for Dynamic Analysis May 19, 2017 Benjamin R. Page NTA 47 th Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

for dynamic analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

for Dynamic Analysis May 19, 2017 Benjamin R. Page NTA 47 th Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Tax Policy Centers Methods for Dynamic Analysis May 19, 2017 Benjamin R. Page NTA 47 th Annual Spring Symposium Taxation in the Trump Era: Reforms, Revenues, and Repercussions Estimating the Macrodynamic Effects of Tax Reform Why


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Tax Policy Center’s Methods for Dynamic Analysis

May 19, 2017 Benjamin R. Page NTA 47th Annual Spring Symposium Taxation in the Trump Era: Reforms, Revenues, and Repercussions Estimating the Macrodynamic Effects of Tax Reform

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.taxpolicycenter.org 1

 To improve revenue estimates – Best guess of macro effects is in general not zero – Effects on estimates tend to be modest  Because economic effects are important policy goals – Economic effects provide additional information about welfare effects – Effects on the economy tend to be modest Why Dynamic Analysis?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.taxpolicycenter.org 2

 Demand – After-tax incomes affect demand – Investment incentives affect demand  Incentives – Marginal tax rates on labor income affect labor supply – Marginal tax rates on capital income affect saving  Deficits – Increased deficits crowd out investment Main channels for macroeconomic effects

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.taxpolicycenter.org 3

 TPC Keynesian Model – Aggregate variables, demand based – Output moves relative to potential  TPC Neoclassical Model – Aggregate variables, supply based – Estimates potential output  Penn Wharton Budget Model – Optimizing forward-looking households – Estimates potential output Models used for TPC dynamic analysis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.taxpolicycenter.org 4

 With more after-tax income, consumers spend more – Lower-income households spend a larger share of their additional income than higher-income households – Baseline assumption:

  • Lowest quintile spends 90 cents of each additional dollar
  • Highest quintile spends just 55 cents of each additional dollar

 Investment incentives lead firms to invest more  Higher wealth leads consumers to spend more

Keynesian Model: Direct effects on demand

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.taxpolicycenter.org 5

 Direct effect generates indirect effects that can add to or offset the direct effect – On the plus side, increased demand can lead to increased hiring, investment spending, or consumption spending – On the minus side, increased demand could lead to higher interest rates, reducing investment and consumer spending Keynesian Model: Indirect effects on demand

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.taxpolicycenter.org 6

Keynesian Model: Indirect effects on demand  In normal economic times the Fed offsets expansionary tax policy by raising rates to prevent an increase in inflation  Indirect effects offset half of direct effects

  • Multiplier of 0.5 on changes in direct

demand  In deep recession the Fed will not change rates, leading to positive indirect effects, adding 50 percent to direct effects

  • Multiplier of 1.5 on changes in direct

demand

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.taxpolicycenter.org 7

Neoclassical Model  Core potential output determined by

  • Labor hours
  • Capital stock
  • Total factor productivity

 Cobb-Douglas production function

  • Capital share = 0.3

 No explicit forward looking

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.taxpolicycenter.org 8

Neoclassical Model: Labor hours  After-tax wage

  • Elasticity of labor hours to the after-tax

wage = 0.24  After-tax income

  • Elasticity of labor hours to after-tax inomce

= -0.05  Effects calculated on an aggregate level

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.taxpolicycenter.org 9

 After-tax rate of return – Depends on pretax rate of return, marginal tax rate on capital income, and expensing ratio – Interest elasticity of saving = 0.2  Deficit – Private saving offset = 0.43 – Capital inflow offset = 0.24 – Additional dollar of deficit crowds out 33 cents

  • f output

Neoclassical Model: Capital stock

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.taxpolicycenter.org 10

 Results of the two models combined using a weighted average  Weights on the neoclassical model of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 over the first five years after implementation of a policy Keynesian and Neoclassical combined estimates

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.taxpolicycenter.org 11

Penn Wharton Budget Model  Overlapping generations model  Simulates economic and budgetary outcomes from household decisions about work and saving  Uncertain working ability and longevity  Households forward-looking

  • Make decisions based on current and future

policies and economic outcomes  Can model unbalanced tax reforms through 2040

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.taxpolicycenter.org 12

Penn Wharton Budget Model: Base parameters  Frisch elasticity of labor supply = 0.5  Elasticity of intertemporal substitution = 0.5  Depreciation rate = 0.085  Population growth rate = 1.2 percent  Weight on open economy results = 0.4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.taxpolicycenter.org 13

Penn Wharton Budget Model  Available online at http://www.budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu  User can alter assumptions for open economy weight, labor supply elasticity, saving elasticity, and federal outlays

slide-15
SLIDE 15

THANK YOU

For more information please contact:

Benjamin R Page bpage@urban.org