Freedom of Information Training Session
Information Management & Legal Services
Freedom of Information Training Session Information Management - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Freedom of Information Training Session Information Management & Legal Services Aim of Training Cover the basics of the Freedom of Cover commonly used exemptions (lawful Information Act 2000 reasons not to release
Information Management & Legal Services
Information Act 2000
reasons not to release information)
used
➔ Uphold individuals rights (members of the public) ➔ Powers to enforce against organisations including:
Which can all damage WCC reputation….
address);
*With exception of considering request as vexatious or if help is required i.e. disability
already available elsewhere (e.g. website).
this and if not refer to other person or agency (e.g. CAB) or submitting request
possible
reframe request
When we can not provide information held for whatever reason, or cannot confirm if the information is held or the existence of the information then we must issue by a ‘refusal notice’. We issue refusal notices -
When we refuse a request we should explain -
Note - There will be legitimate occasions when we will refuse to ‘confirm or deny’ holding requested information. This is particularly likely when dealing with S31 Law enforcement for example.
limit” - £450 (18 hours);
request within authority to see where/whether information is held;
limit/assist the requestor refine the request before refusing request;
Section 1(1) does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the request is vexatious
The FOIA Commission published its report into the Act on 1 March 2016 incl. 21 recommendations for improvement of note are the following: abolish the PIT extension to the time limit - impose statutory time limit for internal reviews - amend section 36 to remove requirement for qualified person’s
However at the same time the Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock stated: "We will not make any legal changes to FOI".
withholding against public interest in disclosure
notice which must also contain details of complaints procedure Exemptions could apply to:
Requestor entitled to a single stage internal review if not satisfied with response - after this can complain to ICO, First Tier and Upper Tier Tribunals Importance of relying on correct exemption and remember you can use more than one!
S21 Information accessible by other means S23 Information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters S32 Court records S34 Parliamentary privilege S36 Prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs (Only House of Commons/Lords) S37 Communications with her Majesty, etc. and honours S40(1) Personal Information S41 Information provided in confidence S44 Prohibitions on disclosure
S22 (+A) Information intended for future publication & research data S24 National Security S26 Defence S27 International relations S28 Relations within the UK S29 The economy S30 Investigations and proceedings S31 Law enforcement S33 Audit Functions S35 Formulation of government policy S36 Prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs S37 Royal Family and honours S38 Health and safety S39 Environmental information S40 Personal Information S42 Legal professional privilege S43 Commercial interests
(for example information held for the purposes of an investigation).
would be likely to harm a particular interest (for example the prevention or detection of crime).
This is an absolute exemption where we do not have to apply the public interest test. Reasonably accessible to the requester (publication scheme/ available through
Even if fee applies - it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is not reasonably accessible even when the charges are from a third party ie The Land Registry We may be in breach of the duty under the Act to provide ‘advice and assistance’ by not explaining how information is otherwise available eg on our website. Test is it “reasonably accessible” Example
“With a view to publication by authority or some other person…” Qualified exemption, public interest test required Exact date does not need to be known, Reasonable in all circumstances Section 22A - unpublished research (intellectual Property Act 2014) Example
S30(1) applies to information which ‘has at any time been held’ for the purposes of any investigations or proceedings which a public authority has a power or duty to conduct - regardless of the purposes for which it might have been obtained or for any other purposes for which it might have been held at any time. S30(2) on the other hand applies to information which ‘was obtained or recorded’ for the purposes of an investigation or proceedings conducted by us - ‘relates’ to the
the information and the content of the information.
This exemption is effectively split into 2 parts - S31(1)(a)-(f) applies to information which would be exempt where disclosure would prejudice general law enforcement activities such as the prevention/detection of crime; and S31(1)(g)-(i) applies to a range of functions that public authorities carry out for various purposes such as ascertaining whether a person has failed to comply with the law. Example
Qualified exemption (for Local Authorities) - public interest test required. Disclosure would or would be likely to - Inhibit the free and frank provision of advice, Inhibit the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation Disclosure would otherwise prejudice (or be likely) the effective conduct of public affairs Decision to use this exemption is the Monitoring Officer’s. This is an absolute exemption for House of Commons/Lords but for Local Authorities we need to apply the public interest test. This exemption is rarely used. You need to consult Legal Services about using this exemption.
Qualified exemption - public interest test required. Where disclosure would endanger the physical or mental health or safety of any individual Think about the harm that could be caused when releasing information - for example children homes, animal testing. The impact of the disclosure on others Example
S40 (1) - requesters own information If information is the personal data of the person making the request it will be exempt under S40(1). (This is because it can be dealt with under the Data Protection Act 1998, as a subject access request). S40(2) Somebody else's information If information is requested about a third party, this will also be exempt under S40(2) if disclosure contravenes any of the Data Protection principles (Principle one Fair and Lawful) Example
This is an absolute exemption no public interest test required
person(including another public authority), and
Actionable = we are likely to be sued!
Qualified exemption - public interest test required. Litigation privilege All documents and correspondence between Legal Services and Public Authority - this is very wide and captures all information Advice Privilege Solicitors, Barristers, Qualified Legal Executives
Qualified exemption - public interest test required. Is the information a trade secret? (Coca Cola ingredients?) ...or likely to prejudice the commercial interests of any person (including our authority) Example
Required for qualified exemptions! ★ Information must be disclosed unless the public interest in maintaining the exemption is greater than the public interest in disclosing it. ★ The decision involves the balancing of factors on each side ★ Each exemption used will require its own separate public interest test
Not defined under the FOI act, ICO advises; Something in the “public interest” is simply something which serves the interests of the public. When applying the test, the public authority is simply deciding whether in any particular case it serves the interests of the public better to withhold or to disclose the information.
➔ Promoting accountability and transparency by public authorities for their decisions ➔ Promoting accountability and transparency in the spending of public money ➔ Allowing individuals and companies to understand decisions affecting their lives and to challenge them ➔ Informing the public of any danger to public health or safety ➔ Contributing to public understanding and participation in a debate of importance
➔ Consider all relevant exemptions ➔ Prejudice or detrimental effect of disclosure ➔ Specific circumstances of the case ➔ Human Rights - e.g. right to a fair trial/privacy ➔ Effect of disclosure on wider world/public e.g. public data
When reviewing the fors and againsts in the public interest test, if all things being equal then disclose. “The exercise of considering the competing public interests depends not upon the length of the list of the different sorts of public interests on one side or the other but upon how important each of the factors is” Hogan v Oxford County Council (17/10/2006)
When can we legitimately extend the 20 working days under the Act?
consider the Public Interest Test (PIT). When we can not reach a decision within the 20 working days relating to the PIT, we need to respond within a reasonable period and issue a notice stating which exemption applies. (ICO advises no longer than further 20 days).
What has been requested? (level/nature of detail) Manner it has been asked? (Has FOI been mentioned?) Err to the side of caution - record as FOI/EIR Can log on iCasework and refuse - BAU - pass case to correct person
When considering the use of exemptions, we can look at how other authorities have used them and in particular how they they been perceived by the ICO For example, the ICO records all decision notices on their web site https://search.ico.org.uk/ico/search/decisionnotice This web site also can let you search on exemption/exception applied to speed up your search WCC Information Management Team and Legal Services http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/im
Re use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015 ROPSI Local Government Transparency Code 2015 LGTC General Data Protection Regulations coming 2018! GDPR Environmental Information Regulations 2004 - coming next time! EIR Datasets ICO guidance from Section 102 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 POFA