For the Seattle Public Utilities South Park Watershed NEBC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

for the seattle public utilities south park watershed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

For the Seattle Public Utilities South Park Watershed NEBC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

End-of-Pipe Municipal Stormwater Treatment Pilot Project For the Seattle Public Utilities South Park Watershed NEBC Stormwater in the Northwest Innovative Water Processing Solutions By Water Quality Management Professionals March 8, 2012 1.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Innovative Water Processing Solutions By Water Quality Management Professionals

End-of-Pipe Municipal Stormwater Treatment Pilot Project For the Seattle Public Utilities South Park Watershed NEBC – Stormwater in the Northwest March 8, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Meet current permit standard of 80% TSS removal
  • 2. Choose a solution or technology that can be

easily modified to accommodate possible future requirements

  • 3. Process effectively at 11 cfs (5,000gpm)
  • 4. Footprint must be 7,000 ft2 or less
  • 5. Solution must have low long-term O&M cost

(volumes could be 150Mgal/year+)

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

~234 Acre Runoff Area

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

72” Outfall

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Watershed is located in a heavy-use industrial

area; water from street runoff but also sheet flow

  • ff many industrial sites
  • Network of conveyance lines feed 3-4 primary

trunk lines which feed a holding vault

  • Water flows by gravity from vault through 72”
  • utfall pipe via a tide-gate system
  • Very little elevation difference in the area (top of

high tide is roughly top of the road)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES Sampling & Analysis QAPP Automated Samplers Sample Collection Site Logistics GRANITE CONSTRUCTION Site Grading

Water Detention Tanks

WATERTECTONICS Treatment Equipment Consumables Installation Operator Labor

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TREATMENT EQUIPMENT Grit Chamber Electrocoagulation* Clarification Media Filtration GAC Filtration PROCESS CONDITIONS Sampling Period Treatment Flowrate WQ CONDITIONS Turbidity/TSS Conductivity

*No pre or post pH adjustment: all pH readings were ~7.7-8.1

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Electrons are being introduced into solution (the

cathode is oxidized and the water is reduced)

  • Coagulation is occurring through both ionic

bonding (charge) & covalent bonding (electron pairing)

  • Water (H2O) is being cleaved at the cathode
  • Hydrogen gas induces electro-flotation
  • Free oxygen increases dissolved oxygen levels
  • Total and dissolved metals removed through the

formation of metal oxides and metal hydroxides

  • Residual solids is reduced (no long-chain polymers

like Chitosan and no counter-ions)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Storm Event Equipment Period Flowrate

  • Avg. NTU In
  • Avg. NTU Out

1.5.12 GC+EC+CL 12hr 200gpm 271 42.5 1.20.12 GC+EC+CL+SF 12hr 200gpm 146.9 15 1.30.12 GC+EC+CL 24hr 200gpm 100.7 28.5 1.31.12 GC+EC+CL+SF+GAC 10hr 200gpm 36.6 3.5 2.28.12 EC+CL+SF+GAC 12hr 200gpm 69.8 4.6 2.29.12 EC+CL+SF+GAC 12hr 200gpm 93 5.4 3.5.12 EC+CL+SF+GAC 7hr 100gpm 237.1 3.9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Units Influent Effluent Total Suspended Solids mg/L 156 33.2 Turbidity NTU 175 35 Fecal coliform cfu/100mL 250 22 Copper, Total µg/L 42.6 10.1 Copper, Dissolved µg/L 4.5 2.3 Lead, Total µg/L 28.5 5 Lead, Dissolved µg/L 0.2 ND < 0.1 Zinc, Total µg/L 163 41 Zinc, Dissolved µg/L 19 8 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons mg/L 0.57 0.19 Motor Oil mg/L 1.6 0.35 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate µg/L 1.8 ND < 1 Total PCB’s µg/L 0.125 0.015

slide-17
SLIDE 17

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 NTU

Turbidity Reduction

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 9:10 10:20 12:00 13:40 14:40 16:30 17:20 18:20 Percent Removal

% Turbidity Removal

slide-19
SLIDE 19

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 9:10 10:20 12:00 13:40 14:40 16:30 17:20 18:20 Microsiemens

Conductivity

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Units Influent Effluent Total Suspended Solids mg/L 138 13.3 Turbidity NTU 130 14.4 Fecal coliform cfu/100mL 380 23 Copper, Total µg/L 39.1 7 Copper, Dissolved µg/L 5.4 3.4 Lead, Total µg/L 20.3 1.8 Lead, Dissolved µg/L 0.2 ND < 0.1 Zinc, Total µg/L 159 27 Zinc, Dissolved µg/L 39 10 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons mg/L 0.53 0.13 Motor Oil mg/L 1.8 ND < 0.2 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate µg/L 1.5 ND < 1 Total PCB’s µg/L 0.073 ND <0.01

slide-21
SLIDE 21

50 100 150 200 250 300 10:30 10:50 11:10 11:30 11:50 12:20 12:40 13:10 13:30 13:50 14:00 14:40 15:10 15:40 16:00 16:30 17:10 17:30 17:50 18:10 18:40 19:00 19:20 19:50 NTU Turbidity Reduction

slide-22
SLIDE 22

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 10:30 10:50 11:10 11:30 11:50 12:20 12:40 13:10 13:30 13:50 14:00 14:40 15:10 15:40 16:00 16:30 17:10 17:30 17:50 18:10 18:40 19:00 19:20 19:50 Turbidity Percent Removal

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Units Influent Effluent Total Suspended Solids mg/L 44.4 32.7 Turbidity NTU 50.7 27 Fecal coliform cfu/100mL

  • Copper, Total

µg/L 18.7 8.7 Copper, Dissolved µg/L 4.4 2 Lead, Total µg/L 11.2 4.1 Lead, Dissolved µg/L 0.6 ND < 0.1 Zinc, Total µg/L 86 42 Zinc, Dissolved µg/L 28 4 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons mg/L 0.23 0.12 Motor Oil mg/L 0.63 0.23 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate µg/L ND < 1 ND < 1 Total PCB’s µg/L 0.032 0.012

slide-24
SLIDE 24

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 9:20 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:40 18:10 19:00 19:50 20:10 21:30 22:20 NTU

Turbidity Reduction

slide-25
SLIDE 25

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 9:20 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:40 18:10 19:00 19:50 20:10 21:30 22:20

Percent Removal

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • One of the first times we’ve analyzed

electrocoagulation treatment on a large-scale without doing sand filtration

  • In removing the sand filtration step, it allowed us

to see that the relationship between metals removal and turbidity/TSS reduction was not direct

  • In fact, it appears that the turbidity/TSS

flocculated particles that were associated with the heavy metal/PCB content settled out disproportionately faster than other turbidity/TSS fractions, maybe due to molecular weight, polarity, particle charge, etc.

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Analytical data from last four storm events is still

forthcoming

  • Interested to see how adjusting clarification time

and adding carbon filtration affect treatment

  • Off-the-shelf weir tanks were used for

clarification on the project; additional effort is needed to design a high-efficiency clarification system; data collected from the pilot should be useful in accomplishing this

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Key advantage is that solids are removed from the

flow of water and not building up on filters

  • Mechanical separation processes AND chemical

reactions that improve and speed up treatment

  • In passive filtration systems, you can get build-up
  • f organic matter which promotes bacterial

growth, which forms bio-films and sub-micron particles that work their way into filter beds and blind them

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

WaterTectonics 6300 Merrill Creek Parkway Suite C-100 Everett, WA 98203 www.watertectonics.com