensure these.

  • 2. Flexible and secure labour contracts

‘Flexibility in the conditions of employment can offer a gateway to the labour market and maintain employers’ ability to swiftly respond to shifts in demand; however, the transition towards open-ended contracts shall be ensured’. An absence of choice or limited options to choose where to work and under what conditions (i.e. full time or part time) is a core characteristic of precariousness.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Main gaps

3. Secure professional transitions: It worryingly mentions that some of the entitlements of jobseekers or inactive persons should not become disincentives to re-staring work, which may be used as a gateway for negative activation with sanctions and conditionality. Income support (including unemployment benefits) and access to services are not mentioned. Nothing is said about vulnerable groups, needing specific support, or about holistic, comprehensive approaches.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Involuntary part-time employment as percentage of total part-time employment by sex, %, EU28

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Male Female

Source: Eurostat

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Involuntary part-time employment as percentage of total part-time employment by age categories and for male 25-49, %, EU28

Source: Eurostat

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total 15-24 Total 25-49 Total 50-64 Male 25-49

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Main gaps

4. Wages: It does not clarify how adequate wages are to be set, and it recommends the evolution of wages in line with productivity, decoupled from inflation. 5. Integrated social benefits and services: It is unclear whether the proposed integrated approach will not effectively reduce access to benefits and services, as the text also speaks of aligning eligibility and coverage. It mentions that better integration can improve the cost-effectiveness of social protection, but nothing is said about the quality of the services, the adequacy

  • f the benefits, or how it would improve delivery of both, from the perspective
  • f the beneficiary.

6. Health care and sickness benefits: It is not said how the promised universal access will be ensured and financed.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Implementation concerns

How social pillar domains will be mainstreamed into the main policy drivers and prevent potentially negative macroeconomic policies? Will funding be allocated (i.e. European Structural and Investment Funds)? Example: Gender equality and work-life balance are not achievable without full promotion of equal opportunities, improvement of childcare.

Gender equality and work-life balance Equal

  • pportunities

Childcare

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Implementation concerns

Employment rate of women, age 15-64, 2014, %

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 EL IT MT HR ES RO SK PL HU IE BE BG SL CY EU28 PT FR LU CZ LV LT AT FI EE UK NL DE DK SE 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 HR PL RO EL UK BG LU SK CZ LV CY LT FI EU28 HU AT NL DE IE PT SL IT ES EE DK SE FR BE MT

Share of children old 3-compulsory preschool out of formal childcare, 2014, %

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Related policy initiatives

There is an EU Commission‟s proposal „New start to address the challenges

  • f work-life balance faced by working families‟ with comprehensive measures

envisaged in legal and policy domains.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you! Marija Babovic marija.babovic@secons.net